Bruce Warner, Director Oregon Department of Transportation A Bi-State Project: Lessons Learned.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
Advertisements

Transportation and the Economy
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Freight in the Southeast Conference Bob Romig State Transportation Development Administrator Florida Department of Transportation February 9, 2011 Florida’s.
The Alameda Corridor: Lessons Learned Presented to: UCI Conference on the New Generation of Transportation Financing in California Costa Mesa, CA Gill.
Dan O’Neal, Chairman Washington State Transportation Commission.
Freight Action Strategy for the Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor February 2003.
Management and Operations In MPO Planning Christopher O’Neill.
CHRIS GUTIERREZ President KC SmartPort, Inc. December 8, 2009.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
Detroit Intermodal Freight Terminal Michigan Department of Transportation Gloria J. Jeff, Director Michigan Department of Transportation.
FREIGHT PLANNING – MPO’S ROLE Ms. Pragati Srivastava Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) February 27, 2014.
Cobb County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) Board of Commissioners Briefing January 22, 2008.
Public Participation Advisory Committee February 25, 2015.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS Chicago Area Rail Infrastructure 16,000 acres, twice the area of O’Hare 78 yards, including 21 intermodal (rail-truck)
Planning for One Transportation System – Marine Highways Kevin Schoeben Deputy Director Office of Planning and Programming Illinois Department of Transportation.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
Alan Spell| Missouri Economic Research and Information Center| Missouri Department of Economic Development Measuring Your Region’s Transportation Strengths.
Page Avenue What has it done for the region? A comparison of traffic volumes from Fall 2003 to Fall 2004 What has it done for the region? A comparison.
TRANSEARCH Data for Planning in Tennessee By Jerry Everett The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,
1 Florida Trade Flow Study presented to Florida Transportation Commission November 5, 2010 presented by Carrie Blanchard, Ph.D., Florida Chamber Foundation.
Transportation leadership you can trust. Performance Measurement State of the Practice presented to AASHTO Annual Meeting presented by Lance A. Neumann.
California Marine Transportation System: Challenges and Potential Solutions Presented to: Western Cargo Conference San Diego, CA October 16, 2004 Gill.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
RAILROAD CAPACITY ISSUES Talking Freight Seminar By: Robert H. Leilich, Railroad Operations Consultant Springfield, VA (703)
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Talking Freight Promoting Economic Revitalization through Enhanced Freight Transportation Eric G. Madden Deputy Secretary for Aviation and Rail Freight.
1 Freight Program Update Karin Foster June 5, 2009.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
May 14, Our transportation system will provide a safe and accessible range of options that enhances existing urban areas communities while providing.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
Freight Advisory Committee May 13th, 2013 Ashley Probart Deputy Director Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board At-Grade Rail Crossings.
5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Conference Performance Measures at Commercial Ports of Entry Juan Carlos Villa.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
FAST Corridor Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Steve Sewell Parsons Brinckerhoff.
UPDATE TBWG MEETING – OTTAWA Kris Wisniewski November 7, 2012.
Freight Impacts on Ohio ’ s Roadways presented by Suzann S. Gad, AICP The Ohio Depart Of Transportation Office of Urban & Corridor Planning.
Regional Freight Planning in Baltimore Jocelyn Jones Baltimore Metropolitan Council 410/ , x1049 March 21, 2001.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
Oregon Passenger Rail Leadership Council Meeting June 6, 2012.
Project Overview I – 70 Dedicated Truck Lanes Update: 3/19/2008 For FHWA Talking Freight Webinar Keith J. Bucklew Indiana Dept. of Transportation.
I-10 Phoenix-Tucson Bypass Study MAG Transportation Policy Committee December 12, 2007.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on ITS Cross Regional Cooperation and Freight and Logistics Applications June 22, 2010 I ntelligent.
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
The Missouri River Freight Corridor Development Project Ernest B. Perry, Ph.D. Missouri Department of Transportation, and.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
The Importance of Public Participation and Outreach in Project Development Gary Flunoy – Business Outreach/Public Involvement Coordinator August 27, 2009.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
History Group of transportation supporters gathered to discuss ideas to address Missouri’s transportation infrastructure investment Reviewed efforts and.
Global City Teams Challenge September 29-30, 2014 Report Out: Connected, Intelligent Transit Portland, Oregon.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
Our nation’s freight transportation system is a vast, complex network of almost seven million miles of highways and local roads, railways, navigable waterways,
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
1. 2 February Alliance Workshop St. Louis Regonal Freightway Alliance Needs Analysis and Freight Development Committee Terminal Rail Association.
The Freight Transportation System Background on domestic highway, rail, and waterborne freight modes.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
A Bi-State Project: Lessons Learned
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Texas FREIGHT AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE: FREIGHT MOBILITY & border master planS 1st Annual Sustainable Civil Infrastructure Management & Planning Conference.
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Analysis of Freight Flows for Transportation Planning
Presentation transcript:

Bruce Warner, Director Oregon Department of Transportation A Bi-State Project: Lessons Learned

I-5 Corridor Columbia River Crossings at Portland-Vancouver I-205 Bridge I-5 Bridge BNSF Rail Bridge Port of Vancouver Port of Portland Portland International Airport Portland Vancouver WASHINGTON OREGON

Duration of Morning and Evening Peak-Period Traffic on the I-5/Columbia River Bridge and Approaches in 2000 and 2020 Photo: Port of Portland A.M P.M. Year A.M P.M. Year 2020

Freight Rail Congestion Comparisons (over 96 hour period) Passenger Trains Freight Trains 20.0% hrs 12.5 mph Chicago 18.2%Delay Ratio hrsHours of Delay 12.3 mphAverage Speed Portland/ Vancouver Measure

What is the Magnitude of the Problem in the Corridor? What Is the Cost of Inaction? What Improvements are Needed? How Can the Improvements Be Funded? What are the Next Steps? Phase 1 Committee Charge

Phase 1 Findings Doing nothing in the I-5 Corridor is unacceptable. There must be a multi-modal solution in the I-5 Corridor -- there is no silver bullet. Transportation funds are limited. Paying for improvements in the Corridor will require new funds. The region must consider measures that promote transportation-efficient development. –balance of housing and jobs –better traffic management Region needs to develop strategic plan for the Corridor.

Governors’ Task Force 28 member committee of representatives from Washington and Oregon. Members are from private business, community groups, environmental groups, and the public sector. Community Forum Approximately members Cross-section of Community Meets six times at major milestones and additionally as needed. Neighborhoods, Businesses, Interest Groups General Public State and Regional Decision-making Bodies: Bi-State Committee Metro and the Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council Oregon and Washington Transportation Commissions

Involvement of the Community Task Force membership Community Forum Design workshops Public input at milestones Environmental justice stakeholder meetings Public comment at meetings

I-5 Partnership Public Outreach Activities Mailings (up to 45,000 people) Canvassing 7 rounds of open houses/public meetings Visits with neighborhood, business and other groups Website -- information and surveys (over 4,500 primary computers have accessed the site over 330,000 times) News features & Advertisements -- billboard, media Information sites -- libraries, coffee shops, etc.

Regional Economic Effects of the I-5 Corridor/Columbia River Crossing Transportation Choke Points prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation presented by Lance R. Grenzeback Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May 2003

Comparison of River Crossings in Selected U.S. Metropolitan Areas of Similar Size 310Missouri River1.78 millionKansas City 3>30Three Rivers2.36 millionPittsburgh 04 Hampton Roads/ Chesapeake Bay 1.57 millionNorfolk 28Mississippi River2.60 millionSt. Louis 12Columbia River1.92 million Portland- Vancouver 27Ohio River1.65 millionCincinnati Rail XingsHwy XingsBody of WaterPopulationMetro Area

Freight Impacts Congestion will spread into the midday period, which is the peak-travel period for trucks Annual vehicle hours of delay on truck routes in the I-5 corridor will increase by 93 percent from 13,400 hours in 2000 to 25,800 hours by 2020 Congested lane-miles on truck routes will increase by 58 percent, and The cost of truck delay will increase by 140 percent to nearly $34 million

National Freight Flows for Goods with Origins or Destinations in Oregon or Washington Source: Cambridge Systematics based on Reebie Associates TRANSEARCH data, 1998

Oregon-Washington Origins and Destinations for Truck Freight Crossing the I-5 and I-205 Bridges at Portland-Vancouver With Tonnage of Freight on Truck Routes Used to Access Bridge Note: Commodities shipped to or from British Columbia are assigned to Whatcom County Origins and Destinations of Truck Freight Crossing I-5 and I-205 Columbia River Bridges, 1998, All Commodities (million tons) (million tons) Volume of Truck Freight on Routes Used to Access I-5 and I-205 Columbia River Bridges, 1998, All Commodities Source: Cambridge Systematics based on Reebie Associates TRANSEARCH data, 1998

Oregon-Washington Origins and Destinations for Rail Freight Using the Portland-Vancouver Rail Triangle With Tonnage of Freight on Rail Lines Used to Access Triangle Origins and Destinations of Rail Freight Shipped via Portland-Vancouver Rail Triangle, 1998, All Commodities (million tons) Volume of Freight on Portland- Vancouver Rail Triangle Access Routes, 1998, All Commodities (million tons) Note: Commodities shipped to or from British Columbia are assigned to Whatcom County Source: Cambridge Systematics based on Reebie Associates TRANSEARCH data, 1998

Lessons Learned Limit project scope to I-5 Corridor. Do not force a solution. Be patient and be prepared to spend money. Work hard to keep all interests/stakeholders at the table. Be multi-modal. Focus on the economics. Ensure equal 50/50 participation by both states. Be sensitive in dealing with bigger partner/smaller partner.