Stratified Medicine Graduate Training Programme in Systems Medicine and Spectroscopic Profiling Department of Surgery and Cancer Departmental Meeting To.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Oxford People Strategy – April 2014.
Advertisements

Healthy Schools, Healthy Children?
Division of Medicine Tips for Athena SWAN Silver Award application.
Performance management IN SchOOLS
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN THE SIERRA LEONE CIVIL SERVICE PRESENTER: DAVID WS BANYA DIRECTOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – HRMO.
APPRECIATE People Management to Improve Patient Care: An Organisational Approach Kevin Croft Director of People & Organisational Development 1.
Department of Medicine Campus visits October 2012 Head of Department, Gavin Screaton Departmental Manager, Matt Lee Academic Opportunities Committee Chair,
Biology Staff Survey Why we ran a staff survey  To see how things have changed since the last survey (2011)  To find out what’s working well and.
NETT Recruitment-Admissions Interactive Review Congruence Survey for case study 1 Relationship between recruitment and admissions activity.
The Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science and the Equality Duty Sarah Dickinson 28 March 2012.
SRDS Reviewers Briefing Andrea Jackson, Jo Rowell & Andy Dougill March 2011.
Data in and data out / action plan Dr Julia Smith.
Report to Council Staff Opinion Survey HR Director 6 March 2009.
Staff Experience Survey 2008 Philip Hopwood VC’s Equality & Diversity Forum: 2 July 2009.
Improving Students’ understanding of Feedback
Executive Report to Council
Context Early in 2009 Edinburgh Napier University adopted a revised Employability policy of aiming ‘to create a learning environment which maximises the.
Departmental Survey: Overview of Results 26 Feb 2009.
The LCVP is funded by the Department of Education and Science under the National Development Plan Preparing students for Work Experience.
Oxford Health Staff Wellbeing and Culture Action Plan
Partnership between the NYCI, the Health Service Executive and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs National Youth Health Programme Kevin O’ Hagan.
Induction and Training
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
Welcome Maria Hegarty Equality Strategies Ltd. What ? Equality/Diversity Impact Assessment A series of steps you take that enable you to assess what you.
Chairs’ Briefing Summer 2015 Transition. Agenda 1.An update on national changes and expectations for governance 2.The new Headteacher Standards and future.
Athena SWAN Gender Equality Quantitative Survey Results
‘Developing the appraisal process in the wider context of the Sport and Fitness sector of Higher Education’. Welcome & Introductions.
York St John University Staff Survey Highlights 2010 David Evans Research Consultant October 2010.
Ethicaltrade.org The ETI supervisor training programme: Promoting equal treatment of workers Course for supervisors.
Customer ServiceMaking it Personal Lets work together to cut it out………….. Speaker Name & Title Supporting “Leading the Way”
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust W&C Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
West Suffolk Hospitals NHS Trust Report on Confidential Survey of Employees 2003.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Facilities Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of.
Safeguarding and looked after children Survey of children’s social work practitioners Results for Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council 2010 (Dud ’10) (No.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust GHH Divisional National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
A Whole College Approach to Equality & Diversity Highbury College A Whole College Approach to Equality & Diversity Deborah See, Executive Director Collegiate.
Avoid Disputes, Not Complaints Best Practice Customer Complaint Handling Stuart Ayres, Scheme Manager Derek Pullen, Scheme Adjudicator.
Athena SWAN University College Cork, April 2015 Dr Ruth Gilligan – Athena SWAN Adviser.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Corporate Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
Athena SWAN - Bronze Award. Key Areas for Improvement After a thorough analysis of the Department through surveys and focus groups we have identified.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust CSS Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
ROSSHALL ACADEMY “Our School Our Future” Our Future”
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
Learning outcomes Understand the importance of diversity, equality and inclusion. 2. Know how to work in an inclusive way 3. Know how to access information,
Course Rep Induction Welcome to the Course Representatives’ Induction
SEN Information Report ‘A Parent Friendly Approach’ Pomphlett Primary School.
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Solihull Division National Survey Outcomes & Staff Engagement, 2012 With comparison where applicable: Heart of England.
Stress. Stress is the adverse reaction people have to excessive pressures or other types of demand placed on them. There is a clear distinction between.
FACTS AND FIGURES Staff Survey Results -Our reply rate: 55 % -Average for faculty: 63% -Top of Faculty : 78% ( ESE) -Bottom of Faculty : Materials! Responses.
JOINT CLUSTER PRESENTATION CINDI BOARD 18 June 2008.
SEN Information Report ‘A Parent Friendly Approach’ Pomphlett Primary School.
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
Induction for New Leaders and Managers Human Resources and Organisational Development.
Performance Enabling – Engagement & Cultural Change.
Staff Survey Results and Recommendations ORC International Helen Shaw | Insight Consultant April 2016 Classification: Private.
Athena SWAN and Good Practice Sarah Dickinson Athena SWAN Manager, ECU.
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
Cluster Host Preparation Meeting Autumn Term 1a Overview and Action Planning Judith Carter Senior Adviser Complex Needs/Vulnerable Learners
Development Management Customer Satisfaction Survey 2015/16 Economy, Planning and Employability Services Reported Prepared May 2016.
Research and Development Dr Julie Hankin Medical Director.
Human Resources division
WRES The Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES) was introduced in 2015 to support a consistent approach across the NHS in tackling workforce race inequality.
Bronze award Bronze awards recognise that the institute has a solid foundation for eliminating gender bias and developing an inclusive culture that.
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
WRES In terms of regulation the Trust is required to implement NHS England’s Workforce Race Equality Standard to support it in undertaking its Public Sector.
WRES In terms of regulation the Trust is required to implement NHS England’s Workforce Race Equality Standardt(WRES)o support it in undertaking its Public.
The Athena SWAN Charter and Recent Developments
Lesson 6 – Personal and professional development
Presentation transcript:

Stratified Medicine Graduate Training Programme in Systems Medicine and Spectroscopic Profiling Department of Surgery and Cancer Departmental Meeting To discuss our 2014 Staff Survey and Athena SWAN Bronze application

Bronze Athena SWAN awarded September Well done! ASPIRATIONS We now need to identify and achieve your aspirations to take this forward to Silver – and ultimately Gold..

Thoughts on the Staff Survey 2014 The College conducted a survey of all staff in February this year Overall response rate was 60% FoM’s was 49% WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Surgery and Cancer has reviewed all areas, particularly where it is performing ‘below’ the College average…. An Action Plan – available on the website - is being developed to address these areas in line with the key areas identified by the Provost’s Board

Recruitment and Selection The percentage of staff who think the College procedures are NOT fair has risen from 13% to 16% since 2011 We will:  Review and encourage staff to undertake recruitment training to ensure all are aware of current requirements to enable a fair selection process  Your success is that of the Departments and that of the University

Managing Pressure In S&C: 45% academic staff 30% of research staff 43% of professional services staff indicate they experience pressure “some of the time” You suggest that the causes are: High volume of work – 59% Conflicting priorities – 23% Lack of decision making authority – 22% Not being consulted on changes that affect jobs – 20% Lack of support from the organisation – 19%

Managing Pressure We will:  Ask Divisional Heads to review workloads and ensure that they and line managers in their Divisions are able to recognise stress  Ask line managers to discuss pressure points with you at your PRDP and identify ways to support you  Provide links to information about training on our web page, enabling you to learn more about coping mechanisms and available support

Recognition 52% of you feel satisfied with the recognition you receive for your contributions to the Department and the wider College This compares with 56% for FoM and 58% for College We’re aware of the challenges of multi-site working but have various proposals We will:  Arrange for HoD/Divisional Head to meet all new staff within first month  Send letters of congratulation to all successful PhD candidates  Recognise Grant awards with letters of congratulation  Welcome your views on establishing local recognition schemes – eg. Employee of the month  Continue to capture and promote all formal and informal achievements on the new Departmental blog  We have requested an HoD discretionary fund to reward specific pieces of work  Welcome your suggestions

PRDP We do better than average in that 85% of staff have an annual appraisal but only 50% of you consider it very useful. We would like to hear how you would like to improve the experience. We will:  Seek ways to explain the value of a good PRDP:  Your opportunity to discuss your aspirations, concerns and plan for promotion one on one  Joint responsibility of you and your line manager to ensure that you prepare effectively by setting aside sufficient time (1 uninterrupted hour – minimum) to maximise the opportunity  Encourage appraisors and appraisees to attend training  Encourage appraisors and appraisees to cover all aspects of work – i.e. not just grants and publications – but contributions to management, measures of esteem and to review and plan for promotion  See how we can learn from effective processes already in place within the NHS

Promotions Confidence in promotion schemes across the College is 48%... 46% in S&C –concerns were highlighted in the Athena SWAN process We will:  Clarify Academic Promotions paperwork as part of our Athena SWAN action plan  Invite female academic staff from other Departments / Faculties to join our Academic Promotion Panels to ensure greater parity between male and female membership  We would be happy to hear your thoughts on this and other promotion schemes

Confidence in Expressing Views 25% of you have indicated that you are not confident in expressing your views without some form of negative consequence. This is of great concern to us and we welcome discussion as to how we can change this situation – our proposals: Granularity and Distribution Issues? We will:  Make a concerted effort to change the perception that people are not able to question senior staff  Work together to enhance the PRDP system which should build confidence  Consider the most effective package of courses to support these endeavours  Encourage managers to attend training to provide them with the tools to support a more open culture

Discrimination, Harassment and Bullying We are just below the College average in each of the above categories with between 13% and 19% of staff saying they have experienced some form of discrimination, harassment or bullying Obviously this is not acceptable We are concerned that such behaviour (more?) is coming from colleagues as well as line managers

Imperial Expectations Imperial Expectations provides a framework to ensure that there is appropriate respect for everyone’s views and encouragement for high quality leadership, management and supervision We will ensure that Imperial Expectations are well advertised throughout the Department: Website Postcards Posters Inclusion in PRDPs

End Discrimination, Harassment and Bullying We will not tolerate discrimination, harassment or bullying and will treat all complaints seriously and investigate Where an investigation finds the complaint to be founded – then the College’s processes for dealing with such issues will be put into operation immediately We understand that in some circumstances you may not wish to approach your line manager – we believe that introduction of a neutral route should be considered at College level and will be proposing this  The College provides support through its policies and through the harassment support contacts (links will be provided to you)  We will encourage all staff to ensure they take the appropriate training  We will explore how other organisations address these problems to learn best practice

Your Working Environment This was highlighted as the main thing people would change about working at the College…. We are:  Refurbishing the 3 rd floor of SAFB to provide enhanced laboratory facilities  Working with Faculty to improve the office/desk provision in SAF  Re-organising use of space at C&W which will relieve pressure in Surgery at St Mary’s  Planning to enhance ECMC space in Cancer  Imperial West and the Future?