Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/1063r0 September 2012 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT)Slide 1 Requirements on WLAN Cellular Offload Date: 2012-09-18 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /446r0 Submission July 2002 Y.Inoue, NTTSlide 1 Discussions on the access control mechanisms for WLAN NG Yasuhiko Inoue, Satoru Hori,
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE / Submission September 2010 James Wang, MediaTekSlide 1 PSMP-Based MU-MIMO Communications Date: 2010, September 14 Authors:
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /1090/r2 Submission September 2013 Submission Zhanji Wu, et. Al. Non-linear pre-coding MIMO scheme for next generation WLAN Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1464r0 Submission November 2011 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT), et. al.Slide 1 The better spectrum utilization for the future WLAN standardization.
Doc.: IEEE /1316r1 Submission Considerations for Cellular-Offloading Use Case Date: September 2011 Joseph Teo Chee Ming et al, I2R.
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on ax OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0287r3 March 2013 Yasuhiko Inoue, NTTSlide 1 Beyond ac – A Very High Capacity WLAN Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Doc.: IEEE /492r02 Submission Orange Labs Date: Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz May 2010 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1042 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang, Kyungki,
Submission doc.: IEEE /870r2 July 2015 Guido R. Hiertz et al., EricssonSlide ax in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1258r2 November 2012 Fang Xie (China Mobile)Slide 1 Operator Deployed WLAN for Cellular offload Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 On Future Enhancements to Technology Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 1 Considerations for Partial Band Interference between WLAN Systems Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2 November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Probe Request and Response in TGai Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0801r1 Akira Kishida, NTT Issues of Low-Rate Transmission Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0878r0 Submission July 2012 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 On the Channel Switching in ah Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0692 JUL 2013 doc.: IEEE /0692 JUL 2013 Adding performance parameters to WNM for better network management Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0068r0 Submission Discussions on the better resource utilization for the next generation WLANs January 2012 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT),
Doc.: IEEE /0820r0 Submission July 2012 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT), et. al.Slide 1 Improved Spectrum Efficiency for the Next Generation WLANs Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0523r2 May 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Understanding Current Situation of Public Wi-Fi Usage - Possible.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1398r0 Nov 2013 Akira Yamada, NTT DOCOMO, Inc.Slide 1 Requirements for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1164 r00 Submission September 2013 Paul A. Lambert, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 Some Par and 5C Requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission September 2010 James Wang, MediatekSlide 1 Wide Band OBSS Friendly PSMP Date: 2010, September 13 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r4 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1288r1 November 2015 K. Yunoki, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 An issue of wider bandwidth operation at real denser environment.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/535r1 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Scanning and FILS requirements Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 19-15/0084r0 Nov 2015 Igal Kotzer, General MotorsSlide 1 On The Intra-Vehicle Channel Model Date: 21-Oct-2015 Authors:
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1259r0 SubmissionYunlu Liu (China Mobile)Slide 1 Measurement Reporting in WLAN Date: Authors: Nov 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1073r0 September 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Access Control Enhancement Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0973r2 July 2011 Lin Wang, ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Considerations of Compatibility with v and 11k Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission Feedback on 3GPP CRs: LAA Multi-Channel Access and Energy Detect (ED) Coexistence Slide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Submission May 2013 BUPT Slide 1 Potential Solutions to D2D Assisted WLAN Date: May 16, 2013 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0206r1 March 2012 Slide 1 Necessity of Probe Reduction Date: Authors:
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 PHY measurements for interference reduction from 11h Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /537r0July.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1359r0 November 2015 Yu Wang, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 System Performance Evaluation of ae Date: Authors:
Amendment Proposal for TV White Spaces Operation
Possible Approaches for HEW
Amendment Proposal for TV White Spaces Operation
802.11ax in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors: July 2015
Month Year doc.: IEEE /0523r0 May 2013
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
IEEE ah Use Case – Outdoor Wi-Fi for cellular traffic offloading
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Feasibility of Coordinated Transmission for HEW
Possible Enhancement for Broadcast Services over WLAN
RTS&CTS Exchange in wideband transmission
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2010
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Management Enhancement for WLAN
HEW Beamforming Enhancements
Relay Enhancement Date: Authors: September 2016
Feasibility of Coordinated Transmission for HEW
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1063r0 September 2012 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT)Slide 1 Requirements on WLAN Cellular Offload Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1063r0 September 2012 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT)Slide 2 Abstract We have proposed a new activity to improve system capacity to support important applications of WLAN such as cellular data offload. This presentation gives some background information why we think capacity enhancement is necessary and summarizes the requirements for the WLAN cellular offload.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1063r0 September 2012 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT)Slide 3 Introduction Mobile data traffic Due to wide spread of smartphones, explosion of mobile data traffic has been recognized. The amount of mobile data traffic is anticipated to increase of more than 10 times in the next several years.  Cellular data offload will be more important for the WLANs in thenear future. Current situations 2.4 GHz band: Almost saturated in many places because only three non-overlapping channels are available huge amount of data exchanged by increased number of devices many operators deploy their hotspot APs, especially in the urban areas, that results very dense deployment of APs r3 shows that 25% of airtime is occupied by beacon, probe request or probe response frames. 5 GHz band: Not utilized so much.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1063r0 Issues Significant interference observed in the 2.4 GHz band which results in poor user experience. It is sometimes very difficult just to connect to an AP in Tokyo area. The 5 GHz band will also be very crowded in near future. Recent smartphones, tablets and Ultrabooks start to support the 5 GHz band ac will extend the bandwidth/channel and there may be less number of non- overlapping channels. In many countries, not all of the channels in 5 GHz band are always available due to the DFS Requirements and limitation of the indoor use. As a result, many BSSs in the 5 GHz band may be using the same channel. Slide 4Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT) September 2012 As an operator, we need to improve user experience of our customers

Submission doc.: IEEE /1063r0 Requirements for the cellular data offload WLANs need to provide better user experience compared to the cellular systems in terms of data rate, cost effectiveness, etc. Requirements in 12/910r0 Carrier Oriented Wi-Fi for Cellular Offload by Laurent (ORANGE) contains many of the requirements. We also think it very important to enhance the system capacity to support huge amount of data traffic. Hopefully, the system capacity shall be increased in proportional to the number of APs where densely deployed. Slide 5Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT) September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1063r0 September 2012 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT)Slide 6 Recent activities Promote the use of 5 GHz band - on going activities: The ac will accelerate the use of 5 GHz band. Operators extensively deploying their hotspot APs supporting the 5 GHz band in places where available. Some mechanisms for this purpose such as fast session handover between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands have been discussed outside the IEEE Observation The above activities will provide near term solutions to improve user experiences of cellular offload. However, there are still remaining issues that should be resolved in IEEE community.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1063r0 Topics for IEEE Standardization Proposed standardization activity Interference Management/Alignment/Coordination to enhance the system capacity, and to improve the flexibility for WLAN area configuration Benefits of having the interference management/coordination: By mitigating the effect of interference, communication quality will also be improved Although the concept of TXOP defined in e provides a kind of fairness, we can discuss additional consideration for it. Drawback Additional complexity is expected. Slide 7Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT) September 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1063r0 Proposed Goals Reduced Interference: This is something we would like to have. It might, however, be difficult to explain quantitatively. We need clear performance criteria that can be measured easily. Examples of performance criterion: Stability, Fairness: These are very important features. But it will be difficult to set a goal that everybody agree. Throughput, System Capacity: Criterion that can be understood easily. Slide 8Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT) September G bit/s of system capacity will be more understandable and acceptable for many people

Submission doc.: IEEE /1063r0 Summary In order to support the use case of cellular offload, Near term solution Promote the use of 5 GHz band Some on-gong activities outside the IEEE 802 Appropriate topics for the IEEE community Capacity enhancement by interference management Proposed goal: to achieve 10 G bit/s of system capacity Slide 9Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT) September 2012 Thank you very much!

Submission doc.: IEEE /1063r0September 2012 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT)Slide 10 References wng-the-better-spectrum-utilization-for-the-future- wlan-standardization wng-discussion-on-resource-utilization wng-Carrier-Oriented-WiFi-Cellular-Offload wng-improved-spectrum-efficiency-for-the-next- generation-wlans