Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Limit Practices

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Limit Practices"— Presentation transcript:

1 Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Limit Practices
Research conducted by: Kay Fitzpatrick, Marcus Brewer, and Others

2 “Famous” Quote “Finally I passed a road sign that read, WELCOME TO TEXAS – DRIVE FRIENDLY.” “Was it my imagination, or did everyone on the road suddenly start driving faster?” - Joan Bauer, Rules of the Road

3 Today’s Presentation Material primarily from NCHRP projects
Design speed – definition and selection Influences on operating speed Setting of posted speed limits Development of criteria for higher design speeds

4 What is the Relationship?
Operating Speed Design Speed Posted Speed

5 Relationships Operating Speed Posted Speed Design Speed

6 Relationships Operating Speed Design Speed Posted Speed

7 Design Speed

8 Design Speed Examples of Where Used
Stopping sight distance Horizontal curves and superelevation Vertical grades and curves Ramp acceleration and deceleration lane lengths Roadside treatments

9 Design Speed Definition
Original definition “…the maximum approximately uniform speed which probably will be adopted by the faster group of drivers but not, necessarily, by the small percentage of reckless ones.” -1938 AASHO

10 Design Speed Definition
Previous definition “…the maximum safe speed that can be maintained over a specified section of highway when conditions are so favorable that the design features of the highway govern.” -1994 Green Book, p. 62

11 Design Speed Definition
Current definition (for now…) “…a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of the roadway.” -2004 Green Book, p. 67 -2011 Green Book, p. 2-54

12 What’s the Design Speed?

13 Design Speed Assumed Relationship to Running Speed Note: Has Been Eliminated for Selected Criteria
Values from 2004 GB

14

15 Design Speed Relationships
Research has found 85th percentile speeds > design speed Large majority of drivers = reasonable and prudent Therefore - associated risk not excessive (even when higher than design speed) for typical situations

16 Design Speed AASHTO Policy on Selection
“Except for local streets where speed controls are frequently included intentionally, every effort should be made to use as high a design speed as practical to attain a desired degree of safety, mobility, and efficiency within the constraints of environmental quality, economics, aesthetics, and social or political impacts.” -2004 Green Book, p. 67

17 Design Speed AASHTO Policy on Selection
“The selected design speed should be a logical one with respect to the topography, anticipated operating speed, the adjacent land use, and the functional class of the highway. In selection of design speed, every effort should be made to attain a desired combination of safety, mobility, and efficiency within the constraints of environmental quality, economics, aesthetics, and social or political impacts.” -2011 Green Book, p. 2-54

18 Design Speed AASHTO Policy on Selection
Functional classification Rural versus urban Terrain type “Some design features, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance, are directly related to, and vary appreciably with, design speed. Other features, such as widths of lanes and shoulders and clearances to walls and rails, are not directly related to design speed, but they do affect vehicle speeds.” -2011 Green Book, p. 2-55

19 Design Speed Selection United States Practices – NCHRP 504
Mailout Survey “What factors are considered when selecting a design speed for a new road?” 40 states responded Answers could be distributed over a range of approaches

20 Design Speed Selection States Using An Approach
(max 40) % Functional classification 36 90 Legal speed limit (+ value) 23 58 Traffic volume 15 38 Anticipated operating speed Terrain 7 18

21 Influences on Operating Speed

22 Influences on Operating Speed Field Studies
79 tangent sites, most suburban/urban Sites not near signals or horizontal curves (elements known to influence operating speed) Free-flow speed measured with lidar Roadway and roadside characteristics

23 Influences on Operating Speed Findings
15 30 45 60 Posted Speed Limit (mph) 85th %-lie Speed (mph) Local Collectors Arterial, C&G Arterial, Shoulder SL = 85th

24 Influences on Operating Speed Findings
20 40 60 80 100 10 30 50 70 Cumulative Dist (%) Arterials, 69 sites Collectors, 20 sites Locals, 13 sites 85th %-ile Speed (mph)

25 Influences on Operating Speed Findings
75 Local Collectors 60 Arterial, C&G Arterial, Shoulders 45 85th %-ile Speed (mph) 30 15 30 60 90 120 150 180 Access Density (pts/mi)

26 Influences on Operating Speed Findings
Est. 85th = Intercept + Posted Speed Limit Intercept Ro2 All Roadways 7.675 0.980 0.90 Suburban/Urban Arterial 8.666 0.963 0.86 Suburban/Urban Collector 21.131 0.639 0.41 Suburban/Urban Local 10.315 0.776 0.14 Rural Arterial 36.453 0.517 0.81

27 Influences on Operating Speed Recommendations
Several variables show influences: Access density Pedestrian activity Absence of centerline or edge line markings On-street parking Median presence Additional data needed

28 Setting of Posted Speed Limits

29 Posted Speed Limits MUTCD Guidelines
Within 5 mph of 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic Road characteristics Speed pace Roadside development Parking practices Reported crash experiences

30 Posted Speed Limits Results from ITE Survey
85th percentile speed  predominant factor Roadway geometry Roadside development Crash experiences Political pressure

31 Posted Speed Limit Rural Roads
Source Functional Class Vehicle Percentile (%) When Speed = Sites Posted + 5 mph + 10 mph NCHRP Rural, Arterial 37 / 48* 70 91 9 FHWA Rural, Minor Arterial 59 87 99 Rural, Principal Arterial 72 90 98 36 Rural 64 86 97 126

32 Posted Speed Limit Rural Roads
(mph) Vehicle Percentile (%) When Speed = Sites Posted + 5 mph + 10 mph 50 81 99 100 12 55 61 85 96 151 60 91 95 98 8 65 59 89 2 70 64

33 Posted Speed Limit Suburban/Urban Roads
Source Functional Class Vehicle Percentile (%) When Speed = Sites Posted + 5 mph + 10 mph TxDOT Suburban/Urban Arterial 32 69 91 35 NCHRP 92 Suburban/Urban Collector 23 57 86 22 Suburban/Urban Local 52 83 96 13

34 Posted Speed Limit Suburban/Urban Roads
Vehicle Percentile (%) When Speed = Sites Posted + 5 mph + 10 mph 25 42 77 94 7 30 28 64 86 35 22 62 90 19 40 32 68 92 45 37 70 15 50 43 76 95 9

35 Operating and Posted Speed Summary of Field Study Findings
Previous findings: 85th %-ile speed exceeds posted 50th %-ile speed near posted NCHRP/other studies: Rural: 37 to 72% at posted speed Suburban/urban: 32 to 52% at posted

36 Posted Speed Limit Zoning Reports
ITE TENC Committee 97-12 Request “speed zoning investigations your agency has recently conducted” 256 reports received 128 contained both 85th percentile speed value and speed limit recommendation

37 Posted Speed Limit Findings from ITE Survey

38 Posted Speed Limit Difference in Measured and Recommended

39 Posted Speed Limit Speed Zone Studies
128 speed zone studies  10% rounded up and 31% rounded to nearest 5 mph 25 50 75 100 -5 5 10 15 20 Cumulative Frequency Diff (85th – Recom SL)

40 Posted Speed Limit Comments
85th percentile speed is a “starting point” Encourage changes in how speed limits are set?

41 Posted Speed Limit Enforcement is Key!

42 Questions?


Download ppt "Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Limit Practices"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google