1 A Framework for Mapping the System Joseph R. Harris Director, National High School Center National High School Center 2008 Summer Institute Washington,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
PORTFOLIO.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
Career and Technical Education State Standards. Wisconsin’s Approach to Academic Standards Provides a vision for student success and guiding principles.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
CTE Essential Standards 1. NC State Board of Education Goals CTE Essential Standards for 158 Courses 5/19/20152 Business & Industry Education & Government.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Reviewing National High School Improvement Strategies, Models, Characteristics and Potential Monica Martinez KnowledgeWorks Foundation (formerly of the.
High Schools Literacy: English Language Learners June 2008 Maria Santos Office of English Language Learners.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
What Everyone Should Know About the Successful K–12 STEM Education Report.
Promoting Collaborative Work in Schools and Districts presentation for Princeton University conference on High Schools Friday, April 27, 2009 Naomi Housman.
Improving Secondary Education and Transition Using Research-Based Standards and Indicators An initiative of the National Alliance on Secondary Education.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
WELCOME. AGENDA  LCFF/LCAP Review  LCAP Process  Community Input/Findings  2014/15 LCAP  Plan Alignment- LEAP/LCAP/SPSA  Planning and Input.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Secondary Experience and Achievement TASK FORCE Staff Leads: Matt Duffy, Brigitte Marshall, Alison McDonald.
1 Connecting Activities Leadership Meeting March 29, 2011.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Business, Technology, and Design (BTD). Unifying Vision/Identity BTD will provide a personalized, supportive, and collaborative academic environment.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Kansas CTE Conference, Wichita, KS February 21, 2011 Mike Gross
Frances Blue. “Today’s young people are living in an exciting time, with an increasingly diverse society, new technologies and expanding opportunities.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW A Vision for School Reform A Vision for Reform: Join Academic and Career Studies to Promote Powerful Learning Skills.
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
The College Board Standards for College Success CCSSO – SEC State Collaborative Alignment Study CCSSO-SEC Meeting and Content Analysis Workshop San Diego,
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Greenville Technical Charter High School Strategic Plan Developed October 2014.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Wisconsin Standards for CTE. Timeline New accountability system begins & AYP ends (ESEA waiver) New proficiency benchmarks for WKCE reading & mathematics.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
High Schools That Work An evidence-based design for improving the nation’s schools and raising student achievement.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Local Control Accountability Plan Board of Education June 25, 2015 Alvord Unified School District Students | Teachers | Instructional Content.
Executive Director , Unity Middle College
Comprehensive Planning
Maryland’s Race to the Top Application
Dropout Prevention & Improving Graduation Rates
Presentation transcript:

1 A Framework for Mapping the System Joseph R. Harris Director, National High School Center National High School Center 2008 Summer Institute Washington, DC June 2008

2 “The trouble with high schools today…..”  “don’t work as well as they used to”  “too large and impersonal - “kids fall through the cracks”  “too many dropouts and low graduation rates”  “teachers are ill-equipped”  “buildings are unsafe and/or rundown”  “don’t meet the needs of diverse student populations”  “root cause of America’s loss of competitive edge”  “don’t prepare students for living in the 21st Century”  “nothing wrong with ‘our’ school - it’s NCLB’s fault”

3 A Growing List of “Fixes”…..  elimination of tracking and low-level courses  standards-based curriculum and instruction  competency / exit exams  more rigor / increased graduation requirements  “algebra for all”  college preparatory pathways for all students  personalization / small schools / small learning communities  teacher quality / alternative certification  increased security / metal detectors / mandatory IDs  integrating technology

4 HS Improvement Focus Areas  Dropout Prevention  Transitions In  Transitions Out / Post-secondary Pathways  School Restructuring  High School Literacy  Tiered Intervention  Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)  21st Century Skills  Career / Technical Education (CTE)

5 HS Improvement Focus Areas Dropout Prevention  Transitions In Transitions Out / Post-secondary Pathways  School Restructuring High School Literacy Tiered Intervention Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)  21st Century Skills  Career / Technical Education (CTE)

6 HS Improvement Strategies / Interventions  National initiatives to increase rigor and “raise the bar”  Small schools / Small learning communities  Dropout prevention initiatives and early warning systems  School-to-work / Career and technical education  Common assessments  Model high schools / Replicating “turnaround” schools  State / local priority initiatives  “Packaged interventions”

7 Picturing the HS Improvement Landscape…..

8

9 Dropout Prevention Transitions In Tiered Intervention Dual Enrollment Small Schools Career Academies Transitions Out HS Literacy Model High Schools Freshman Academies Advisories HS Equity & Access HS Restructuring SLCs Post- secondary Pathways HS STEM HS Assessment Credit Recovery Virtual Learning Positive Behavior Rigorous Content CTE

10 Picturing the HS Improvement Landscape….. Dropout Prevention Transitions In Tiered Intervention Dual Enrollment Small Schools Career Academies Transitions Out HS Literacy Model High Schools Freshman Academies Advisories HS Equity & Access SLCs Post- secondary Pathways HS STEM HS Assessment Credit Recovery Virtual Learning Rigorous Content CTE HS Restructuring

11 Picturing the HS Improvement Landscape…..

12 Picturing the HS Improvement Landscape….. Alignment Alignment Coherence Coherence Connectedness Connectedness

13 Picturing the HS Improvement Landscape….. “Building Better High Schools”

14 A Call for Alignment, Coherence and Connectedness  Collaborative projects with RCCs and SEAs  National High School Center Advisory Board  Friends of the National High School Center and other high school improvement organizations  National High School Center staff, senior advisors, and expert consultants  Independent researchers and high school improvement experts

15 Institute Organized to:  provide a view of the “high school improvement system” and why thinking systemically can help  offer tools that you can use to map the systems you are working with / within  provide a glimpse of how RCCs and SEAs can work together to plan next steps  help high school reformers create more effective learning experiences for ALL students

16 Benefits of Mapping the HS Improvement Landscape  Promoting a common language  Building consensus  Facilitating alignment and coherence  Analyzing and enhancing strengths  Leveraging resources  Enabling gap analyses  Supporting scale-up and sustainability

17 NHSC Mapping Framework Elements 1. Rigorous Curriculum and Instruction 2. Assessment and Accountability 3. Teacher Quality and Professional Development 4. Student and Family Supports 5. Stakeholder Engagement 6. Leadership and Governance 7. Organization and Structure 8. Resources for Sustainability

18 1. Rigorous Curriculum and Instruction  Align with rigorous state and local standards and vertically interfaced with local school curriculum  Organize around individual student instructional needs through  formative assessments and continuous progress monitoring  academic supports and extended learning opportunities for content recovery  literacy and cognitive skills development  Incorporate multiple research-based instructional strategies, technologies and new modalities for learning  Adapt to a variety of school and classroom organizational structures Mapping Framework Elements

19 2. Assessment and Accountability  include variety of classroom, school-based, and district level assessments as well as state standards-based competency and exit exams  encourage and support continuous progress monitoring and formative assessments embedded in instruction  provide timely and effective feedback and access to data that support the early identification of students at risk or with special needs  collect and report longitudinal data to measure short- and long- term student growth for instructional planning and accountability Mapping Framework Elements

20 3. Teacher Quality and Professional Development  span broad range of preservice, certification and licensure, induction and inservice, compensation, and leadership development  promote knowledge of content and academic literacy skills, varied and effective pedagogy, effective classroom management skills and positive behavior  embed at the school and classroom levels throughout the school year with increased opportunities for teachers to work together  provide teachers with skills in assessing students and adjusting instruction Mapping Framework Elements

21 4. Student and Family Supports  support students as they transition into/through/out of high school with  formal and informal guidance programs  attendance and behavior monitoring and support systems  wrap-around and English-language services  foster a positive and personalized school climate that cultivates student voice and leadership  promote health and physical education and co-curricular activities  provide family-focused services and outreach that respect and honor the student’s family and community Mapping Framework Elements

22 5. Stakeholder Engagement  engage the interests, needs, skills, resources and strengths of multiple stakeholders  foster relationships among P-16 schools, the workforce, families, and communities  ensure that all appropriate stakeholders are at the table from the start  incorporate multiple culturally and linguistically appropriate communications strategies and technologies Mapping Framework Elements

23 6. Leadership and Governance  distribute decision-making authority at all levels with alternative structures to address multiple functions of running high schools  provide principals and other instructional leaders with adequate knowledge, time, and interpersonal skills to work collaboratively with teachers  shift the focus of state and local policymakers and education agency staffs to support comprehensive high school improvement  develop strategies and skills to support required organizational change Mapping Framework Elements

24 7. Organization and Structure  support effective teaching and learning and personalization through physical and operational changes and alternative time and scheduling approaches  provide increased opportunities to learn, such as virtual courses, dual enrollment opportunities, and work-based internships  include students with special needs in the general curriculum  support teacher organizational changes and difficult process of culture changes Mapping Framework Elements

25 8. Resources for Sustainability  adequately staff the initiatives and provide appropriate time and necessary fiscal support to take hold and scale-up  grow both the physical and human capital within the system and continuously develop teacher knowledge and skills  continuously upgrade facilities, tools, and materials  define priorities and allocate needed resources over time Mapping Framework Elements

26 NHSC Mapping Framework Elements 1. Rigorous Curriculum and Instruction 2. Assessment and Accountability 3. Teacher Quality and Professional Development 4. Student and Family Supports 5. Stakeholder Engagement 6. Leadership and Governance 7. Organization and Structure 8. Resources for Sustainability

27 Discussion Thinking about a specific high school improvement focus area or initiative…  What are examples of policies and practices in different elements that are connected to one another?  What policies and practices in different elements may be in tension?  Are any policies or practices hard to characterize> Under which element(s) could it fall or does it cut across all eight?

28 Task 1: Mapping HS Improvement Focus Areas  Goes both broader and deeper into thinking about individual focus areas and the connections across focus areas  Helps to break down “big ideas” into research-based strategies and initiatives that can be implemented systemically  Ultimately leads to identification of specific initiatives for addressing the focus area(s)

29 Task 2: Mapping HS Strategies and Interventions  Inventories existing initiatives and identifies the elements each initiative addresses  Highlights areas of strength and possible gaps among strategies  Suggests collaborative opportunities, including connections to other SEA priorities  Identifies connections among initiatives and builds “holistic” approaches (reducing reliance on “silver bullet” and “stovepipe” solutions)

30 Task 3:Planning for Implementation  Identifies potential “entry points” and “levers” for incremental implementation strategies  Points out individuals to engage in the work  Prioritizes alignment between high school improvement focus areas and targeted interventions  Looks both broader and deeper at contextual factors and potential challenges  Lays the groundwork for ongoing collaborations between the SEAs, RCCs, and NHSC