The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Daylene Meuschke Barry Gribbons Michelle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Division Action Plans in Student Affairs Putting Student Learning First.
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Developing an Institutional Assessment Plan: Product and Process Bruce P. Szelest Winter Workshop - January 20-21, 2005 Saratoga Springs, NY Association.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Human Resource Services Planning Council September 20, 2011 Overview of Service Area Outcome 1: Mission, Evaluation and Outcomes.
NAVIGATING THE WATERS: USING ASSESSMENT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE Amy Harper, Area Coordinator, Fordham University Greer Jason, PhD, Assistant Dean of Students,
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
School Governance for Parents: Advisory Committees How ELAC and SAC Can Help Your School Develop a Better Balanced Scorecard.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP) Planning, Assessment, Allocation Learn More.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
Washington State University Strategic Plan Overview and Implementation Process On web site at
2011 RP Conference: Growing Solutions. This session will give you: a sense of the bigger issues that are shaping our system an outline of what is happening.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Presenters: Bonnie Ann Dowd, CBO San Diego Community College District Chris Hill, Grossmont College Aimee Myers, Sierra College Facilitator: Glenn Yoshida,
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
College-wide Partnerships: Integrated Planning. Once upon a time…
Convocation Opening Address College of Sequoias Welcome&Introductions.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
CCSF Strategic Planning Update September 23, 2010 General Presentation for the CCSF Community and Board of Trustees.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Incorporating SLOs and Assessment into Program Review, Planning and Resource Allocation in a Time of Budget Reduction Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator.
Mt. SAC April 15, INTRODUCTION TO PLANNING Barbara McNeice-Stallard Director Research and Institutional Effectiveness Parts of this document were.
CCC Planning & Assessment “Wrap Up” Findings & Recommendations By: Diane Drebin, Kate Gray and Judy Redder (a.k.a.“The Wrappers”) 06/02/08.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
All College Day Friday, January 25, 2013 West Valley College Integrated Planning.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
INTEGRATED PLANNING: ADAPTING BEST PRACTICES FOR YOUR COLLEGE February 26, 2016 College of the Canyons Presenters: Barry Gribbons, College of the Canyons.
A Presentation for the Annual Conference of the Missouri Community College Association November 6, 2003 Larry McDoniel Ann Campion Riley Assessment of.
Assessing the Operations at Your Institution: Purposes + Planning + Processes = Performance Arizona Assessment Conference Yavapai College, Prescott, Arizona.
What’s Going on at SCC Presented by: Corinna Evett.
EDUCATIONAL MASTER PLAN TIMELINE Mr. Rick Miranda Acting Vice President, Academic Affairs/Asst. Superintendent Dr. Kristi Blackburn Dean of Institutional.
SPRING ASSESSMENT OF COLLEGE PROCESSES.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Program Review and Integrated Planning: A Conversation About Data
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Integrated Budget Process as Evidence of Institutional Effectiveness
Los Angeles Trade Technical College Institutional Self Evaluation Report Presented to the Institutional Effectiveness and Student Success Committee.
Sam Houston State University
In Preparation to ACCJC team site visit on 10/8-10/11
Sam Houston State University
Accreditation follow-up report
Foothill College Strategic Objective - Governance
Presentation transcript:

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Daylene Meuschke Barry Gribbons Michelle Barton Barbara McNeice-Stallard Strengthening Student Success Conference October 5, 2012 Integrating and Evaluating Planning Efforts Across the Institution

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Viewer Discretion Advised The materials you are about to see and activities you are about to participate in have been prepared by four practitioners who have nearly 100 years of combined experience in research and planning. The materials are not a guarantee that your college’s planning processes will be magically transformed overnight but should provide some guidelines on how other colleges have integrated their planning processes in accordance with the ACCJC standards. Please enjoy the show!

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Agenda Introduction and Overview of Session Overview of Integrated Planning Integration of Program Review and Budget Strategic Plan Educational Master Plan Implementation Process Challenges Evaluation of Planning Tying it all together

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Planning 1. Big Goals: Big Hairy Audacious Goals (BHAGs) 2. Supporting evidence for BHAGs 3. Specific Objectives for Big Goals 4. Goals and Objectives Drive Budget 5. Include everyone 6. Communicate early and often 7. Action Plans 8. Follow up

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges BHAG Activity – Part 1 1. Identify one or two BHAGs for your department/unit/division on campus that you want to accomplish over the next 2-3 years. 2. Why is this is a goal for your department/unit/division (i.e., provide a justification for this goal)? 3. What evidence have you collected to justify this goal? If no evidence has been collected, what evidence needs to be collected? 4. What resources are needed to achieve this goal (staff, budget, coordination with other departments, etc.)? 5. Is this goal documented in any other plans?

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Integrated Planning: California Community Colleges Directly connect various planning processes Educational Master Plan Strategic Plan Other District/College Plans (Facilities, Staffing, Technology) Instructional and Support Services Program Plans SLOs Financial Resources Planning (i.e., Budget Development) What are your Big Goals? Where do your Big Goals Live?

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Integrated Planning: California Community Colleges Inclusive / Respect Collegial Consultation Effective communication Use Data Evaluate the Process

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Integrated Planning: Why? Accreditation Requirement Align Resources with Institutional and Department Priorities Articulates what is important to the college Clarifies how the college operates (resource allocation based on priorities)

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Integrated Planning: ACCJC Key Elements Data Driven Mission Implementation Re-evaluate Institutional Goals Broad-based / Collegial Process SLOs Resource Allocation Human Resources Physical Resources Technology Resource Allocation ACCJC Reports 20 college on sanctions because of integrated planning. (ACCJC Spring News, Spring 2012)

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Integrated Planning Self- Assessment Identify how your college integrates each of the ACCJC key elements. Cite specific evidence that demonstrates the linkages in your plans (e.g., program review and budget). We’ll take a few minutes after the activity to share some examples from the activity.

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Examples of Planning Processes: Palomar College

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Examples of Planning Processes: College of the Canyons

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Examples of Planning Processes: Mt. San Antonio College

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Alignment of Planning Timelines: Skyline College

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Alignment of Planning Timelines

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Alignment of Planning Timelines: College of the Canyons Note: Program Reviews are on a three year cycle with annual updates.

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Department Planning: Major Principles College Mission Department Mission Educational and Facilities Master Plan Objectives, especially from SLOs Strategic Plan Resource Allocation Discretionary Budgets Technology Needs Broad-based Collegial Process Transparency

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges College of the Canyons Online Demo

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Department Planning: Palomar College Integrated with Divisional Planning Councils as opposed to a separate committee Two/Three year cycle Includes three parts: Analysis (Quantitative, Learning Outcomes Assessment) Planning Resource Allocation Needs Councils review PRPs Budgets requests linked to PRPs Distribution of PRP funds Division Budgets Councils use PRPs to identify divisional planning priorities for consideration in following year’s Institutional Strategic Plan

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Department Planning: Mt. San Antonio College Individual units document planning efforts and accomplishments, annually. Deans, Directors, and V.P.s summarize unit PIEs and submit report to e-PIE. Four VPs submit summaries, including resource requests, to Institutional Effectiveness Committee (IEC) IEC works with VPs to summarize annual planning efforts for the President’s Advisory Council (PAC). Summaries from IEC may be translated by PAC into new or revised college goals and strategies for upcoming year PIE serves as the vehicle for aligning College goals and institutional processes for evaluation, planning and resource allocation.

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Department Planning: Other Examples Chaffey College ents.htm ents.htm Crafton Hills (2012 RP Group Excellence in Planning Award) _and_Planning/Planning_and_Program_Review.a spx _and_Planning/Planning_and_Program_Review.a spx Tip: Take a look at other colleges that have won awards and/or are not on sanction for lack of integrated planning.

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges BHAG Activity – Part 2 Return to your BHAG Activity from the beginning of the session. How is your BHAG integrated with the program review and budget processes?

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Examples of Strategic Plans: College of the Canyons Organizing and Developing the Strategic Plan External and Internal Data The Rudder: Sets Big Goals Detailed accomplishments and goals drawn exclusively from Department Plans Review Whole Document for Missing Pieces Enter Missing Pieces into Program Reviews

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges BHAG Activity: Part 3 Return to your BHAG Activity from the beginning of the session. How is your BHAG integrated with the Strategic Plan process? Is there integration with the program review, budget and strategic plan processes?

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Educational and Facilities Master Plans External and Internal Data Major Changes New Centers New Programs Organizational Structures and Processes Department-level detail Data Long-term goals: Pull first draft from Program Review Resource needs: Technology, Facilities, Staff, Other

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges BHAG Activity: Part 4 Return to your BHAG Activity from the beginning of the session. How is your BHAG integrated with the Educational Master Plan process? Is there integration with the program review, budget, strategic plan and Educational Master Plan processes?

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Implementation Process Establish a plan of action for integrating the planning processes. Identify who will carry out the actions in each process. Determine how progress will be monitored and communicated to the campus community. Establish an evaluation plan. Discuss results from evaluation of the processes and identify ways to improve it. Implement the changes identified from the evaluation process. Repeat process

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Implementation Timelines

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Implementation Example on Monitoring Progress – Palomar Action Plan

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Evaluating Planning Individual Plans: Feedback Loops/Enhancements Master Plan Strategic Plan Other Plans Department Plans Overall Process All Staff: Surveys Subcommittee Review: Retreat / Focus Group Results: Evidence of Improved Student Learning Examples of Evaluation of Planning Processes can be found in your binder.

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Examples of Evaluating Planning: College of the Canyons Program Review Task Force (annual) Faculty / Staff Survey (annual) College Planning Team (annual)

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Examples of Evaluating Planning: Mt. San Antonio College Evaluated by employees through an online survey and/or via their department/unit annual program review process Managers evaluate the process annually and it includes their department/units' evaluation of the process Vice Presidents evaluate the process annually and it includes their immediate managers' evaluation of the process. Institutional Effectiveness Committee (IEC) evaluates the process annually and it is included in the Vice President's annual evaluation President's Advisory Council (shared governance) evaluates the process annually based on the IEC report

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Examples of Evaluating Planning: Palomar College Evaluates the Integrated Planning, Evaluation, and Resource Allocation Decision-Making Model (IPM) and the Resource Allocation Model (RAM). Annually, the Strategic Planning Council (SPC) completes a formative evaluation and identifies ways to strengthen and improve the IPM. Upon completion of the three-year Strategic Planning cycle, SPC completes a summative evaluation to assess the effectiveness and outcomes of the IPM and RAM. See handout in your notebook for detailed information on the evaluation process.

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges BHAG Activity: Part 5-7 Part 5 - How are faculty and staff engaged throughout the planning processes? How is engagement maintained through the processes? Part 6 - How is it implemented? How is effective use of the plans being documented? How is progress being monitored? Part 7 - How are these processes evaluated?

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges The Paradox of Consultants Fresh views and ideas Plans must be owned by the College and its Departments

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Words of Encouragement Don’t be afraid to fail. In good times and in bad times. It’s a cultural change – stick with it. Budget development Institutional Action Priorities from department plans Developing expertise takes time. Start now because you will need to go through several iterations.

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges There is a Silver Lining! You’re developing tools to make the process of integrating planning efficient. It’s a disciplined process drawing from department plans. People feel they have a voice in the planning process, are more engaged, and take ownership of their plans. Integrated planning with budget results in better understanding of resource allocation amongst faculty and staff.

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Review of Today’s Discussion and Activities Strategic Plan Sets Direction and Draws Exclusively from Department Plans, even through iterations Master Plan First Draft Draws from Department Plans: Follow up with an interview. Every Budget Request Connected to Department Objective Other District/College Plans Draws from Department Plans Peer Review

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Final Activity: Part 8 Reflect on the previous activities. List the next steps with regard to planning for your department, division or the college. What aspects of the planning processes need improvement? What needs to happen to strengthen the integration?

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Questions/Concerns?

The Planning Working Group An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Contact Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D., Director, Institutional Research College of the Barry Gribbons, Ph.D., Asst. Superintendent/V.P., Institutional Research, Technology and Online Services College of the Michelle Barton, M.S., Director, Institutional Research and Planning and Past President, RP Group Palomar Community College Barbara McNeice-Stallard, M.Sc., Director, Research & Institutional Effectiveness Mt. San Antonio