Baltimore County Public Schools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PBS Overview Goal for Today To introduce you to key principles and basic concepts for a continuum of support for students known as Positive Behavior.
Advertisements

Working Your Way Up the Triangle: Systems, Data and Practices Mary Richter, Ph.D. Missouri SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Reducing Disproportionality in Suspensions and Positive Behavior Supports Suzann Wilson Lori Rogerson.
Guiding and Evaluating Positive Behavioral Support Implementation Shawn Fleming.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Name of School Date.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Third International Conference on Positive Behavior Support
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Building on Success: Developing a Model for System-Wide Implementation of PBIS Joan Ledvina Parr Linda Marchineck Margaret Grady Kidder Baltimore County.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support: School-wide Implementation.
Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Celeste Rossetto Dickey PBIS/MTSS Coordinator
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Leadership Summit Breakout Sessions March 30, 2009.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
PBIS Regional Meeting for Team Leaders and Coaches November 27, 2006 Sheppard Pratt Conference Center.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS) Core Behavioral Component The Response to Intervention Best Practices Institute Wrightsville Beach,
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support February 24, 2004 Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Beth Robinett, Topeka 501 (
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
Connecting PBIS & SST to Address Student Needs
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in BCPS Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in BCPS Margaret Grady Kidder, Coordinator.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Starting/Sustaining Universal Team Milt McKenna, Co-Coordinator, PBIS MD Maryland State Department of Education
School-wide Positive Behaviour Support [name] [organization] Website:
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Administrator’s Role Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
Behavior Supports Academics: Three-Tiered Model in Relation to Discipline and Achievement Joan Ledvina Parr Baltimore County Public Schools Margaret Grady.
Systematic Behavior Planning Supports Academic Instruction Joan Ledvina Parr Baltimore County Public Schools Margaret Grady Kidder Baltimore County Public.
Positive Behavior Intervention Supports PBIS Cambrian School District April 2011.
Overview of the Eight Steps Planning Guide School-Wide Positive Behavior Support Adapted from - George Sugai.
Spartan Expectations Be Responsible  Return promptly from breaks  Be an active participant  Use the law of two feet Be Respectful  Maintain cell phone.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Follow-up Jon Dyson, Lavonne Nkomo, George Sugai Center on Disabilities University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
+ Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Lilja Elementary School Respect. Responsibility. Kindness. Engaged Learning.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Positive Behaviour for Success (PBS) Universals Pre-Training Session 2012 Positive Behaviour for Success Illawarra South East Region.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Sustaining and Improving Implementation of SWPBS Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on Positive Behavior Support
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
PBIS at Chesapeake HS July 14, What is PBIS?  Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.  A proactive approach to school-wide discipline.
PBIS Overview Cedar Hill Elementary. Purposes of Presentation  To provide an overview of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)  To review.
Using Information for Decision Making Identifying Interventions that support Targeted and Intensive Students.
Texas Behavior Support (TBS): School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support (PBIS) “Overview”
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support: School-wide Implementation.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Using Information for Decision Making
Presentation transcript:

Baltimore County Public Schools Building on Success: Developing a Model for System-Wide Implementation of PBIS Joan Ledvina Parr Linda Marchineck Margaret Grady Kidder Baltimore County Public Schools

Baltimore County Public Schools 25th largest school system in the nation 108,015 students 162 schools 103 Elementary FARMS 35.9%, Mobility 11.3%, LEP 3.3%, 27 Middle FARMS 33.1%, Mobility, 14.3% LEP 1.1% 26 High FARMS 19.6%, Mobility, 15.2% LEP 1.1% 6 Other 17,000 Employees including 8,200 teachers

PBIS in Baltimore County Coordinated through the Department of Student Support Services Mr. Dale Rauenzahn, Executive Director Mrs. Patsy Holmes, Director Dr. Margaret Grady Kidder, Coordinator Dr. Joan Ledvina Parr, Coach Facilitator/SWIS Facilitator Ms. Linda Marchineck, IST/PBIS Coach/SWIS Facilitator Ms. Susie Swindell, Coach/SWIS Facilitator 32 PBIS Schools and 24 Coaches participate

Maryland PBIS Partnership and Collaboration

History of PBIS in Maryland and BCPS Schools Trained in PBIS 1998 Collaboration: MSDE and Sheppard Pratt Health System 99 Tough Kids Tough Times Forum 15 Schools Trained Statewide 1 BCPS ES Trained Maryland Summer Institute 2000 Maryland Summer Institute 2001 2 ES and 2 MS Trained Project Target and Johns Hopkins University join the collaboration with MSDE and SEPH, 2002 Maryland Summer Institute 2002 7 ES and 4 MS Trained Maryland Summer Institute 2003 3 ES, 2 MS, 4 HS Trained Maryland Summer Institute 2004 4 MS and 2 HS Trained

Positive Behavioral Support in Baltimore County Universal Interventions All schools are encouraged to use the BCPS Positive Behavior Planning Guide BCPS Schools Total Schools 103 Elementary 27 Middle Schools 26 High Schools 6 Other Schools Targeted Interventions Selected schools are invited to participate in PBIS Training Schools selected by suspension rates Schools self-select based on their School Improvement Plan PBIS Schools 14 Elementary 12 Middle Schools 6 High Schools

Secondary Prevention: Baltimore County 2004-2005 162 Schools: 32 Schools are PBIS Schools Secondary Prevention: Targeted Interventions include training schools in PBIS 20 % Primary Prevention: Universal Interventions for all schools include using the Positive Behavior Planning Guide 80% of Schools

Basic Concepts of PBIS School Teams are Trained at the Summer Institute sponsored by Maryland State Department of Education, Sheppard Pratt Health System, and the Johns Hopkins University The following training materials are adapted from the PBIS model as developed by George Sugai and Rob Horner, University of Oregon

Process for Supporting Behavior and Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Staff Behavior DATA Supporting Decision Making SYSTEMS PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior

Key Elements of PBIS School-wide behavior planning is based on a balance of four key elements: Clearly specified OUTCOMES that are related to behavior and student achievement SYSTEMS that support staff buy-in and sustained use of effective practices DATA gathered by the school to make decisions about improving behavior and learning Evidence-based PRACTICES and interventions that are effective for staff and students

Positive Behavior Support Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior DATA office discipline referrals PBIS self assessment survey all staff (parents/students?) input academic progress attendance direct observation school improvement goal progress SYSTEMS School wide Non classroom Classroom Individual students PRACTICES define (behav. expect. & routines) teach acknowledge correct follow up & feedback consensus & collaboration Supporting Student Behavior

Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures 1-5% 1-5% Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response 5-10% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive 80-90% 80-90% Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive

Academic and Behavioral Interventions Consistent implementation of Voluntary State Curriculum On-going curriculum-based assessments Differentiated instruction Intensive special education interventions and services School-wide positive discipline Effective classroom organization and behavior management Targeted interventions for groups of students Individualized interventions for specific students like FBA/BIP’s

PBIS School-wide Interventions Overview Establish commitment and maintain team Establish school-wide expectations Establish an on-going system of rewards Establish a system for responding to behavioral violations Establish a data system to monitor progress and aid in decision making Arrange for consistent implementation and utilize district level support

1. Establish commitment and maintain team Establish PBIS Leadership Team Strong, administrative support School-wide representation on PBIS Team Secure school-wide agreements and supports Strive for “full” (>80%) faculty participation Prioritize resources (time, materials, cost) Plan on a 3 – 5 year commitment Establish a data-based action plan Use the PBIS Staff Survey results Use behavioral incident data (office referrals, etc.)

2. Establish school-wide expectations Develop rules of behavior 3 to 5 positively stated rules Easy to remember Apply to all students, settings, and staff Develop a matrix of expected behavior in target contexts Contexts include: classrooms, hallways, gym, cafeteria, common areas, bus loading zone, etc. Teach the expected behaviors using an instructional approach Directly teach (tell/explain, model/show, practice, give reminders and pre-corrections) Actively supervise Positively reinforce

Develop Rules of Behavior The 5 Be’s Be kind Be safe Be cooperative Be respectful Be peaceful Code of Conduct I am respectful I am responsible I am safe I am prepared Respect + Responsibility = Pride Show respect Show responsibility High 5’s Be respectful Be responsible Be there, be ready Follow directions Hands/feet to self The Respect School Respect others Respect property Respect yourself Formula 4 Success = Respect Responsibility Ready-to-learn Re-thinking

Develop Rules of Behavior RAMS Rules R esponsibility and Respect A cademic Achievement M otivation S uccess Tenets of Kenwood Pride B e there and prepared L ive responsibly U phold integrity E arn and give respect Viking Code of Conduct Be respectful Be responsible Be ready Eagle PRIDE P reparation R esponsibility I ntegrity D iligence E arn Respect

Matrix of Expected Behavior

3. Establish an on-going system of rewards Acknowledge expected behavior Use tangible rewards and acknowledgements High 5’s, coupons, gotchas, etc. Use social recognition Assemblies, bulletin boards, names over the intercom Use guidelines Fade tangibles Schedule strategically Maintain 5:1 positive to correction ratio

4. Establish a system for responding to behavioral violations Develop an agreement about which behaviors are handled in the classroom and which are office managed Use verbal redirection, teacher consequence, and/or office referral Use pre-correction and restatement of expected behaviors

5. Establish a data system to monitor progress and aid in decision making Utilize a data management system, e.g., SWIS Develop procedures for ongoing monitoring and evaluation Meet regularly to review data and implement interventions

6. Arrange for consistent implementation and utilize district level support Develop targeted interventions for groups of at-risk students Build capacity for function-based support in order to develop individualized plans for specific students (FBA/BIP’s) Connect PBIS Team with School Improvement Team and Student Support Team Utilize district level support and other leadership resources

How Baltimore County Supports its PBIS Schools Levels of PBIS Support include School-based team Strong, administrative leadership is encouraged School-wide representation on PBIS team PBIS Coach assigned to school team Provides expertise on the PBIS process, behavior analysis, and data interpretation MSDE/BCPS Leadership Teams Provides consultation and support

Phases in the BCPS Model of PBIS Training as a Support to the Summer Institute Training Phase 1—Administrator Commitment Spring Forum arranged and Coach Facilitator consults Phase 2—Training the PBIS School Team Coach assigned to each school Phase 3—Implementing PBIS within the School Coach, Coach Facilitator, and BCPS Leadership Team assists

Phase 1—Administrator Commitment Administrators of identified schools attend a Spring Forum to learn about PBIS Follow-up meeting with the Coach Facilitator to share information such as: School rules Matrix of expected behaviors Classroom managed vs. office managed behaviors Flowchart of the disciplinary process Gotcha and recognition tickets

Phase 1—Administrator Commitment (continued) School completes a Staff Survey to document areas of concern The new school is encouraged to send faculty members to visit exemplar PBIS schools within Baltimore County

Phase 2—Training the PBIS School Team PBIS school team members attend the Summer Institute hosted by MSDE-SPHS-JHU School teams begin to plan their implementation of PBIS They attend a poster session of exemplar schools and dialogue with those schools’ representatives BCPS Coach Facilitator follows up with new school teams throughout the summer to provide guidance

Phase 2—Training the PBIS School Team (Continued) School teams develop their products and plan for teacher training the first week of school Each school is assigned a coach who works with that school during the planning as well as implementation phases Schools are encouraged to review and adapt the work of experienced PBIS schools Lesson plans Teacher training models Incentive programs for students and staff Acknowledgement assemblies Motivational strategies for students and staff

Phase 3—Implementing PBIS within the School PBIS team trains faculty about PBIS concepts Works best with multiple leaders training small groups Encourage discussion and questions Faculty is given samples of all products and trained in their use Gotchas Minor incident reports (for teacher managed behavior) Office referrals Rules are posted in all classrooms, hallways, and throughout the building

Phase 3—Implementing PBIS within the School (continued) Gotchas are collected and reinforcement systems are implemented Students are acknowledged for appropriate behavior Staff are acknowledged for their support of the program Office referrals are logged into the SWIS system and are analyzed

Phase 3—Implementing PBIS within the School (continued) PBIS Team meets at least monthly to coordinate on-going implementation, analyze data, and develop new interventions Schools are encouraged to maintain a binder with all their school products, team notes, and other information for reference A coach works with every school team to provide additional support, PBIS knowledge, and behavioral expertise Schools are encouraged to attend state level and county level PBIS meetings for new ideas and support

Baltimore County Schools Trained in PBIS

Baltimore County Schools Trained in PBIS

Percentage of Baltimore County PBIS Schools and Length of Time Implementing PBIS (6) (6) (9) (11)

How Well are Schools Implementing Concepts of PBIS? School Self-Report (Form A) Completed monthly Measures the number of critical features (22) in place System-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Observational data from independent assessor Completed annually Measures the 7 features of school-wide implementation Implementation Phases Inventory (IPI) Completed semi-annually Measures 4 levels of implementation Measures 36 critical elements

Self-Report Data from Elementary Schools Form A—Percentage of features in place

Self-Report Data from Middle Schools Form A—Percentage of features in place

Self-Report Data from High Schools Form A—Percentage of features in place

Self-Report Data from Form A Percentage of Features in Place

Systems-Wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Research quality tool for assessing Universal/School-wide PBIS External person spend 2 hours at school, reviewing documents, interviewing staff, interviewing students. PBIS is “in place” with a score of at least 80% Total Measures 7 critical features of PBIS

Seven Critical Features of SET Seven critical features of PBIS listed, defined, and scored within SET: Behavioral Expectations Defined Behavioral Expectations Taught On-Going System for Rewarding Behavioral Expectations System for Responding to Behavioral Violations Monitoring and Decision-Making Management District-Level Support

Pre- and Post-Training SET Scores

Implementation Phases Inventory (IPI) Features of PBIS listed, defined and scored to obtain scores in the following categories: Preparation Phase Initiation Phase Implementation Phase Maintenance Phase Percentage of the 36 Critical Elements also obtained

Percentage of Baltimore County PBIS Schools and their Implementation Phases (7) (8) (6) (5) Based upon 26 schools

Implementation Phases Inventory—Percentage of Critical Features in Place

Discipline Data: Suspensions & Expulsions Elementary School Middle School High School

Elementary School Suspensions & Expulsions

PBIS Elementary Schools Average Number of Suspensions & Expulsions per Year

PBIS Middle Schools Suspensions & Expulsions

PBIS Middle Schools Average Number of Suspensions & Expulsions per Year

PBIS High School Suspensions & Expulsions

PBIS High Schools Average Number of Suspensions & Expulsions per Year

PBIS Supports Academic Achievement: An Initial Look at PBIS and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Elementary School Middle School High School

Behavioral Support Enhances Academic Achievement Percentage of PBIS Schools Making Annual Yearly Progress

How does Behavior Support Help? Behavior support improves minutes in instruction Behavior support makes instructional minutes more effective Behavior support creates a climate that is more calm and conducive to learning.

For additional information please contact: Office of Psychological Services Baltimore County Public Schools 410-887-0303 Joan Ledvina Parr Linda Marchineck Margaret Grady Kidder Maryland’s PBIS website jparr@bcps.org lmarchineck@bcps.org mkidder@bcps.org www.pbismaryland.org

Building Success in Baltimore Co Schools One Step at a Time

Thank you for your support as we continue to REACH FOR THE STARS and help students believe in themselves and achieve in Baltimore County Schools

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Baltimore County Schools

Positive Behavioral Interventions And Supports (PBIS)

Behavioral and Academic Interventions Behavioral Systems Academic Systems 1-5% Intensive Individual Interventions 6-20% Targeted Group Interventions 80% Universal Interventions

Secondary Prevention: Primary Prevention: Tertiary Prevention: Interagency Partnerships Community Partnerships Court/ Institutional Liaisons Spot Light On Schools/ P.O.s Maryland’s Tomorrow Program Homeless Program NW/SW IEP Team Individual Student IEP/ 504 Plans Student Therapeutic Support Student Threat Assessments Abuse and Neglect Reporting Program (CPS Liaisons) Traumatic Loss Teams Baltimore County 2004-2005 32 Schools: 14 ES, 12 MS, 6 HS ~5% ~15% Secondary Prevention: Project Attend/ FACE School Resource Officer Program D.A.R.E./ S.A.D.D. Programs Student Assistance Programs Wellness Centers Health Action Plans/ Appraisals Peer Helper/ Mediation Programs Pupil Personnel Home Visits/ Social Histories Instructional Support Teams (IST) Functional Behavior Assessments Behavior Intervention Plans Educational/ Psychosocial Assessments Psychological Assessments Student Case Management Social Skills, Anger Management, Conflict Resolution Parent Presentations/ Trainings Alternative School/Program Placements Primary Prevention: School Improvement Planning School Emergency Safety Plans Positive Behavior Plans/ Codes Character Education Programs Parent/ Family Resources Student Support Teams Health Screenings/ Protocols School Nurse/ Assistant Services Essential Guidance Curriculum School Counselor Services Pupil Personnel Services Residency/ Attendance Officer Services School Social Work Services School Psychologist Services ~80% of Students