1. Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS) ESC3 – NET3 Session: Data Analysis/Problem Statements

2. AGENDA What does your data tell you? Problem Statements - GOALS Building a Strong Improvement Plan Important Dates and Steps To Be Taken Now

4. Data Process Reporting State Districts & Campuses IR or Met Standard Indexes & Safeguards Federal (ESEA Waiver) Districts & Campuses Priority and Focus Safeguards Performance-Based Monitoring (PBM) Districts PBMAS Targeted Improvement Plan with Progress Reports

5. Purpose Identify trends in your data Develop problem statements based on objective data findings

6. Sorting through the data

10. si

11. Problem Statement

13. CriteriaY/N Substantiated by facts/data Written objectively Uses concise language Includes specific details (who, what, when, where) Focuses on a single, manageable issue Has relevance to our campus Avoids causation or assigning solutions Problem statements are…

14. REVISED Problem Statement ELLs have a 50% pass rate in reading ELLs have a 50% pass rate in reading due to a lack of parental involvement Problem Statement

15. Data Analysis Quality Check Has a thorough data analysis been conducted on the indexes and system safeguards that were missed or are potential areas of concern? Have clear problem statements been identified and created? Do problem statements meet the criteria in the problem statement checklist?

16. CSFs Organized by Data Sources Screenshot of Data sources by CSF

17. Improvement Plan Template Optional Required

18. T I P S COLLECTIVELY Ensure data has been COLLECTIVELY discussed and reviewed. CONCISEOBJECTIVE Use of CONCISE and OBJECTIVE language. TARGETEDSPECIFIC Ensure data are TARGETED and SPECIFIC to the gaps.

19. Purpose Conduct a Root Cause Analysis Determine why gaps exist Review additional data sources Identify root causes

21. Significance of the root cause It’s a HYPOTHESIS If we drill down, we may be able to solve the problem

22. Problem Statement ELLs have a 50% pass rate in reading Lack of teacher understanding for the instructional strategies needed to meet linguistic needs of ELLs Root Cause WHY?

23. 5 Whys 10,5,5 2 Circles

25. Control Influence

27. Root Cause 5 Whys 10,5,5 2 Circles 2 Circles 10,5,5

28. CSF Data Sources

29. ✓ Answers WHY the problem is occurring. ✓ Does not contain solutions or suggest actions. ✓ Is validated by data. ✓ Is focused on what the team can control. Root Cause Quality Check

30. New Template EXAMPLE There is a lack of a streamlined communication process and protocol with our external providers Average parent attendance/participation at our quarterly parent night is 25% ELLs have a 50% pass rate in reading Teachers lack of understanding the instructional strategies needed to meet the linguistic needs of ELLs

31. 2015-2016 Template

32. T I P S ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS Ensure a ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS was completed. ANSWERs WHY Determine if the “root cause” ANSWERs WHY the gap is occurring. COLLABORATIVE Determine the analysis was COLLABORATIVE and VETTED VETTED by the team.