FEMA Region III Coastal Hazard Analyses and DFIRMs Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling to Revise Coastal Inundation and Flooding Estimates in Georgia and Northeast Florida Association of State Flood Plain Managers Conference May.
Advertisements

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Great Lakes Flood Hazard Mapping Project - Data Development (Lake Michigan) Bruce Ebersole USACE Engineer.
Hurricane Storm Surge Simulation on Petascale Computers Clint Dawson and Ethan Kubatko, UT Austin; Joannes Westerink, Notre Dame; Anna Spagnuolo, Oakland.
1 Demonstration of Methodology Expert Panel Open Meeting Austin, Texas November 12, 2014.
Lonnie G. Harper & Associates, Inc. Lonnie G. Harper, PE & PLS (LGH) David Minton, PE (LGH) Dr. Joseph Suhayda (Coastal Oceanographic Consultant) Dr. Roy.
Coastal Flood Mapping Using Customized GIS Layers by Jeff Zanotti.
Research Lead  The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CHC-R 5 th Annual Meeting January 31-February 1, 2013 AdcircLite-NC Rapid computation of.
CHAPTER 5: PREDICTING STORM SURGE LESSONS FROM HURRICANE IKE.
The Effects of Starting Wave Conditions on Coastal Flood Hazards: A Sensitivity Analysis for the Texas Coast Katrina Myers, PE, CFM Guillermo Simón, PE,
1 Changes to Alabama Flood Maps Impacts to Flood Insurance Presented By: Leslie A. Durham, P.E. ADECA Office of Water Resources January 23, 2014.
A Roadmap for a Seamless Elevation Surface: Benefits to Storm Surge Forecasting Lindy Dingerson NOAA Coastal Services Center.
Floodplain Boundary Standard A Coastal Perspective May 23, 2012 Mark Zito, GISP, CFM CDM Smith Alex Sirotek, CFM CDM Smith RSC 1 Lead.
US Army Corps of EngineersCoastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC SWIMS Hawaii Hurricane Inundation Fast Forecast Tool Jane McKee Smith, Andrew B. Kennedy,
WORKING GROUP 1 MODELING OF WIND WAVES AND SURGE EVENTS IN THE CASPIAN, BLACK, AZOV AND BALTIC SEAS.
Comparison of Wave Climate Analysis Techniques in Sheltered Waters May 19, 2011 Tim Hillier, P.E., CFM Associate Lauren Klonsky Water Resources Engineer.
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Flood Mitigation Section South Carolina Map Modernization Initiative Update Pee Dee GIS Users Group Meeting.
Company Confidential/Proprietary A Regional Prototype System for a National Problem Chesapeake Inundation Prediction System Bridging the Gap from Forecast.
Model Simulation Studies of Hurricane Isabel in Chesapeake Bay Jian Shen Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences College of William and Mary.
Research Lead  The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CHC-R 5 th Annual Meeting January 31-February 1, 2013 AdcircLite-NC: Rapid evaluation of.
HAZUS ®MH Coastal Flood Hazard Analysis FATIH C. DOGAN ABS CONSULTING.
North Carolina Neuse River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings April 23, 24, and 25, 2001.
An Instrumented Coastal Process Modeling Test Bed US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Jeff Hanson U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development.
Flooding in New York City 30 October Current Conditions.
Changes to FEMA Mapping John Grace, CFM Coastal Engineer - FEMA Region 1 - Boston March 14, 2014 – The Soil and Water Conservation Society – Winter Conference.
VDATUM: the Vertical Datum Transformation Tool
Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program
FEMA Region III Coastal Hazard Analyses and DFIRMs Update Jeff Gangai – Dewberry Robin Danforth – FEMA Region III.
1 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center FEMA REGION III COASTAL MAPPING PROJECT May 19, 2011 Coastal Analyses and Outreach Robin Danforth, FEMA.
FEMA’s Coastal Mapping and Management Process. 2 2 Welcome  Background and Coastal study methodologies  Technical Opportunities  Management Opportunities.
Demonstration Study to Evaluate Coastal Flood Hazards on Lake Erie ASFPM, San Antonio, TX May 22, 2012.
Using Partnerships to Meet NOAA’s Needs for its Next Generation Storm Surge System NOS/OCS/CSDL J. Feyen F. Aikman M. Erickson NWS/NCEP/EMC H. Tolman NWS/OST/MDL.
FLOOD STUDY Cumberland County, NJ FEMA REGION II February 22, 2011.
North Carolina White Oak River Basin Plan December 19, 2000.
Update on Storm Surge at NCEP Dr. Rick Knabb, Director, National Hurricane Center and representing numerous partners 21 January 2014.
DFIRM Subcommittee Update 1. Challenges Remain Climate Change and Sea Level Rise: Identify sea level rise timeframe and associated critical issues Data.
National Weather Service Flood Inundation Mapping A New Way A New Wayof Looking at Flooding Diane Cooper Hydrologic Services Program Manager NWS - Southern.
FEMA Region II Essex County, NJ Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) FEMA Region 2 Mitigation Division July 14th, :00-11:00.
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center COASTAL OUTREACH ADVISORY TEAM Kick-off Meeting November 19, 2010 FEMA Region III Coastal Mapping Project.
Wave Height Estimate for Multi- Frequency Flooding Events Elena Drei-Horgan, PhD, CFM Darryl Hatheway, CFM Paul Carroll, PE May 24, 2012.
Environmental and Water Resources Engineering Division Civil Engineering Dr. Soumendra Nath Kuiry Assistant Professor Hurricane Gustav (2008) Simulation.
Building the Digital Coast. Priority Coastal Issues Land use planning (growth management) Coastal conservation Hazards (flooding/inundation/storm surge)
ASFPM May 19, 2011 by Darryl Hatheway, CFM, AECOM San Diego and Vince Geronimo, CFM, PE, AECOM Oakland.
1 Web-Based Data Archive, Monitoring, and Mining Tool Jeffrey A. Melby, PhD USACE ERDC Coastal and Hydraulics Lab
North Carolina Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings January 30 and 31, 2001.
Evaluation of Analytical Techniques for Production of a Sea Level Rise Advisory Mapping Layer for the NFIP Jerry W. Sparks, P.E., CFM ASFPM Annual National.
FEMA’s Risk MAP Coastal Updates – An Overview Jonathan E. Westcott, P.E. ASFPM 2012 National Conference San Antonio, TX Session D.8.
North Carolina Pasquotank River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings May 17 and 18, 2001.
Great Lakes Flood Hazard Mapping Program The initiative is a system-wide solution that provides a comprehensive analysis of storm and high water events.
Morganza to the Gulf Hurricane Protection Feasibility Report March 2002 Hydraulic Analysis.
Coastal Hazard Analyses and DFIRM Update For Maryland Robin Danforth – FEMA Region III Jeff Gangai – RAMPP Heather Zhao– RAMPP Jeff Hanson – USACE/ERDC.
1 May 24, 2007 FEMA Texas Gulf Coast Mapping after Hurricane Rita Stephen C. Altman, P.E., CFM Michael Baker, Jr. Inc.
Regional Planning for Sea-Level Rise in Hampton Roads Benjamin McFarlane, AICP Regional Planner NOAA Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 26, 2011.
Coastal Process Modeling US Army Corps of Engineers Jeff Hanson Research Oceanographer MORPHOS Program Manager US Army Engineer Research and Development.
Mitigation Directorate FEMA’s Mitigation Directorate and Hurricane Emergency Management The Mitigation Directorate supports Hurricane risk assessment and.
Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage Rebecca Haney Coastal Geologist Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management.
Evaluation of Preliminary DFIRMs Phase I Findings Terrebonne Parish June 22, 2009.
The Integration of Bathymetry, Topography, and Shoreline and the Vertical Datum Transformations Behind it Charting and Mapping the Land-Sea Interface.
Joseph L. DiLorenzo, Ph.D. NAJARIAN ASSOCIATES
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center U.S. IOOS MODEL VALIDATION CAPABILITY SURA SUPER-REGIONAL TEST BED Working across agencies to bring observations.
Maryland’s Coastal Resiliency Assessment Nicole Carlozo, MD DNR October 14, 2015 Good afternoon. I’m here today to provide some information on Maryland’s.
FLOOD STUDY Salem County, NJ FEMA REGION II February 22, 2011.
NOAA Data & Catastrophe Modeling Prepared by Steve Bowen of Impact Forecasting September 16, 2015.
Tropical Report: Modeling Hurricane Ike with SLOSH Don Slinn, Jeff Ren, Go Fujita Univ of Florida Coastal Engineering.
Cape May County, NJ Initial Coordination Meeting FEMA Region II Mitigation Division September 29th, :00-11:00.
Middlesex County, NJ Initial Coordination Meeting FEMA Region II Mitigation Division October 13th, :00-15:00.
North Carolina Lumber River Basin Plan
Landuse Attributes for Overland Wave Modeling
<<County Name>> <<Date>>
Update on Great Lakes Coastal Methodology
Union County, NJ Initial Coordination Meeting
Presentation transcript:

FEMA Region III Coastal Hazard Analyses and DFIRMs Update Jeff Gangai – Dewberry Robin Danforth – FEMA Region III

Introduction State of Effective Coastal Studies Why a coastal restudy is needed? Elements of a Coastal Flood Insurance Study Ongoing FEMA Region III Storm Surge Modeling Effort Overland Wave Analysis Components Preliminary coastal tasks to be performed for coastal counties.

State of Effective Coastal Study Topographic data used for modeling and mapping date back to the Mid-1970’s and mid-1980’s from USGS maps SWELs go back to a 1978 VIMS study for the Chesapeake Bay and Tidal Gage Analysis on the Atlantic Coast. Coastal studies date back to late 1970’s and early 1980’s Wave height determined with NAS method. Erosion analysis not performed Wave setup not accounted for Limited WHAFIS nad/or wave runup modeling performed

Why a coastal restudy is needed? New Guidelines need to be implemented Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico Guidelines Update (2007) Sheltered Water Report (2008) PM 50 Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA) (2008) To update base data such as topographic dataset and aerial imagery to high resolution products and seamless Digital Elevation Model (DEM) To utilize newer coastal hazard modeling methodologies developed during the FEMA Mississippi Coastal Restudy To take advantage of higher performance numerical modeling To take advantage of improvement in GIS technologies to allow for more accurate and detailed FIRMs

Hurricane Isabel Sept 18, 2003 Recorded Surge Levels: 7.5 ft/2.2 m Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel 8.3 ft/2.5 m at Gloucester Point

Hurricane Isabel, Chesapeake Bay

FEMA Region III Study Area Four states plus District of Columbia Five metropolitan areas Complex coastal geomorphology Delaware River/Bay system - Tidal up to Trenton, NJ - 782 square mile bay - Strategic shipping and military port Chesapeake bay - Third largest estuary in world - 11,000 miles of tidal shoreline - Major shipping, seafood and military ports VA: 30 counties with shoreline exposed to the Atlantic Ocean and the Chesapeake Bay MD: 16 counties (Atlantic Ocean and Chesapeake Bay)

Elements of a Coastal Flood Insurance Study BFE on a FIRM includes 4 components: Storm surge stillwater elevation (SWEL) Wave setup Wave height above total stillwater elevation Wave runup above storm surge elevation All applied to an eroded beach profile The above components are computed through: Terrain processing and profile erosion Storm surge study for SWELs determination Coastal Hazard Analyses Floodplain boundaries, flood hazard zones and LiMWA are then mapped on FIRMs

FEMA RIII Storm Surge Project Organizational Chart FEMA Project Officer Robin Danforth DHS Region III US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Advisory Board R. Luettich (UNC-CH) B. Ebersole (USACE-CHL) J. Smith (USACE-CHL) K. White (USACE-CRREL) K. Galluppi (RENCI) M. Powell (DE) R. Wise (NAP) USACE Storm Surge Program Manager J. Hanson (USACE-FRF) J. Roughton (USACE-FRF) D. Nelson (USACE-CRREL) Project Support J. Gangai (Dewberry) E. Drei-Horgan (Dewberry) B. Batten (Dewberry) Storm Specification P. Vickery (ARA) V. Cardone (Oceanweather) A. Cox (Oceanweather) Modeling System B. Blanton (RENCI) P. Vickery (ARA) V. Cardone (Oceanweather) A. Cox (Oceanweather) R. Luettich (UNC-CH) H. Friebel (NAP) E. Devaliere (UNC) C. Fulcher (UNC) J. Atkinson (ARCADIS) H. Roberts (ARCADIS) GIS Database K. Gamiel (RENCI) B. Blanton (RENCI) M. Forte (USACE-FRF) J. Yuan (ECSU) Bathy / Topo J. Miller (NAP) C. Rourke (NAP) M. Hudgins (NAO) P. Moye (NAO) M. Schuster (NAB) J. Scott (NAB) M. Forte (USACE-FRF) M. Blanchard (RENCI) L. Stillwell (RENCI)

Return Period Analysis Approach Storm Forcing Extratropical Wind Fields Hurricane Tracks High-Resolution Bathy / Topo Mesh Storm Surge Modeling Winds Waves Water Levels Return Period Analysis JPM-OS Hurricanes EST Extratropicals Flood Levels 10-, 50-, 100-, & 500-year

Extra-Tropical Storm Forcing Selection based on water levels at 7 stations Total of 31 historical storms 1975-2009 Kinematic reanalysis of all wind fields Empirical Simulation Technique (EST) used for return period calculations To include sampling at 5 tidal stages Return Period Analysis

Nor’Ida November 2009 Norfolk, VA Remnant of Hurricane Ida Added to extratropical data set Sewells Point, VA 6-ft Surge Delaware

Tropical Storm Forcing Record of 20 hurricanes in 60 years insufficient for 100- and 500-yr computations Synthetic storm set used to develop landfall frequencies and hurricane parameters Joint Probability Method for return period analysis Demonstrated validity with comparisons to historic data Modeled Tracks VA/DE/NJ Central Pressure Difference Heading

Development of a Topo/Bathy Digital Elevation Model (DEM) 10 m DEM DEM covers: NJ DE MD VA Portions of PA Delaware Bay Chesapeake Bay and main tributaries Atlantic Ocean

High Resolution Bathymetry and Topography Data assimilation through USACE districts Use Lidar for topography where available Region divided into 20 tiles Consistent bathy/topo surface with 10-m horizontal resolution 10-m Resolution Region III DEM Geographic Tiles

ADCIRC Grid Grid allows to capture complex coastal morphologies and provide high resolution of shoreline features, embayment and estuaries Expected grid resolution 50 m at shore/high developed areas, 1-2 km offshore ADCIRC will be coupled with the 2D wave model SWAN The coupling of the two models will allow to compute starting wave conditions and wave setup for the overland wave analyses

Storm Surge Modeling System Wind and Pressure Fields TC96 PBL Hurricane Model OWI Extratropical Reconstructions Water Levels ADCIRC Coastal Circulation and Storm Surge Model Waves/ Radiation Stress WaveWatch III Basin Scale Waves SWAN Coastal Waves Radiation Stress WW3 Coupling SWAN

Storm Surge Project Status Accomplishments: Bathy/Topo Inventory Draft DEM Establish JPM Approach Winter Storm Selection and Windfield Develop. Prototype Modeling System Validation Tools – Interactive Model Evaluation and Diagnostics System Ongoing: DEM Review ADCIRC Mesh Development Models Calibration and Validation Synthetic Storms Development Future Tasks: Production Frequency Analysis

Coastal Hazard Analyses Components Transect layout Field Reconnaissance (land use, obstructions, shoreline conditions, structures) Starting wave conditions (wave height and period) from 2D wave modeling eliminating the need for limited fetch analysis Wave setup from 2D wave modeling Primary Frontal Dune (PFD) Dune erosion: 540 sqft rule WHAFIS modeling for overland wave height computation 2% Wave Runup All above analyses will be performed with the Coastal GeoFIRM tool Coastal GeoFIRM Technology facilitates higher resolution while reducing costs Framework allows preliminary tasks to be performed parallel for surge modeling Benefits: Accelerated study timeframe High resolution results Improved mapping accuracy Repeatability Less subjectivity

Transect Placement Shoreline in High and Low Population Density Areas

Field Reconnaissance

Overland Wave Hazard Modeling WHAFIS 4.0 Profile elevation 1% SWELs Starting wave conditions Wave Setup Obstruction cards (OF, IF, BU, VE, MG)

Coastal Hazard Modeling and Mapping Workshop Wave Runup FEMA G&S 2007 requires the use of the 2% runup vs. the mean runup computed prior to 2007 Mild-sloping beaches, bluffs and cliffs Coastal Structures: Will structure survive the 1% event? Is structure certified? Modeling of integral structure vs. fail structure to determine higher hazard Runup on structures limited to 3 ft on top of the structure’s crest w/overtopping possible AO Zone Methods: Runup 2.0, TAW, ACES, SPM Page 23

Added Detail with GIS

Mapping

Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA) FEMA Procedure Memorandum No. 50, 2008 At present not a regulatory requirement No Federal Insurance requirements tied to LiMWA CRS benefit for communities requiring VE Zone construction standards in areas defined by LiMWA or areas subject to waves greater then 1.5 ft. Potential of additional 650 points

Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA) Defined by the area subject to wave action with waves greater than 1.5 ft in height

LiMWA – mapped example

Project Schedule Spring 2010 Summer 2010 Fall 2010 Spring 2011 Complete DEM Surge Model validation Initiate Surge production Complete Surge production and return period analysis GIS site fully populated Complete Overland Wave Analysis Complete Hazard Mapping Hurricane Isabel September 2003

Web/GIS Interface Public outreach site under construction Storm Selection Public outreach site under construction GIS interface to results for stakeholders Google-earth displays of storm tracks, model output fields and return periods Inundation Levels Maximum Wave Heights

Questions?