NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
PARTICIPATION AND ADOPTION OF THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS INITIATIVE 1 Transforming Education in Kentucky Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner Michael.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) September, 2013.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
REICH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION SPRING SEMESTER 2008 Opening Meeting WELCOME.
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Connecticut Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Grant.
September 20, 2004CTQ National Forum Rhode Island’s Journey Toward Aligning the State Teacher Licensing System: An Example of One State’s Reform.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Tom Luna Superintendent of Public Instruction Feb. 12, 2014 TIERED LICENSURE.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Teacher Performance Assessment (TPA) The University of Toledo Faculty Senate October 9, 2012.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Maryland Technology Grant “ Our goal is to ensure that all Maryland teacher candidates are proficient in integrating technology in the classroom for teaching.
Connecticut Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Grant.
College and Career Ready Standards (a.k.a. Common Core Standards) and Educator Effectiveness Systems Kutztown University College of Education Faculty Retreat.
Teacher & Administrator Standards October 21, 2011.
Looking at Teaching through the Lens of Standards Irv Richardson A Presentation to the 600s Sub-Committee July 22,2010 9:00 – 11:00.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2005 Wisconsin Quality Educator Initiative Educator Preparation Program Approval and Licensing.
DRAFT 4.0 PRESENTED TO THE OREGON STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY 17, 2012 Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Using Missouri’s Annual Performance Report for Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation Gale “Hap” Hairston Director – Educator Preparation David.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Educator Performance Assessments ESE Spring Convening May 27 and 28, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
C ollaboration for E ffective E ducator D evelopment, A ccountability, and R eform (CEEDAR) Center U.S. Department of Education, H325A
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
Diploma Implementation Advisory Task Force September 26, 2006.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
Adoption Teacher & Administrator Standards December 1, 2011.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
Prince William County Public Schools Strategic Plan “Providing a World-Class Education” Superintendent’s Advisory Council on Instruction November 14, 2013.
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
Janice why don’t you take the first seven slides as an introduction, I will take 8-11 I think in my section. We should make the presentation more interactive.
Aligning for sustainability: Making the most of your resources
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
Division of Talent and Performance
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2005
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Campus Improvement Plans
Presentation transcript:

NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014

Our Responsibility, Our Promise CCSSO task force report on educator preparation and entry into the profession Adopted by Multiple States Gates Funded Grant Opportunity – 7 states Ten Recommendations in Three Areas Licensure Educator Preparation Program Approval Data Collection, Analysis, and Reporting

GOAL A tiered, performance-based licensure for all educators, based on Idaho’s definitions of “Learner Ready Teacher” and “School Ready Principal” and aligned to a coherent development continuum

A Learner Ready Teacher  Has deep knowledge of the content and how to teach it  Understands differing needs of their students, holds them to high expectations and personalizes learning to ensure each learner is challenged  Cares about, motivates, and actively engages students in learning  Collects, interprets, and uses student assessment data to monitor progress and adjust instruction  Systematically reflects, continuously improves, and collaboratively problem solves  Demonstrates leadership and shared responsibility for the learning of all students.

NTEP Grant Goals LICENSURE Revise and enforce licensure standards for teachers and principals. Licensure performance assessments Multi-tiered licensure system Reform current licensure systems to be more efficient and have reciprocity.

LICENSURE - Progress LICENSURE Initial teacher certification progress Relied on IHE Coalition Initial certification recommendation Performance based measure in pilot stage

IHE Coalition All teacher preparation institutions (8 universities plus 3 community colleges, state department, state board reps) Voluntary working group – 24 months Common Danielson Based Assessment for graduates/teacher candidates Connection to first year of in-service through Individualized Personal Learning Plan (IPLP)

IHE Coalition Surveyed university faculty, cooperating teachers, administrators and other teachers Developed Common Danielson Based Assessment Developed common IPLP Piloting Danielson tool and IPLP this year – 25 triads (faculty, cooperating teacher and teacher candidate)

NTEP GOALS PROGRAM APPROVAL Hold Educator Preparation Programs accountable. Adopt and implement rigorous program approval standards. Align preparation content standards to PK- 12 standards for all licensure areas. Provide support to preparation programs to assist with continuous improvement.

Program Approval Progress 3 year reviews (InTasc Standards) – Common Core LA – Common Core Math – Integration of Technology – Data Fluency and responsiveness Common Summative Assessments Faculty training in Danielson

NTEP GOALS DATA COLLECTION, ANALYSIS & REPORTING Create structures to guide confidential and secure data collection, analysis, and reporting Use data collection for continuous improvement and accountability

Data Collection, Analysis, Reporting Progress Currently reviewing other states Working with State Board on Title II data points Considering the work of Teacher Prep Analytics

Teacher Prep Analytics Candidate Selectivity: Academic Strength (mean and range of candidates GPA at admission, completion), Promise for Teaching (dispositions, perceiver, interest, fit and relevant experience), Applicant/candidate/completer Diversity by race, ethnicity, age and gender at admission and completion

TPA (cont) Quality of Preparation: Candidate content (national assessment)/pedagogical content knowledge, Candidate teaching skill – national assessment at completion or upon certification Consumer satisfaction (program completer surveys at completion and year 3, principal surveys of candidates)

TPA (Cont) Program Completer Effectiveness: Impact on K-12 students – value added Demonstrated teaching skill (K-12 student surveys, evaluations of candidates)

Communication IHEs State Education Deans Provosts and VPS Education Faculty who prepare teachers Education Faculty who prepare admin Presidents?Teacher Candidates State Offices State Department of Education State Board of Education Professional Standards Committee K-12 System Leaders Idaho Assn of School Boards Idaho Assn of Administrators Idaho Assn of School Superintendents Regional Superintendents Regional PrincipalsIAESPIASSP Idaho Assn of Special Ed Directors Teachers Idaho Education Association Northwest Professional Educators Legislature Sen Education Committee House Education Committee Business/Community Leaders IBEAlbertsonsPTA Chamber of Commerces?

Communication IHEs State Education Deans Provosts and VPS Education Faculty who prepare teachers Education Faculty who prepare admin Presidents?Teacher Candidates State Offices State Department of Education State Board of Education Professional Standards Committee K-12 System Leaders Idaho Assn of School Boards Idaho Assn of Administrators Idaho Assn of School Superintendents Regional Superintendents Regional PrincipalsIAESPIASSP Idaho Assn of Special Ed Directors Teachers Idaho Education Association Northwest Professional Educators Legislature Sen Education Committee House Education Committee Business/ Community Leaders IBEAlbertsonsPTA Chamber of Commerces?

Key Outcomes – 12 months Within 12 months (Sept 2014) – The first two tiers (initial and professional) will be approved with performance measures defined – Stakeholders are informed and pilots are being conducted – Tiered licensure for administrators stakeholder group has been convened.

Key Outcomes – 18 months Tiered licensure for administrators is designed and approved Gateway requirements for initial licensure piloted and implemented Gateway requirements for professional licensure determined and pilot is outlined

Key Outcomes – 24 months Gateway requirements for teacher leader tier are established Pilot of professional licensure is underway Administrative licensure gateway requirements are established and are in pilot stages

Questions

IHE Timeline Initial meeting – April 26, 2012 Initial Goals – induction and commonalities in student teaching experience in Treasure Valley Adoption of Danielson model for all IHEs Determining appropriate level of performance for teacher candidates Survey of stakeholders

IHE Timeline Development of Common Summative Assessment Development of IPLP Danielson Training for University Supervisors Creation and Design of Pilot NTEP Grant…