1. How was the course organized? Faculty present: Lectures, small groups, and labs. Students prepare: Problem-based learning issues, journal article reports, weekly formative assessments.

2. How many faculty were involved each week in teaching in Block1? PBL: 19 faculty Lectures: 4-6 faculty Histopath: 5 faculty Other lab/small grp: 1-6 faculty Doctoring: (36 faculty)

3. Accessibility Faculty access: –Material covered by other faculty –Student learning issues –Student responses on formative assessments –Item analysis on assessments –Student activity on Angel (e.g. Do students read each others’ learning issues?) –Student opinions –Student performance –Individual or groups of students. Students access: –Weekly schedules –Course lecture notes and slides –Each others’ learning issues and other Web Board postings –Other students or faculty –Their scores on assignments and the class distribution of scores on assignments –Announcements –Group assignments –Laboratory materials

4. STUDENTS LIKE THE COURSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Evaluation of Components of Block 1 of Medical School Scores for ANGEL over the First Three Blocks = 4.4, 4.2, 4.4

5. II. The following statements concern ANGEL as a learning tool. N/A: Not Applicable Strongly Disagree DisagreeUnsureAgree Strongly Agree Mean 1. The ANGEL training was adequate to get me started easily with Block 1. 0.9%2.8% 4.6%55.6%33.3% 4.15 2. I was able to monitor my learning via ANGEL’s multiple tracking capabilities (viewing all my grades, self assessment feedback, learner profile options). 1.9%0.9%8.3%11.1%38.0%39.8% 4.09 3. Block 1 materials on ANGEL were well organized. 0.0% 0.9%2.8%35.8%60.4% 4.56 4. The student discussion boards helped address my questions and problems effectively. 13.0%3.7%2.8%16.7%33.3%30.6% 3.97 5. I had quick access to faculty support via the various discussion boards. 14.8%4.6%6.5%17.6%19.4%37.0% 3.91 6. Learning via an on-line system made Block 1 engaging for me. 1.9% 0.9%20.4%46.3%28.7% 4.01 7. I asked questions via ANGEL which I would not have asked face to face. 31.5%11.1%18.5%12.0%19.4%7.4% 2.91 8. I read postings by other students in my PBL group. 1.9%0.9% 31.5%63.9% 4.59 9. Having all the Block 1 materials on a single system helped organize my learning experiences. 0.0%0.9% 3.7%18.5%75.9% 4.68 10. I was able to customize my learning based on the features offered in ANGEL. 5.6%3.7%12.0%24.1%30.6%24.1% 3.63 11. I found on-line learning via ANGEL to be flexible to my learning style. 2.8%1.9%5.6%12.0%43.5%34.3% 4.06 12. On-line learning gives me more flexibility than paper/text based learning. 1.9%2.8%9.3%16.7%33.3%36.1% 3.92 13. Comparing my scores to the class average motivated me. 5.6% 13.9%13.0%24.1%38.0% 3.79 14. Having Block 1 on ANGEL allowed me to learn the course material in ways that I have never done before. 2.8%4.7%11.2%29.0%26.2% 3.60

6. Common features in CMS’s Presentation Communication Assessment Evaluation Content authoring Management/Reporting Scheduling/Calendaring Search tools Individualized learning tools