AACSB Update SBAA Summer Meeting 2014 Robert Reid EVP & Chief Accreditation Officer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mission The mission of Kappa Omicron Nu is empowered leaders in scholarship, research, and leadership. This mission will enable the organization and chapters.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
University Regional Affairs: The Blueprint for Student Attainment Rebecca Torstrick Assistant Vice President for Regional Affairs and University Academic.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
College of Business Spring 2013 Advisory Council Meeting AACSB Standards Update.
All-Campus Meeting of Faculty & Staff Monday, August 19, 2013 G. Michael Pratt, Ph.D Associate Provost, Miami University Dean, College of Professional.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
AACSB International Accreditation: An Overview
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
STRENGTHENING COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE NORTHLAND FOUNDATION DECEMBER 9, 2010 Succession Planning.
Creating a Continuous Improvement Program: A Balanced Scorecard Approach A Presentation AACSB Continuous Improvement Conference September 15, 2003 Presented.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
District Accreditation as a Quality System Presented by Mary Beth Huber On behalf of the Calcasieu Parish SACS CASI Steering Committee.
F LORIDA A TLANTIC U NIVERSITY B OARD OF T RUSTEES.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System.
SBAA 2009 Annual Meeting Savannah, Georgia November 10, 2009 Contours of Quality: Shaping the Future of Management Education Jerry E. Trapnell EVP & Chief.
Shaping the Future of Management Education 2013 AACSB Business Accreditation Standards Dan LeClair EVP & Chief Operating Officer
Building Superior Membership and Accreditation Value MAACBA Annual Meetig New Brunswick, NJ October 17, 2014.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
LeBaron Woodyard Dean, Academic Affairs October 30, 2013 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHIEF INSTRUCTIONAL OFFICERS FALL 2013 CONFERENCE.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
NAEYC Affiliate Relations Report November 21, 2009 NAEYC Annual Conference Washington, DC Gwen Simmons, Director Matt Seiler, Affiliate Relations Coordinator.
1 New Directions for Management Education SBAA Annual Meeting November 7-9, 2004 John Fernandes President and CEO AACSB International.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
AACSB International 2015 Update and Discussion ©AACSB.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
Faculty Governance Jane Dillehay Faculty Chair Jan Hafer AAUP Chair 12 August 2011.
College of Business California State University, Monterey Bay February 28, 2014 College of Business Committee Structure: Preparing for AACSB.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
From Dialogue to Action Michelle L. Younker New Mexico Mathematics Summit October 2, 2015.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
“International Accreditations as Driver of Responsible Management Education” 1st PRME Chapter Meeting Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) April 2016.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Övergripande org. illustration
AUPHA Leaders Conference March 15, 2016
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
AACSB Accreditation Update and Lifelong Learning Trends
Division of Talent and Performance
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Strategic Enrolment Management Planning OVERVIEW
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Heather Brod, Executive Director of Faculty Affairs and FAME
Academic Program Review Comprehensive Report
Fort Valley State University
Presentation transcript:

AACSB Update SBAA Summer Meeting 2014 Robert Reid EVP & Chief Accreditation Officer

Topics Membership and accreditation –Profile –Accreditation pillars –Training and seminars –What we've learned –Accreditation Management System (AMS) AACSB 2020 committee Amsterdam office CEO search

Reach of AACSB International Distribution of schools as of June 2, AACSB-accredited members present No AACSB members present AACSB members present

The AACSB Network 1,369 member business schools in 89 countries and territories 711 accredited schools in 47 countries and territories (less than 5% of the estimated number of schools offering business degrees worldwide) 180 accounting-accredited programs in 7 countries and territories 50 corporate/foundation/non-profit members

The World of Management Education Region AACSB Members AACSB- Accredited In Accreditation Process Estimated Schools Offering Business Programs Africa Eastern, South-Eastern, and Southern Asia ,896 Central and Western Asia Europe ,467 Latin America and the Caribbean ,147 Northern America ,730 Oceania Global1, ,790 Source: AACSB data and analysis as of 6/2/2014.

Engagement - Innovation – Impact Executive summary of most significant strategies and outcomes in the past five years related to engagement, innovation and impact Review Accreditation Standards Appendix for suggested areas of potential Impact, p

Engagement Schools are expected to: Achieve both academic and professional engagement by students and faculty Identify desired characteristics of engagement, aligned with the school’s mission Maintain an appropriate balance of academic and professional engagement 8

Engagement Focus Mission contextual and must focus on ensuring students, faculty and other stakeholders participant in the life of the business school Linked to Eligibility Criterion B, Standards 1, 2, 5, 9, 10, 13, and 15 9

Engagement Possibilities Strategic decisions about deployment of professionally engaged faculty (IP & PA) Faculty & student engagement with business community Faculty & student engagement with broader academic community 10

Innovation Schools are expected to: Pursue continuous improvement Be entrepreneurial and experiment Innovate –Innovations include both the potential for success and risk of failure –Innovations should be well-developed and aligned with mission/strategy Report most significant activities and results Mission contextual innovation is the focus 11

Innovation Focus The mission of the business school is the context: Innovation is focused on stakeholders and not unique from other business schools Focus on most recent 5-year period Linked to mission & strategic plan development and implementation (Standard 1) The question is: “What is new for us?” 12

Innovation Possibilities Adding on-line or distance delivered courses and/or degrees New areas of programming Distinctive service/outreach projects Distinctive collaborative activities with business, non-profits, government, or other institutions New student engagement activities New research initiatives 13

Impact School’s are expected to: Focus on outcomes that have impact Produce intellectual contributions that have a positive impact on theory, teaching and practice Demonstrate that the business school is “making a difference” in business and society 14

Types of Impact Standards Appendix Mission alignment impact Intellectual contributions impact Academic impact Teaching & instructional impact Academic program impact Practice & community impact Executive education impact Research center impact 15

Impact Focus Through mission execution, how is the business school making a difference? Success/impact of graduates/students Research outcomes Community and business related outcomes Can be localized to stakeholders Linked to Standards 1, 2, 8, 9, and 15 16

Impact Possibilities Translation of research outcomes into consulting, executive education/continuing education programming, practice oriented ICs Participation in policy development Success of graduates Impact on professional practice Impact on academic societies Journal quality & citations Successful educational materials 17

Accreditation – Transition Seminars updated and offered globally –Business Accreditation and Accounting Accreditation Seminars Volunteer training –400+ volunteers trained in 17 workshops held in Asia, Europe, North America –Evaluations 3.9/4 point scale –Webinar for early Peer Review Teams –Additional training planned for

2013 Accreditation Standards What we’ve learned from schools: –Positive feedback about PRT preparation –Accreditation staff resources receive positive feedback –Demonstrating engagement and impact is evolving –Suggestions for revision to PRT report and Fifth Year Report Guidelines

2013 Accreditation Standards What we’ve learned from Peer Review Teams: –Schools criteria and documentation for Std 15 Faculty Engagement and Qualification were well done –Engagement documentation is immature –Need to modify the PRT report to better align with the Fifth Year Report

Accreditation Management System Current accreditation process Accreditation web based portal –Schools –Mentors –Peer Review Team members –Accreditation Committees Timeline Beta testing & rollout

2020 Committee Charge “Recommend strategies and structures to significantly increase AACSB’s achievement of its global mission, providing for superior membership advantage as well as quality improvement and quality assurance services, with particular focus on emerging economies.”

2020 Committee Methodology –Committee meetings and discussion –Emerging economies research –Outreach & engagement with business schools in emerging economies

2020 Committee Timetable –January 2014: Board of Directors launched the committee –September 2014: Interim report to AACSB board –Fall 2014: Global engagement and feedback –January 2015: Final report to AACSB board

AACSB Office in Amsterdam April 2014: Board of Directors approval Service area – Europe, Middle East and Africa Timeline Recruiting –Senior Vice President –Initial staff

AACSB CEO Search Process –Search Committee –Search Firm –Input from members

Sample Member Feedback Sessions Northeast Business Deans Association Annual Meeting September 13, 2013 Western Association of Collegiate Schools of Business Annual Meeting October 8, 2013 Middle American Business Deans Association Annual Meeting October 14, 2013 Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities Business Deans Conference October 13-15, 2013 AACSB Europe Annual Conference October 19, 2013 AACSB Middle East and Africa Annual Conference October 21, 2013 Middle Atlantic Association of Colleges of Business Administration Annual Meeting October 22, 2013 Council of Texas Deans Annual Meeting October 28, 2103 Southern Business Administration Association Annual Meeting November 12, 2013 AACSB Deans Conference February 2-4, 2014 AACSB Accounting Accreditation Seminar February 8, 2014

CEO Search Timetable Feedback –To provide additional input regarding the CEO recruitment effort or to express interest as a candidate, please contact Kim M. Morrisson or Betty Hasler at AACSB _

Questions and Discussion