Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Test of the dressed spoke cavity

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Test of the dressed spoke cavity"— Presentation transcript:

1 Test of the dressed spoke cavity
Vitaliy Goryashko on behalf of the FREIA Group October 2014

2 Cold RF Tests spoke cavity DEDICATED RF TESTS CW, HIGH GRADIENT
cavity Q_0 vs Eacc microphonics transfer function of the Lorentz force detuning parameters of mechanical modes BASIC RF TESTS VERY LOW POWER calibration loaded Q cavity spectrum cavity tuning spoke cavity STANDARD RF TESTS PULSED, HIGH PEAK POWER accelerating gradient X-ray emission multipacting barriers cavity tuners ACCELERATOR MODE PULSED, HIGH PEAK POWER nominal voltage profile fast RF feedback feedforward with piezotuners

3 Equipment and Power Levels
DEDICATED RF TESTS CW, up to 100 kW phase-locked LLRF (self-excited loop) high-power amplifier cavity resonance monitor (built in into LLRF) BASIC RF TESTS some mW VNA spectrum analyzer scope spoke cavity STANDARD RF TESTS PULSED, up to 400 kW signal generator high-power amplifier data acquisition system scope with I/Q mode spectrum analyzer ACCELERATOR MODE PULSED, up to 400 kW signal generator high-power amplifier LLRF with feedback and feedforward

4 Q-slope: can we do it at FREIA?
Calorimetrical measurement of Q0: JLab procedure close inlet and outlet valves of the cryomodule record the pressure as a function of time apply a known amount of resistive heat to the helium again record the pressure a function of time build the calibration curve: the rate of pressure rise vs. heat load apply RF to the cavity, record the pressure rise calculate the dynamic RF load using the calibration curve

5 Lorentz Force Transfer Function for a 325 MHz Spoke; ANL
Dangerous frequencies that must be avoided in the cavity environment

6 Tests of the bare cavity
at FREIA

7 Self-Excited Loop (SEL)
no need for frequency tracking during turn-on or amplitude ramping quickly bring up cavity gradient without running the tuners free of electromechanical instability J.R. Delayen, “Phase and Amplitude Stabilization of Super-conducting resonators”, Ph.D. Thesis, Caltech (1978).

8 Unlocked Self-Excited Loop: an Ideal Resonator

9 Generator driven configuration
SC Resonator Generator driven configuration SEL

10 Unlocked Self-Excited Loop: FREIA test bench
A perfect sinusoidal signal amplifier attenuator A signal from the cavity is sent back to the amplifier through the attenuator. cavity The next step is to close the phase loop.

11 Self-Excited Loop for the spoke

12 Test plan

13 Day 1, zoomed in view

14 Day 2, zoomed in view Q-circle method: Makes use of the NI system
Time-consuming (~10 hours per test) but fully automated by Krish

15 Cavity re-conditioning: X-ray emission
1 hour

16 Transmitted signal upon re-conditioning
re-conditioning started 15 minutes later

17 Q-slope measurements

18 VNA Standard reflective type measurement forward cavity reflected
Reflection coefficient S11 Frequency

19 cavity Self-excited loop cavity reflected signal limiter
forward drive signal 10 KHz span phase shifter amplifier The ratio of the reflected signals to the forward one gives S11

20

21 Microphonics

22 Microphonics measurements

23 Microphonics spectrum: dissipated power ~ 50 W

24 Microphonics in the time domain

25 Microphonics at low and high power
dissipated power

26 Quasi-static Lorentz Force Detuning
The loop amplitude is modulated with a 10-sec period.

27 Quasi-static Lorentz Force Detuning cont’d
The loop amplitude is modulated with a 20-sec period. The 7.7 Hz resonance is suppressed and the overall microphonics level is reduced.

28 Quasi-static Lorentz force detuning: 20-sec
Hz/(MV/m)^2

29 Dynamic Lorentz Force detuning

30 Amplitude modulation of the self-excited loop

31 Cavity voltage and frequency modulation
3 Hz 3 Hz 100 Hz 100 Hz

32 Cavity voltage and frequency modulation cont’d
318 Hz 318 Hz 600 Hz 600 Hz

33 Transfer function of the dynamic Lorentz force detuning
noise goes up because the cavity voltage modulation goes down

34 Guillaume’s simulations of the cavity mechanical modes
Frequency Mode 1 & 2 212Hz Beam tube on CTS side 3 & 4 265Hz & 275Hz Spoke bar/Helium vessel 5 & 6 285Hz Coupled mode Cavity/Helium vessel 7 313Hz Helium vessel 8 to 11 315Hz to 365Hz 12 396Hz beam tubes Mode 1: 212 Hz Mode 3: 265 Hz Mode 5: 285Hz Mode 12: 396Hz

35 Comparison with the Argonne double spoke cavity


Download ppt "Test of the dressed spoke cavity"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google