Jorge Schulz Bechtel National Inc. 10 May 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIR POLLUTION AND METEOROLOGY
Advertisements

21M062007D The Shaw Group Inc. ® An Analytical Screening Technique to Estimate the Effect of Cooling Ponds on Meteorological Measurements – A Case Study.
Laboratory Modeling of Atmospheric Dispersion at the Fluid Modeling Facility of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by William H. Snyder MiniTech.
Nuclear waste vitrification efficiency: cold cap Pavel Hrma Albert A. Kruger Richard Pokorný 1.
S A L T M O D A computer program for the prediction of the salinity of soil moisture, ground water and drainage water, the depth of the water table, and.
RETS-REMP WORKSHOP June 25, 2012 Greg Jones R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC 1.
Wind Resource Assessment
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Temporal Comparison of Atmospheric Stability Classification Methods
Performance of Air Quality Models in Urban Areas  Objectives and Motivation  St. Louis study and ISC urban  Model Improvements  Performance of Improved.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
Weather and X/Q 1 Impact Of Weather Changes On TVA Nuclear Plant Chi/Q (  /Q) Kenneth G. Wastrack Doyle E. Pittman Jennifer M. Call Tennessee Valley Authority.
Suspended particle property variation in Gaoping Submarine Canyon Ray T. Hsu and James T. Liu Institute of Marine Geology and Chemistry, National Sun Yat-sen.
The ANSI/ANS 2.15 Standard for Modeling Routine Radiological Releases from Nuclear Facilities John Ciolek AlphaTRAC, Inc.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Muhammad Ali, Jovica V. Milanović Muhammad Ali – United Kingdom – RIF Session 4 – 0528 Probabilistic Assessment Of Wind.
X/Q for Releases From Area Sources 2009 RETS-REMP Workshop Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc.
Using ARCON96 for Control Room Radiological Habitability Assessments
Brake Pad Wear Debris Characterization Mark A. Schlautman, Ph.D Christos Christoforou, Ph.D. Ashley Haselden School of the Environment Clemson University.
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
VII. How might current analysis methods be enhanced or combined to obtain more information about the nature of OC, EC, and other carbon fractions in filter.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Climate Meteorology. Factors Affecting Climate Climate includes not only the average weather conditions of an area, but also any variations from those.
A STUDY ON THE TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS IN THE ENVIRONMENT Goung-Jin Lee, Hee-Geun Kim 2006 RETS.
OEC Webinar on Nuclear Safety New Airborne Dispersion Modeling and Its Impact on Safety Basis Documentation at a DOE Waste Handling and Processing Facility.
Air Quality Modeling.
Identifying Non-Linear Flow for Modeling of Routine Releases from TVA Nuclear Facilities Toree M. Cook Kenneth G. Wastrack Doyle E. Pittman Tennessee Valley.
Waste Treatment Plant Project Adapting Dispersion Software to DOE Standard 3009 Jorge Schulz Thomas R. McDonnell Bechtel National, Inc EFCOG Safety.
SRNS-F Comparison of Parameters for Modeling Tritium Dispersion Accident Analyst Nuclear & Criticality Safety Engineering Savannah River.
1 U N C L A S S I F I E D Modeling of Buoyant Plumes of Flammable Natural Gas John Hargreaves Analyst Safety Basis Technical Services Group LA-UR
CHAPTER 5 Concentration Models: Diffusion Model.
Stack Design Done by Eng. Mohamed AbdElRhaman. Content Definition of the stack Applications of stack Dispersion Model Selection of stack design Conclusion.
EFCOG Safety Analysis Working Group May 10, 2012 Jeremy Rishel Bruce Napier Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling in Safety Analyses: GENII.
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Dispersion of Air Pollutants The dispersion of air pollutants is primarily determined by atmospheric conditions. If conditions are superadiabatic a great.
Deposition Velocity Issues at Y-12 Bruce A Wilson Chief Engineer, Nuclear Facility Safety Douglas Clark Analyst B&W Technical Services Y-12 May 9, 2012.
Air Dispersion Primer Deposition begins when material reaches the ground Material from the lower stack reaches the ground before that of the taller stack.
Hiromasa Nakayama*, Klara Jurcakova** and Haruyasu Nagai*
Dispersion Modeling A Brief Introduction A Brief Introduction Image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Changes in Floods and Droughts in an Elevated CO 2 Climate Anthony M. DeAngelis Dr. Anthony J. Broccoli.
Building Aware Flow and T&D Modeling Sensor Data Fusion NCAR/RAL March
Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.
An ATD Model that Incorporates Uncertainty R. Ian Sykes Titan Research & Technology Div., Titan Corp. 50 Washington Road Princeton NJ OFCM Panel Session.
Comparison of the AEOLUS3 Atmospheric Dispersion Computer Code with NRC Codes PAVAN and XOQDOQ 13th NUMUG Conference, October 2009, San Francisco, CA.
Transport and dispersion of air pollution
K.S Carslaw, L. A. Lee, C. L. Reddington, K. J. Pringle, A. Rap, P. M. Forster, G.W. Mann, D. V. Spracklen, M. T. Woodhouse, L. A. Regayre and J. R. Pierce.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Consequence Analysis 2.2.
Analysis on the amount of graphite dust deposited on steam generator of HTGR Wei Peng 1, Tian-qi Zhang 1, Su-yuan Yu 2 * 1 Institute of Nuclear and new.
NUMUG - Oct Atmospheric Stability – Methods & Measurements Robert F. Yewdall PSEG Nuclear LLC.
Stratospheric Aerosol Size Distribution Retrievals Using SAGE III Mark Hervig GATS Inc. Terry Deshler University of Wyoming.
1 An Introduction to the Headquarters Operations Center and RASCAL Kevin Quinlan Physical Scientist, NRO U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 21.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
Various Methodologies for Calculating the Impacts on Delta-T From Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSI) Jim Holian and Steve Mirsky, SAIC.
HYSPLIT/ALOHA Demonstration Glenn Rolph OAR Air Resources Laboratory June 21, 2016.
Factors that Affect Climate What is Climate? Weather conditions of an area including any variations from the norm. Exchange of energy and moisture.
Recent Developments Regarding Control Room Habitability Assessment
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Identification of Methane Emissions in an Urban Setting
Subsea gas release seminar
Modeling Iodine Released During a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
AERLINE: Air Exposure Research model for LINE sources
Validated equivalent source model for an underexpanded hydrogen jet
Exercise 1: Fenton River Floodplain Exercise
VO Biophysik | G. Schauberger | Institut für Med. Physik & Biostatistik Reconstruction of airborne emissions by inverse dispersion modelling and.
What would be the typical temperature in Atlanta?
PURPOSE OF AIR QUALITY MODELING Policy Analysis
E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi
Wind Velocity One of the effects of wind speed is to dilute continuously released pollutants at the point of emission. Whether a source is at the surface.
Presentation transcript:

Jorge Schulz Bechtel National Inc. 10 May 2012

 Background leading to the deposition velocity investigation  Particle size distributions investigated  Determination of deposition velocity distributions  Calculation of atmospheric dispersion factors  Effects of WPT processes on particle size distributions  Conclusions

 Dry deposition velocity (V dd ) is an empirical function of: ◦ Particle size distribution ◦ Wind speed ◦ Surface roughness ◦ Atmospheric stability class  V dd is used to account for plume depletion as plume travels downwind

 At WTP initially a value of 1 cm·s -1 for V dd was used for unmitigated releases ◦ Based on DOE guidance for MACCS2 ◦ DOE-STD Appendix A  Subsequently the Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board (DNFSB) concluded that 0.1 cm·s -1 for V dd was appropriate ◦ Based on an average particle size of 2 μm  Responding to the DNFSB, DOE recommended a value of 0.3 cm·s -1 for V dd

 Due to the differing opinions of DOE and the DNFSB, WTP launched an investigation to: ◦ Obtain particle sized distributions (PSD) for the incoming waste from Tank Farms ◦ Develop V dd distributions ◦ Determine depleted atmospheric dispersion factors (χ/Q) based on the incoming waste PSDs ◦ Determine a single value that results in a 95 th percentile depleted χ/Q ◦ Investigate the effects of particle densities and respirable fractions on the depleted χ/Q

 WTP-RPT-153 ◦ Extensive Review of Hanford waste PSDs ◦ Composite PSDs developed representing waste in 19 Hanford Tanks  WTP-RPT-048 ◦ Ongoing investigation of waste form qualification for tank 241-AZ-101  BNFL-RPT-038 ◦ Investigated the effects of caustic leaching and/or water washing waste before vitrification  Data for tanks AZ-101 and AZ-102 from Tank Waste Information Network System (TWINS)

ParameterCompositePuO 2 AZ- 101 AZ-102 No Sonication AZ-102 Sonication SourceWTP-RPT-153TWINSWTP-RPT-048TWINS Mean (μm) Percentile (μm) Median (μm) Percentile (μm) Respirable Fraction69%45%23%84%52%57%

ParameterCompositePuO 2 AZ- 101 AZ-102 No Sonication AZ-102 Sonication SourceWTP-RPT-153TWINSWTP-RPT-048TWINS Mean (μm) Percentile (μm) Median (μm) Percentile (μm)

 PSDs are very spread out – little consistency between sources  A Monte Carlo simulation was created ◦ V dd distributions developed ◦ Resultant χ/Q distributions developed

 Spreadsheet based on Regulatory Guide Gaussian Model  10 years of meteorological data  Uses particle size distributions previously determined

 Deposition velocities from 0.1 to 1,500 cm·s -1  Mean from 0.65 to 61 cm·s -1  Particles with V dd greater than a few cm·s -1 are not in the respirable range  Further investigation on respirable range (<10 μm AED)

 Using the respirable fraction PSDs, the 95 th percentile χ/Q was determined  The single-value V dd that would result in the 95 th percentile χ/Q was back-calculated  V dd is in the range of 0.32 to 0.47 cm·s -1

 WTP pretreatment of Tank Farm waste includes: ◦ Ultrafiltration ◦ Dilute caustic washing ◦ Elevated temperature caustic leaching  Thus pretreatment of the waste changes the PSDs  Mean particle diameter decreases from 3.8 to 1.2 μm during pretreatment operations  V dd that yields the 95 th percentile χ/Q is in the range of 0.29 to 0.40 cm·s -1

 Full range PSDs as reported have large variations  Limiting PSDs to the respirable range (<10 μm AED) indicates that the V dd and χ/Qs are not very sensitive to differences  A V dd of 0.3 cm·s -1 is reasonable from the work performed  Conservatively, WTP selected a V dd of 0.1 cm·s -1 for unmitigated releases and 0.0 cm·s -1 for mitigated releases (HEPA filtered)