1. RF Monitoring: 2012-2013

2. RF Monitoring  RF Monitoring will still have its own guidance document for 2012-2013  http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.as px?id=2147495560&menu_id=214748 3703&menu_id2=2147483719 http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.as px?id=2147495560&menu_id=214748 3703&menu_id2=2147483719

3. Staging Criteria for RF Monitoring 1.Ranking from RF Tracker Data (last year’s data) a)LRE Calculation b)Commensurate School Day c)Related Services 2.Time since last RF Monitoring On-Site Review 3.New Residential Facilities Present in the LEA 4.2011-2012 PBMAS SPED Stage 5.History of Noncompliance in special education 6.Current Escalated Oversight 7.RF Tracker Data Quality

4. Staging “Levels” Based on points assigned in matrix of staging criteria (“selection rubric” –Not Staged –Stage 1 –Stage 2 –Stage 3 –Stage 4 –Stage 4A –Stage 4B

5. Submission Window  Submission Window  (begins when staging is released in ISAM (likely in September) and ends on December 7, 2012*  Stage 1 – will complete all documents by December 7, 2012 and retain locally Subject to submission request by TEA

6. PBMAS: An Evolution

7. Staging for PBMAS 4 program areas –BE/ESL –CTE –NCLB –SPED

8. Staging for PBMAS (cont) Each program area has indicators Each indicator is assigned a performance level (“PL”) of 0, 1, 2, or 3 –PL increases from 0-3 based on variance from state “standard” or “target” i.e., 0 = within state “standard” or “target”; PL increases as variance increases from state “standard” or “target”

9. Staging for PBMAS (cont) Based on the numbers of PLs 2 or 3 per program area, staging is assigned Staging is separate for each program area –Not staged –Stage 1 –Stage 2 –Stage 3 –Stage 4

10. PBMAS Manual 2012 Manual Organization –Section I: Introduction –Section II: Components of the 2012 PBMAS –Section III: BE/ESL Indicators –Section IV: CTE Indicators –Section V: NCLB Indicators –Section VI: SPED Indicators –Section VII: Appendices

11. Section VI: SPED Indicators Pages 82 – 119 18 indicators

12. Name & Description of Indicator

13. Indicator Calculation

14. Minimum Size Requirements & Special Analysis

15. Data Source for Indicator

16. Additional Notes

17. Performance Level Assignments/ Determinations

18. Information regarding special analysis, etc.

19. Standards (if applicable to the indicator)

20. Major Changes for 2012-2013  One Guidance Document (regardless of single program or integrated interventions)  http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=2147504027&men u_id=2147483703&menu_id2=2147483708 http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=2147504027&men u_id=2147483703&menu_id2=2147483708  District AYP staging  District AU status  BE/ESL  CTE  NCLB/ESEA  SPED*

21. Texas Accountability Intervention System

22. Changes for 2012-2013  One CIP, One CAP for PBMAS, AU, AYP  RF still separate for 2012-2013  Improvement Plan Workbook (district)  data analysis  needs assessment  improvement plan  corrective action plan (CAP), if noncompliance is identified

23. Submission Window  Submission Window  (begins when staging is released in ISAM (likely in September) and ends on December 7, 2012*  Submission window is same for all staged LEAs, regardless of staging “levels” or programs  Note: Earlier (October 15) “submission window” for districts who are staged for AYP/AU only

24. Staging and Submission If staged in two or more PBMAS program areas with no stage of intervention higher than a Stage 1, conduct all activities, complete CIP, and retain locally

25. Texas Accountability Intervention System

26. ISAM Updates

27. Hot off the Press…

28.  Noncompliance Module

29. Hot off the Press…  Noncompliance Module

30. Hot off the Press…

31.  Noncompliance Module Hot off the Press…

32. 32 2012-2013 SPED Monitoring TETNs September 13, 2012 November 8, 2012 January 29, 2013 March 21, 2013 May 14. 2013 All sessions will be from 1:00-3:00