1-4009769 (8/21/2015) Program Independent Assessment (PIA) Joe Kusick SAS Senior Manager, Program Independent Assessment Chairman, Raytheon EVMS Council.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building the Balanced Scorecard
Advertisements

The Department of Energy Enterprise Risk Management Model
Ron Rhodes Accelerating Growth and Avoiding “Surprises”
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
PROJECT MANAGEMENT for CONSTRUCTION
Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM ACF Roundtable IT Governance – what does it mean to you as an audit committee member July 2010 The AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM is.
The Outsourcing Process
A framework for describing IT Project Management Processes and Tool Set Features Enterprise Project Management Framework.
Program Management Overview (An Introduction)
Lesson 10 IT Project & Program Management.
Project Work and Administration
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
4. 2Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with the Unified Process Objectives  Explain the elements of project management and the responsibilities of a.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Project Closure CHAPTER FOURTEEN Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Space and Airborne Systems NDIA/SEI CMMI Technology Conference Presented by N. Fleischer 1 Raytheon’s Six Sigma Process and Its Application for CMMI By.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
Managing Project Quality
Unclassified. Program Management Empowerment and Accountability Mr. David Ahern Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition AT&L(A&T) 14 April 2009 The Acquisition.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Challenges Faced in Developing Audit Plans and Programs 21 st March, 2013.
Strategic Management the art and science of formulating, implementing and evaluating crossfunctional decisions that enable an organization to meet its.
S/W Project Management
COPYRIGHT © RAYTHEON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 4/2004 Customer Success Is Our Mission Raytheon Six Sigma The Boldness to Imagine the Future The Passion.
Engaging with stakeholders: Adding value to the energy system 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment Porto Pedro.
Chapter 10 Contemporary Project Management Kloppenborg
“Business Performance Management” Corporate Performance Management “The Importance of Integrity” Facilitated by: Warren White VP – Change Acceleration.
Organization Development (OD) is the process of improving organizations. The process is carefully planned and implemented to benefit the organization,
1102 Contract Specialist as a Business Manager Debbie Bartlett Defense Acquisition University.
CDS Operational Risk Management - October 28, 2005 Existing Methodologies for Operational Risk Mitigation - CDS’s ERM Program ACSDA Seminar - October 26.
Information System Design IT60105 Lecture 21 Staff Organization, Risk Management and Software Configuration Management.
So What? Operations Management EMBA Summer TARGET You are, aspire to be, or need to communicate with an executive that does not have direct responsibility.
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
Application Lifecycle Management : Leveraging the Cognos Investment Prepared for Cognos User Conference January 20, 2005.
CSZ QUANTUM LEAP – Vic Falls Peter Doona Finance Director BAT Zimbabwe.
Customer Success Is Our Mission 1 Ed Franklin Raytheon Company Evaluation Team March 23, 2005 The RCET: What is it? and What have we seen?
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT. A project is one – having a specific objective to be completed within certain specifications – having defined start and end dates.
IT Requirements Management Balancing Needs and Expectations.
© The Delos Partnership 2005 Dairygold Workshop Supplier Relationship Management.
National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Environmental Management System Implementation August 2005.
Copyright © 2008 Industrial Committee on Program Management. All rights reserved. Predictive Measures of Program Performance March 19, 2009 Industrial.
“Look, who is the most successful in attracting and holding good people? The nonprofits. The satisfaction has to be greater than in business because there.
Optimizing a Nation-Wide Donor Center Network BackgroundBackground The client is a global provider of biological products and enabling technologies, which.
Core Banking Transformation: A Roadmap to a Successful Core Banking Product Implementation - PMI Virtual Library | | © 2008 Kannan S. Ramakrishnan.
Earned Value Management Presented By: Steve Krivokopich May , 2006.
Where We Are Now 14–2. Where We Are Now 14–2 Major Tasks of Project Closure Evaluate if the project delivered the expected benefits to all stakeholders.
Case Study: How Web Technology Facilitated Implementation of a Business Plan NAPEO 2004 Presented by: Dan Danzig, VP Marketing SpectrumHR, LLC.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Project Management 6e..
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
The Goal: To Climb Above The Competition Copyright 2005: I Lead Projects, L.L.C. Course Description Project Process Workplates Project Process Workplates.
The Second Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress Presented by J. Glenn George Thursday, March 29, 2007 Day II – Track.
Quick Recap.
CMMI ® – The Current State Presented by Gregory Shelton Corporate Vice President Engineering, Technology, Manufacturing & Quality 3 rd Annual CMMI Technology.
Intelligence and Information Systems 1 3/17/2004 © 2004 Raytheon Company USC/CSE Executive Workshop on Agile Experiences March 17, 2004 A Raytheon Agile.
IFS310: Module 2 1/18/2007 Systems Planning and SDLC.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee for Public Works 14 August 2002.
Identify, Develop and Retain High Performers
What has been accomplished at the end of MSD 1 & 2?
Cmpe 589 Spring Fundamental Process and Process Management Concepts Process –the people, methods, and tools used to produce software products. –Improving.
Alex Ezrakhovich Process Approach for an Integrated Management System Change driven.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
September 2016 EVM 202—Lesson 8 Integrated Product Team (IPT) Analysis and Performance Case.
Chapter 4 Systems Planning and Selection
Raytheon Parts Management
Presentation transcript:

(8/21/2015) Program Independent Assessment (PIA) Joe Kusick SAS Senior Manager, Program Independent Assessment Chairman, Raytheon EVMS Council November 18, 2002 Presented to the 14 th Annual International Integrated Program Management Conference

(8/21/2015) Agenda Program Independent Assessment (PIA) Goals Objectives Benefits PIA Process Key Focus Areas Summary

(8/21/2015) Goals Early identification of program execution problems Facilitation and completion of the program closure planning process to mitigate program risk and meet and exceed program objectives Program execution that meets and exceeds customer and company requirements in terms of schedule, cost and technical objectives ensuring customer delight and program profitability that meets and exceeds business expectations

(8/21/2015) Objectives Provide knowledge transfer that is both tacit and explicit to the program leadership team so that the IPDS process if followed Provide leading indicators to the program leadership and execution team to facilitate the IPDS process Improve the Raytheon Company financial position by working with the program execution team to identify those opportunities and methodologies to reduce program cycle time, improve efficiencies and reduce waste through cost avoidance and recovery

(8/21/2015) Benefits Program execution that is predictable to ensure that what is promised to our customers, shareholders and employees is delivered A program leadership team that has the knowledge, both tacit and explicit, to execute a program, meet objectives, and grow the business by delighting the customer Career growth fueled by knowledge and performance and the satisfaction that the leadership team is succeeding

(8/21/2015) PIA Process PIA Triggering Mechanisms Strategic implications to the Enterprise Significant customer or senior management issues or concerns — “Show cause” letters, termination for default, poor cost, schedule, technical performance Randomly selected reviews of the business’s programs to assess the health of the organization

(8/21/2015) PIA Process (Cont.) PIAs shall be comprised of program independent experts from within and external to Raytheon The PIA experts will be responsible to identify program issues and determine root cause and corrective action in conjunction with the program leadership team The PIA experts will facilitate: — IPDS Gate Success Criteria and Attributes Enter/Exit Criteria Graded Pass/Fail Criteria — Risk Planning — Closure Planning — Program “report out”

(8/21/2015) PIA Process (Cont.) The PIA experts will facilitate: Program closure planning “follow up” Program Health Assessment — “Look Ahead” — Current Operations(Program Health Assessment) Most important, the PIA experts will facilitate knowledge transfer for each major phase of the program life cycle to the program leadership team Tacit Knowledge Explicit Knowledge

(8/21/2015) Key Focus Areas Customer Issues Cost Schedule Technical Financial Status Funding Cash Flow Profitability People, Processes, and Tools Knowledge Software Hardware Resource Availability “Rice Bowl” Issue Resolution

(8/21/2015) Key Focus Areas Contractual Issues Definitized/Undefinitized work Technical Requirements Adherence to IPDS Projected Performance Design to Unit Production Cost Profitablity Customer Satisfaction Overall Program Health

(8/21/2015) Key Lessons Learned Understand the mission, adequately fund the contract, work to realistic schedules, educate the customer/contractor team The probability of success of a program is determined by the realism by the customer and the contractor during the proposal phase; and the robustness of the initial program plan after contract award Improve the discipline in utilizing the IPDS process. Ensure that the IPDS “Gates” are followed

(8/21/2015) Recent Program Independent Assessment’s APEX Goleta “Go Live” Government DCMA (Roger Christiansen) Stated that the “ PIA performed at Goleta focused the Raytheon Government team on the critical items to achieve program implementation success. The PIA made both Government and Raytheon lead personnel aware of the program management tools available to deal with risk, opportunity planning, the lines of communication, and a closed loop corrective action process. The PIA was a valuable tool to facilitate the transfer of knowledge that lead to successful program execution”. Space Imaging Contracts Outcome: Refocusing of program execution teams on core program management principles to meet reported EAC objectives Navy Radar Contracts Improved Performance to the Program Management Contractual Baseline, avoided a Nunn-McCurdy Breach Other Programs where PIA’s enhanced the Program Execution Team’s probability of success: DD(X), AN-TPQ 47 Firefinder, ADS, TFC, CACS2, PAWS 2, AESA and several NRO programs.

(8/21/2015) Summary PIA’s will ensure the probability that a Program Plan is Integrated Achievable Profitable The resulting program execution satisfies and delights the customer facilitating Business growth