The IPPC Directive and EPER Iksan van der Putte. Objectives of IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) To prevent or minimise emissions To.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pollutant Emissions to Water E-PRTR Reporting requirements Thematic Eionet Workshop 11 September 2008.
Advertisements

© European Communities, 2007 Purpose The European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Bureau (European IPPC Bureau) of the JRC/IPTS was set up.
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES OF STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS.
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES of STANDARD MINIMUM EMISSION STANDARD (sometimes known as LIMIT VALUES) UNIFORM EMISSION STANDARD.
IPPC and Industry By Dr. Ken Macken Dublin Regional Licensing Manager.
Industrial Pollution Control and Risk Management: IPPC Neil Emmott Environment Directorate-General 7 April 2006.
BULGARIAN COMPETENT AUTHORITIES IN THE FIELD OF IPPC Kalin Iliev Ministry of Environment and Water Bulgaria.
Consolidation of he Environmental Monitoring System in Albania (CEMSA) An EU-funded project managed by the Delegation of the European Commission to Albania.
Substantive environmental provisions Prof. Gyula Bándi.
Hellenic Ministry for the Environment, Spatial Planning and Public Works Greek Experience on the Implementation of EPER REPORTING IN GREECE Η ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ.
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, Marine and Soil EU Substitution Conference - Hamburg, 13/14 June 2002 Slide 1 EU Conference on Substitution.
The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.
Workshop Inspire MIG-P/MSCPs and Reporting under environmental aquis January 2015 JRC Ispra Andreas Grangler DG Environment Unit C.3 – Air & Industrial.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
Integrated Control of Industrial and Chemical Substances in Cyprus Integrated Control of Industrial and Chemical Substances in Cyprus Final Conference.
1 NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS (NTUA) School of Chemical Engineering Unit of Environmental Science and Technology (UEST) Katherine Haralambous.
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
BAT as a main tool for minimisation of the negative impact of industrial activities Aivi Sissa Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
The Sevilla process for supporting the implementation of the IPPC Directive Michael Parth Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
Scope of the Protocol on PRTR Jan Maršák, Ph.D. IPPC and PRTR Unit Ministry of the Environment Czech Republic Regional UN ECE Workshop Minsk, Belarus,
Workshop, 12/3/2004 Banska Bystrica – SLOVAC REPUBLIC “INTEGRATED LICENCE PROCEDURE (Greek case)” Katerina Iakovidou-Anastasiadou Hellenic Ministry for.
PRTR-online survey. Questions – Items Question 3 – Item 2.
Current state on Harmonisation and Implementation/Enforcement of Environmental Legislation - Industrial Pollution Control in SLOVENIA Barbara Bernard Ministry.
Economic and Cross Media aspects Bo Jansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
IPPC Directive state of play and future developements
Emission control in Bulgaria The involved institutions at national and local (sub-national) levels in Emissions inventory are Ministry of Environment.
EPER reporting process in Hungary with emphasis on the experiences Edina Gampel Counsellor National Inspectorate for Environment, Nature and Water Budapest,
The IPPC Directive and its implementation Alexandre Paquot European Commission Environment Directorate-General Phare Capacity.
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
From EPER to E-PRTR EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
ROMANIA INTEGRATED POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL - IPPC MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER MANAGEMENT PRAHA June 2004 Iuliana Chidu EU Counsellor.
Compilation of emission inventories The situation in the Netherlands Special Session of the UNCEEA on Climate Change (New York, 25 June afternoon)
Pollutants in Europe: what, where and how much European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Data 11 th May 2010.
The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.
Challenges of developing national capacity for PRTR systems in Central and Eastern Europe Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program June 2004.
IPPC vs Emissions Trading Lesley James Friends of the Earth (England, Wales & N.Ireland) and the European Environmental Bureau.
1 Review of the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directives Marianne Wenning DG ENV, Head of Unit,
The legal background for implementing the IPPC, EPER, and PRTR Protocol Requirements Orsolya Adamovics Department for Conservation of Environment Ministry.
Strengths and weaknesses of the permitting system and enforcement process in RIEW – Veliko Turnovo Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Water - Veliko.
Industry environmental self- monitoring and reporting UK experience with reference to the Pollution Inventory Dr Ian Whitwell The Environment Agency of.
Iuliana CHIDU European integration counsellor Ministry of Environment and Water Management Prague - CZECH REPUBLIC April 2005 DIRECTIVE 96/61/EC.
How to start with the implementation of IPPC Directive Czech Republic Czech Environmetal Inspectorate.
| Folie | Folie 2 Reporting according to pollution registers Experiences in Austria Mag. Daniela Wappel.
Page 1 Annexes of the Directive 96/61/ES on IPPC Agency on Integrated Prevention Ms. Lucie Svobodová Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental.
1 Short overview of the implementation of IPPC, LCP, Seveso II, Waste Landfill and Incineration directives Short overview of the implementation of IPPC,
CROATIA Country Report IPPC Directive: implementation, problems, constraints, open questions,… Anita Pokrovac Patekar, B. Sc. Pharm. Ministry of Environmental.
The current legal situation
1 Review of the IPPC Directive and related legislation Second Meeting Of Working Group E On Priority Substances 17 October 2007 Filip FRANCOIS – DG ENV.
Creating the environment for business Assessment of the Implementation by the Member States of the IPPC Directive Advisory Group Meeting Friday 13 th January.
Workshop on Introducing integrated pollution control system – Kiev, 25 – 26 January, European IPPC Bureau Main conditions for forming the integrated.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 1 The IPPC Directive Introduction to the philosophy Rob Kramers.
IPPC A general overview Nigel Barraclough Policy Adviser Industrial Pollution Control Branch Air and Environment Quality Division. Taiwanese Environmental.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
Introduction to the philosophy
BMRA Legislative Policy Group – Shredder Sub Group
The Italian PRTR Andrea Gagna
BAT - BREF Their scope Rob Kramers Senior advisor InfoMil.
Annexes of the Directive 96/61/ES on IPPC
INTEGRATED PERMITTING IPPC DIRECTIVE: BEST PRACTICE
Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Experience in the UK in implementing E-PRTR and Data Validation
E-PRTR Regulation PRTR Protocol
Aleksandra Antonowicz Green Federation GAJA/CCB
IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing
EPER European Pollutant Emission Register
Quality aspects of EPER
Industrial Emissions Directive Targeted stakeholder survey
WFD CIS Working Group Meeting Brussels, 4/4/2019
Presentation transcript:

The IPPC Directive and EPER Iksan van der Putte

Objectives of IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) To prevent or minimise emissions To provide a high level of environmental protection for the environment as a whole To minimise the consumption of raw material and energy To simplify and strengthen the role of the Control Authorities

The IPPC Licensing System controls –Effluent discharge –Emissions to air –Waste management –Noise –Related activities from Specified Activities with

IPPC: Integrated stand for Individual balance of cost and benefit. All aspect in one permit. IPPC: Pollution is all that may be harmful to human health and to the quality of the environment. Include Energy consumption and waste production => BAT shall be use to prevent Pollution but also to conservation of energy and waste minimization IPPC: Prevention comes before control (can take more time) IPPC free interpretation !

Air Land/ soil Water Energy efficiency Raw materials Waste Generation Noise integrated approach Prevention of Accident

… and restoration of the site upon closure. integrated approach

Best Available Techniques (BAT) means... Best= Most effective and advanced Available = Commercially available and demonstrated Techniques = Technology and operating practices/management to reduce impact on the environment as a whole

ESTABLISHING Best Available Techniques (BAT) The ‘competent body’ / environmental regulator in Member States i.e. determined for specific installations according sector and local issues you will get different BATs in different places and different countries there is no ‘single’ BAT for a certain type of industrial activity

Issues considered in identifying BAT (a balanced judgment) Identification of BAT Costs and benefits of measure Achievable emissions Environmental impacts – air, land, water BREF’s Energy use Technical reliability Installation time

Use of BAT in IPPC IPPC Permit Emission limit value & other conditions Level of control achievable by BAT Other issues: - local environment - geographic location - technical characteristics EQS

IPPC Licensing applies to these sectors Energy Industries Production and Processing of Metals Mineral Industry Chemical Production Waste Management Other Activities (but excluding Nuclear) The Directive lists the activities covered by IPPC under 6 main headings and 31 sub-categories (Annex I) Total 56 industrial activities

“Other Activities” includes... Pulp, Paper, Timber Dyeing of Textiles Tanneries Slaughterhouses Food Processing Milk processing Disposal of dead Animals Intensive rearing of Poultry and Pigs Use of Solvents for surface treatment Manufacture of Carbon

Some categories include activities of all sizes e.g. Manufacture of Fertilisers Other categories have specified thresholds e.g. Slaughterhouses with a throughput exceeding 50 t/d Does IPPC apply to all sizes of enterprise?

What is a PER? An integrated database with emission data or pollutant releases associated from identified facilities which is accessible to the public EPER: European Pollutant Emission Register

IPPC Directive - Article15 (3) Article 15 (3) states:- “An inventory of the principal emissions and sources responsible shall be published every three years by the Commission on the basis of the data supplied by the Member States. …………………….”

PER - Commission Decision Commission Decision 2000/479/EC detailed the measures Member States must take to implement Article 15 (3) of the IPPC Directive.

Requirements The Decision requires Member States to supply data about IPPC facilities (every 3 years) under the following headings: Releases Time Pollutants (above a threshold) Sources Locations

Releases The report must include the direct releases to air and water as well as the indirect release by transfer to an off-site wastewater treatment plant; Releases to land or groundwater, transfers of waste and on-site transfers are not included..

Time The release year will make it possible to follow trends and analyse emission reductions as a result of the achievement of industrial sectors; The EPER has started in 2003 with a reporting frequency of 3 years.

Pollutants The emission data must be reported for a list of 50 pollutants (chemicals or groups of chemicals), of which 37 substances for air and 26 for water, Waste is excluded from the reporting obligations.

Sources The emissions of about 20,000 individual facilities covered by the IPPC Directive must be reported together with an identification code of the industrial sector, so that the data can be aggregated and compared for both sectors and countries.

Locations The site of the facility must be identified geographically, so the data can be used for modeling and calculations of the concentrations in ambient air

Objectives There are several objectives of a PER. Some the key ones being: provides data to aid governments in developing environmental policy; it is a public instrument for governments to monitor environmental policies; a tool to enhance public awareness of environmental pollution.

Benefits A PER can have several benefits: harmonises reporting requirements and avoids duplicate reporting by industry; provides additional information to prioritise enforcement of permit compliance; it enables facilities to compare their performance with similar facilities.

EU Goals The goals of the EPER (from the Commissions point of view) are related to different groups of users: Government Public Industry

Selected Pollutants The selection criteria for putting substances into Annex 3 (of the Decision) were based on the environmental significance of the pollutants and are as follows: considering the Annex III list of the Directive and making a differentiation between air & water; pollutants for which international reporting requirements already exist; having both individual chemicals and groups; including pollutants for both air and water.

Quality Quality Assurance: responsibility of Government & Reporting Industries; Quality Control: responsibility of Government. Quality of reported data is the accumulated result of the following aspects: Timeliness; Completeness; Uncertainty; Comparability; Consistency; and Transparency.

Determination Methodologies The EPER database indicates for each data set what methodology was used to determine the emission data. These are: M=measured using standardised or accepted methods; C=based on nationally orinternationally accepted estimation methods; E=based on non-standardised estimations or expert guesses

Timetable The timetable for the EPER, originally, was as follows: first reporting by Member States June 2003; second reporting by member states June 2006; after review a decision should be taken as to whether to move to annual reporting; from 2008 the Member States will be encouraged to report the annual data in December rather than June of the following year.

The “Future” of EPER After each reporting cycle the whole aspect of the EPER is to be reviewed. Possible changes (currently being accomplished) include: the reporting frequency may change; the contents of the list of pollutants and the thresholds may change; the facilities that have to report may be expanded beyond those covered by IPPC expansion of the scope of the EPER into a fully integrated PRTR

PER: Responsibilities There are 3 bodies with differing responsibilities associated with the functioning of the EPER: Industry (IPPC Processes); Government; The Commission (& the EEA).

Industry Functions Identify those substances which are in Annex 3 of the Decision which the plant emits above the thresholds in that Annex; Calculate the amount (kgs/year) released; Report to the to the competent authority in a timely manner.

Government Functions Identification of facilities with Annex I Activities; Identification of Source Categories & NOSE-P Codes; Collection of Data; Validation of Data (Quality Control); Submission of data to the Commission

Commission Functions Receipt of data; Consistency checking; Compilation of data; Dissemination of data; Issuing of Guidance; Review of methodology.

Examples of Situations with Various Sites, Facilities and Activities

Example 1

Releases to Water

Releases to Air

Example 2

Releases to Water

Releases to Water - Combined Facilities (exception- ref service contract)

Releases to Air

Example Bulgaria RIEW: Regional Inspectorate for Environment and Water MOEW: Ministry of Environment and Water ExEA: Executive Environment Agency; EEA: European Environment Agency

I think you have a problem EPER “Industry and government should co-operate to get EPER moving into the right direction”