Disaster Drills, Testing, and Evaluation  A part of any management program, testing, and evaluation is critical.  The purpose of an organized drill is.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DISASTER PLANNING: Do it Before Disaster Strikes Community Issues Satellite Workshops Department of Commerce & Economic Opportunity.
Advertisements

Patient Movement in the Midst of a Disaster
Principles and Challenges of Training Harold L. Timboe Commander, Medical Reserve Corps Texas State Guard.
A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.
Exercise Swaps Community Emergency Response Team.
CERT Program Manager: Training and Exercises
National Incident Management System Overview Briefing Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Implementation.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 2—Community Recovery What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
Tabletop Exercise Meningitis Outbreak
For Discussion Purposes Only
Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness Mr. James Kish, Director Technological Hazards National Preparedness Directorate.
All-hazards readiness in the United States Learning to communicate and build a culture of preparedness David Passey Senior Representative U.S. Federal.
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
IS-0700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Session 121 National Incident Management Systems Session 12 Slide Deck.
PREPARE AMERICA for a Unified Response to Terrorism A NATIONAL HOMELAND SECURITY PREPAREDNESS TRAINING SOLUTION OFFERED BY AMERICA’S COMMUNITY COLLEGES.
Understanding Multiagency Coordination IS-701.A – February 2010 Visual 2.1 Unit 2: Understanding Multiagency Coordination.
Citizen Corps Uniting communities. Preparing the Nation. 1.
What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
Workshop Summary ISPS Drills & Exercises Workshop Port Moresby 2006.
TABLETOP EXERCISE 10 Step Process School Emergency Operations Plan Exercise Toolkit, Part 1 of 11. Colorado School Safety Resource Center (Department of.
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY Continuity of Operations Planning (COOP)
Using Tabletop Exercises Carl Osaki, MSPH, RS Clinical Associate Professor Department of Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences, SPHCM, University.
National Disaster Recovery Framework. National Disaster Recovery Framework Reasons for establishing the Framework Past large-scale recovery efforts revealed.
Capability Cliff Notes Series HPP Capability 1—Healthcare System Preparedness What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
Part of a Broader Strategy
Jeffery Graviet Emergency Services Coordinator, Salt Lake County Chairperson, Salt Lake Urban Area Working Group.
Community Preparedness & Disaster Planning. Why Disasters occur ?
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Practical Information on Crisis Planning: A Guide for Schools and Communities U.S. Department of Education August 2004.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
Using Tabletop Exercises Carl Osaki, MSPH, RS Clinical Associate Professor Emeritus Dept of Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public.
This work was supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative Agreement 1U01TP Public Health System Training in Disaster.
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
Disasters and Emergencies The Role of The Chaplain in the world of Emergency Management.
Association of Defense Communities June 23, 2015
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Dr. Charles W. Beadling Central Asia Regional Health Security Conference April 2012 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
Technician Module 2 Unit 2 Slide 1 MODULE 2 UNIT 2 Planning, Assessment & Analysis.
ADM 677 Crisis Management in Educational Settings Karen McCuiston Kentucky Center For School Safety.
Background, Purpose, and Value of Exercises. 9/11 has changed water system security requirements Continued training for intentional incidents is critical.
1 The DNA of Emergency Management. 2 Approaches to Disaster Planning Two types of planning u Emergency 0perations Plan u Emergency Support Function.
Survivor Centric Emergency Management Integrating the Access and Functional Needs of the Whole Community Before, During and After Disasters August 2015.
California Emergency Management Agency State Emergency Plan Briefing Emergency Partnership Advisory Workgroup Meeting April 16, 2009.
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
PS Version 1 National Response Framework Overview for Private Sector Audiences January 22, 2008.
Emergency Management Training and Education System Protection and National Preparedness National Preparedness Directorate National Training and Education.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 Mr. Scott A. Weidie, J722 1 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) 04 March 2008 Governments and Crises: Roles.
NFPA 1600 Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs.
Disaster Planning Workshop Hosted By: Pleasantview Fire Protection District.
Rotary and the Resilient Community A.J. Briding Certified Emergency Manager Certified Organizational Resilience Executive.
Session 161 National Incident Management Systems Session 16 Slide Deck.
Implementing Multiagency Coordination IS-701.A – February 2010 Visual 4.1 Unit 4: Implementing Multiagency Coordination.
2015 USACE Exercise – December 1, 2015 New Madrid Seismic Zone – Earthquake FEMA Mission, Legal Authorities and Regional Capability Overview Gus Wulfkuhle.
Public Health System Training in Disaster Recovery (PH – STriDR) This work was supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative Agreement.
Harris County Case Study.  Aligning plans with emergency support functions (ESFs) can facilitate an efficient and effective response to emergencies.
Business Continuity Planning 101
Overview Briefing Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) Presidential Policy Directive 8 / PPD-8: National Preparedness May 2012.
Q & A Overview of the Coalition Surge Test (CST)
Emergency Operations Planning
Developing a Multiyear Training and Exercise Plan
2017 Health care Preparedness and Response Draft Capabilities
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Unit 6- IS 230 Fundamentals of Emergency Management
Unit 5- IS 800 Introduction to the National Response Framework
Unit 6- IS 230 Fundamentals of Emergency Management
Disaster Recovery Operations
Presentation transcript:

Disaster Drills, Testing, and Evaluation  A part of any management program, testing, and evaluation is critical.  The purpose of an organized drill is to a test the disaster plan.  A drill will expose strengths and weaknesses in the plan and in the capabilities of responders.  It also allows various agencies that do not commonly work together to become familiar with one another’s response capabilities and with their roles in the plan.

Core Capabilities  The National Preparedness Goal identified 31 core capabilities—these are the distinct critical elements needed to achieve the National Preparedness Goal.  The Core Capabilities establish the expected activities to be carried out for a particular disaster.  Core capabilities may apply to all or some phases of the disaster (prevention, protection, response, recovery, mitigation)  When developing a disaster plan assessment program, drills, and evaluation methods, core capabilities should be used as a framework.

Examples of Core Capabilities  Planning  Public Information and Warning  Operational Coordination  Intelligence and Information Sharing  Screening, Search, and Detection  Access Control and Identity Verification  Housing  Cybersecurity  Risk and Disaster Resilience Assessment  Threats and Hazard Identification  Critical Transportation  Environmental Response/Health and Safety  Fatality Management Services  Mass Care Services  Mass Search and Rescue Operations  Operational Communications  Economic Recovery

Core Capability: Critical Transportation  Mission Area  Response  Description  Provide transportation (including infrastructure access and accessible transportation services) for response priority objectives, including the evacuation of people and animals, and the delivery of vital response personnel, equipment, and services into the affected areas.  Core Capability Targets  Establish physical access through appropriate transportation corridors and deliver required resources to save lives and to meet the needs of disaster survivors.  Ensure basic human needs are met, stabilize the incident, transition into recovery for an affected area, and restore basic services and community functionality.

Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)  The Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) doctrine consists of fundamental principles that frame a common approach to exercises.  Guided by elected and appointed officials  Capability-based, objective driven  Progressive planning approach  Whole community integration  Informed by risk  Common methodology  Applicable to any type of hazard or exposure.

Exercise Design and Development  Exercise planning team members are identified  Schedule planning meetings  Identify and develop exercise objectives  Design the scenario  Create documentation  Plan exercise activities  Plan evaluation  Coordinate logistics.

Exercise Overview  Scope:  Exercise type  Exercise duration  Exercise location  Exercise parameters  Mission Areas:  Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response, and/or Recovery  Core capabilities  Objectives  Threat or hazard  Scenario Overview  Participating organizations

Exercise Conduct  After design and development activities are complete, the exercise is ready to occur.  Activities essential to conducting individual exercises include preparing for exercise play, managing exercise play, and conducting immediate exercise wrap-up activities.

Different Disaster plan approaches  Disaster Plan Exercises and Drills can be of many different forms  Examples include:  Table top exercises  Drills  Full Scale Field Exercises

Table Top Exercises  Use paper, verbal, or computer-based scenarios designed to improve coordination, to share information, and to practice decision-making.  Paper drills are often done to demonstrate how "response functions" work and communication together as part of the Incident Command System plan.  In table tops exercises, those involved include a facilitator and agency participants.

Table Top Exercises  A tabletop exercise is a focused practice activity that places the participants in a simulated situation requiring them to function in the capacity that would be expected of them in a real event.  Its purpose is to promote preparedness by testing policies and plans and by training personnel.

Framework for a Table Top Scenario  Facilitator guides the group  Members would be representatives from the various groups/agencies expected to respond to the scenario  Provide background information about the scenario the participants will be responding to  The facilitator will then begin to provide the group information about what is occurring in “real time.”  For example: Hospital XYZ reports an apparent disease outbreak to the Department of Public Health. 75 people have arrived at the hospital emergency room in the last 24 with symptoms of abdominal pain and fever. All people recently attended a banquet at a local hotel.

Discussion Session  The group then holds discussions on how they would respond. Questions may include:  Who needs to be notified?  Would there be enough beds or medical personnel to handle a large disease outbreak in the participants’ communities?  What mutual aid agreements are in place to help assist the participants ‘communities in such a situation?  Does this size necessitate implementation of the Incident Command System (ICS)? If so, who would be in charge of Incident Command?  The facilitator continues to provide information to the group as the disaster unfolds. At each step, the group holds discussions on how the disaster response should be implemented.  This process also includes evaluators who are monitoring the interactions between the participants.  At the conclusion of the disaster, the facilitator debriefs the group to identify lessons learned from the exercise, areas of improvement in an after-action review.

FEMA Private Sector Division  The FEMA Private Sector Division began a new series of tabletop exercises in 2010 as a tool to help private sector organizations advance their organization’s continuity, preparedness and resiliency.  Tabletop exercises are designed to help an organization test a hypothetical situation, such as a natural or man- made disaster, and evaluate the group’s ability to cooperate and work together, as well as test their readiness to respond.

Emergency Preparedness Drills  A drill is a coordinated, supervised activity usually employed to validate a specific function or capability in a single agency or organization.  Drills are commonly used to provide training on new equipment, validate procedures, or practice and maintain current skills.  Drills can also be used to determine if a part of a plan can be executed as designed, to assess whether more training is required, or to reinforce best practices.

Field Exercises  A field exercise takes place in real time to test the mobilization, including the activation of the Emergency Operations Center, of all or as many as possible of the response components.  In full-scale exercises, the participants include the responder, controller, evaluator, and victims.

Exercise Evaluation  Evaluation is the cornerstone of an exercise and must be considered throughout all phases of the exercise planning cycle, beginning when the exercise planning team meets to establish objectives and initiate exercise design. Effective evaluation assesses performance against exercise objectives, and identifies and documents strengths and areas for improvement relative to core capabilities.

Evaluation  Evaluation tools are developed along with the drill/exercise.  The evaluation of the disaster exercise should be tied to the core capabilities and capability targets.  Core capabilities  The distinct critical elements necessary to achieve a specific mission area (e.g., prevention). To assess both capacity and gaps, each core capability includes capability targets.  Capability target(s)  The performance threshold(s) for each core capability; they state the exact amount of capability that exercise players aim to achieve. Capability targets are typically written as quantitative or qualitative statements.  Capability targets and critical tasks are based on operational plans, policies, and procedures to be exercised and tested during the exercise.  Critical tasks  The distinct elements required to perform a core capability; they describe how the capability target will be met.  Critical tasks include the activities, resources, and responsibilities required to fulfill capability targets.

Organizational Exercise Evaluation Guides  Exercise Evaluation Guides containing organizational capability targets and critical tasks.  These are developed for a specific organization.  Improvement Planning  During improvement planning, the corrective actions identified during individual exercises are tracked to completion, ensuring that exercises yield tangible preparedness improvements.  An effective corrective action program develops IPs that are dynamic documents, which are continually monitored and implemented as part of the larger system of improving preparedness.

National Training Program  The National Training Program (NTP) provides an organized approach to training for emergency managers and emergency response providers.  The NTP provides policy, guidance, and tools that address training design, development, delivery, and evaluation, as appropriate.  The NTP supports the development, promulgation, and regular updating, as necessary, of national voluntary consensus standards for training; and ensure that the training provided under the NTP is consistent with the standards.

FEMA Training Organizations  Center for Domestic Preparedness  Emergency Management Institute  National training and Education Division  National Fire Academy

Center for Domestic Preparedness  The Center for Domestic Preparedness (CDP) develops and delivers advanced training for emergency response providers, emergency managers, and other government officials from state, local, and tribal governments.

Emergency Management Institute  The Emergency Management Institute (EMI) develops and delivers emergency management training to enhance the capabilities of federal, state, local, and tribal government officials, volunteer organizations, and the public and private sectors to minimize the impact of disasters.

National Training and Education Division  Training and Exercise Integration/ Training Operations (TEI/TO) offers more than 125 courses to help build critical skills that responders need to function effectively in mass consequence events.  Training partners include the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium (NDPC), the Rural Domestic Preparedness Consortium (RDPC), the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS), and Center for Domestic Preparedness (CDP), among others.

National Fire Academy  Provides leadership skills and advanced technical training for local fire and emergency services in prevention, preparedness and response.