M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Cost of Service Ratemaking Michigan Public Service Commission Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jefferson County PUD 1 Presented by: Gary Saleba, President EES Consulting, Inc. A registered professional engineering and management consulting firm with.
Advertisements

Public Interest Energy Research –Natural Gas Program Status Presentation to Air Emissions Advisory Committee May 12, 2005 Philip Misemer California Energy.
1 COST OF SERVICE OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY Utah Cost of Service Taskforce May 23, 2005 Dave Taylor.
1 Northeast Public Power Association Electric Utility Basics Electric Rates and Cost of Service Studies.
Breaking Down Barriers to Energy Efficiency Utility Revenue Decoupling and other Revenue Stabilization Tools Jim Lazar, RAP Senior Advisor Presented to:
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Utility Rates Electric, Natural Gas, and Water. Electric Utility Different Utility Business Models – “IOU” – Investor Owned Utility Ultimately responsible.
Let’s Talk Energy Savings: The City of Norwalk partners with Conservation & Load Management (C&LM) Mayor Alex Knopp November 18, 2004.
Organization of the electricity supply industry © 2012 D. Kirschen & University of Washington 0.
DRA Advocacy Joe Como, Acting Director. 2 DRA Facts The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 3  History: CPUC created DRA (formerly known as the.
Plant Utility System (TKK-2210)
Utility Analysis. Baseline Electricity Analysis  Understanding and documenting current energy use is called developing a baseline. Developing a baseline:
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
1 of 46 Tariff Development II: Developing a Cost of Service Study Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Ikechukwu N. Nwabueze,
NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program The Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission and The Vermont Public Service Board by Ann Bishop Vermont.
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
Small Renewable Net Metering - An Investor Owned Utility Perspective John R. Grimwade Senior Director Strategic Planning & Development Presentation to.
Triennial Plan 2: Legal Framework. About Us  Efficiency Maine is an independent trust – Accounts and administrative responsibilities transferred from.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
TVA Generates Power and sends it down Transmission Lines to Newport Utilities Distribution Substations TVA Newport Utilities Substations Distributes the.
Implementation of Power Rates Rate Applications Group LADWP Rates & Contracts
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
1 of 9 Regulatory and Industry Practices to Reduce Line Losses Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Ikechukwu N. Nwabueze,
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen 1 © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington.
1 THE RATE CASE PROCESS A Blend of Science and Superstition Presentation to the Mongolian Energy Regulatory Board By Burl Haar Executive Secretary Minnesota.
Rate Design June 23, 2015 Laurie Reid. 2 Overview 1.A little bit of physics 2.The Ratemaking Process 3.Generally Accepted Ratemaking Principles 4.What’s.
Revenue Decoupling: New York’s Experience & Future Directions NARUC 2007 Summer Committee Meetings July 17, 2007 James T. Gallagher Director, Office of.
Cost of Service Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Contributions In-Aid and Development of Fees Utility Financial Solutions Mark Beauchamp, CPA, CMA, MBA President
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Renewable Energy Financing and Property Tax Issues June 25, 2011 Michigan Energy Fair.
Submitted to Southeast Symposium on Contemporary Engineering Topics (SSCET) New Orleans, LA - August 31.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Utah Cost of Service and Rate Design Task Force
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
Distributed Energy Resources The Energy Challenge of the 21 st Century.
How to Help Your Customers Read Their Electric Bills and Apply for Incentives Charley Budd, KEMA.
Sec. 5 RE-REGULATION- EPAct 1992 FERC Orders 888 and 889 (1996) EPAct 2005 In short these three laws move the power industry towards an increase in competition.
From an Intervener's Perspective by Matt White.  An intervener is a non-utility that participates in a rate case to advocate its interest  Interveners.
Virginia Energy Purchasing Governmental Association (VEPGA) Primer On Rate Design Concepts & Practices And Explanation of VEPGA Rates & Schedules (What.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Michigan Public Service Commission Renewable Energy Overview 2011 GLREA Energy Fair Jesse Harlow Engineer, Renewable Energy Section Michigan Public Service.
Overview of a Water Action Plan: California Public Utilities Commission Paul G. Townsley, President Arizona American Water January 18, 2011.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Energy Optimization Plans 2011 Biennial Review Pre-Filing Update Rob Ozar, Manager Energy Optimization Section March.
1 Knowing Your Customers Better Through Load Research Presented By: Lawrence M. Strawn Senior Retail Pricing Coordinator Orlando Utilities Commission September.
COST OF SERVICE STUDIES Carryn Lee Manager-Water & Sewer Rate Design Branch Assistant Director-Financial Analysis Division KENTUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.
Utah Geothermal Power Generation Workshop Regulatory Issues August 17, 2005 Presented by Becky Wilson Utility Economist Utah Public Service Commission.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION BALANCED RATES RULEMAKING R California Water Association’s Restatement of Goals and Objectives for the.
NASUCA Annual Meeting Austin, Texas November 10, 2015 Scott J. Rubin, Attorney + Consultant 333 Oak Lane + Bloomsburg, PA Office: (570)
Talha Mehmood Chapter # 5 TARIFF. Introduction The electrical energy produced by a power station is delivered to a large number of consumers. The supply.
Electricity pricing Tariffs.
Demand Response
1 Basic Concepts on Power Supply Agreement (PSA) Francis Saturnino C. Juan Executive Director Energy Regulatory Commission.
Presented to the City of Dover, Delaware June 6, 2006 Revenue Requirements, Cost of Service and Rate Adjustments for the Electric Utility.
1 Before Ghana Public Utility Regulatory Commission Proposed Electricity Tariff Guidelines Workshop Ahmed Kaloko,Ph.D. Chief Economist Pennsylvania Public.
Cost of Service Studies April 14,  Used to reasonably allocate costs (revenue requirement) incurred by utility amongst customer classes  2 Types.
1 Dr. Ahmed Kaloko Chief Economist Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Transition from Public Service to Competitive Markets.
2015 ElectriCities Advanced Meter School. Rate Design Goals The two primary goals of rate design are to (a)provide rates that lead to utility revenues.
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
Residential demand charges
Welcome to Cloverland Electric Cooperative’s Special Board Meeting
California Product Offerings
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Homework Ch 12 Electricity Regulation
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Case No UT PNM Workshop Comments
Presentation transcript:

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Cost of Service Ratemaking Michigan Public Service Commission Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Regulation Status of Michigan Electric Utilities 8 Investor-Owned Electric Utilities (regulated by MPSC) 9 Cooperative Electric Utilities – 3 rate-regulated by MPSC – 6 member-regulated 41 Municipal Electric Utilities (not regulated by MPSC)

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION General Rate Case Process Request for rate increase initiated by utility Provides MPSC Staff, other interveners (Attorney General, ABATE, MCAAA, MEC, etc.) ability to scrutinize requests through contested case proceeding MPSC determines final rates

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Rate Development Determination of Revenue Requirement (cost assessment) for a test year Allocation of Costs to customer classes based on usage patterns Cost of service study Rate Design to recover costs through rates and charges

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION The Traditional Ratemaking Process Revenue Requirement Cost Allocation Rate Design (prices)

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION REVENUE REQUIREMENT FORMULA Revenue Requirements=r(RB) + E + D + T r = overall rate of return RB = rate base E = operating expense D = depreciation and amortization T = taxes

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION The Traditional Ratemaking Process Revenue Requirement Cost Allocation Rate Design (prices)

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Cost Allocation A class cost of service study is a study in which the total company cost of service (revenue requirement) is spread or allocated to customer classes. Customer Class or Class of Service – A set of customers with similar characteristics who have been grouped for the purpose of setting an applicable rate for electric service – Common classifications include residential, commercial, primary service and industrial The allocation of the total company cost of service to the individual customer classes can provide a revenue requirement target for each customer class, so that each class of customers pays the costs that the utility incurs to serve that class.

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Cost of Service Study Steps Functionalization: costs broken down into production, transmission, distribution Classification: costs classified by customer, energy, demand Allocation: costs allocated to different customer classes – residential, commercial, industrial

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Cost Functionalization Production Production Plant Costs Fuel Costs Purchased Power Transmission Backbone & Inter-tie Facilities Generation Step-Up Facilities Subtransmission Plant Distribution Poles, Towers, Fixtures Line Transformers Meters

Functionalization to Classification Distribution Poles, towers, fixtures Line transformers Meters Station Equipment Production Production Plant Fuel costs Purchased Power Transmission Backbone & Inter-tie Facilities Generation Step-up Facilities Subtransmission Plant Line transformers Poles, towers, fixtures Demand & Customer Station Equipment Demand Meters Customer Demand & Energy Transmission costs are charged to utilities based on MISO schedules, some of which are based on demand, some on energy. Purchased Power Production Plant Demand & Energy Fuel costs Energy

Classified Distribution Costs Classified Production Costs Charged Transmission Costs Allocate Classification to Allocation ResidentialIndustrialCommercial

Function Allocation Factor ResidentialCommercialIndustrial Production Demand & Energy % Production Plant + Purchase % Energy % Fuel Purchase % Transmission Demand & Energy % Transmission% Distribution Demand% Wires % Customer% Meters % Classified Distribution Costs Charged Transmission Costs Allocate Cost Allocation Classified Production Costs

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Production Cost Allocation Can be based on demand, energy use, or a combination of both Examples: – 100/0 – 100% demand, 0% energy use – 75/25 – 75% demand, 25% energy use – 50/25/25 – 50% demand, 25% on-peak energy use, 25% total energy use Demand typically measured at a peak or peaks – – 12 CP – system peak hour in each month of a year – 4 CP – system peak hour on 4 highest peak days of a year

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Consumers Energy Load Data from July 5 th, 2010

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Consumers Energy Load Data from April 14 th, 2010

Consumers Energy Case No. U Example Total Revenue Requirement: $4 Billion Cost Allocation Across 3 Rate Classes Class Requirement: $1.8 Billion Class Requirement: $1 Billion Class Requirement: $1.2 Billion Residential 43.6% Industrial 30.8% Commercial 25.6%

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION PA 286 of 2008 Sec. 11(1) requires MPSC to move to cost-of- service rates (“de-skewing”) – By Oct. 6, 2013 for DTE and Consumers (deadline met) – Electric rates for other companies moved toward cost of service – 50/25/25 production and transmission allocator Limits ability to approve special contracts or rates Unique to Michigan

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION The Traditional Ratemaking Process Revenue Requirement Cost Allocation Rate Design (prices) 11 of 79

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Ratemaking Process Cost allocation determines how many dollars to collect from various classes or services Rate design determines how to collect dollars from various customer groups and services In principle, costs should be recovered through charges matching their classification and functionalization –fixed costs, however, are often recovered through usage charges (particularly for residential and other small customers)

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Rate Design Michigan employs a three step structure: Power Supply Charges : Charge for on each unit of sale (kWh or MWh). Charge for each unit of demand (KW or MW) for larger commercial and industrial customers Delivery Charges: Customer Charge – Fixed monthly charge. Distribution Charge – per kWh Energy (and Demand for some Commercial & all Industrial rates) charge on each unit of sale. Surcharges: Power Supply Cost Recovery Reconciliation for self-implemented rates Funding for low income assistance, Renewable Energy, and Energy Efficiency programs

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION DTE Industrial Rate Example Industrial Primary Voltage)1,000kW Demand 432,000kWh Distribution Charges Service Charge$ Max Demand Charge$2.352, Distribution Delivery Chg$ , Surcharges VHWF-$1.30($1.30) LIEAF Surcharge$0.99 EOS 11,500+ kWh$ RRA-$ (1,323.65) NDS SBC$ , SBTC$ , Power Supply Charges Billing Demand Charge$ , % On-Peak Demand On-Peak$ , % On-Peak Energy Off-Peak$ , % Off-Peak Energy Surcharges REPS (Prim. >41,500)$26.68 PSCR$ Bill$38, $$/kWh$0.0896

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION A Point to Consider Utility rates are prices People respond to prices – Prices provide incentives and signals to producers and consumers Rate design will affect behavior – Expect a different response to a high customer charge and low usage charge than to a low customer charge and a high usage charge, even if the two are designed to produce equal revenues in the short run (Why?) Rate design affects behavior, which affects future costs 34 of 79

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION A Feedback Loop Revenue Requirement Cost Allocation Rate Design (prices) Customer Behavior

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Other Ratemaking Processes 25 of 46 REP, EO, LIEAF, Securitization, etc. – Authorized by legislation (PA 295, PA 286, etc.) – Used to track specific expenses – Pay for specific utility programs Generally recovered in per kWh charges – Sometimes on a per customer basis for the residential class Created, reconciled, and approved outside of rate cases

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Other Ratemaking Processes (Cont.) 26 of 46 Utility Self-Implemented rates – reconciled after approval of final rates Special Contracts – Individually approved by the Commission TIER ratemaking – Simple mechanism used for rural co-ops

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Power Supply Cost Recovery (PSCR) 27 of 46 Recovers costs for purchased power and fuel The rate consists of a base and factor. The PSCR base is imbedded in the base power supply rates The factor can change each month up to the maximum factor and is recovered through a surcharge Utility is required to submit a multi-year forecast of customer power supply requirements

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Principles of Rate Regulation 28 of 46 Fairness to both the regulated utility (its owners (or stockholders)) and the ratepayers Avoidance of unjust or undue discrimination between rate classes or customers – Cost causation - the concept of the cost causer pays the costs it imposed on the utility system – PA 286 of 2008 requires cost based rates

M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Work Group Focus Under current legislation find ways to lower electricity costs for energy intensive industrial users Cost Allocation Rate Design We will not be looking at revenue requirement or other ratemaking procedures such as surcharges