WestEd.org Special Education Supports Information System Update Greg Austin, WestEd Director, Health and Human Development Program & Cal-SCHLS System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inclusive Services: An Overview
Advertisements

ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
NCLB, Highly Qualified and IDEA 2004 How it all fits together and What it means for you. RIDE Spring Leadership Conference May 11, 2006 Grossi/Olsen 2006.
Purpose of Instruction
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
2013 Spring Meeting Size-Alike Session “Supporting Principals as Leaders of Learning”
WestEd.org Using and Promoting the California School Climate Survey and the Special Education Supports Information System (SESIS) Greg Austin, PhD
126th Annual Meeting and Conference December 9, 2011 Discussion of Significant Findings and Aggregate Data Based on the Results of the Endicott College.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Cal-SCHLS Update Nov 17, 2010.
Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
Parent School Climate Survey Results and Analysis November 2010.
SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBER PERCEPTIONS REGARDING PREFERRED LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS IN WEST VIRGINIA Keith A. Butcher.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
A Study of Teacher Competencies and Involvement in Transition Services for Middle and High School Students with Disabilities Conducted by: John Mattos.
Assuring Quality of Education: Regulations for Education Programs
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
© 2014 K12 Insight Parents, Students and Staff School Time Task Force Survey — Comparison Report Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools April 3 – 25, 2014.
Chks.wested.org and cscs.wested.org Cal—School Climate, Health and Learning Survey 2010/ Survey Administration.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
Why/Purpose Instructional Support Services Program Review The purpose of the review is to create a well-articulated, high quality, financially sustainable.
Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
Presidential Youth Fitness Program Training Healthful Living.
The Road to College: Rigor, Readiness, and Retention.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Update On Social and Emotional Development and Learning Guidelines S/CDN September 12, 2008 Mark J. Barth
© All rights reserved 2014 Great Colleges Survey All Campus Update January 21, 2015.
Access to Learning Section E STANDARDS & INDICATORS Council of International Schools New England Association of Schools & Colleges.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
Teacher Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Achieving Cultural Proficiency – A Leadership Perspective Friday, October 2, 2015 Presenters: Dr. James P. Lee, Superintendent Dr. Drew Davis, Director.
Seaside Elementary School.  This survey includes questions related to Professional Development (PD). This report is divided into sections, with findings.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Training Goals ► To define “Educational Benefit” ► To learn a process for reviewing your district’s IEPs.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Educational Benefit Review (ED Benefit). Educational Benefit Purpose To determine if the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) was reasonably.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.
1 Building Collaborative Relationships to Improve Student Learning Presented by Auburn Montgomery School of Education.
Regional School District 13 Board of Education’s Recommended Budget
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California Department of.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
HINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET PROPOSAL UPDATE FOR FY 16 Operating Budget Proposal Update from the Administration January 22, 2015.
All Surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart above (and on subsequent pages)
Ekaterina P. Forrester, Ph.D.
Planning, Assessment & Research Analysis and Use of Student Data Part I Administrative Academy Los Angeles Unified School District.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Educational Benefit Review (EBR) Purpose Determine if the student’s IEP is reasonably calculated for the.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Budget Overview March 27, K – 3 Elementary Maintains small class sizes (19-22 students per class) Maintains current level of teaching assistants.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
End of Year Report: Proposed Changes for FY17 and FY18
Alexandria City Public Schools Preliminary Results of the 2016 Teaching, Empowering, Leading, and Learning (TELL) Survey. Dawn Shephard Associate Director, Teaching,
TELL Survey Background
2016 DTSDE Surveys: Warring Elementary School
2016 DTSDE Surveys: Clinton Elementary School
Overview of AIR Special Education Program Review and Next Steps
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Family Guide: Understanding Transition Team Members’ Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

WestEd.org Special Education Supports Information System Update Greg Austin, WestEd Director, Health and Human Development Program & Cal-SCHLS System / Presented to the CA Strategic Plan Leadership Team Meeting, June 8, 2011, California Dept of Ed

WestEd.org SE Staff Responsibility Questions Q1. What is your role at this school (Mark all apply): Teacher; Special Education Teacher Q2. Do you provide services to the following types of students: Special Education SESM: School personnel with responsibilities for teaching or providing services to students with IEPs, including general ed teachers who serve students with IEPs, paraprofessionals…other support providers (e.g., speech therapists).

WestEd.org District Report Example All SE Providers vs. Others

WestEd.org State Report Two-year aggregation of data from all districts Disaggregated by SE vs. Non-SE responsibilities Issue: Given 8 column report layout, what is the best approach to disaggregation?

WestEd.org Respondents Core Module Total Respondents:95,000 SE Teachers 6,500 (07%) Gen Ed Teacher w/ SE Services40,000 (42%) Other SE Services17,000 (18%) SESM Module Total Respondents:56,000 SE Teachers 5,700 (10%) Gen Ed Teacher w/ SE Services26,000 (46%) Other SE Services 9,500 (17%)

WestEd.org Main State Findings Results often vary for SE vs. GE Teachers compared with all SE Providers vs. Non-Providers -Level of results overall lower for teachers only Supportive workplace: T 36% vs 37%; All: 39% vs 40% -Group differences often greater Safe for staff: T 39% vs 43%; All 45% vs 46% Welcomes parents: T 41% vs 39%; All 41% vs 42% Students well-behaved: T 65% vs 70%; All 73% vs 70% PD behavior/classroom management: T 45% vs 38%; All 39% vs 38%

WestEd.org Main Teacher Findings: Group Differences Elementary teachers more positive than Secondary Elementary SET more positive than GET -Learning & working environment -Staff collegiality and sense of mission -Student learning readiness & motivation -Adverse impact student behavior -Learning supports Secondary SET often less positive than GET on same indicators as above

WestEd.org Main Teacher Findings: Group differences Across schools SET higher than GET for: -Welcoming parent involvement -Materials reflecting student culture -Need PD for (1) behavior/classroom management, (2) youth development Across schools SET lower for: -Adults treating students (1) fairly, (2) with respect

WestEd.org Findings for SE Teachers Half or more need PD in serving IEP students and meeting SEL/developmental needs Only about one-third strongly agree school positive working place, safe, collegial, have high expectations for students, treat students fairly/respectfully Less than one-quarter strongly agree provides resources to work w/ IEP students But 60% report provides a lot of services for students w/ disabilities or special needs and resources to do job effectively.

WestEd.org Findings for SE Teachers Elem/Middle much higher than High School for doing a lot of service for students with disabilities/special needs (65% vs 46%) Elem much higher than Middle or High School for having resources to (1) do job effectively and (2) work with IEP students (31% vs. 16%; 29% vs. 21%)

WestEd.org SESM Findings: SE Teachers Results become less positive across school types Six highest (30%-36%) strong agreement overall: -Reduces instructional interruptions -Effectively schedules mandated activities -Integrates SE into daily operations -High expectations for IEP students -Provides positive working environment -Climate encourages continued service

WestEd.org SESM Findings: SE Teachers Six lowest (12%-19%) strong agreement overall -Works to minimize paperwork -Sufficient time to collaborate -Alternative modes of communication -Sufficient resources for SE programs/services -Relevant paraprofessional training -Adequate benefits/compensation

WestEd.org SESM SE vs. Other Teachers (Strongly Agree) Integrates special ed into daily operations (35%/35%) Encourages genera/special ed teaming (27%/25%) Participation in decision-making (22%/17%) Has good communication to support IEP students (26%/17%) — biggest difference Service to IEP students shared responsibility (20%/21%) Adequate benefits/compensation (19%/15%) Sufficient resources for SE services (17%/15%) Provides relevant paraprofessional training (12%/11%) Minimizes paperwork (12%/14%)

WestEd.org State Report Issues: Core Eight column limitation Total district results relevant? More specific breakdowns than all SE vs. Others: -SE vs. GE teachers for MS and HS (4 columns) -All SE staff at grade levels for comparison to district reports (3 columns). -Separate reports SE vs. GE teachers and SE Providers vs. Others for MS and HS All SE staff vs. all others by grade level

WestEd.org State Report Issues: Summary Tables Recommendation: Combine agree with strongly agree -Would wash out group differences

WestEd.org State Report: SESM Issues Report separately SE Teachers vs. Other Providers? How handle non-SE respondents? -27% non-SE. Half of all non-SE respondents. Delete? Only four items not SE-specific: Paper work (recommended to delete), paraprofessional training, offers adequate benefits, decision- making (also in Core)

WestEd.org SESM Item Factor Analysis Goal: Summarize and simplify results No factor into originally four categories: -Barriers to service delivery -SE Integration -Students expectations and supports -Personnel supports Two main factors not easily distinguished with several items not factoring well -Sequential factors: Items 7-17 and Option: Explore single SE Supports Index

WestEd.org CASPLT Instrument Revision Recommendations What can we do to shorten, clarify, and simplify the survey — and provide more useful results — without affecting trends?

WestEd.org Integrate all SESM into Core Issues: -Increases survey length for many -Would non-SE providers know answers? Decision-making already in Core (S24) Only add to Core other items more relevant to all staff at local level — disaggregate at state level? -Paraprofessional training (S13), -Supports for teaching diverse students (S15), -State-adopted instruction (S18), -Adequate access to technology (S19), - Adequate benefits to continue work (S21)

WestEd.org Combine SESM & Core Demographics Delete highest level credential and primary service setting (S3 & 4) Keep degree and credential questions (S1 & 2) -Relevance in data use and analysis? -Info available from other sources? Roles: Add Other Service Provider (Speech therapist etc.) -Separate option or add to health aide category?

WestEd.org Other Specific SESM Deletions Paperwork (S7) SE shared responsibility (S12) -Rationale? SE high expectations (redundant from Core) (S14) State adopted instructions materials: delete reference to SE and move to Core. (S18) -Relevant for all?

WestEd.org Create District Response Section SESM questions related to (1) paraprofessional training, (2) alternative modes of communication, (3) adequate benefits. (S13, 16, 21) Encourages enrollment in rigorous courses (q 20) Instructional materials reflect culture (q 21) Issue: Original policy to not differentiate school from district

WestEd.org Revisions to Core CSCS Questions Being reviewed by staff For clarification: -Why delete close professional relations? Drawn from Futernick study Vary wary of changes that might affect trend monitoring

WestEd.org Delete Learning Supports Module Revisions being explored with end-users Why directions deemed confusing? Other options for health-related information? Scale inconsistency is problematic