Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 4: S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan Development August 2012 I. Welcome (3 minutes)
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Student Growth Goals Sorting it out. Over- arching Goal 2.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Developing the Individual Education Program (IEP) Be an advocate Be involved Be knowledgeable.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Princeton Public Schools Welcomes Tri-State Evaluation Team K-12: Writing December 12, 2012.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
“SMARTer” Goals Winter A ESE-MASS Workshop for superintendents and representatives from their leadership teams.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
Educator Evaluation Workshop: Gathering Evidence, Conducting Observations & Providing Feedback MSSAA Summer Institute July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Department.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
APS Teacher Evaluation A SMART Process for Student and Teacher Growth.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Collecting Artifacts: Showcasing Your Best Work!
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
1 Presented by Media Services Media Specialists Connections and Issues Training: November – December Zone Based Meetings.
Observation Process and Teacher Feedback
Creating A Culture of Continuous Improvement – Part II Every participant will be able to: Use Schoolspring to apply for jobs and positions in the BPS district.
ORIGINAL SMART GOAL FORM Smart Goal Setting Form Name: School: Shared: Primary Evaluator (Name/Title): A minimum of one student learning goal and one professional.
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Educator Effectiveness and The Common Core State Standards October 20, 2013 Bend Oregon.
Teachers directing the work of paraprofessionals
Welcome – Please sign-in and sit with your Mentor Professional Growth Planning Process.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
“Every Child a Graduate” Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction SPECIAL EDCATION FRAMEWORK FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Life-long learning and continuous.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan Development August
Developing High Quality Student Learning Objectives
START Supporting Teachers and Rewarding Them. Is mentoring enough?
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Monomoy Educator Evaluation System Training
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
March  Third annual 2141 Club meeting  Recognizing new members  Introductions  Developing a support network.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Outcomes-Based Superintendent Evaluation Pilot for a Comprehensive, Transparent, Continuous superintendent evaluation process WSSDA Conference - Nov 2013.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Discussion of W-APT, ACCESS Testing, Adequate Yearly Progress and Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
MASBO SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 PUTTING THE SYSTEM IN PRACTICE.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Jennifer Keefe GOVERNOR’S TEACHER NETWORK ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT.
What it means for New Teachers
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
ORIGINAL SMART GOAL FORM
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Common Core State Standards
Baldwin High School Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Presentation transcript:

Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus. Every educator is an active participant in the evaluation process. Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus. Every educator conducts an analysis of evidence of student learning, growth, and achievement. Every educator conducts an assessment of practice against Performance Standards. Every educator prepares to strategically identify professional practice and student learning goals. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1

Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Identify characteristics of S.M.A.R.T. goals. Translate student learning and professional practice goals into S.M.A.R.T. goals. Review a sample Educator Plan that describes key actions and benchmarks. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

S.M.A.R.T. Goals S = Specific and Strategic M = Measurable A = Action Oriented R = Rigorous, Realistic, and Results Focused (the 3 Rs) T = Timed and Tracked Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What Makes a Goal “S.M.A.R.T.”? Individually: Read Handout 1, What Makes a Goal “S.M.A.R.T.”? Underline one phrase that you find most significant in the reading. At your table: Share your phrases. Discuss the phrases that emerged and any insights about the document. Identify one phrase as a table that you will share with the larger group. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Smart Goals Professional Practice Student Performance About you and your practice “I will” and “we will” Must be measurable; consider what evidence you will collect Student Performance About your students “Students will” Not about you and what you will do Must be measurable

Smart Goals are not….. A legal requirement – ex: Comply with IEP An expectation of the job – ex: I will consistently show up for work An expectation in the rubric – ex: I will be in contact with parents Too vague that they cannot be tracked and measured, or too difficult to track and measure - ex: My students will improve

Identifying S.M.A.R.T. Goals During the 2012-13 school year, we will create a writing focused curriculum with an emphasis on expository writing. –Team Level During the 2012–13 school year, our beginner ELL students will improve their English language proficiency as measured by a second administration of the district language proficiency assessment used to determine student placement at the beginning of the year. –Team Level Students' math skills will improve for the MCAS. – Teacher Level I will get better at classroom management. – Teacher Level During the 2012-13 school year, I will learn about a flipped classroom, create flipped units for my class and evaluate the effectiveness of a flipped classroom. – Teacher Level Work with a partner. Determine if each of the four statements on Handout 2 are S.M.A.R.T. or if they need revision. Revise one statement to make it S.M.A.R.T.er. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Making a S.M.A.R.T. Goal S.M.A.R.T.er S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statement + Key Action Steps Benchmarks (Process and Outcome) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Educator Plan Development Educator Plan Form Student Learning Goal(s) and Professional Practice Goal(s) Planned Activity Action Supports/Resources From School/District Timeline/Benchmark or Frequency Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Teacher Educator Plan Example Sample Professional Practice Goal for a Teacher: During the 2012-13 school year, I will learn about a flipped classroom, create flipped units for my class and evaluate the effectiveness of a flipped classroom. Student Learning Goal(s) and Professional Practice Goal(s) Planned Activity Action Supports From School Timeline/Benchmark or Frequency 1. November 1 – December 3, I will participate in the Accept Collaborative Flipped Classroom PD 2. By December 15, I will observe other classrooms in the building who are working with a flipped model 3. January - April I will create three flipped units for my class 4. By May 1, I will ask for feedback from students and my supervisor about their perceptions of the usefulness of the implementation of my flipped class Registration for the Flipped Class PD, maybe a sub to watch other classes with the flipped model, and feedback from my supervisor specifically about my flipped units. September —sign up for Accept PD. Keep a notebook during the class November – December – learn about flipped class and create first unit Visit a flipped class at Keefe and record notes Meet with flipped class teachers and share best practices - ongoing *Evidence - Notes from Accept PD, flipped unit, website with flipped units, student feedback, self-reflection log Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Teacher Educator Plan Example Sample Student Performance Goal for a Teacher: During the 2012-13 school year, ELL students will improve their content specific writing skills in Biology class. Student Learning Goal(s) and Professional Practice Goal(s) Planned Activity Action Supports From School Timeline/Benchmark or Frequency 1. By October 1 – establish a baseline measurement of the writing ability of ELL students 2. October - January, assign daily writing assignments that vary in length 3. Observe 3 ELL classes and note best practices 4. February – assign a 3 page Biology specific writing task 5. March – conduct a formative assessment of writing ability A sub to cover my class when I observe other classes; I might ask for PD about teaching ELL students or writing in the content area. 1. Assign writing tasks with varying degrees of length and skill to measure growth 2. Take notes on best practices when observing classes and implement them into my class 3. Progress monitor students and provide interventions as needed 4. Assess the level and degree to which the writing level of ELL students has increased *Evidence - Keep a folder for 3 ELL students, one beginner, intermediate and higher, and collect samples of their writing throughout the year. Keep notes on class observations. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Implementation Responsibility Educator Responsibilities: Identifying, collecting & organizing artifacts/evidence related to goal progress. Documenting action steps completed. Collecting and submitting artifacts. Collecting and submitting evidence related to Standards III and IV. Evaluator Responsibilities: Making resources and supports available. Observing practice and providing regular and specific feedback on performance. Monitoring progress – including midpoint check-ins. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education