Design Exceptions 101 Ed Fischer, State Traffic-Roadway Engineer Mike Morrow, FHWA Field Operations Engineer Kent R. Belleque, Senior Interchange Engineer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Design Program Review Massachusetts Department of Transportation September 20-23, 2011.
Advertisements

OR 22 – Greenwood Road to Doaks Ferry Road Expressway Management Plan.
Corridor Management Strategies Pilot in Region 4 Findings and Recommendations Reported to HMT May 2013 By: Martin Matejsek, Laura Wipper, Steve Lindland.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM)
Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Rumble Strip(e) June 16, 2011 Simone Ardoin Assistant Road Design Engineer Administrator.
Design Exceptions and Risk Management (Tab 6). Roles and Responsibilities 2Design Exceptions and Risk Management At the end of this module, participants.
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
Flexibilities in VDOT’s Design Policies and Standards 2012.
1 C E T A S Range of Alternatives Presentation Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
LAND AREA: 688 SQ. MI. – 3RD LARGEST IN OHIO 421 C/L MILES 393 BRIDGES (275 NBIS) 1,800 CULVERTS 5,000+ SIGNS 10 RAILROAD CROSSINGS (at grade) CURRENT.
1 Context Sensitive Design A.K.A. The “Think” Method of Design Howard Preston, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineering CH2M HILL.
I-69 Strategic Planning Corridor Study: Fulton To Eddyville, KY Fulton, Hickman, Graves, Marshall, Livingston, Lyon Counties Public Meeting November 15,
AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Meeting June 10, 2004 NCHRP Project 3-69 Design of Construction Work Zones on High-Speed Highways Kevin M. Mahoney Penn State.
Enhanced Safety Prediction Methodology and Analysis Tool for Freeways and Interchanges James A. Bonneson August 2012 NCHRP Project
Caltrans Approval Process: Update Van Ness Avenue BRT Citizens Advisory Committee September 8 th, 2009.
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
Road Safety Audits Ghazwan al-Haji PhD student ”On whats goes wrong in road design and how to put it right safely”
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
Prepared for the Ottawa Region MISA Professional Network Centre - Summer 2006 Writing a Research Proposal for Funding An Overview.
Tender Packages (Consistency with Current Design Bulletins) Basic Knowledge for Roadway and Bridge Projects Seminar for CEA Members Edmonton February 12,
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 5 1 Module 5: CSS and Livability in Project Development.
Design Exceptions Presented by David Joe Polly PE, PLS, WRE Senior Standards Engineer Roadway Engineering Unit
“ROUNDABOUTS FIRST” POLICY IN NEW YORK STATE What is it and how did it get developed?
Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE). Outline  Background  ICE Process  Impacts  Current Status.
CAD Standards Presented by Gary Holeman PE Senior Design and Automation Engineer Roadway Engineering unit
SCOHTS Meeting Robert Pollack - FHWA April 28, 2010.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Safety Investment Program (SIP) Policies for Oregon Literature Review Findings.
Interchange Design Wes Mayberry Transportation Engineering Intern
Local Government Section
2009 ACEC/ODOT CONFERENCE ODOT’S 1R PROGRAM Liz Hunt, P.E. ODOT Pavement Services Engineer.
Project Scoping Fundamentals Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist Local Government Section April 6, 2010.
Presentation Topics Oregon Transportation Investment Acts (OTIA) Goals of Statewide Traffic Mobility Program Focus of ODOT’s Mobility Approaches Results.
Incorporating Safety into Design CE 453 – Highway Design October 2, 2006 Jerry Roche, P.E. Transportation Safety Engineer FHWA – Iowa Division Federal.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Lesson 13 (Some of these pictures show bicyclists not wearing.
1 C E T A S Purpose and Need Presentation Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
1 C E T A S Triage Presentation, Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
DR O.S ABIOLA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA. CVE 505 HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I.
2009 ROADWAY CONFERENCE 1R PROGRAM Cathy Nelson Steven Lindland.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
Quantitative Safety Information and Project Development Session 8 Policy Level Issues Related to Safety Timothy Neuman, PE Chief Highway Engineer CH2M.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Recent Guideline Changes 1 Recent AT Guideline Changes Existing Documents New Technical Documents Bridge Structure Design Criteria Bridge Design Bulletins.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Project Development Process Dave Holstein Office of Roadway Engineering.
Positive Guidance Principles. Positive guidance concept - Provide drivers sufficient information about roadway design, operations, and potential hazards.
Module 2-1 The Foundation For Road Safety Management Policy History and Institutional Structures of Road Safety Management Think about it …
Walking is for Everyone Ensuring Access for All Walking Summit October 29, 2015.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
An Introduction to Contracts and Design Guides Presented by: David Lake, P.E. Roadway Designer Nevada Department of Transportation.
Highway Infrastructure and Operations Safety Research Needs (NCHRP 17-48) Prime Contractor: UNC Highway Safety Research Center Subcontractors: VHB Jim.
HSIS Annual Meeting October 2011 FHWA Office of Safety Data Support.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
Edward L. Fischer P.E..  Ed, it was hard to read slides from back of room with this background.  Can I change it? Nancy Brickman.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
Change Orders on Federal-aid Highway Construction Projects Bren George-Nwabugwu (FHWA) ; (317)
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Access Management Training Brooke White, Access Management Engineer.
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
Geometric Design Strategic Research Program Transportation Research Board AFB10 Geometric Design Committee Brian L. Ray, PE Committee Chair July 27, 2010.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
Project Management Team Meeting #3
Importance of Geometric Design
Technical Committee on Geometric Design
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Design Criteria CTC 440.
School of Civil Engineering
Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Limit Practices
Presentation transcript:

Design Exceptions 101 Ed Fischer, State Traffic-Roadway Engineer Mike Morrow, FHWA Field Operations Engineer Kent R. Belleque, Senior Interchange Engineer

Items to Cover Today Design Exception Background Key Items in Design Exceptions –Timelines –Evaluation Criteria –Justification –Helpful Tools Planning Level Design Exceptions Case Studies (Helpful Hints) Expectations from Ed and Mike Q & A

Chief Engineer’s Role Authority for Design Standards Outlined in Title 23 CFR 625 Oregon Highway Design Manual (HDM) Approval of Exceptions to Standards Delegated to State Roadway Engineer Contact with FHWA on Process

Expectations from ODOT Provide Enough Information that Convinces the Reviewer to Approve not Achieving the Standard Can we get to Yes?

When Should the Process Begin? Start Discussion ASAP with ODOT Allow Sufficient Time for Review May also Require Approval by FHWA Insufficient Data will Require More Time

What Should be Included? General Discussion on the Design Exception Evaluation of the Exception Justification Review and Approval (Tech Center and FHWA Level)

Areas of Special Note Vertical Clearance and Motor Carrier Contact

Areas of Special Note 3R- Roadside Design- Region

Areas of Special Note Form has been updated –Top 10% SPIS –Interchange Spacing

Other Available Tools Highway Safety Analysis Tools – ROADWAY/highway_safety.shtmlhttp:// ROADWAY/highway_safety.shtml –Crash Data –SPIS/SIP –Crash Reduction Factors

Flexibility in Design-FHWA Design Exceptions –Consideration of Safety and Operations –Consideration of Crash History and Roadway Character –Cost to Attain Full Standard and Impact on Environmental Features –Degree of Reduction Impact on other Standards Mitigation

Flexibility in Design-AASHTO Similar to FHWA Guidance –Proper Justification –Crash analysis, Rationale for Exception Stresses Importance of Documentation

Flexibility in Design- 1R and SF TRB Special Report R Practices 1R and Single Function Impact on Design Exceptions?????

Design Exceptions on a National Level Dealing with Same Issues as ODOT –Why are Design Exceptions Done? 42%- Reduces Liability 40%- Design Exception Documentation Number of Exceptions Varies

NCHRP Synthesis 316 Type of Exceptions Similar

Planning Design Exceptions Planning Studies Need to Follow Design Standards –Design Elements Need to Meet Standard or Get an Exception –If Elements are Unknown, don't Show Specific Dimensions Timing of Planning Design Exceptions –Construction in 5 years-Process the Exception Before Putting in Planning Document –Construction in 5-10 years-Submit Draft Design Exception and Obtain Written Indication of Approval/Denial

Non-Design Exceptions Issues PLA01-Review Process for Design Concepts on ORS Routes –Vehicle Carrying Capacity and Lane Reductions

Tech Services- To Do List Design Speed Horizontal and Vertical Angle Points 3R- Criteria A & B Others??

Real Life Examples: Case 1 Specifically it is requested that the following design features not be further evaluated: horizontal alignment, vertical alignment, grades, lane width, shoulder width, bridge width and the correction of deficient bridge rails and missing ADA sidewalk features, roadway cross slopes, cut/fill/ditch slopes, access, and clear zone.

Case 2: Reasons for Not Attaining Standard

The Request: Case 3

Case 3 (Continued)

The Request: Case 4

Items to Remember Look at Crash Data Number and Type of Exceptions Cost by Itself is not a Good Justification Look for Ways to Mitigate –Striping –Signing –Illumination

Items to Remember Identify Design Exceptions ASAP Work with Design Exception Review Team in Salem –Christopher Henson Rural Roadway Engineer –Rich Crossler-Laird Urban Roadway Engineer –Kent Belleque Interchange Engineer –Dan MacDonald Roadside Safety Engineer –Dave Polly Standards Engineer –And Others Allow Sufficient Time for Processing

Web Page Links Design Exceptions – design_exceptions.shtmlhttp://egov.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/ENGSERVICES/ design_exceptions.shtml –Request Form Instructions –Required Signatures Technical Bulletins – tech_bulletin.shtml

Comments from ODOT and FHWA Ed Fischer and Mike Morrow Q and A