FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Broward’s Infrastructure Design to Guide and Sustain Permanency for Young Foster Children (BRIDGES)
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
Prince George’s County Human Services Coalition Funders Panel Presenter: Renette Oklewicz Director, Foundation Programs January 11, 2012.
Interfacing Initiatives Hometown Collaboration Initiative (HCI)  Expansion of leadership and civic engagement to capitalize on innovative strategies 
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Early Achievers Overview Starting Strong – August 15, 2012.
Educational Access Project for DCFS An Overview of a Partnership Between Northern Illinois University and the Illinois Department of Children and Family.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
“If you don’t know where you are going, how are you gonna’ know when you get there?” Yogi Berra Common Elements of Strong Program Evaluation THEORY OF.
Healthy Child Development Suggestions for Submitting a Strong Proposal.
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
School Stability and Transportation Coordination for Children in Out of Home Placement Philadelphia Department of Human Services and School District of.
Katie A: From Compliance to Transformation CMHACY: May 14, 2015 Sylvia Deporto, MS Lynn Dolce, MFT Bonnie Friedman, LCSW Jennifer Clancy, MSW.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative Update Meeting September 23, 2004 Bridgeport Holiday Inn.
Colorado Educational Stability Grant April David T. Menefee, Ph.D. Associate Director for Quality and Performance Improvement Division of Child.
PROJECT SCHOOL SUCCESS— PHASE II NYC ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN’S SERVICES OFFICE OF EDUCATION SUPPORT AND POLICY PLANNING (OESPP) & DIVISION OF POLICY,
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
Speakers Dr. Blanca Enriquez, Director, Office of Head Start
Lucas County Pathways to Success Initiative Deborah Hodges, Project Director Marjory Curry, Program Coordinator Denise Navarre Cubbon, Administrative Judge.
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
EDUCATION STABILITY MATTERS OREGON. 2 PRESENTED BY: Catherine Stelzer, MSW Oregon Team: A.J. Goins (Project Manager), Julie York, Sarah Walker, Annie.
OUR KIDS OF MIAMI-DADE/MONROE, INC. EDUCATION COLLABORATION PROJECT Presented by: Additional Key Project Team: Claudia Kitchens Robin Molan Director of.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Helping Families Receive the Best Start in Life.  Check In  AOK History  AOK Communities  Conceptual Framework  Advancing Collaborative Leadership.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
Wisconsin Educational Collaboration for Youth in Foster Care John Elliott Hilary Shager April 25 th, 2013.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Bay Area Consortium RBS Stakeholders Communication Plan.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Building Community Partnerships to Serve Immigrant Workers Funded by the Ford Foundation Nonprofit and Community College Collaborations.
ACO Mapping Group Recommendations 1. Are the subclass members being identified? 2. Are the subclass members being assessed? 3. Are the subclass members.
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
Strategic Planning and the Importance of Collaboration: A conversation... Barrett Johnson, L.C.S.W. | CalSWEC Lisa Molinar, M.A. | Shared Vision Consultants.
Promoting school connections for youth in child welfare Joan Rock, Implementation Coordinator Kristen Hayden-West, Implementation Coordinator Jessica Strolin-Goltzman,
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
PASS PATHWAY FOR ACADEMIC STABILITY AND SUCCESS Dr. Bibhuti Sar, Principal Investigator; Dr. Becky Antle, Evaluator, Dr. Collins-Camargo, Team Leader;
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Creating a Trauma - Informed Child Welfare System The Oklahoma Story Building Systems to Support Trauma-Informed Practice November 15, 2012 Annette Kirk.
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
State Advisory Council Birth to Age 8 Alignment through the Rural Opportunities Initiative Summary Presentation for the Board of Early Education and Care.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
1 Leadership Symposium on Evidence-Based Practice in Child Welfare Services June 28, 2007 Davis, CA Inter-Agency and University Research Collaboration:
Children grow up in a safe and supportive environment Families are stronger and healthier, leading to greater success and personal development for children.
CSEFEL State Planning Rob Corso. CSEFEL  National Center focused on promoting the social emotional development and school readiness of young children.
1 Discovery Contributions to Recent EC Policy Results– The View from State-Level Grantees and Stakeholders Prepared by the Center for Assessment & Policy.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
Good Start, Grow Smart Inter-American Symposium Understanding the State of the Art in Early Childhood Education and Care: The First Three Years of Life.
Solano County Behavioral Health MHSA Innovation Plan A Joint Project Between Solano County and the UC Davis Center for Reducing Health Disparities.
Using Logic Models to Create Effective Programs
Improving Practices Within Neglect and Delinquent Systems Through Effective Communication and Collaboration.
Start Something ™ Enhanced School-Based Mentoring Affinity Group Leadership Discussions April 2012 ™
2016 Spring Grantee Convening IKF Evaluation Update Center for Community Health and Evaluation April 11, 2016 Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
As we reflect on policies and practices for expanding and improving early identification and early intervention for youth, I would like to tie together.
Wraparound Oregon Designing a coordinated service system for children, youth and their families.
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
CPM as the Framework for Practice & System Change
Presentation transcript:

FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services Michael Paynter, County Office of Education – Foster Youth Services Rachel Velcoff Hults, National Center for Youth Law Jennifer Laird, MPR Associates, Inc. 1

Grantee: National Center for Youth Law, FosterEd Initiative NCYL is a non-profit organization based in Oakland, California that works to ensure that low-income children have the resources, support, and opportunities they need for healthy and productive lives. NCYL’s FosterEd Initiative seeks to improve the educational outcomes of children and youth in foster care. FosterEd operates in California, Indiana, and Arizona. The Santa Cruz County project is a pilot for the state of California. 2 Grantee Program APRIL 2013

Project Description: Goals and Objectives Improve the educational outcomes of Santa Cruz County foster children/youth by ensuring each has an educational champion with the beliefs, capacities, and behaviors proven to support educational success, and is developing educational resiliency. Ensure that project outcomes and processes are measurable and regularly measured, with data used to drive improvement and evaluate success. 3APRIL 2013

Project Description: Key Collaborative Partners County Office of Education – Foster Youth Services Superior Court of California, County of Santa Cruz, Juvenile Division Human Services Department – Family and Children’s Services Community organizations and providers, such as CASA State-level oversight provided by California’s Improving Educational Outcomes of Children in Care workgroup 4APRIL 2013

Project Description: Target Population School-age children/youth who are the subject of an open Santa Cruz County dependency case and reside in Santa Cruz County, and their educational champions. There are approximately 245 such children/youth in Santa Cruz County at any given time. To date, the project is serving approximately 60 children. Implementation is being phased in, with children entering the project at select points in the dependency process. Educational resiliency work will be focused on youth ages 11 to 17. 5APRIL 2013

Project Description: Proposed Services, Activities, Processes, Outputs Identification of one or more educational champions to support the child’s school success. Identification of the educational champion’s and child’s education- related strengths and needs. Development of educational intervention plans. Implementation, ongoing monitoring, and updating of educational intervention plans. 6APRIL 2013

Project Description: Logic Model APRIL 20137

Project Description: Key Expected Outcomes One or more educational champions are identified for each child in foster care in Santa Cruz County. Educational champions develop the beliefs and expectations needed to support the child’s school success. Educational champions develop the skills and capacities needed to support the child’s school success. Child’s educational needs are increasingly identified and addressed. Over time, educational outcomes improve (i.e. attendance rates and grades). 8APRIL 2013

Evaluation Approach External Evaluators: MPR Associates Key Research Questions: 1. Who participates in FosterEd? For the target population of foster children/youth, what portion of them has an educational champion who participates in FosterEd? Who are the participating educational champions, and what are their relationships to the child/youth (e.g., biological parent, foster parent, relative caregiver)? 2. What activities are associated with the implementation of FosterEd? What services are provided to educational champions through FosterEd, and by whom? What factors enhance or detract from the implementation of FosterEd? APRIL 20139

Evaluation Approach (continued) Key Research Questions 3. Do educational champions who participate in FosterEd demonstrate growth over time in beliefs, behaviors, and capacities associated with educational success? If so, what is the nature of that growth? Did participants perceive activities related to FosterEd to be beneficial? 4. Do foster children/youth with educational champions in FosterEd demonstrate improvement in educational performance? For children/youth with educational champions served by FosterEd, is there demonstrated improvement in rates of school attendance, California Standards Test (CST) performance, and school behavior? How do these rates compare to district, county, or state-level student performance? APRIL

Research Design: Mixed-method approach (quantitative and qualitative) Leveraging merged child welfare and education data Quasi experimental Evaluating a number of comparisons strategies Assessment of short- and long-term outcomes Example of short-term outcome: increased skills of educational champion to support child’s or youth’s education Example of long-term outcome: increased school attendance and grades APRIL Evaluation Approach (continued)

Opportunity to provide meaningful, individualized support to foster children and youth and their educational champions. Opportunity to raise education as a critical part of the dependency court case plan and service provider focus. Opportunity to develop tools, strategies, and best practices that can be used in Santa Cruz County as well as other counties throughout the state. APRIL Expected Opportunities

Effective engagement of birth parents who are facing a diverse range of challenges personally and within the court process. Develop individualized intervention plans with incremental goals. Present involvement in education as a positive way to support and provide stability for the child. Identify and engage caregivers and others as “co-champions.” Gathering and reviewing data for large numbers of children and educational champions. Focus on inter-agency collaboration and systemic and technological communication. Develop standardized tools to screen for and track strengths, needs, and goals. APRIL Expected Challenges & How to Address Them

Sustainability Plan Implementation is being carried out by Santa Cruz County agencies, largely through use of existing resources. Grant-supported staff will model educational coaching, case management, and project management strategies for social workers, FYS staff, and existing service providers (train-the- trainer approach). Investment in development of assessment/screening tools, technological infrastructure, and practices for ongoing use beyond the grant period. APRIL

Dissemination Plan Distribution of curriculum and related materials online (see through state-level leadership team, and through trainings (such as state-wide FKCE program training) Development and distribution of toolkits for project implementation in other counties, with support from the Child & Policy Institute of California and state-level leadership team. Dissemination of final evaluation report. APRIL

Questions for Fellow CWED Grantees What strategies do you recommend for effectively engaging and collaborating with school district and school site staff? What lessons are you learning, and what advice can you share, regarding improving data-sharing in your jurisdiction? Do you have advice for how best to support agency and project staff as the scope of implementation grows? ° ° ° Thank you for your time and input! For more information about FosterEd: Santa Cruz County, please visit or contact Rachel at APRIL