Technology and Cognition Just Because We Can, Should We? Minds and Machines.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Extended Mind.
Advertisements

Music During Vietnam By: Emmanuel Alvarez. The Doors – Unknown Soldier Lyrics Unborn living, living, dead Bullet strikes the helmet's head, And it's all.
The Subject-Matter of Ethics
Evolution and Cognition Minds and Machines. Neil deGrasse Tyson on Human Intelligence
Meditations on First Philosophy
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 1 Foundations for Learning Mathematics.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 8 Moore’s Non-naturalism
Introduction The Soul and the Body. Paul Gauguin (1897) Whence come we? What are we? Whither go we? Introduction.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Practice Standards.
Can a machine be conscious? (How?) Depends what we mean by “machine? man-made devices? toasters? ovens? cars? computers? today’s robots? "Almost certainly.
Pragmatic action (Kirsh and Maglio 1994) Task-performance is often described in terms of step-by-step progression through a range of states of the world.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Introduction What is the issue? What do people say for/against the issue? What do people say for/against the issue? How I researched the topic What results.
Is there such a thing as conscious will?. What is “conscious will”?! Having “free will” or “conscious will” basically means being in control of one’s.
thinking hats Six of Prepared by Eman A. Al Abdullah ©
Looking at the Roots of Philosophy
Evolution of Cognition and Cognitive Theories Minds & Machines.
Evolution of Cognition Minds & Machines. Early Organisms: Perception and Action, but no Cognition SenseAct Environment Agent.
Evolution, Cognition, and the Environment Minds and Machines.
The field of philosophy offers many different theories or points of view on the nature of these categories of reality, and on the relationships between.
READING FOR HIGH SCHOOL AND BEYOND. WHAT I DO NOW: *BEFORE I READ *WHEN I READ *AFTER I FINISHBEFORE I READWHEN I READAFTER I FINISH Reading Actively.
Chapter 9.2 Changing Population Trends. 9.2—Changing Population Trends Key Questions: What are the problems associated with population growth? Are the.
1 The Economics, Business & Enterprise Association © 2008 FIRE!!!
PERCEPTION. Why an issue? Sensory perception a key source of our beliefs about the world. Empiricism – senses the basis of knowledge.
Critical Analysis Key ideas to remember. What's the Point? Here are some questions you can ask yourself to help you analyze: So what? How is this significant?
Toulmin’s Model of Argument According to Dr. Caughron.
Philosophy 4610 Philosophy of Mind Week 8: Can a Computer Think?
Introduction to Physical Science “What is Physical Science?”
+ Ethics II The nature of moral knowledge. + Moral knowledge Do you know the difference between right and wrong? Does anybody? Is moral knowledge even.
Get to know: YOURSELF!!!. Extrovert  Extraversion (E) I like getting my energy from active involvement in events and having a lot of different activities.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
Assessment. Levels of Learning Bloom Argue Anderson and Krathwohl (2001)
DO NOW: 1.State whether you agree or disagree with this statement-and tell me WHY- “Everyone learns the same way.” Be prepared to justify your answer.
MAX This is MAX. He is a brain in a vat. (and this is a new take on an old thought experiment) Unlike other envatted brains however, the Physical Reality.
Perspectives of Psychology Ms. Rebecca Do Now: Why do you think people think, feel and act in certain ways? Are they born a certain way? Do they.
Multiple Intelligences theory of Howard Garner The question is not "How smart are you?" it's "How are you smart?" SchoolCounselingByHeart.wordpress.com.
Situated Cognition: A New Direction in AI Bram van Heuveln.
Evolution and Cognition Minds and Machines. The Astonishing Hypothesis “You, your joys and your sorrows, your memories and your ambitions, your sense.
What is Artificial Intelligence?
The Nature of Knowledge. Thick Concept When a short definition is not enough, it is called a thick concept word. It can only be understood through experience.
COMP 2208 Dr. Long Tran-Thanh University of Southampton Decision Trees.
Argument From Dreaming. 1 This is the second sceptical argument – the second wave of doubt, after the argument from illusion – senses cannot be trusted.
Intellectual Development from One to Three Chapter 12.
Chapter 1 What is Biology? 1.1 Science and the Natural World.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
THE “COLLEGES I AM THINKING ABOUT” LIST IN YOUR FAMILY CONNECTIONS ACCOUNT.
DECISION MAKING. GET READY FOR CLASS Pick up – Lesson 3: Decision Making Take out your homework assignment from last time. – Make sure everything is completed.
INTRODUCTION TO COGNITIVE SCIENCE NURSING INFORMATICS CHAPTER 3 1.
Why it matters  Your essay reveals something important about you that your grades and test scores can't—your personality.  It can give admission officers.
Journal 9/8/15 Is there anything in your life that you are 100% certain about? Anything you know for sure? Objective Tonight’s Homework To learn about.
Piaget’s Psychological Development Piaget ( ) Swiss Psychologist, worked for several decades on understanding children’s cognitive development.
Strategies for Improving Concentration & Memory -Knowledge Zone.
10 Great Ways to Stop Procrastinating and Get More Done in Less Time Time Management Tips by Arman Sadeghi.
Relativism, Divine Command Theory, and Particularism A closer look at some prominent views of ethical theory.
And This Is Me… And This Is Me….  I am 35 years old  I am married to my best friend  We will celebrate our 20 th year anniversary in November.
11. Why is there Death...in the World Today? Discovering the Bible Class 3.
WHAT MODELS DO THAT THEORIES CAN’T Lilia Gurova Department of Cognitive Science and Psychology New Bulgarian University.
Situated Cognition Minds and Machines.
Assessment.
Assessment.
What do we mean by the word “knowledge?”
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
My Dream Project By: Staci Mion.
Do we directly perceive objects? (25 marks)
MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE SELF-ASSESSMENT
MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE SELF-ASSESSMENT
01 4 Ethical Language 4.1 Meta-Ethics.
What is Anxiety? BSC *click on the speaker to start audio on each slide.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them
FOSTER RESILIENCE What Leaders Know Deborah Gilboa, MD
Presentation transcript:

Technology and Cognition Just Because We Can, Should We? Minds and Machines

Just Because We Can, Should We? No! Duh!

Just Because We Can, Should We? An Argument Premise 1: If we can, we will Premise 2: If we will, we should Conclusion: If we can, we should

Just Because We Can, Will We? No! Duh!

We Control Technology, Technology does not Control Us We don’t feel that we will, or are even more inclined to do something, just because we can. We feel in control. We make the decisions, not the tools, technology, or situation around us. Commonly Believed Corrolary: Technology is not good or bad. It is us who decide whether to use technology in a good or bad way.

The Neutrality of Technology “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people”

However … “Why do people climb mountains? Because they are there” –H. Korman "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad man.“ –Lord Acton, British Historian

From: “Drone Strikes Reveal A Lost Moral Compass” Last year at this time, in preparation for the harvest feast, the children joined their grandmother […] in the field to pick okra. Though often aware of the intimidating drone of these robotic machines overhead, the family, secure in its own sense of innocence, was unprepared for the hellfire that descended on them unexpectedly when a drone fired missile struck them followed swiftly by a second. When the dust and the cries for help subsided, eight relatives, including the children, were found to be wounded and their grandmother […] dead, her body burned and torn beyond recognition.

From: “Drone Strikes Reveal A Lost Moral Compass” (Cont’d) There is, I fear, an explanation. A compass has gone askew, the moral compass that when pointing true tells us when our worship of war as a substitute for wise foreign policy and its lethal ever-expanding soulless technology is leading us into a legal, moral, spiritual abyss.

From: “Drone Strikes Reveal A Lost Moral Compass” (Cont’d) [J]ust as those poorly plotted maneuvers over our children's heads remind us that we are at war, the senseless murder of a grandmother […] should remind us that […] the horrors we model, condone and justify today are shaping a dystopian future […] where the commitments to human rights and law are quaint, outmoded notions that can be shredded and burned beyond recognition because... well, because we can. –Albany Times Union, November 16, 2013Albany Times Union, November 16, 2013

A Sobering Video Baghdad AirStrike July 17, 2007Baghdad AirStrike July 17, 2007 (embedded video)

The Plan I will use cognitive science to make an argument that tools, technology, and the nature of our environment can have an impact on our inclinations to do or not do something.

Traditional, Naïve, View of Cognition Cognition SenseAct Environment Agent (Brain) Cognition = f(brain) Perception and Action are ‘mere’ input to and output from thinking, reasoning, problem solving, and decision-making

Catching a Fly Ball

The World as External Memory Situated Cognition people say that the brain often uses the environment as a kind of ‘external memory’. Examples: –Taking apart your computer: how do you lay down the pieces to get it back together? –Notes you write to yourself –Planners, calendars, cellphones, laptops

Copying Blocks Experiment OriginalCopy Bins Task: Subjects have to make a copy of the configuration of blocks on the left by ‘grabbing’ individual blocks from the bins at the bottom and placing them on the right. Result: after grabbing block from bin, eyes would move to original to check position

‘Epistemic moves’: Moves that are not part of a solution, but help find one Rotating Slamming

No Opposable Thumbs …

External Representations … VI / XLIV \ ??

The Google Effect

Avatars (or simply characters you control) In a video game, you don’t push the button, you jump!

Biological Being We often think the boundary between ‘me’ and ‘my environment’ is my skin: –Me: heart, lungs, legs, bones, brain, etc. –Not Me: clothes, wallet, laptop, glasses, etc. This distinction makes sense if I talk about genetics, diseases, growth, etc.: biology!

Physical Being As a physical being I have: –Mass –Shape –Color These properties allow us to explain and predict things such as: –How much weight I add to an airplane –How people can recognize me from other people But note: things like clothes, glasses, wallet, are part of me. This is my physical being.

Cognitive Being As a cognitive being, I: –See things –Remember things –Solve problems –Make decisions –Etc According to situated cognition, I may need to refer to things that are outside of my biological (or physical) being in order to explain those capacities.

Situated View on Cognition Processing SenseAct Environment Cognitive Agent (Brain) Cognition

Using Tools to create a new Cognitive System? Cognitive System A World Cognitive System A Tool World Cognitive System B

Our Best Tool: Language Literacy Numeracy Science Math Logic Language allows us to pass knowledge and skills along to others, through all of space and time. It is a huge part of culture.

Evolution Darwin Wallace ‘Discovered’ the theory of evolution independently. Coincidence? Did one look over the shoulder of the other? No. Many of the ingredients and basic ideas for evolution were already in place. Darwin and Wallace were both able to put the final pieces in and complete the puzzle. In fact, the history of science and inventions is full of such ‘multiple discovery’: it shows that ideas don’t originate from a ‘naked’ brain, letmultiple discovery alone ‘pop’ up in a brain, but instead gradually evolve in the public domain.

Talk about Evolution: Next Step in Cognition? Think! SenseAct Environment Agent

No! Cognition will advance by incorporating more and more tools Process SenseAct Environment Cognitive Agent 1 Tool ActSense Cognitive Agent 2

OK, So What?

Exploration and Exploitation As a controller, the brain has to figure out how what it controls is able to interact with the world. That is, before it can ‘exploit’ its powers, it first needs to ‘explore’ its powers. Thus, it has to figure out the action potentials of what it controls, as well as those of its environment. As such, the brain will figure out and classify things as: –walkable –reachable –graspable –movable –hammerable …?

Hammer-Man! Hammers don’t hit Nails, People Do! “If all you have is a hammer, everything becomes a nail” - Bernard Baruch

Copying Blocks Experiment II OriginalCopy Bins Same task as before. However, original is hidden by square, and you have to click on it to reveal the original. Moreover, it takes a certain amount of time for original to appear. Result: the more time it took for original to appear, the more subjects started to rely on internal memory (brain).

The Google Effect The Google effect is that people forget those things that they can ‘Google’.Google effect Some people lament this, saying that people have become ‘lazy’ or ‘stupid’, not unlike how the calculator has made people worse at basic arithmetic. But in reality, this was in fact a very smart move of the brain. Incorporating the internet as external memory is not ‘lazy’, but efficient. And while brain alone = less smart, brain + internet = smarter! Most importantly, the brain naturally integrates its environment if it makes sense: we don’t control this!

How our Brain Integrates Technology: Perception (Click on pic for vid)

How our Brain Integrates Technology: Action (click on pic for vid)

Monday, November pm EMPAC Theater Dr. Jonathan Wolpaw “Adaptive Neurotechnologies: Principles & Promise” Live Demonstration of Brain-Computer Interface!

Conclusion Technology very much has the potential to change us as cognitive beings, affecting our capacities for perception, action, problem solving, reasoning, etc. i.e. all of cognition. As such, they are anything but neutral, and we’ll have to be cautious in how we proceed with the development of these technologies.

Thank you! “With great power comes great responsibility” Voltaire, French Philosopher

Back to Drones: Confessions of a Drone Warrior Drone operator Brandon Bryant Was part of drone missions that killed 1626 people Suffers from PTSD November 2013 Issue of GQ

PTSD for Drone Operators? “There was no significant difference in the rates of MH diagnoses, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depressive disorders, and anxiety disorders between RPA and MA pilots.” - Pentagon StudyPentagon Study

Why do Drone Operators get PTSD? To some extent, their brain says: “I’m there” Old theory: PTSD is caused by fear Do drone operators fear for their lives the way soldiers do that are actually in the battle zone feel fear? Does the virtual presence become that real? Unlikely. So, new theory: PTSD is caused by moral anguish of killing people

Solution to PTSD?!? [R]esearchers have proposed creating a Siri-like user interface, a virtual copilot that anthropomorphizes the drone and lets crews shunt off the blame for whatever happens. “Siri, have those people killed.”

Just Because We Will, Should We? Variants: Just because we do, should we?

Technology will Change and Destroy Humanity! If technology becomes more and more integrated with our brains and with our being, basically making us into a race of cyborgs, then that means the end of humankind! So no, even if we will, that doesn’t mean we should.

Problems Ought-From-Is or Naturalistic Fallacy: Just because humans are a certain way, doesn’t mean that we should be or stay that way.

Technology is Simply Speeding Up Evolution! If technology is really going to change humanity and make us into a race of cyborgs, well, that’s just the next step of evolution: Homo Sapiens 2.0! So yes, we will, and we should!

Problems Naturalistic Fallacy again: just because evolution happens doesn’t mean it is good. Only shows 1 line of evolution … but evolution is a tree! Suggest evolution = progress. In particular: ‘smarter’ is better … but ‘tree’ of evolution suggests quite a different picture. Also, ‘progress’ is only increased ‘fitness’ to local environment … this is far cry from ‘fitness’ in any kind of absolute sense, let alone that this would be ‘better’ in any kind of moral sense.