Prof. Sarosh H Lodi NED University of Engineering and Technology What Works and Does not Work in the Science and Social Science of Earthquake Vulnerability,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
During the semester Introductions Basics of earthquakes History and Recording Damaging Earthquakes and Understanding seismic exposure Undertaking loss.
Advertisements

Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures
Introduction to Lateral Force Resisting Systems
Basic structural theory. Statics Things dont continue to move if forces are resisted – Static Equilibrium What resists the force? Equal and opposite Reaction.
Performance of buildings in the February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake Associate Prof Rajesh Dhakal University of Canterbury Christchurch, NZ Sixth International.
1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.
FIG. 19 BUILDING WITH PENTHOUSE
Outline CH1.Introduction CH2.Preliminary Design CH3.3D Model.
An-Najah National University
Structural System Overview
1 Sikandar Iqbal Graduate Trainee Engineer Civil Engineering Township Comparison & Analysis of Township Buildings.
Structural Bracings Presentation by V. G. Abhyankar
CHAPTER 9 MASONRY.
Abstract This project is a structural analysis and design of a residential building located in JENIEN City, The building is consisted of 7 floors. The.
Annual Meeting Montréal September 26, 2009
ATHENS 12 th of April, M. Eng. Velyan Petkov The European Center for Risk Prevention, Sofia, Bulgaria Bulgarian seismic design codes and civil construction.
Contents : Introduction. Rapid Visual Screening.
PCI 6th Edition Connection Design.
Reinforced Concrete Design II
SEISMIC ANALYSIS WITH SHEAR WALLS
COLUMNS.
1. By Dr. Attaullah Shah Swedish College of Engineering and Technology Wah Cantt. Reinforced Concrete Design-II Lec-3 Retaining walls.
University of Palestine
Design Example The 10” TH. wall system shown in the figure below is to be checked for a service gravity load of 3 Kips/ft and a lateral load of 25 Kips,
ATHENS WORKSHOP / EC 8 – 3 : 2005 and nGCSI : 2012 APRIL 12, 2013 Recent Greek Provisions for RC Structures with URM Infills M. Chronopoulos and P. Chronopoulos,
Al-Najah National University Engineering Faculty Civil Engineering Department Graduation Project: Analysis & Design of Warehouses in Jaba’-Jenin.
Static Pushover Analysis
BEAMS AND COLUMNS PRESENTED BY K.ROSHIN RUKSHANA.
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
TOPICS COVERED Building Configuration Response of Concrete Buildings
Er.T.Rangarajan,B.E,M.Sc(Struct.Engg), Consulting structural engineer.
Structural Analysis and Design of
Prepared By: Mohammed wafiq omer Mahmoud hammad Abd Algani Sami Malath omair An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department.
Tulkarem Multipurpose Sport Hall Prepared by: Moatasem Ghanim Abdul-Rahman Alsaabneh Malek Salatneh Supervisor: Dr. Shaker Albitar.
Structural Design of Movenpick Hotel
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department.
AN-NAJAH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING COLLEGE Civil Engineering Department Graduation project " AFORI Residential Building Structural Design And Analysis"
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
 Effective height of walls  The effective height of a loadbearing wall is assessed by allowing for the relative stiffness of the elements of structure.
Roll No. 14, 23, 25, 29, 43. EARTHQUAKE An earthquake (also known as a quake, tremor or temblor) is the result of a sudden release of energy in the Earth.
BEAMS: Beams are structural members that can carry transverse loads which produce bending moments & shear force. Girders: Main load carrying members into.
UNIT 5 BRICK MASONRY.
Comparative Study of Chord forces in Flat Slabs due to Seismic loads in buildings of different plan aspect ratios Aman Gupta (B.Tech. student) Dr. S. Mandal.
Soil mechanics and foundation engineering-III (CE-434)
INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.
Confined Masonry Construction
Review of Indian Seismic Codes
How to make Buildings ductile for Good Seismic Performance?
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT Design
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
AQQABA SECONDRY SCHOOL Structural Design.
Outline: Introduction: a ) General description of project b) Materials
Supervied by : Eng. Ibrahim Mohammad Prepared by : Atheer Daraghmeh
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
An-Najah National University
Integrative Design of a Secondary School
ATHENS WORKSHOP / EC 8 – 3 : 2005 and nGCSI : 2012 APRIL 12, 2013
Welcome to My Presentation
A Brief Idea on Seismic Retrofitting Techniques
Analysis and Redesign of Al – Tatbeqea Faculty
Model Updating of a Nine-Story Concrete Core Wall Building
Outline CH1.Introduction CH2.Preliminary Design CH3.3D Model.
Earthquake resistant buildings
Supervisor: Dr. Mahmoud Dweikat.
An Najah National University Submitted to : Dr.Munther Diab .
Masonry Bearing Walls.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم RaRami Abu Baker An- Najah National University
OUTLINES - location & Description. Material properties.
Graduation Project Bracing system for deep excavation.
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Foundation
Presentation transcript:

Prof. Sarosh H Lodi NED University of Engineering and Technology What Works and Does not Work in the Science and Social Science of Earthquake Vulnerability, January 28-29, 2011

Most of the buildings in the urban areas are semi – engineered non-ductile reinforced concrete moment resistant framed structures with very stiff masonry walls but not designed and detailed to resist seismic forces. Most of the buildings in the rural areas are non – engineered load bearing stone/ brick masonry structures with no resistance to seismic forces. Most of the buildings in the urban areas are semi – engineered non-ductile reinforced concrete moment resistant framed structures with very stiff masonry walls but not designed and detailed to resist seismic forces. Most of the buildings in the rural areas are non – engineered load bearing stone/ brick masonry structures with no resistance to seismic forces. INRTODUCTION

Typical Urban Buildings

Model 1 Model of infill to increase seismic resistance a cost effective solution

COMPARISON OF BARE FRAME AND INFILL FRAME

MATERIAL PROPERTIES GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES f’c = 21 MPa fy = 415 MPa Fcm = 2.1 MPa

PARAMETERS USED FOR ANALYSIS BARE FRAMEFRAME WITH INFILL Soil profile type =SD C t = 0.03 (For moment resisting frame) R = 5.5 Zone = 2B Soil profile type = SD C t = 0.02 (For all other building system) R = 5.5 Zone = 2B

MODELING PARAMETERS OF INFILL (STRUTS) a = Depth of strut t = Width of strut t c = Thickness of shortcreteE c = Modulus of Elasticity of shortcrete E m = Modulus of Elasticity of infillE fe = Modulus of Elasticity of frame h col = Depth of column I c = Moment of inertia of column h inf = Height of infillL diag = Diagonal length of infill  Inclination angle of infill For retrofitted strut: For ordinary strut in above equation use: E c = 0 and t c = 0

STRENGTH OF INFILL (STRUTS) For Compression strut: For Tension tie:

TIME PERIOD AND BASE SHEAR FOR BARE FRAME FOR INFILL FRAME

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STRENGTH BASED ON PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS

FAILURE MECHANISM BARE FRAME FOR INFILL FRAME

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STOREY DISPLACEMENTS

Model 2 Addition of strength to the infill to increase seismic resistance

RETROFITTED MODELS a)BY MAKING STRONGER COLUMN AND BEAM WHICH ARE TO BE FAILED IN PREVIOUS ANALYSIS i.RCC OR STEEL JACKETING OF COLUMNS ii.RCC OR STEEL JACKETING OF BEAMS b)BY INTRODUCING A SPINE

RETROFITTED MODELS Retrofitted columns and beams with infill Retrofitted Elements 8 “ th RCC wall & 4” th shortcrete with 6”c/c steel 6” thick shortcrete with 8” c/c steel 3” thick shortcrete with 8”c/c steel 2” thick shortcrete with 12”c/c steel Retrofitted infill wall

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STRENGTH OF RETROFITTED MODEL

FAILURE MECHANISM OF RETROFITTED MODELS Retrofitted columns and beams with infill Retrofitted infill wall

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STOREY DISPLACEMENTS

Campaign

Typical Rural Buildings

Typical Construction

INTRODUCTION School buildings are vital for a society They are places of learning They also play a significant role in the relief operation in post-disaster situations. These buildings can be used as temporary shelters. Assessment of seismic vulnerability of school buildings is essential to ensure safety of children and teachers.

DESCRIPTION OF SCHOOL School consists of 4 classrooms. These have been divided into 3 blocks. Load resisting system consists of cavity walls of stone rubble masonry. These provide resistance against gravity loads. Roofing system consists is of timber trusses and corrugated metal sheeting. Construction inherently lacks resistance to lateral loads.

PLAN OF SCHOOL

VIEW OF SCHOOL A view of school is shown in figure below.

TYPICAL SECTION OF WALL Typical wall section of the construction in the area is shown in figure below. X Y Z

ANALYTICAL MODELLING A mathematical model of the school was developed. Finite Element Program SAP was employed. Individual blocks were modelled as solid brick elements. Mortar was modelled using non-linear springs. Non-linear properties of mortar were defined using existing constitutive models. Geometric non - linearity were also taken into account. Ground shakings were simulated using El-Centro ground accelerations

ANALYTICAL MODELLING Axial behaviour is modelled as follows

ANALYTICAL MODELLING Shear behaviour is modelled as follows

ANALYSIS OF RETROFITTED SCHOOL A view of the mathematical retrofitted model is shown in figure below

ANALYSIS OF RETROFITTED SCHOOL A view of retrofitted long wall is presented in figure below which shows the jacketing scheme around the openings.

ANALYSIS OF RETROFITTED SCHOOL A view of retrofitted short wall is shown in figure below which displays a typical wall without openings.

PROGRESS IN RETROFITING WORK

STRUCTURAL RETROFITTING OF GGPS NAYASHER # 3 PROGRESS IN RETROFITING WORK

STRUCTURAL RETROFITTING OF GGPS NAYASHER # 3 PROGRESS IN RETROFITING WORK

STRUCTURAL RETROFITTING OF GGPS NAYASHER # 3 PROGRESS IN RETROFITING WORK

STRUCTURAL RETROFITTING OF GGPS NAYASHER # 3 PROGRESS IN RETROFITING WORK

STRUCTURAL RETROFITTING OF GGPS NAYASHER # 3 PROGRESS IN RETROFITING WORK

STRUCTURAL RETROFITTING OF GGPS NAYASHER # 3 PROGRESS IN RETROFITING WORK

STRUCTURAL RETROFITTING OF GGPS NAYASHER # 3

Thanks!