I MPROVING P OST -S CHOOL O UTCOMES FOR S TUDENTS WITH H EARING I MPAIRMENTS An In-School Predictor-based Transition Education Model Jennifer Coyle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Indicator 14 and why is it important?
Advertisements

1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
The California Community of Practice on Secondary Transition Presents A Webinar Series Triangulating Postsecondary Goals Webinar I: The Big Picture Hosted.
This document was developed by the National Post-School Outcomes Center, Eugene, Oregon, (funded by Cooperative Agreement Number H326U090001) with the.
Pat Brown, EdD University of Washington Center for Technology and Disability Studies
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Transition and Indicator 13 Writing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) That Meet the Legal Mandate A Webinar Series Presented by The California Community.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
Getzel. Sheryl Burgstahler, Ph.D. University of Washington Services, Supports and Accommodations Role of Technology.
Dr. Pat Rogan Executive Associate Dean Indiana University School of Education Indianapolis
Transition to Postsecondary Education, Training, Employment, & Independent Living.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
New York City Department of Education Office of Special Education Initiatives Placement and Referral Center Transition Services: An Overview.
North Carolina Back-to-Work Program Overview. North Carolina Back-to-Work Program Page 2 Legislative Requirements Purpose: The NC Back-to-Work program.
ALL ROADS LEAD TO EMPLOYMENT Skills for Employment: Your GPS Guide PRESENTED BY: The Center for Change in Transition Services.
What Is TRANSITION & Transition PLANNING?
Welcome!! Aligning Current Practices with Predictors of Post-School Success: Helping Teachers Plan for Action With Project Skills Presented By: Melissa.
Effective Practices during Transition: Does Preparation Make a Difference Mary E. Morningstar, Ph.D. University of Kansas Sung Jik Bae, Ph.D. University.
Idaho Transition Cadre Hailey, ID October 2, 2013
Systems Change 3 Integrated Jobs Strategy Policy Funding Outcome Data Capacity Development Innovation Leadership Values Collaboration Hall et al (2007)
 Describes the special education program and services that are provided within a school district and those special education programs and services which.
Are We making a Difference
Characteristics of Evidence-Based Predictors of Post-School Success
Clarification Week…. How’s it going? Do you need anything from us?
Got Data! Now What? Charlotte Y. Alverson April 14, 2011.
Introduction and Overview Reaching the Summit of Success, September 16 th and 17 th, 2014 Dr. Tiana Povenmire-Kirk and Kimberly Bunch-Crump.
Special Education Cooperatives Transition Role Group Meeting September 14, 2010 Johnny Collett Division of Learning Services.
Oregon Pathways for Adult Basic Skills Transition to Education and Work (OPABS) Initiative.
Indicator 13 File Review 1)Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2)CCTS.
THE OHIO LONGITUDINAL TRANSITION STUDY (OLTS) Lawrence Dennis, Office for Exceptional Children, Ohio Department of Education & Dr. Robert Baer, Center.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Center for Change in Transition Services Improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities in Washington State Cinda Johnson Sue Ann Bube.
Quality Transition Services Guiding Students To Early Adulthood March 20, 2012.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Getting the Research Into Practice in Secondary Transition.
Tools Parent Centers Can Use to Help Families with Secondary Transition Planning Catherine Fowler, National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance.
Transition Tool Kit Training Refresher Saint Paul Public Schools.
Beyond Perkins Addressing the Needs of Students with Special Needs.
2. NLTS2 Study Overview. 1 Prerequisites Recommended module to complete before viewing this module  1. Introduction to the NLTS2 Training Modules.
According to recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of August 2010, the percentage of individuals with disabilities participating in the labor.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 New Research findings on children and youth from the National.
( ':~
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
“I NEVER PLANNED NOT TO GO TO COLLEGE”: VOICES OF YOUNG ADULTS WITH ASPERGER SYNDROME TRANSITIONING TO COLLEGE PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A QUALITATIVE STUDY.
YOUTH TRANSITION PROGRAM (YTP) PUT INTO PRACTICE Reynolds School District.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
National High School Center Summer Institute What’s the Post-School Outcomes Buzz? Jane Falls Coordinator, National Post-School Outcomes Center Washington,
PRESENTING: Bill East, Executive Director, NASDSE Steve Wooderson, CEO, CSAVR May 5, 2015 Capacity Building Institute – Impact of Workforce Innovation.
District 214 – Transition Planning System Buffalo Grove High School Special Education Department.
How to write great transition IEPs and meet compliance for Indicator 13!
SUPPORTING ADOLESCENTS WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING IN TRANSITION TO POST-SCHOOL EDUCATION & EMPLOYMENT A narrated PowerPoint for careers personnel.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Pennsylvania Post School Outcome Survey (PaPOS) Utilizing the Data Results for Longitudinal Planning.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
Heather C. Allcock Ph.D. College- and Career-Readiness for Students with Significant Disabilities.
Cumberland County Schools Transition. Indicator 1 Graduation Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma is.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Predictor Rubric Transition Improvement.
Interagency Collaboration through the CIRCLES Model: Connecting for Success Texas Transition Conference 2016 Dr. Tiana Povenmire-Kirk.
The New York State Post School Indicators Longitudinal Study The High School Classes of 2000 and 2001 New York State Education Department, Office of Vocational.
Connecting Post-School Outcome Data with Evidence-based Practices and Predictors NPSO Cross Regional Meeting Denver, CO March 2, 2011.
Important Changes to Youth Services in WIOA. Youth Services in WIOA Some of the most significant changes from WIA to WIOA are related to youth services.
Evidence-Based and Promising Practices to Increase Graduation and Improve Outcomes Dr. Loujeania Bost Dr. Catherine Fowler Dr. Matthew Klare.
Introductions. 5 of Anything Part 1- Take turns at your table telling the other team members each person’s 5 favorite movies. Part 2- As a group select.
Carol Feldman-Sparber, Ph.D. Kent State University
Alfred Daviso, Ph.D. The University of Akron Carol Feldman-Sparber
Al Daviso, Ph.D. The University of Akron
The School-Based SLP’s Role in Post Secondary Transition
Working with Transitioning Youth
Al Daviso, Ph.D. The University of Akron
The Transition Planning Process
Presentation transcript:

I MPROVING P OST -S CHOOL O UTCOMES FOR S TUDENTS WITH H EARING I MPAIRMENTS An In-School Predictor-based Transition Education Model Jennifer Coyle

T ODAY ’ S A GENDA Introduction NSTTAC predictors NLTS2 data Analyses Preliminary results Questions and comments

The field of deaf education has always been fueled by strong emotion rather than demonstrated efficacy. (Luckner, 2004)

I NTRODUCTION Transitioning from high school to life after graduation is a rite of passage for all students, regardless of presence of disability. Transition planning with post school goals is mandated by the federal government Post school outcomes are important When compared to students without disabilities, students with disabilities continue to lag behind

S TATEMENT OF THE P ROBLEM Of the 6.2 million students who have a disability in the United States, 744,000 are students with hearing impairments (USDOE, 2011) 57% attend typical schools and are educated in general education classrooms (Gallaudet Research Institute, 2011) Of the 86% in general education classes 85% have a general education teacher as the only teacher 15% have a general education as well as a special education teacher (Shaver et al., 2011)

S TATEMENT OF THE P ROBLEM Students with hearing impairments are enrolled in general education settings 60% of their day (Shaver et al., 2011) 61% took at least one vocational education class 31% participated in a prevocational education class 25% were enrolled in a life skills class 55% had an occupationally specific vocational education class (USDOE, 2011)

S TATEMENT OF THE P ROBLEM Due to this low incidence, funding and specialized teachers are limited Research is plentiful on strategies and practices that is often generalized for all disabilities Research is focused on literacy and not transition education issues But, research is slim on evidence based practices

NSTTAC’ S P URPOSE Build capacity of states, locals, and schools to implement and scale-up policies, procedures, and evidence-based practices designed to ensure college- and career-readiness for students with disabilities  Conduct knowledge development activities – including literature review of policies and practices and analysis of SPP Indicator 13 data and improvement activities  Technical assistance and dissemination activities at universal, targeted, and intensive (5 states/ year) levels  Leadership and coordination activities 8

9 Post- school Outcomes EmploymentEducation Independent Living

Predictors/Outcomes EducationEmploymentIndependent Living Career Awareness XX Occupational Courses XX Paid Employment/Work Experience XXX Vocational Education XX Work Study X Community Experiences X Exit Exam Requirements/High School Diploma Status X Inclusion in General Education XXX Program of Study X I N -S CHOOL P REDICTORS BY P OST -S CHOOL O UTCOME A REA

Predictors/Outcomes EducationEmploymentIndependent Living Self-Advocacy/Self- Determination XX Self-Care/Independent Living XXX Social Skills XX Interagency Collaboration XX Parental Involvement X Student Support XXX Transition Program XX I N -S CHOOL P REDICTORS BY P OST -S CHOOL O UTCOME A REA

N ATIONAL L ONGITUDINAL T RANSITION S TUDY 2 (NLTS2) Follow up to the National Longitudinal Transition Study ( ) 2000 – 2009 OSEP and IES Students ages 13 – 16 in December 2000 All 12 disability categories Multiple data collection methods Multiple data providers Five waves of data collection

NLTS2 Parents Students Teachers School staff Direct assessments Mail surveys Phone interviews Transcripts

R ESEARCH Q UESTIONS Of the 16 NSTTAC in-school predictors, are students with hearing impairments: Participating in a program of study that includes classes pursuant to post-school goals? Participating in career development* classes (e.g., career awareness, occupational courses, vocational education, work study)? Employed in high school? Receiving high school diplomas?

R ESEARCH Q UESTIONS Of the 16 NSTTAC in-school predictors, are students with hearing impairments: Receiving instruction in community-based environments? Exhibiting social skills? Exhibiting self-care and/or independent living skills? Participating in general education classes? Exhibiting self-advocacy skills?

R ESEARCH Q UESTIONS Of the 16 NSTTAC in-school predictors, are students with hearing impairments: Involved in transition planning? Receiving involvement from community agencies in their transition planning? Satisfied with their special education services? Parents’ participating in their individualized education (IEP) meetings?

R ESEARCH Q UESTIONS Which, if any, of the 16 NSTTAC predictors predict postsecondary employment for students with hearing impairments? Which, if any, of the 16 NSTTAC predictors predict postsecondary education enrollment for students with hearing impairments?

M ETHODS Crosswalk between predictors and NLTS2 survey questions After matching components of predictor definitions to NLTS2 items, refined list of variables created Correlational and regression analyses

P RELIMINARY D ATA Transcript data 856 students with hearing impairments Male = 509 Female = students with hearing impairments Caucasian = 592 African American = 125 Hispanic = 101 Asian/Pacific Islander = 10 American Indian/Alaska Native = 18 Multi/Other = 8

P RELIMINARY D ATA Transcript data Diploma or type of certificate of students with hearing impairments (N = 860) Regular = 165 Special education = 155 Certificate of completion = 15 GED = 1 Vocational occupational certificate = 7 Unknown = 7 No diploma = 510?

P RELIMINARY D ATA Transcript data Graduation status of students with hearing impairments (N = 647) Graduated = 350 Aged out = 66 Dropped out = 74 Moved = 30 Unknown = 127

P RELIMINARY D ATA Transcript data Students with hearing impairments (N = 347) who received: Career assessment = 122 Career counseling = 75 Job readiness training = 188 Instruction in looking for jobs = 106 Job shadowing = 79 Internship or apprenticeship = 13

P RELIMINARY D ATA Transcript data Students with hearing impairments (N = 347) who received: Tech-prep program = 12 Entrepreneurship program = 5 Other work experiences = 112 Job skills training = 93 Placement support = 22 Job coach = 69 None of these = 67

P RELIMINARY D ATA Transcript data Did a student with a hearing impairment receive instruction specifically focused on transition planning? Yes = 243 No = 107 Was planning for transition to adult life done for students with hearing impairments? Yes = 388 No = 66

Q UESTIONS ?

C ONTACT I NFORMATION Jennifer Coyle