EPR Assessment 1

Overview Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber Overall Instructor Assessment Section I: Ratee Identification Data Section II: Job Description Section III: Evaluation Of Performance Section IV: Promotion Recommendation Section V: Rater’s Comments Appropriate Bullets Inappropriate Bullets Overall Instructor Assessment EPR comparison (SrA Harris)

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty) I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item) 1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 4. DAFSC 5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE 6b. SRID 7. PERIOD OF REPORT 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORT From: Thru: II. JOB DESCRIPTION 1. DUTY TITLE 2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed) Inefficient. An unprofessional performer. Good performer. Performs routine duties satisfactorily. Excellent performer. Consistently produces high quality work. The exception. Absolutely superior in all areas. 2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge) Lacking. Needs considerable improvement. Sufficient. Gets job accomplished Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions. Excels in knowledge of all related positions. Mastered all duties. 3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork) Ineffective. Gets satisfactory results. Highly effective leader. Exceptionally effective leader. 4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources) Manages resources in a satisfactory manner. Skillful and competent. Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities. 5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions) Poor. Sound. Emphasizes logic and decision making. Highly respected and skilled. 6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES Unprofessional, unreliable. Meets expectations. Sets an example for others to follow. Epitomizes the Air Force professional. 7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas) Unable to communicate effectively. Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily. ideas clearly and concisely. Highly skilled writer and communicator. AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO) SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) 10

20th Bomb Squadron, ACC, Fogler AFB OR 12345 MXOBR549 OJ2MG FOR TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item) 1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 4. DAFSC Climber, Cliff R. 123-45-6789 SMSgt 2A690 5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE 6b. SRID 20th Bomb Squadron, ACC, Fogler AFB OR 12345 MXOBR549 OJ2MG 7. PERIOD OF REPORT 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORT From: 1 Jan Thru: 31 Dec 365 ANNUAL

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty) I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item) 1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 4. DAFSC 5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE 6b. SRID 7. PERIOD OF REPORT 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORT From: Thru: II. JOB DESCRIPTION 1. DUTY TITLE 2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed) Inefficient. An unprofessional performer. Good performer. Performs routine duties satisfactorily. Excellent performer. Consistently produces high quality work. The exception. Absolutely superior in all areas. 2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge) Lacking. Needs considerable improvement. Sufficient. Gets job accomplished Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions. Excels in knowledge of all related positions. Mastered all duties. 3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork) Ineffective. Gets satisfactory results. Highly effective leader. Exceptionally effective leader. 4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources) Manages resources in a satisfactory manner. Skillful and competent. Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities. 5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions) Poor. Sound. Emphasizes logic and decision making. Highly respected and skilled. 6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES Unprofessional, unreliable. Meets expectations. Sets an example for others to follow. Epitomizes the Air Force professional. 7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas) Unable to communicate effectively. Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily. ideas clearly and concisely. Highly skilled writer and communicator. AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO) SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) 11

NCOIC, Sortie Support Flight II. JOB DESCRIPTION 1. DUTY TITLE NCOIC, Sortie Support Flight Supervises 24 People. Responsible for effective management of 2 facilities, 4 vehicles, and equipment account valued more than $5 million. Ensures capability to receive, inspect, store, and maintain over 350 line items. Provides guidance and establishes training standards necessary for effective planning and scheduling of all Sortie Support Flight functions in support of operational and contingency requirements. Ensures expedient completion of all Time Compliance Technical Orders. Establishes accountability for all aircraft training devises. Enforces safety and supply discipline. ADDITIONAL DUTY: Squadron Performance Measures Coordinator. 2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty) I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item) 1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 4. DAFSC 5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE 6b. SRID 7. PERIOD OF REPORT 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORT From: Thru: II. JOB DESCRIPTION 1. DUTY TITLE 2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed) Inefficient. An unprofessional performer. Good performer. Performs routine duties satisfactorily. Excellent performer. Consistently produces high quality work. The exception. Absolutely superior in all areas. 2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge) Lacking. Needs considerable improvement. Sufficient. Gets job accomplished Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions. Excels in knowledge of all related positions. Mastered all duties. 3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork) Ineffective. Gets satisfactory results. Highly effective leader. Exceptionally effective leader. 4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources) Manages resources in a satisfactory manner. Skillful and competent. Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities. 5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions) Poor. Sound. Emphasizes logic and decision making. Highly respected and skilled. 6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES Unprofessional, unreliable. Meets expectations. Sets an example for others to follow. Epitomizes the Air Force professional. 7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas) Unable to communicate effectively. Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily. ideas clearly and concisely. Highly skilled writer and communicator. AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO) SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) 11

VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS NONCONCUR 1 IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION V. RATER’S COMMENTS (Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities ) RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME CONSIDER READY IMMEDIATE PROMOTION RATER’S RATER’S RATER’S NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DUTY TITLE DATE SSN SIGNATURE CONCUR NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77) VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS NONCONCUR VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE (N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee) X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW A B C D SENIOR RATER SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL LOWER LEVEL YES NO Last feedback was conducted on: ______________. 2 3 4 5 26

VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS NONCONCUR 1 IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION V. RATER’S COMMENTS (Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities ) RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME CONSIDER READY IMMEDIATE PROMOTION RATER’S RATER’S RATER’S NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DUTY TITLE DATE SSN SIGNATURE CONCUR NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77) VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS NONCONCUR VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE (N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee) X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW A B C D SENIOR RATER SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL LOWER LEVEL YES NO Last feedback was conducted on: ______________. 2 3 4 5 VII. INDORSER’S COMMENTS AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (REVERSE) (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO) 26

Rater’s Comments Start with a strong impact statement! ­ Single-handedly spearheaded squadron ORI preparations, ensured "Outstanding" rating in June 200X ORI

Rater’s Comments -­ Personally created inspection checklists for all sections to ensure compliance with established directives -­ Allowed sections to teach other sections their processes; improved working relations between sections -- Increased efficiency, eliminated duplication of effort, saved over $26,000...decreased equipment support by 25%, pre-flight inspection times by 50%, post-flight inspections by 33%, and no-shows by 73%

Rater’s Comments ­ Constantly striving to improve quality of life for all members of the unit; personally undertook challenge of reducing dormitory problems...rid the dormitory of all incidents of underage drinking/property damage -- Incorporated inputs from dormitory members to ensure all issues were addressed; morale skyrocketed -­- First dormitory to be selected Dorm of the Month; showcase for other units on base to emulate

Rater’s Comments - Instilled pride of ownership across all sections; ensured all personnel in customer service positions received customer service training--decreased customer wait time and increased customer satisfaction - Greatly enhanced civil-military relations…delivered a riveting presentation and was lauded by civic leaders - Selected SNCO of the year--exemplifies core values and instills pride--promote to CMSgt immediately!

Rater’s Comments Weak comments would include: - Elected President of Wing Top 3 organization, making the organization more responsive to enlisted personnel and community partnerships -- Organized the Top 3 children's Haunted House, manned the refreshment booth at the base picnic -- Organized renovation efforts for Bear Creek Elementary School, hard work praised by school leadership

Rater’s Comments - Spearheaded squadron pre-inspection barbecue to reward efforts of all members for preparation efforts - POC for Wing POW/MIA day; largest crowd ever...emotional day of remembrance carried out to perfection

Rater’s Comments Inappropriate comments include: - Submitted for Meritorious Service Medal for his consistently superior efforts and outstanding results

Feedback Dates Midpoint Feedback: 17 Jul

VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS NONCONCUR 1 IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION V. RATER’S COMMENTS (Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities ) RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME CONSIDER READY IMMEDIATE PROMOTION RATER’S RATER’S RATER’S NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DUTY TITLE DATE SSN SIGNATURE CONCUR NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77) VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS NONCONCUR VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE (N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee) X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW A B C D SENIOR RATER SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL LOWER LEVEL YES NO Last feedback was conducted on: ______________. 2 3 4 5 VII. INDORSER’S COMMENTS 26

Overall Instructor Assessment 134 AF 67 RA 134 AF 67 RA 134 AF 67 RA AF 67 134

Mediocre EPR What would a “middle-of-the-road” performer’s EPR look like?

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty) I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39-62 carefully before completing any item) 1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 4. DAFSC 5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 6a. PAS CODE 6b. SRID 7. PERIOD OF REPORT 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 9. REASON FOR REPORT From: Thru: II. JOB DESCRIPTION 1. DUTY TITLE 2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed) Inefficient. An unprofessional performer. Good performer. Performs routine duties satisfactorily. Excellent performer. Consistently produces high quality work. The exception. Absolutely superior in all areas. 2. JOB KNOWLEDGE (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge) Lacking. Needs considerable improvement. Sufficient. Gets job accomplished Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions. Excels in knowledge of all related positions. Mastered all duties. 3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork) Ineffective. Gets satisfactory results. Highly effective leader. Exceptionally effective leader. 4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS (Consider how well member uses time and resources) Manages resources in a satisfactory manner. Skillful and competent. Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities. 5. JUDGMENT (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions) Poor. Sound. Emphasizes logic and decision making. Highly respected and skilled. 6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES Unprofessional, unreliable. Meets expectations. Sets an example for others to follow. Epitomizes the Air Force professional. 7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas) Unable to communicate effectively. Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily. ideas clearly and concisely. Highly skilled writer and communicator. AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V2) (PerFORM PRO) SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) 11

VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS NONCONCUR 1 IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION V. RATER’S COMMENTS (Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities ) RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME CONSIDER READY IMMEDIATE PROMOTION RATER’S RATER’S RATER’S NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DUTY TITLE DATE SSN SIGNATURE CONCUR NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77) VI. RATER’S RATER’S COMMENTS NONCONCUR VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE (N/A for CMSgt or CMSgt selectee) X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW A B C D SENIOR RATER SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL LOWER LEVEL YES NO Last feedback was conducted on: ______________. 2 3 4 5 26

Rater’s Comments - Received laudatory comments for response to a mobility exercise scenario -- Flawlessly processed over 50 Emergency Notification Data Cards for mobility personnel -- Contributed directly to squadron earning overall "Excellent" rating - Innovative customer service representative -- Devised new method for recording customer request -- Reduced customer waiting time by 25 percent

Rater’s Comments - Accomplished checklist to compare current operating procedures with governing regulations -- Found and corrected several problem areas reducing time lost due to duplication of efforts - Completed Community College of the Air Force English course -- Improved her written communications skills -- Reduced grammatical errors on correspondence - Completed Airman Leadership School...improved overall knowledge for the Air Force - Displays behavior appropriate for a senior airman; recommend for promotion

Summary Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber Overall Instructor Assessment Section I: Ratee Identification Data (Not Assessed) Section II: Job Description (Not Assessed) Section III: Evaluation Of Performance Section IV: Promotion Recommendation Section V: Rater’s Comments Appropriate Bullets Inappropriate Bullets Overall Instructor Assessment EPR Comparison

EPR Assessment 1