International Civil Aviation Organization Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) Comparative Analysis Mikołaj Ratajczyk.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework

Advertisements

Experiences on the road to Fatigue Risk Management Regulation

ICAO was created in 1944 to promote the safe and orderly development of civil aviation in the world. A specialized agency of the United Nations, it sets.

The Next Generation Air Transportation System Future of Airports and Aviation 29 th Annual Airports Conference March 1, 2006.

International Civil Aviation Organization Establishing and Sustaining an RSOO: Enablers, Obstacles and lessons learnt Meshesha Belayneh Regional Director,

International Civil Aviation Organization Nancy Graham Director - Air Navigation Bureau 28 October 2011 Symposium on RSOOs Meeting Outcomes.

International Civil Aviation Organization Presentation Title SESSION 2: THEME 1 – Regional Cooperation for the Enhancement of Safety Oversight. Topic 1.2.

C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Building Effective Institutions for Managing Regulatory Policy Charles-Henri Montin, Senior.

Cranfield Safety and Accident Investigation Centre Independent Investigation How it works in aviation Prof Graham Braithwaite.

International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan Theme.

Aviation Regulations Department Belgrade, 12 July 2010.

An introduction to concept and initial views as to its use in the Review of the IORP Directive Chris VERHAEGEN OPSG meeting - 15 October

What SMS means for an Operator’s relationship with the CAA

XBRL as a tool for supervision Arnoud Vossen Chairman CEBS Expert Group on Financial Information.

David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.

European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters

Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon

Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,

International Civil Aviation Organization Regional Cooperation for Enhancement of Safety Oversight BENEFITS OF REGIONAL COOPERATION Presented by Emmanuel.

Presented to: Pacific Aviation Directors’ Workshop By: Jim Spillane, Sr. FAA Representative, Pacific Rim Date: 3/14/2012 Transition to the USOAP Continuous.

European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters.

WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.

SMS Implementation Lessons Learned CTA COSCAP-NA Kim Trethewey.

EU perspective on occupational health and safety - role and place of unions Károly György Kiev, December December Károly György, MSZOSZ.

State Aviation Administration The State Aviation Administration of the Ministry of Transport and Communications of Ukraine ICAO EUR Regional Preparatory.

ICAO Requirements on Certification of Aerodromes Module - 2

European Commission Rita L’ABBATE Legal aspects linked to internal market DG Enterprise and Industry MARKET SURVEILLANCE COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK UNECE “MARS”

Engagement and Cooperation on IAEA Safeguards – Additional Protocol: VERTIC Initiative and Methods 23 October 2014 IAEA Symposium on International Safeguards.

Designing tools for enhanced monitoring of railway safety performance of the European Union and its Member States Vojtech EKSLER & Cecilia LIND Safety.

EU/ICAO Symposium on Regional Organizations 10 – 11 April 2008 Presentation to 8 th COSCAP-NA Steering Committee Meeting COSCAP North Asia Cooperative.

16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.

SMS Implementation Lessons Learned October th Steering Committee COSCAP-SEA, Macau 2 Sources ICAO Regional Workshop on Safety Management.

RE-E / IRSC / 27/09/ /10/09 1 The necessary evolution of railway safety regulations in Europe A challenge – Risks to be controlled.

SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.

Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.

Guide to Options Comparison Revision of the SAFEGROUNDS Guidance James Penfold, Quintessa SAFESPUR, 4 October 2007.

European Aviation Safety Agency Head of Aircraft Product Certification

Independence and powers of regulators: legal and institutional requirements Heinz Hilbrecht, Director, European Commission World Forum on Energy Regulation.

Standardisation in the European Statistical System inventory of normative documents and the standard-setting process – results of the ESSnet on Standardisation.

Cooperative Development of Operational Safety and Continuing Airworthiness COSCAP – South Asia 19th Meeting of the Steering Committee 26 – 28 January 2010,

Department Speaker’s name Monday, 01 February 2016 The European Aviation Safety Policy Ensuring a high level of aviation safety for the European citizens.

International Civil Aviation Organization Enablers, Obstacles and Lessons Learned Erick Ferrandez EASA Technical Cooperation Section 26 October 2011 ICAO.

International Civil Aviation Organization Challenges Facing RSOO’s Captain Gregory Fox Caribbean Aviation Safety and Security Oversight System.

International Civil Aviation Organization Role of RSOOs in relation to new ICAO Strategies and Programmes Mikołaj Ratajczyk Permanent Representation of.

Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.

Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision TECHNICAL & OPERATIONAL COMPETENCE ATS.

Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.

Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision OVERVIEW OF THE SINGLE EUROPEAN SKY Roderick.

TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.

SMS Implementation Lessons Learned. 2 Sources ICAO Regional Workshop on Safety Management Systems (SMS) and State Safety Programme (SSP) Implementation.

Meeting of the „Resolution 6” CC Task Force

Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary

STRESS TESTS and TAIWAN PEER REVIEW PROCESS

ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)

4 - 8 November 2013 AIM relevant - Assembly conclusions

Promotion of financial and technical assistance

Quality and Qualifications Ireland and its Functions

Obstacles and lessons learnt by the SRVSOP

Circular Economy -Public Consultation – Results

Nancy Graham Director - Air Navigation Bureau 28 October 2011

Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) Comparative Analysis Mikołaj Ratajczyk Permanent Representation of Poland to.

Regional Director, Eastern & Southern African Office, ICAO

CYRAIL Final Conference ERA on cybersecurity

Incentives for electricity infrastructure – ERGEG view

AERODROME CERTIFICATION COURSE

EU plan: Supporting directives • The EU Renewable Energy Directive was adopted at the end of 2008 • EU Renewable Energy Directive.

PROPORTIONALITY PRINCIPLE in EU LEGISLATION

Reference Manual update Item 5.2 of the agenda

RSOO Role in Relation to New ICAO Strategies

Briefing to ICAO TCB Seminar

Presentation transcript:

International Civil Aviation Organization Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) Comparative Analysis Mikołaj Ratajczyk Permanent Representation of Poland to the European Union ICAO Symposium on Regional Safety Oversight Organisations Montréal, October 2011

2 Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) ICAO Symposium on Regional Safety Oversight Organization, Montréal, October 2011 Regional cooperation increasingly seen as a promising approach to enhance air safety and efficiency; A number of regional air safety cooperation schemes already exist (earliest established in 1960’s); … but still lack of comprehensive, cross- cutting studies of RSOOs and their benefits (recent exception: new edition of ICAO Doc part. B);

3 Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) ICAO Symposium on Regional Safety Oversight Organization, Montréal, October 2011 There could be advantages in promoting greater understanding of RSOO concept or making it more precise:  The notion of RSOO increasingly used in ICAO documents (e.g. Assembly Resolutions);  But there is currently no RSOO definition, or common understanding of it in the ICAO context (concept very broad);  Especially, where safety functions normally attributed to States are concerned, there should be no ambiguity as to who is responsible;  Improving understanding of different types of RSOOs (or classifying them) could have advantages but should be practical, based on relevant criteria (e.g. legally binding delegation of safety responsibilities), and take into account that …

4 Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) ICAO Symposium on Regional Safety Oversight Organization, Montréal, October 2011 Most of the RSOOs are still young, and expected to continue evolving in the years to come:  Concept not new, but a real „RSOO boom” in the last ten years;  8 out of 10 organisations studied established only in the last decade (6 out of 10 if evolution from other organisations taken into account);  Dynamics of ‘young’ organisations in general different to that of older ones – further changes can be expected;

5 Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) ICAO Symposium on Regional Safety Oversight Organization, Montréal, October 2011 There is no single model or “one size fits all” approach for RSOOs  Needs of States differ - the concept therefore implemented in a “tailor-made” manner;  Three main types of RSOOs: a) networks of aviation safety regulators, b) international safety organisations, c) and regional safety agencies evolving within the broader framework of a REIO;  Most dealing with regulatory and oversight issues, but also accident investigation or aviation security bodies;  Broad range of considerations influencing the model finally chosen;  And we also need to bear in mind that …

6 Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) ICAO Symposium on Regional Safety Oversight Organization, Montréal, October 2011 RSOOs (especially those established recently) have a clear tendency to evolve into more “institutionalised” structures:  4 out of 8 organisations established in the last decade have already undergone an evolution;  Some examples of transformations:  technical cooperation project international safety organisation/agency;  network of aviation safety regulators international safety organization/agency;  States generally consider it necessary for an RSOO to have legal personality (9 out of 10 organisations studied have some sort of legal personality, and evolution of RSOOs over time clearly also going in this direction);

7 Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) ICAO Symposium on Regional Safety Oversight Organization, Montréal, October 2011 Delegation of safety functions to RSOOs important but still not widely utilised  Some of the RSOOs are empowered to exercise, in a legally binding manner, safety functions, normally attributed by the Chicago Convention to States (e.g. certification);  A powerful tool to simplify the exercise of a safety function in a uniform, and legally binding way across a whole region;  One of the most important criteria distinguishing the different types of regional air safety organisations;  In theory can be far reaching, but in practice still not widely used (e.g. only 3/10 RSOOs issuing certificates on behalf of their Member States);

8 Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) ICAO Symposium on Regional Safety Oversight Organization, Montréal, October 2011 The „tool-box” concept  Experience shows that if political will exists, legal solutions can accommodate States’ needs (i.e. legal engineering a solution rather than obstacle), but…  States need to be aware that the institutional/legal choices will have far reaching implications for an RSOO;  Experience also shows that it is helpful to organise the whole process in a structured way (e.g. a „matrix” plotting different possible RSOO safety functions with institutional alternatives);  This structured, tailor-made approach could be replicated in a more generic way;

9 Features and Evolution of Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOO) ICAO Symposium on Regional Safety Oversight Organization, Montréal, October 2011 Conclusions  giving more precision to the notion of RSOO could be advantageous – but in a practical manner based on relevant criteria and taking into account, in particular:  the majority of RSOOs are still young, and expected to continue evolving in the years to come;  there is no single model or “one size fits all” for RSOOs;  RSOOs have a clear tendency to evolve into more “institutionalised” structures with legal personality;  there could be benefit in developing a methodology and more structured guidance material for establishing RSOOs in a tailor-made manner (i.e. a “tool-box” concept), to best meet the safety needs of States concerned;

International Civil Aviation Organization Thank you for your attention Contact: Mikołaj Ratajczyk Permanent Representation of Poland to the EU tel. (32)