Rider 70 Changes to Staging for Special Education.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

General Supervision Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 15 – General Supervision 20 – Timely and Accurate Data.

Advertisements

1 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD PBMAS Program Effectiveness Review PBM November 11, 2008 DEIC Meeting Prepared by: Susan Kovacs Director of Federal & Special Programs.

System Safeguards and Campus Improvement

Campus Improvement Plans

Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.

Division of Instructional Support Office of School Improvement, Accountability & Compliance.

New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Recommendations for Change June 1, 2011.

Initial Compliance Reviews (ICRs) Didi Garcia Texas Education Agency Division of Federal and State Education Policy.

RF Monitoring: RF Monitoring  RF Monitoring will still have its own guidance document for 

Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates March 07, 2014 Jana Schreiner, Accountability and State Assessment Consultant.

Adapted from Texas Education Agency PBM ProductDate of 2014 release Projected date of 2015 release PBMAS (Unmasked reports) LEA reports posted.

2013 Office of Special Education (OSE) Fall Forum Tuesday, November 4, 2013  10:15 am – 11:45 am  Ballroom E Jayme Kraus Data Analyst, Performance Reporting.

Special Education Directors’ Meeting May 14, 2009 Nori Cuellar Mora, Ed.D. Education Service Center – Region 2 Teaching and Learning.

California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.

State Performance Plan: A Two-Way Street Ruth Ryder Larry Wexler Division of Monitoring and State Improvement Planning.

PEIMS and Accountability. Clear System of Data Quality Documentation (Enrollment, Special Program, etc.) PEIMS Data Entry Pearson Data File Answer Documents.

State of the State Texas Education Agency TCASE Midwinter Conference January 2008.

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.

Roles and Responsibilities

Department of Special Education Division of Special Programs in the Office of Academics 1111 W. 6 th Street Phone: (512) Austin, Texas

Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.

2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.

1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.

Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS) ESC3 – NET3 Session: Data Analysis/Problem Statements.

Go for the Touchdown with ESC-2

Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS) January 2005 Update.

 Leading, Learning, Serving.   District – Stage 2 AYP  District - Stage 3 AYP (possibility )  Campus – Stage 1 AYP (possibility.

1 General Supervision. 2 General Supervision (and Continuous Improvement) 1.What are the minimum Components for General Supervision ? 2.How do the Components.

An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.

Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.

Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.

Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS). Data Process Reporting State Districts & Campuses IR or Met Standard Indexes & Safeguards Federal (ESEA.

An Overview 2015 PBMAS and Intervention Activities

Addressing Federal Program Stages in PBM OCTOBER 27, 2015.

FREQUENCY and DURATION SPED Monitoring TETN December 16, 2010 Event # 8222.

District Annual Determinations IDEA Part B Sections 616(a) and (e) A State must consider the following four factors: 1.Performance on compliance.

State of the State Texas Education Agency TCASE Summer Conference July 2008.

June 2015 Good morning and welcome! 1.Open template and begin to review; and 2.Be sure you have your 2015 accountability data out, ready for easy.

YEAR #2 DETERMINATIONS ISD Special Education Directors’ Meeting September 18, 2008.

Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services 2008 LEA Determinations: Final Data Based on 2006–2007 from the February 2008 APR.

South Hunterdon Regional School District Consolidated Monitoring Report (CMR) Presentation to the SHRSD Board of Education on October 26, 2015 Audit from.

In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.

Staging Training Region 4 ESC January 16, Data Validation Acronyms  DVM – Data Validation Monitoring  DA – Data Analysis (Intervention document)

Assessment & Accountability Update Richard A. Blair, Sr. Education Specialist Professional Service Provider Network Meeting October 13, 2015.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.

Summer Summit June 30 – July 1, We needed another acronym in education? TOP REASONS FOR A CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK 4. Our assessment.

State Performance Plan Data Submission for Spring 2016 Webinar Presented by Lori Merrell & Elizabeth Danner Webinar handouts available at

Statement of Condition – During my audit I noted expenditures to the Child Nutrition Federal Program which were allowable but the District.

State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.

Harlingen CISD Performance Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS)

April 29-30, Review information related to the RF monitoring system Ensure that the agency meets its ongoing obligation to have a monitoring system.

Welcome to Texas As seen through Region 1 Eyes. Geographically.

CTE PEIMS Coding Steve Neal Educational Consultant for CTE

What Data? Where? Ann Jinkins June 5, 2014.

Career Technology Education Performance-Based Monitoring Summer Overview Ed Garcia, CTE Specialist Region One Education Service Center (956)

CTE PEIMS Coding Steve Neal Educational Specialist for CTE

Residential Facility Tracker

SPR&I Regional Training

CAREER READINESS INDICATOR

Roles and Responsibilities

Driving Through the California Dashboard

Roles and Responsibilities

YEAR #4 (2010) DETERMINATIONS

Residential facility tracker

Residential facility tracker

Career and Technical Education (CTE) Programs of Study

Presented by: Michele Elledge

Presentation transcript:

Rider 70 Changes to Staging for Special Education

Chapter 2 Adopted Recommendations 6. Combine, link, align, and/or eliminate indicators where possible to ensure a single, unified system for monitoring special education. 7. Combine the three separate special education systems— State Performance Plan (SPP), the Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS), and the Residential Facilities (RF) Monitoring and RF Tracker System—into a single, integrated, non-duplicative monitoring system with a single reporting schedule such that an area is only addressed once.

Unified Systems: Performance on federally required determination elements and performance on PBMAS indicators based on district data will be unified for Special Education Staging in fall of 2015.

Unified Performance Based Monitoring System (PBM) SPED : Integrated analysis of: 1.PBMAS indicators 2.Compliance SPP Indicators 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 3.Valid, reliable, and timely data submission 4.Uncorrected noncompliance 5.Financial audit findings CTE BE/ESL NCLB Stage of Intervention Stage of Intervention/Federal LEA Determinations: Stage 1 or Not Staged = Meets Requirement Stage 2 = Needs Assistance Stage 3 = Needs Intervention Stage 4 = Needs Substantial Intervention Integrated Intervention (assigned a stage of intervention for more than one program area) (required engagement in the Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS)) Residential Facility (RF) Monitoring Stage of Intervention Unified State & Federal Accountability System Texas Education Agency 20154

Federally Required Annual Determinations 34 Code of Federal Regulations § requires states to make annual determinations about the performance of districts. There are 4 federally required elements in making annual determinations for each LEA. Each will be assigned a performance level according to prescribed criteria.

Texas Education Agency 20156

7

Staging of Special Education Program Unified System Performance levels on indicators from PBMAS report + Performance on federally required indicators report _______________________________________ SPED Stage of Intervention/Annual Determination Not Staged or Stage 1 = Meets Requirement Stage 2 = Needs Assistance Stage 3 = Needs Intervention Stage 4 = Needs Substantial Intervention