MAVEN CDR May 23-25, 2011 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Environmental Review May 22 -23, 2012 Flight Software Peter R. Harvey Mars Atmosphere and Volatile.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PFP IPDR 2010/6/ Particles and Fields Package (PFP) GSE Timothy Quinn.
Advertisements

GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
Instrument TrainingIDPU - 1 UCB, Dec 6, 2006 THEMIS INSTRUMENT TRAINING IDPU.
1 PFP MSR, 8/21/2012 Particles and Fields Package Monthly Status Review (MSR) August 21, 2012 Dave Curtis, PFP PM.
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS ICU/FSW Peter R. Harvey Dorothy Gordon –ICU Will Rachelson – FSW Dec 1, 2012.
SwRR 4/28/ Telecon MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Requirements Review SwRR Peter R. Harvey April 28, 2010.
AT91RM9200 Boot strategies This training module describes the boot strategies on the AT91RM9200 including the internal Boot ROM and the U-Boot program.
18-1 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Environmental Review May , Package Dave Curtis, PFP Package Manager Mars.
1 PFP MSR, 11/17/2009 Particles and Fields Package Monthly Status Review (MSR) November 17, 2009 Dave Curtis, PFP PM.
Barbara PlanteFIELDS iPDR – DCB Flight Software Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument PDR DCB Flight Software Barbara Plante UC Berkeley SSL
D. GordonFIELDS iCDR – DCB Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR DCB Dorothy Gordon Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley 1.
25-1 MAVEN IPSR October 30,31, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Ship Review October 30,31, : SMA Jorg Fischer, MAM Mars Atmosphere and Volatile.
TIM Phase A 1 SSL, 8/15/2007 Electric Field and Waves Instrument (EFW) Technical Interchange Meeting EFW Digital Electronics Digital Control Board (DCB)
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
1Sep 30-Oct 1, 2009EFW I-CDR Instrument Critical Design Review EFW Flight Software Peter R. Harvey 2009 Aug 31 RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation.
21-1 MAVEN IPSR October 30,31, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Ship Review October 30,31, : Flight Software Peter R Harvey Mars Atmosphere.
10c-1 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Environmental Review May , c - Board Analysis Update Christopher Smith Mars.
24-1 MAVEN IPSR October 30,31, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Ship Review October 30,31, : ATLO Support Dave Curtis Mars Atmosphere and Volatile.
THEMIS IDPU FSW 11/29/ UCB THEMIS IDPU FSW V4 Mission Profile Tests Peter Harvey Michael Ludlam.
MAVEN CDR May 23-25, 2011 Particles and Fields Package Critical Design Review May , 2011 Integration and Test Dave Curtis PFP Package Manager Mars.
Control & Data Handling, Operator Control, Aircraft Interface to C&DH Steve Musko Space Physics Research Laboratory University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI.
Flight Software Overview
GoetzPre-PDR Peer Review October 2013 FIELDS TDS FPGA Peer Review Keith Goetz University of Minnesota 1.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes 12/25/20151 Flight Software Template for Instrument Critical Design Review Gary M. Heiligman.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Systems Engineering Mike DeKlotz GSFC Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large.
Test Plan: Introduction o Primary focus: developer testing –Implementation phase –Release testing –Maintenance and enhancement o Secondary focus: formal.
Status 1 Telecon MAVEN PFFSW STATUS 8/14/2012 Conf: #
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Flight Software Summary Peter Harvey Space Sciences.
10-1 MAVEN IPSR October 30,31, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Ship Review October 30,31, : EMC Dave Curtis Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN.
Pre-PDR Peer Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Peer Review Requirements Definition Peter R. Harvey May 12, 2010.
HarveyFIELDS iCDR – Flight Software Solar Probe Plus FIELDS DCB FSW Requirements Peter Harvey University of California 1.
MAVEN Archive Overview J. Mafi PDSMC Face-to-Face Berkeley, California 18 November 2014.
Timothy QuinnFIELDS SOC CDR – CTG Solar Probe Plus FIELDS SOC CDR Command, Telemetry, and Ground Support (CTG) Timothy Quinn UCB 1.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
GoetzPre-PDR Peer Review October 2013 FIELDS Time Domain Sampler Peer Review Keith Goetz University of Minnesota 1.
13-1 MAVEN PFP ICDR, May 23 – 25, 2011 Particles and Fields Package Critical Design Review May , 2011 GSE Timothy Quinn.
4-1 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Environmental Review May , Verification Dave Curtis, PFP Package Manager.
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS MAG Peter Harvey. MAG FSW Requirements.
HarveyFIELDS iCDR – Flight Software Solar Probe Plus FIELDS DCB Flight Software Design Peter Harvey University of California 1.
11-1 MAVEN PFP ICDR May 23-25, 2011 PF Flight Software Critical Design Review May , 2011 Peter R Harvey Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN)
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR FSW Overview Sergio Maldonado FSW Test Team Lead Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
1 PFP Team Meeting Particles and Fields Package Weekly Team Meeting, SSL April Dave Curtis, PFP PM.
THEMIS Instrument PDR 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 ESA & SST (ETC) Interface Board Preliminary Design Review Robert Abiad University of California - Berkeley.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Systems Engineering Michael Ludlam Space Sciences.
THEMIS CDR 1 UCB, June 16, 2004 ESA & SST (ETC) Interface Board Critical Design Review Robert Abiad University of California - Berkeley.
THEMIS Instrument CDR 1 UCB, April 20, 2004 ESA & SST (ETC) Interface Board Critical Design Review Robert Abiad University of California - Berkeley.
20-1 MAVEN iPSR Oct 30-31, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Ship Review October 30-31, PFDPU D. Gordon, W. Donakowski & PFDPU Team Mars.
TRIO-CINEMA C&DH- 1 KHU, 10/19/2009 Command & Data Handling System (C&DH) Peter Harvey David Curtis David McGrogan Space Sciences Laboratory University.
1 PFP IPDR 2010/6/ Particles and Fields Package (PFP) Instrument Preliminary Design Review Integration & Test David Curtis, PF Package Manager.
Pre-PDR Peer Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Peer Review RFAs and Recommendations Peter R. Harvey.
Acceptance Test Readiness Review
Operational Flight Software
Operational Flight Software
Adopting the Python language for On-board Programmable Payload Autonomy Steven Doran 2016 Flight Software Workshop 12/14/2016.
Simulink Interface Layer (SIL)
Working with MAVEN Data
Particles and Fields Package (PFP) SWEA Pre-CDR Peer Review
Command & Data Handling
Critical Design Review
University of California - Berkeley
cFE FSW at APL & FSW Reusability
I&T&C Organization Chart
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS
Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission
THEMIS FM4/FM5 INSTRUMENT SUITE
Acceptance Test Review
AT91RM9200 Boot strategies This training module describes the boot strategies on the AT91RM9200 including the internal Boot ROM and the U-Boot program.
CubeSat vs. Science Instrument Complexity
Integration & Test Instrument Operations Coordination
Presentation transcript:

MAVEN CDR May 23-25, 2011 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Environmental Review May , 2012 Flight Software Peter R. Harvey Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission

1-2 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Agenda PER Requirements Development Plan & Status Verification Status IV&V Status Design Overview Central Processor Utilization EEPROM Utilization Memory Utilization and Track Remaining Work

1-3 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 PER Requirements Note: There are no NHB 7150 requirements for FSW PER

1-4 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Software Development Plan Software Products: Boot FSW (PROM) Build1 : Support ETU DCB Test, S/C Interface tests Build2 : Updated, Built for Flight Unit PROM Operational FSW (EEPROM) Build1 : Support S/C Interface, ETU Instrument I&T  Build2 : Support Storage Capabilities, Onboard Data Processing, FLT I&T  Build3 : Updated, Built for Flight EEPROM Command and Telemetry Database Table Load Scripts  FSW Test Scripts

1-5 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Software Development Status Operational FSW Development -210 Requirements -18 require inspection Requirements in flux -218 changes (Level 5) - 83 changes since CDR Boot FSW Development -68 Requirements -8 required inspection

1-6 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Software Verification Status Other Tests/Environments BOOT BUILD2 CPT on DVF BOOT BUILD2 & OPERATIONAL BUILD1 I&T of all ETU Instruments LPW SEP MAG SWEA SWIA STATIC PFDPU – S/C ETU Test at LM PF High Fidelity Simulator to LM Test Bed  OPERATIONAL BUILD2 PF FLT I&T of Instruments  OPERATIONAL BUILD3 Development  Long Duration & CPT on PFDPU ETU

1-7 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 IV&V Status Action Items Remaining 3 Severity 2 Issues (SEP, EUV, HV safing reqmt not found) 5 Severity 3 Issues (SEP, EUV, HV, EEPROM, I/F detail suggested) 1 Severity 4 Issue (Incorrect parent reqmt) FSW completed all Action Items, Awaiting IV&V concurrence Impacts to Requirements = 4 additional Level 5, 2 additional Level 4 No impact to FSW implementation

1-8 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 FSW Design Overview Development Plan : MAVEN_PF_SYS_008A Processor : 16 MHz Coldfire IP Memory : 32K PROM, 256K EEPROM, 3 MB SRAM, 8 GB Flash Language: C Deliveries: Boot, Operational, HFS Requirements: 66 (Boot), 210 (Operational) SLOC : ~3777 in 11 modules (Boot), ~14500 in 19 modules (Op) Test Platform: DVF (Development and Verification Facility) Major Functional Requirements: – Command Reception & Distribution – Engineering Housekeeping Telemetry – On-Board Limit Monitoring, Fault Response – Relative Time Command Sequences – Real-Time Data Collection and Playback – Archive Data Collection and Playback – Data Compression – High Voltage Controls – Attenuator Controls – Controllers for Six Science Instruments – Fault Protection

1-9 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 CPU Utilization

1-10 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 EEPROM Utilization

1-11 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 SRAM Utilization

1-12 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Memory Utilization Simplified NVM to use EEPROM only (no FLASH required).

1-13 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Memory Track PROM Functions Boot Software V1.3 EEPROM Load Uplink Support EEPROM Operational Software V 2.0+ Instrument Drivers Instrument LookUp Tables Relative Time Sequences of commands Limit Monitor Database RESOURCE NEEDS 43% PROM 44% RAM 75% EEPROM 0% LUTs stored in FLASH

1-14 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Work Remaining FSW Development Remaining GSEOS Development Remaining  Instrument simulation on ETU (MAG2, SEP2)  Instrument ETU’s integrated into PF ETU  Limit checking instrument housekeeping  I&T Test Scripts, DCB Test Scripts  FSW Test Scripts for Operational verification  DeCompression Software

1-15 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Backup Backup Slides

1-16 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Orbit Test Sequence

1-17 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Orbit Test Sequence

1-18 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Long Duration Stress Test (72 Hr) High Rate of Commands –Command Pass Simulation Every Hour –Memory Load – Uplink of RTS Database (16KB) –Serial Commands – 1kbps for 60 seconds –Memory Dump RTS Database –Simultaneously Executing RTS and Verifying Results High Rate of Telemetry –Continuous Telemetry at 200% nominal (10 Kbps) –Real Time 200% (5 Kbps) –Burst 200% (5 Kbps) CPU Intensive Processing –Moment maximum rate (4 second period) –Magnetic maximum rate (1 second period) –STATIC maximum rate ( 4 second period) –Data Compression Enabled on All Available Packets –SRAM Memory Scrubbing Enabled –Fault maximum rate (4 second period) Verification –Test Status Logged Every Hour (72 reports) –No Errors in FSW or GSE

1-19 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Boot RTS Boot RTS has 5 RTS Sequences defined of 32 possible. RTS is loaded with the program. All RTS can run simultaneously. Commands executed at 4 Hz. RTS are variable length. Each can be enabled/disabled.

1-20 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Operational RTS Operational RTS has 41 RTS Sequences allocated of 64 possible. RTS database is stored in EEPROM.

1-21 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Command/Eng APIDs

1-22 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Science APIDs

1-23 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Science APIDs

1-24 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Science APIDs

1-25 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Data Compression Count Compression Four scales required {19-to-8, 26-to-8, tbd, tbd} Standard lossy encoding Offscale limit checking CPU Use: ~5-6% MAG Delta-Modulator Implemented by GSFC request Compresses 32x3 to 64x3 (8-bit delta) Packet Size is Constant Packet Period changes 19-to-8 encoding

1-26 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Data Compression SPD Compression Spec’d by D. Curtis Modified Huffman encoding 4 encodings attempted Best-of-4 applied Packet compressed at TM Real-time rate req’d

1-27 MAVEN IPER May 22-23, 2012 Software Deliverable Schedule Deliverables (src:MAVEN-SYS-PLAN-0020 rev B) Operational FSW BUILD3 ATRR, CPT, ATR and AR expected in summer 2012