Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLIC08 workshop Structure production: CERN activities and Master Schedule G. Riddone, W. Wuensch, R. Zennaro, Contributions from C. Achard, S. Atieh, V.
Advertisements

5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
SLAC workshop 7-10 July 2009 WP1: microwave based accelerators Status of CLIC X-band high-power components G. Riddone, (contribution from A.
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan RF System The AREAL RF system will consist of 3 RF stations: Each RF station has a 1 klystron, and HV modulator,
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan RF System The AREAL RF system will consist of 3 RF stations: Each RF station has a 1 klystron, and HV modulator,
Measurements on phase stability at CTF3 Giulio Morpurgo / CERN IWLC 2010.
ON/OFF news. Reflected Transmitted Stroke 8.0 mm RF power, dB Piston position (gap width), mm ON OFF Compact design of the high RF power variable (mechanically)
Recent 30 GHz CTF2 M. Gerbaux, S. Döbert, Jan Kovermann, R. Zennaro.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
Demonstration of the Beam loading compensation (Preparation status for ILC beam loading compensation experiments at ATF injector in this September) (PoP.
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting - 24 th May 2013 CTF3 1 CTF3: Highlights of the 1 st run R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
CTF3 commissioning status R. Corsini - CTF3 committee 17 th September 2009 Update on CTF3 Operations and schedule This time I will try to give a more complete.
Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 h – 23 h October 2008 Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 th – 23 th October 2008 MICE RF distribution system.
Test Facilities Sami Tantawi SLAC. Summary of SLAC Facilities NLCTA (3 RF stations, one Injector, one Radiation shielding) – Two 240ns pulse compressor,
HIGH RF POWER TESTING FOR THE CLIC PETS International Workshop on Linear Colliders 20 th October 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for the CLIC team with.
Drive Beam and CTF 3 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 October 22, 2010 Erik Adli, Department of Physics, University of Oslo and CERN Bernard.
30 GHz waveguide line modification towards 12 GHz.
R&D proposals for EuCard 2 EuCard2, April 21Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  SRF basic research (W. Weingarten)  CTF3 and CTF3+, possible infra - structure for.
Test Facilities and Component Developments Sami Tantawi SLAC May 15, 2008.
RF Power production at CTF3 X-band structure collaboration meeting,SLAC 6 th July 2009 Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  30 GHz power production  12 GHz power production.
June 2007, CERN. HDS 60 (cells) copper was processed from both sides Low Vg a/λ=0.16 High Vg a/λ=0.19 HDS 11 titanium Very often we do observe, that after.
X-Band RF Structure and Beam Dynamics Workshop, December 2008 CERN experience with 12 GHz high power waveguide components Igor Syratchev (CERN)
TBL as a 12 GHz power source, overview and first results from commissioning IWLC 2010 workshopSteffen Döbert, BE-RF  Current status of TBL  Status of.
Anders Sunesson RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting October 24, 2012 CTF3 Experimental program for end 2012 R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team.
The status of RF components on Maria Filippova, RF components: Loads Phase shifters Attenuators Hybrids Splitters Directional couplers.
J.L. Navarro (CERN), for the CLIC/CTF3 collaboration.
Summary of progress towards CLIC goals and next steps for structure testing 6 th X-band collaboration workshop, April 18 th- 20 th 2012 Steffen Döbert,
KEK workshopWalter Wuensch18 April 2012 Status and objectives of the CLIC X-band and high- gradient activity.
The NLC RF Pulse Compression and High Power RF Transport Systems Sami G. Tantawi, G.Bowden, K.Fant, Z.D.Farkas, W.R.Fowkes J.Irwin, N.M.Kroll, Z.H.Li,
EnEfficient RF Sources Workshop. June 2014 I. Syratchev X-band high RF power testing activity at CERN I.Syratchev.
I. Syratchev, CLIC Breakdown Workshop, CERN, 20 May 2008 Power Circulation in a CLIC Accelerating Structure I. Syratchev.
Contribution from Pakistan to CLIC & CTF-3 Project. NASIR ABBAS
CLIC work packages CTF3-003 (TBL+) CLIC0-001 (CLIC DB injector) CLIC0-002 (photo injector option for CLIC DB injector.
PETS TESTING ANALYSIS 4 th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting 3 rd May 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for CLIC collaboration.
1 R. Corsini – CLIC Project Meeting CTF3 Update CTF3 Update R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
TBTS Test Program & Schedule G. Riddone
W. Wuensch CLIC project meeting High-power rf structure testing.
ON/OFF news. Reflected Transmitted Stroke 8.0 mm RF power, dB Piston position (gap width), mm ON OFF Compact design of the high RF power variable (mechanically)
Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda Accelerator Laboratory, KEK.
Two-Beam Test Stand results 5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program SLAC, Stanford, CA, USA Erik Adli, University.
1 CTF3 CLEX day July 2006 CLEX day 2006 Introduction G.Geschonke CERN.
Oleksiy Kononenko CERN and JINR
I. Syratchev, structure team meeting, Re-circulation Re-visited I. Syratchev.
I. Syratchev, HGW 2012, KEK, Japan The high power demonstration of the PETS ON/OFF operation with beam. I. Syratchev for CLIC team.
CLIC Workshop 2008 TBTS status. PETS testing program and installation status. Igor Syratchev & Germana Riddone for the CLIC team.
Update on PETS experiments (Igor for the CLIC collaboration)
02-Dec XB Dec-2010 XB-10 Engineering design, production and follow-up of X-band RF components G. Riddone in collaboration.
Nextef status and expansion plans Shuji Matsumoto for KEK Nextef Group /5/51 4th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting, CERN.
High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam CLIC workshop,
Linac RF System Design Options Y. Kang RAD/SNS/NScD/ORNL Project – X Collaboration Meeting April , 2011.
Status of CTF3 G.Geschonke 1CTF3/CLIC Collaboration Board
2010 TESTING PROGRAM AND RESULTS FOR THE CLIC PETS X-BAND WORKSHOP ON RF STRUCTURES, BEAM DYNAMICS AND SOURCES 2 nd December 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti.
RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3.
TBL experimental program, evolution to RF power testing in TBL ACE 2011, February 2-3Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  Current status of TBL  Experimental program.
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan
Multi-stage pulse compressor
Test of the dressed spoke cavity
First Year of Operation at the Two-beam Test Stand
Manipulating RF phase and amplitude at high power level.
News from TBTS International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders,
CLIC RF Structure Development Mtg, Alexey Dubrovskiy and CTF team
by P. Musumeci and F.Tazzioli
Application of moderate (5 MW) X-band power sources for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program and other projects I. Syratchev, CERN.
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
12 GHz High Power RF components requirements for CEA activities
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Presentation transcript:

Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3

CLIC target RF pulse in ASTA, SLAC. Present breakdown rate ~2x10 -6 (CLIC target - 1x10 -7 /pulse/m) PETS RF high power tests in ASTA (SLAC). Energy Average power Peak power CLIC target Mean av. =137 Mean peak = Mean av. =112 Mean peak = Hours #pulses

PETS high power production at CERN (TBTS) Operation mode#1#2#3CLIC Current, A< Pulse length, ns140<240< Bunch Frequency, GHz12 3 PETS power (12 GHz), MW < DBA CRDL TBTS CLEX CTF3 CTF2 #1 #2 #3 Different scenarios of the drive beam generation in the CTF3 To compensate for the lack of current, the active TBTS PETS length was significantly increased: from the original m to 1 m. In order to demonstrate the nominal CLIC power level and pulse length, it was decided to implement a different PETS configuration – PETS with external re-circulation. Variable Splitter (coupling: 0  1) Variable phase shifter To the Load PETS output Drive beam PETS input Round trip efficiency: 75% Round trip delay: 22 ns <30A 14 A 4 A For the fixed parameters of re-circulation (loop delay, coupling, ohmic efficiency and RF phase error) and given pulse shape of the current, the generated RF pulse can be reconstructed/predicted rather well: Coupling = 1  = 0 Coupling = 0.7  = 17 0 Full re-circulation50% re-circulation

Variable high power RF power splitter Variable high power RF phase shifter Fully equipped 1 m long TBTS PETS PETS tank with re-circulation RF circuit installed in TBTS test area (October 2008) Two Beam Test Stand (TBTS) Drive beam PETS high power production at CERN (TBTS)

June-September 2009 PETS TBTS processing history In total, 60 hours (~2x10 5 pulses) of the RF power production in the PETS was accumulated. The peak RF power in full recirculation regime was gradually increased from 20MW to ~ 180 MW.

T DB =100 ns P peak = 73 MW T DB =150 ns P peak = 110 MW T DB =260 ns P peak = 170 MW expected measured reflected current Pulse shortening (full re-circulation) One day at TBTS (W expected – W measured )/ W expected Number of pulses Pulse shortening statistics Pulse shortening and RF phase The processing strategy was rather aggressive. However, in most of the cases the pulse shortening followed the recirculation parameters transient modification (phase and amplitude) and thus the power production was normally quenched (no missing energy).

The detailed analysis of the signals gave us a strong indication that in most of the cases the breakdown activity was associated with feedback loop and not the PETS itself. We have opened attenuator and found multiple traces of breakdowns inside the attenuator splitter. It was decided to completely remove the attenuator and to continue the next run in a full re-circulation mode using a phase shifter for the power level modulation.

October-December 2009 PETS TBTS processing history Since the phase shifter has being kept at the same position, which corresponds to the full recirculation. In total there were about 75k pulses at 1.2 Hz, which is ~25 beam-hours (25 SLAC’s minutes) beginning 3 weeks later Pulse energy, J Each point is an average value over 100 pulses beginning 3 weeks later RF pulse envelopes with pulse shortening at the different stages of processing T the end of processing period the system behavior at the peak power levels ~60/70 MW was rather stable predicte d measured

Attenuator Phase shifter ~λ/2 Phase shifter autopsy: 1. The hybrid of the phase shifter showed much stronger damages than that of attenuator. 2. The surface looks melted rather than having “dirty” spots. 3. The breakdown spots nicely show the standing wave pattern. 4. In the mode converter, the breakdown erosion was found mostly at/close to the input flange. (Note: for the same input power phase shifter was exposed to `~40% more electric filed than attenuator) 3dB hybrid Mode converter

December 2009 PETS TBTS calibration test (no recirculation) predicte d measured TBTS PETS low RF power measurements before and after processing

TBTS PETS 2009 processing summary  During June - December 2009 about 100 hours (~3.5x10 5 pulses) of the RF power production in the PETS were accumulated in total.  The processing was mostly done in free mode, when the PETS was trying to digest any drive beam current available at the moment.  Each breakdown was followed with fast RF power production quench which was protecting the system. Therefore aggressive processing strategy was adopted and frequent breakdowns were allowed.  Finally, up to 180 MW peak RF power in breakdown mode and ~70 MW with in a rather stable operation were achieved.  The power produced was in very good agreement with simulations.  The RF signal analysis indicated that in most of the cases breakdown activity was associated with feedback loop and not the PETS itself. Latest visual inspection of the attenuator’s and phase shifter’s hybrid bodies showed serious breakdown damages and confirmed that these devices were limiting the performance.

Current TBTS hardware status and actions taken since beginning The brand new waveguide components made by GYCOM (Russia) went through the complete cleaning procedure: - Chemical - Hydrogen firing - Vacuum firing and were installed back into the PETS re-circulation loop 2. The TD24 accelerating structure tank was installed into TBTS area. Ready for the 2-beam operation. Accelerating structure tank PETS tank The brand new components In the case, if problem with attenuator and phase shifter will continue, we have prepared back-up solution with a fixed 3dB splitter. The operation will start with fixed 50% RF power split and tuned in-phase recirculation length. Recirculation loop tuned to its resonance fixed 3dB splitter

About 15 MW RF power was produced with a 10A beam according to predictions. No pulse shortening or other breakdown activities were observed. 0.8m TBL PETS, beam driven power production