Understanding the context of distance students: Differences in on- and off- campus engagement with an online learning environment Associate Professor Stuart.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creating a USP via IT, iPad and iPhone: the rapidly evolving Property and Real Estate course and flexible delivery Professor Richard Reed School of Marketing.
Advertisements

Interact: A Case Study By Matt Dyki School of Commerce Charles Sturt University.
MATERIALS AND METHODS In 2007, VETS5011 – Practice Management and Professional Life included an intensive series of 36 one hour didactic lectures and group.
A quasi-experimental comparison of assessment feedback mechanisms Sven Venema School of Information and Communication Technology.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
2006 International Symposium of Computer Assisted Language Learning,June 2-4, Beijing China Tutor feedback in online English language learning: tutor perceptions.
Illinois CEE Student Survey Results Dr. Julia Melkers, Associate Professor School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia Summary.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca.
Graduating Senior Exit Survey Lindsay Couzens, M.S. And Bea Babbitt, Ph.D. Academic Assessment 1.
Presentation Name December 05 Embedding blended learning into mainstream Higher Education “Developments” Debbie Reynolds Clare Denholm.
1 A Course on Multimedia QoS Networking: Transition to Hybrid Offering and Comparative Evaluation Martin Reisslein, Jana Reisslein, and Patrick Seeling.
Programming 1 Feedback Session. The unit has improved my understanding of programming. 1.Strongly Agree 2.Agree 3.Neutral 4.Disagree 5.Strongly Disagree.
How was the course organized? Faculty present: Lectures, small groups, and labs. Students prepare: Problem-based learning issues, journal article reports,
Cardiff v Malaysia: a comparison of students’ academic experience in a first year MPharm module Dr Steve Hiscox PHRMY PCUTL Module 2 September 2011.
What Are Secondary Students' Expectations for Teachers in Virtual School Environments? Kevin Oliver, Assistant Professor of Instructional Technology North.
Factors Affecting the Innovation- Decision Process to Adopt Online Graduate Degree Program in Thailand (IEC2014) Siripen Pumahapinyo (1) Praweenya Suwannatthachote.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Digital Technologies: The challenges for a modern law school. Tina Hart, Melanie Fellowes & Abdul Jabbar.
Does Technology Belong in the Classroom? Presented by: Molly Carlson.
Data Collection and Preliminary Analysis Our survey addressed the first two of the questions presented in this study. The Qualtrics survey was framed by.
TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Sex comparisons among science faculty at Hunter College Hunter College Gender Equity Project & Provost’s Office 2007 Science Faculty Survey Department.
Demonstration: Course Management and Learning Software: My Lab Products Sue C. Spaulding UNC Charlotte Department of Psychology Teaching and Learning with.
Student experience and expectations of technology Associate Professor Michael Sankey Director, Learning Environments and Media.
Hacettepe University Usluel, Y. K., Mazman, S.G. & Arıkan, A. PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ AWARENESS OF COLLABORATIVE WEB 2.0 TOOLS WWW/INTERNET 2009.
Developing Faculty wide teaching of statistics and SPSS using web- based interactive resources Volker Patent, Innovations fellow, the Open University.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com” Introduction and relevance Research problem and purpose Research methodology Statistical analysis-Validity.
EVALUATION REPORT Derek R. Lane, Ph.D. Department of Communication University of Kentucky.
A comparison of two methods of synchronous (real time) interaction in distance learning Jane Montague University of Derby
Hyun-Myoung Kim* and Young-Soo Kim** Dept. of Biology Education, Seoul National University, Korea Application of Internet Services to Promote.
Enhancing problem-based learning designs with a single e-learning scaffolding tool:Two case studies using challenge FRAP Advisor : Min-Puu Chen Presenter.
The learning experience and satisfaction of management students in a diverse learning environment: A Cross Campus Study at the University of Toronto Dr.
Economics and business students: different, different but the same Dr Inna Pomorina Bath Spa University.
2012 Community Affiliates Survey Barbara Packer-Muti, EdD Institutional & Community Engagement.
Survey tools, focus groups and video as a means of capturing student experience and expectations of e-learning Dave.
5 - 8 December 1999 Brisbane, Australia Ascilite99 1st Announcement and Call for Papers December 1999 Brisbane, Australia Ascilite99 1st Announcement.
Jenni Parker, Dani Boase-Jelinek Jan Herrington School of Education Murdoch University Western Australia.
The National Student Survey (NSS) Penny Jones, Strategic Planning Office Tracy Goslar and Miles Willey, Academic Standards & Partnership Wednesday 16 March.
A Preliminary Investigation of Student Perceptions of Online Education Angela M. Clark University of South Alabama Presented at ISECON 2003 San Diego,
Bringing Together Survey Results of the UNLV Student Experience
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
Mapping the Changing Technological Landscape: Faculty and Student Surveys on Educational Technology Cara Lane, Research Scientist Catalyst Research and.
Copyright Copyright University of Washington This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies.
Support Services for Online & Distance Ed Programs Pace University -- A.S. in Telecommunications Degree FIPSE Learning Anytime Anywhere Partnership (LAAP)
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Discovering the value that the library can contribute to quality teaching and learning through student evaluation data Associate Professor Stuart Palmer.
Faculty Applications of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Research Kathleen McKinney and Patricia Jarvis with the assistance of Denise Faigao.
Assessment & Feedback The Devil is in the Detail. David Kane Birmingham City University
USING VIDEO CONFERENCING TOOLS FOR TEACHING By Prof. Larry Farmer.
Mapping Pedagogy to Technology a simple model Dr Jo Coldwell School of Information Technology Deakin University Geelong
Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code: 00113B PSYCHOLOGY IN AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND: Innovation in distance education & flexible delivery Lucy Zinkiewicz.
IN WHAT WAYS DO PRESERVICE TEACHERS UTILIZED AN WEB-BASED LEARNING SUPPORT SYSTEM? Fethi Ahmet Inan The University of Memphis Soner Yildirim.
Monday, June 23, 2008Slide 1 KSU Females prospective on Maternity Services in PHC Maternity Services in Primary Health Care Centers : The Females Perception.
Recruiting and Retaining People Lecture 1: Introduction to the Module Classroom L212.
Taeho Yu, Ph.D. Ana R. Abad-Jorge, Ed.D., M.S., RDN Kevin Lucey, M.M. Examining the Relationships Between Level of Students’ Perceived Presence and Academic.
CSWE Overview This resource highlights key aspects of the mission of the Commission on Research and its goals for the next 5 years. It will then.
Using Rubrics to Communicate Unit Learning Goals to 6th Grade Science Students Jodine Tolentino.
Using Blackboard as a Tool to Teach Online Technology Skills in College Classrooms Dr. Victoria Haddad Adjunct Professor, College of Technology Wilmington.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Information Retention in e-Learning De Leon Kimberly Obonyo Carolyne Penn John Yang Xiaoyan.
Recruiting and Retaining People Lecture 1: Introduction to the Module.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Eurocall Nottingham 2011, United Kingdom 1. Introduction ENHANCING WRITING SKILLS THROUGH BLOGS IN AN EFL CLASS Ruby Vurdien, White Rose Language School,
Course Director’s Strategy Day
A nationwide US student survey
Deakin associate degrees of arts and education
Digital experiences with Moodle at Divine Word University
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the context of distance students: Differences in on- and off- campus engagement with an online learning environment Associate Professor Stuart Institute of Teaching and Learning Deakin University, Australia 1

Introduction Distance education continues to thrive! In part due to a complex relationship with online technologies Much online learning research ignores the influence of demographic characteristics of system users There are very real differences in demography, technology experiences and reasons for study between on- and off-campus students 2

Context – Deakin University Approximately 40,000 students Approximately 30% off-campus Mature and large-scale OLE implementation providing support to both on- and off-campus students Previous investigations identified differences in the perceptions and use of elements of the OLE between on and off-campus students 3

Methodology DSO = Deakin Studies Online In 2011 all coursework students were surveyed about: demographic and background information; place and mode of access to DSO; perception of importance of, satisfaction with, and frequency of use of, a range of DSO functions; a number of overall DSO satisfaction measures; and open-ended written comments about DSO 4

Response rate & demographic information PopulationSample Number of respondents Gender Female59.5%67.8% Male40.5%32.2% Faculty Arts and Education30.4%30.1% Business and Law36.9%28.6% Health19.8%22.9% Science and Technology12.9%16.9% Other-1.5% Campus Geelong – Waurn Ponds12.1%14.1% Geelong – Waterfront 5.8% 7.5% Melbourne – Burwood50.3%43.5% Warrnambool 3.2% 3.5% Off-campus28.6%31.4% Mean enrolment duration2.24 years2.42 years 5

Place of access to DSO Primary place of access Other places of access 6

Mode of access to DSO Primary mode of access Other modes of access 7

Mean importance and satisfaction ratings for DSO functions 1. Accessing unit guide and other unit information11. Submitting assignments 2. Accessing unit lecture, tutorial or lab notes etc12. Receiving feedback on assignments 3. Interacting with unit learning resources13. Working collaboratively in a group 4. Using the unit calendar14. Reviewing unit progress 5. Reading unit announcements15. Using the e-portfolio 6. Contacting teachers via internal unit messaging16. eLive synchronous communication tool 7. Contacting students via internal unit messaging17. iLecture class lecture recording 8. Reading contributions to online discussions18. Other iLecture recoding (eg podcasts etc) 9. Contributing to online discussions19. Deakin’s social software 10. Completing online quizzes/tests20. Turnitin plagiarism/originality assessment Importance : 1 = not important; 3 = neutral; and 5 = very important Satisfaction : 1 = not satisfied; 3 = neutral; and 5 = very satisfied 8

1. Accessing unit guide and other unit information11. Submitting assignments 2. Accessing unit lecture, tutorial or lab notes etc12. Receiving feedback on assignments 3. Interacting with unit learning resources13. Working collaboratively in a group 4. Using the unit calendar14. Reviewing unit progress 5. Reading unit announcements15. Using the e-portfolio 6. Contacting teachers via internal unit messaging16. eLive synchronous communication tool 7. Contacting students via internal unit messaging17. iLecture class lecture recording 8. Reading contributions to online discussions18. Other iLecture recoding (eg podcasts etc) 9. Contributing to online discussions19. Deakin’s social software 10. Completing online quizzes/tests20. Turnitin plagiarism/originality assessment 9

1. Accessing unit guide and other unit information11. Submitting assignments 2. Accessing unit lecture, tutorial or lab notes etc12. Receiving feedback on assignments 3. Interacting with unit learning resources13. Working collaboratively in a group 4. Using the unit calendar14. Reviewing unit progress 5. Reading unit announcements15. Using the e-portfolio 6. Contacting teachers via internal unit messaging16. eLive synchronous communication tool 7. Contacting students via internal unit messaging17. iLecture class lecture recording 8. Reading contributions to online discussions18. Other iLecture recoding (eg podcasts etc) 9. Contributing to online discussions19. Deakin’s social software 10. Completing online quizzes/tests20. Turnitin plagiarism/originality assessment 10

1. Accessing unit guide and other unit information11. Submitting assignments 2. Accessing unit lecture, tutorial or lab notes etc12. Receiving feedback on assignments 3. Interacting with unit learning resources13. Working collaboratively in a group 4. Using the unit calendar14. Reviewing unit progress 5. Reading unit announcements15. Using the e-portfolio 6. Contacting teachers via internal unit messaging16. eLive synchronous communication tool 7. Contacting students via internal unit messaging17. iLecture class lecture recording 8. Reading contributions to online discussions18. Other iLecture recoding (eg podcasts etc) 9. Contributing to online discussions19. Deakin’s social software 10. Completing online quizzes/tests20. Turnitin plagiarism/originality assessment 11

1. Accessing unit guide and other unit information11. Submitting assignments 2. Accessing unit lecture, tutorial or lab notes etc12. Receiving feedback on assignments 3. Interacting with unit learning resources13. Working collaboratively in a group 4. Using the unit calendar14. Reviewing unit progress 5. Reading unit announcements15. Using the e-portfolio 6. Contacting teachers via internal unit messaging16. eLive synchronous communication tool 7. Contacting students via internal unit messaging17. iLecture class lecture recording 8. Reading contributions to online discussions18. Other iLecture recoding (eg podcasts etc) 9. Contributing to online discussions19. Deakin’s social software 10. Completing online quizzes/tests20. Turnitin plagiarism/originality assessment 12

1. Accessing unit guide and other unit information11. Submitting assignments 2. Accessing unit lecture, tutorial or lab notes etc12. Receiving feedback on assignments 3. Interacting with unit learning resources13. Working collaboratively in a group 4. Using the unit calendar14. Reviewing unit progress 5. Reading unit announcements15. Using the e-portfolio 6. Contacting teachers via internal unit messaging16. eLive synchronous communication tool 7. Contacting students via internal unit messaging17. iLecture class lecture recording 8. Reading contributions to online discussions18. Other iLecture recoding (eg podcasts etc) 9. Contributing to online discussions19. Deakin’s social software 10. Completing online quizzes/tests20. Turnitin plagiarism/originality assessment 13

1. Accessing unit guide and other unit information11. Submitting assignments 2. Accessing unit lecture, tutorial or lab notes etc12. Receiving feedback on assignments 3. Interacting with unit learning resources13. Working collaboratively in a group 4. Using the unit calendar14. Reviewing unit progress 5. Reading unit announcements15. Using the e-portfolio 6. Contacting teachers via internal unit messaging16. eLive synchronous communication tool 7. Contacting students via internal unit messaging17. iLecture class lecture recording 8. Reading contributions to online discussions18. Other iLecture recoding (eg podcasts etc) 9. Contributing to online discussions19. Deakin’s social software 10. Completing online quizzes/tests20. Turnitin plagiarism/originality assessment 14

Mean frequency of use for DSO functions 1 = never; 2 = less than once/week; 3 = once/week; 4 = once/day; and 5 = multiple times/day 15

Mean frequency of use for DSO functions 1 = never; 2 = less than once/week; 3 = once/week; 4 = once/day; and 5 = multiple times/day 16

Mean frequency of use for DSO functions 1 = never; 2 = less than once/week; 3 = once/week; 4 = once/day; and 5 = multiple times/day 2. Accessing unit lecture, tutorial or lab notes etc 4. Using the unit calendar 5. Reading unit announcements 10. Completing online quizzes/tests 11. Submitting assignments 12. Receiving feedback on assignments 13. Working collaboratively in a group 14. Reviewing unit progress 15. Using the e-portfolio 19. Deakin’s social software 20. Turnitin plagiarism/originality assessment 17

Overall satisfaction with DSO Statement On- campus Off- campusSignificance DSO enhances my learning F 1314 = 2.34 p > 0.12 DSO is reliable and available when I need it F 1314 = p < 2x10 -6 I am satisfied with the level of support I received in using DSO in my studies F 1314 = 2.95 p > = strongly disagree; 3 = neutral; and 5 = strongly agree 18

Conclusions In some ways, on- and off-campus students are becoming more alike … 19

Conclusions In some ways, on- and off-campus students are becoming more alike … … but, there were still significant differences between on- and off-campus student engagement with the OLE 20

Conclusions In some ways, on- and off-campus students are becoming more alike … … but, there were still significant differences between on- and off-campus student engagement with the OLE These differences challenge the institution to understand the reasons for them … 21

Conclusions In some ways, on- and off-campus students are becoming more alike … … but, there were still significant differences between on- and off-campus student engagement with the OLE These differences challenge the institution to understand the reasons for them … … and also challenge the value of one-size-fits-all institutional policies and templates for the use of OLEs 22

Thank you for your time Presentation: 23