© 2011 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), all rights reserved. Use without permission is prohibited. RESPONDING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Health and Healthcare Issues. Public Health and Healthcare.
Advertisements

Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
1 The Advisory Team for Environment, Food, and Health.
Lesson 3 Responding to Emergency Events. For additional information or questions please contact Toledo-Lucas County Health Department APC:
Missouri’s Response Radiation Emergency Callaway/Cooper Nuclear Plants Keith Henke Radiological Response Coordinator Bureau of Environmental Epidemiology.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
Christa-Marie Singleton, MD, MPH Associate Director for Science
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 7—Mass Care What Is It And How Will We Measure It? For sound, click on the megaphone and then move arrow.
Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Environmental Health XII. Electromagnetic radiation Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
© 2007 Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), all rights reserved. Use without permission is prohibited. The Canadian.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Session 121 National Incident Management Systems Session 12 Slide Deck.
Environmental Health and Safety Radiation Control and Radiological Services.
Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain The Codex General Principles of Food Hygiene Module 2.3.
The CFIA: Who We Are and What We Do March 2014 Presented by: Aline Dimitri Presented at: McGill University.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
EMERGENCY PLAN AND PROCEDURE IN INDUSTRY INVOLVING NORM/TENORM
WELLINGTON COUNTY CONFINED SPACE. Learning Outcomes The participant will:  Assess hazards associated with Confined Space Entry  Identify a Confined.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 14—Responder Safety and Health What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
Hazardous Waste and Emergency Response
Radiological Health Advisory Board Meeting May 25, 2011.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 11—Non- Pharmaceutical Interventions What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
Central Asia Regional Health Security Workshop Co-organized with the Command Surgeon, US Central Command and the George C. Marshall European Center for.
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
LHD Rad Response Template. Overview Previously provided “Empire County” All- Hazards Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan Radiological.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 7—Mass Care What Is It And How Will We Measure It? For sound, click on the megaphone and then move arrow.
© 2007 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), all rights reserved. Use without permission is prohibited. An Update.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Senior Regulators Meeting Technical Cooperation Programme Supporting Radiation Safety Infrastructure in Member.
Gaps & Useful Practices Los Angeles County Multi-Agency Radiological Response Plan (MARRP) Kathleen Kaufman Former Director, LA County Radiation Management.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Commission, regulation, advisory, standards. Description This presentation provides general information about each of the.
19-20 March 2009 IAEA, Vienna RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting "Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources" (TSA-1),
Terezia Sinkova EFSA The new EU Food Safety Agency.
BERYLLIUM SAFETY - SLIDE 1 OF 86 © Copyright SafetyInstruction.com 2006 WELCOME BERYLLIUM SAFETY FOR EMPLOYEES CORPORATE SAFETY TRAINING REGULATORY STANDARD.
International Atomic Energy Agency THE “EMERGENCY CONVENTIONS” Interregional Training Course on Technical Requirements to Fulfil National Obligations in.
Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 4 May 7, 2002 On Farm Food Safety A Process of Intervention Martin Firth Manager, Policy and Strategies Canadian Food.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 2 Conceptual.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency V. McClelland, NNSA, US DOE.
Emergency Exposure Situations Developing a National Capability for Response to a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency Requirements for Infrastructure.
Community preparedness for radiation emergencies: How can the MRCs help? Medical Reserve Corp.
EPA's Radiological and Nuclear Emergency Response Program June 18, 2009 Presented by: Ronald Fraass, Lab Director National Air and Radiation Environmental.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 11—Non- Pharmaceutical Interventions What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
OVERVIEW OF THE ROLES OF VARIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR AFLATOXIN CONTROL IN TANZANIA RAYMOND N. WIGENGE DIRECTOR OF FOOD SAFETY TFDA.
Health Physics 1a: Sources of Radiation. Introduction Scientists have studied radiation for over 100 years and we know a great deal about it. Radiation.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
RANET EPPR 2007 Ann Heinrich. 2 BackgroundBackground Secretariat issued in 2000 a global Response Assistance Network (RANET)* document Aim: To provide.
Florida Operations Level Hazardous Materials Training Unit 1 Program Introduction and Response Plans.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 Mr. Scott A. Weidie, J722 1 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) 04 March 2008 Governments and Crises: Roles.
IAEA 1 - Issuing regulations a, b The regulators of transport in Republic of Belarus are Department of supervision for the safe industrial activities and.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Kyrgyz Republic.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Developing a National Capability for Response Emergency Response Plans Lecture IAEA Post Graduate.
Organising of the Official Food Control in Finland Jorma Hirn Director General National Food Agency.
PROTECTIVE ACTIONS AND REENTRY. Protective Actions Promptly and effectively implemented or recommended for implementation to minimize the consequences.
Office of Food Safety and Recall Food Safety Investigation and Recall Presented by: Francis Lindsay, CFIA Technical Specialist Querétaro, México, October.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Introduction to the Canadian Food Safety System Roles and Responsibilities in Food Surveillance December 9, 2013 Samuel Godefroy, Ph.D. Director General,
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
Office of Legal Affairs
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
Linkage of Radiation Emergency Plan to the national emergency response plans Kiema, E. Kisenge Corresponding Author Contact: Mobile no
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Training Courses for RPOs
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
Presentation transcript:

© 2011 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), all rights reserved. Use without permission is prohibited. RESPONDING TO A NUCLEAR EMERGENCY AFFECTING FOOD Lorie Whitcombe, Health Canada JoAnne Ford, CFIA A presentation to the Food Forum for Industry and Government in Southwestern Ontario

What is Radiation? Radiation is energy in the form of electromagnetic waves or particles Radiation can be divided into two categories: Non-ionizing radiation (visual light, heat, microwaves, radio waves) Ionizing radiation (alpha, beta, x-rays and gamma rays) Ionizing radiation sources are higher energy than non-ionizing sources and have the potential to cause significant cellular damage upon exposure Ionizing radiation sources: can be found naturally everywhere in the environment (air, water, soil, cosmic rays) can also be man-made (diagnostic x-rays, construction materials, diagnostic radioisotopes, nuclear fuel) Precautions should always be taken to limit exposure to sources of ionizing radiation 2

Radiation Exposure vs. Radioactive Contamination Radiation Exposure occurs when: The radioactive source is external to the body and does not come into physical contact with the body UV rays from the sun are a constant source of non-ionizing radiation exposure X-rays are a common source of ionizing radiation exposure Radioactive Contamination occurs when : Radioactive materials come into direct contact with our skin, or are introduced into the body Radioisotope particulates from a Radiological Dispersal Device or from a Nuclear Power Plant accident are potential sources of radioactive contamination 3

Potential Routes of Radiation Exposure or Radioactive Contamination During an Emergency 4

Federal Roles and Responsibilities During a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency Nuclear activities and post-accident liability are federally regulated, thus implicate the federal government from onset of an emergency Provinces have also pre-identified the need for federal assistance in responding to a nuclear emergency Additionally, the federal government is also responsible for: Areas of emergency response within its jurisdiction Liaising with the international community and coordinating international support to an emergency in Canada Liaising with diplomatic missions in Canada Assisting Canadians abroad and Coordinating the national response to a nuclear emergency occurring abroad 5

Federal Nuclear Emergency Plan (FNEP) These arrangements support governance/decision-making and provide technical assessment and operations to address radiological public health consequences The FNEP focuses on specific multi-organization governance and scientific/technical arrangements that supplement the existing all-hazards provisions of these documents in the event of a nuclear emergency 6 In a radiological / nuclear emergency, FNEP describes additional inter-departmental arrangements that will augment the “all-hazards Federal Emergency Response Plan (FERP) The FNEP (2012) describes the framework for coordinating scientific and technical resources to support the federal off-site response to significant nuclear emergencies, either in delivery of its responsibilities or in support of provincial/territorial actions

FNEP Technical Assessment Group (TAG) 7 The FNEP TAG is a multi-departmental group composed of scientific/technical experts from designated FNEP Government institutions, and is chaired by a senior technical expert The FNEP TAG : gathers data conducts assessments formulates science-based recommendations implements appropriate actions for the management of off-site radiological consequences (if required) and supports provinces and territories in accordance with the Provincial/Territorial Annexes of the FNEP Health Canada is the designated departmental lead of FNEP, and the Director of HC’s Radiation Protection Bureau acts as the FNEP TAG Chair. CFIA is a FNEP (and TAG) member department

FNEP Ontario Annex 8 FNEP Ontario Annex is intended to be the bridge between the FNEP and the [Ontario] Provincial Nuclear Emergency Response Plan (PNERP) Describes the points of interface between the technical federal, federal-regional and provincial governments Describes the technical and scientific resources and capabilities that can be provided to (and may be requested by) the Province during a response Contain lists of provincial response actions and corresponding FNEP-based ‘automatic triggers’ (if x, then y) o Annex to be signed by both Health Canada and Province of Ontario, rendering the Annex a “pre- arrangement” as defined under the federal Emergency Management Act 6(3) o Will allow expedited response arrangements to occur during an emergency

PEOC and PEOC Scientific Section During a nuclear emergency, the overall responsibility for the coordination of off-site emergency response rests with the Province of Ontario As the emergency unfolds, the Province will activate the Provincial Emergency Operations Centre (PEOC) and the PNERP and escalate the scale of response as appropriate The PEOC is managed through an Incident Management System, composed of distinct units (Command, Operations, Finance, Planning and the Scientific Section) The Scientific Section is responsible for: Guiding the overall scientific activities of the response Coordination the radiation monitoring and surveillance activities of the Environmental Radiation and Assurance Monitoring Group (ERAMG); a subgroup of the Scientific Section Analyzing the results of monitoring efforts and Providing recommendations on the adoption of protective and/or precautionary measures 9

10 The ERAMG is under the overall responsibility of the Ministry of Labour; but is considered to be co-led by the Ministry of Labour and Health Canada Both Provincial and Federal departments are members (including HC and CFIA) ERAMG includes the PEOC- based group and the Field- based group, which is further subdivided into: Field Survey Team Field Sampling Team Environmental Radiation and Assurance Monitoring Group (ERAMG)

ERAMG The ERAMG plans and conducts the radiation monitoring and surveillance activities in potentially affected areas surrounding the emergency site and throughout the province, that are necessary for the enactment/removal of protective and precautionary measures Goal of monitoring and surveillance: Confirm areas of safe agri-production through the sampling air, precipitation, water, milk and food 11

Protective Actions Protective Actions that may be enacted by the Province include: Shelter-in-place Evacuation Thyroid blocking (Potassium Iodide consumption) Use of Protective Equipment Food / water consumption controls Food / water consumption controls Crop / livestock / milk ingestion controls Crop / livestock / milk ingestion controls Decontamination If the emergency is severe, the Province may enact any of the actions listed above immediately. In that case, the protective and precautionary measures are referred to as default actions Protective Actions are recommended and enacted in specific sectors depending on accident modelling and progression Precautionary Actions include measures such as the closing of beaches, schools, institutions etc. 12

CFIA’s Role In a Nuclear Emergency  Emergency response and  Field response to support the province of Ontario.  Identify and communicate with CFIA stakeholders.  Conduct sampling of consumer foods, and agricultural products including animal feed for radioactive contamination. 13

CFIA’s Role In a Nuclear Emergency  Work with other Federal and Provincial authorities to undertake activities within their mandated areas to support the Environmental Radiation and Assurance Monitoring Group (ERAMG) and/or Technical Assessment Group (TAG) in evaluating food/feed/livestock hazards.  Provide sampling data to the TAG.  Work with Federal and Provincial authorities to implement protective measures for foods, plant products, animals and feed under federal jurisdiction. 14

15 CFIA Field Activities During a Nuclear or Radiation Emergency  Identify CFIA regulated/inspected establishments affected by emergency.  Communicate with CFIA regulated/inspected establishments.  Sample foodstuffs and animal feed within CFIA mandate at locations identified as safe to do so.  Control measures for affected product. Provide additional resources as required to support ERAMG,PEOC, NEOC

In The Field ERAMG Field Response Health Canada - MOL OMAFRA Field Response CFIA Field Response 16 ERAMG Scientific Section (PEOC)

17 Field Survey and Field Sampling Responsibilities of ERAMG

 Safe Food for Canadians Act  Food and Drugs Act  Agricultural Products Act  Dairy Products Regulations  Egg Regulations  Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Regulations  Honey Regulations  Maple Products Regulations  Processed Products Regulations  Feeds Act 18 Legislative Framework for Food Safety

19 Food Production Facilities Inspected by CFIA Federally Registered : Meat Processing and Slaughter Plants Dairy Product Facilities Honey/Maple Facilities  Egg Processing and Shell Egg Facilities  Processed Fruit and Vegetable Facilities  Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Packers/Exporters  Non-Registered Sector Food Facilities  CFIA also inspects registered animal feed mills

Control of Hazards  Licensing and Registration of Specified Food Production Facilities  Inspection and Investigation  Mandatory and Voluntary Recall of Foods  Authority to Sample  Power of Entry and Detention  Prosecution 20

Questions? 21

22