Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Behavior of Ideal Systems
Advertisements

CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
10.1 Introduction Chapter 10 PID Controls
Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
Nyquist Plot – First Order Lag
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Transforming C(s) into c(t): Negative Feedback Control with Proportional Only Controller Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond.
Green Team Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson September 14, 2005 UTC ENGR 329 Speed System.
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Flow Control System Steady State Operation & Step Response February 1 st, 2006 U.T.C. ENGR 329.
FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM
LEVEL-1 Frequency Response –Experiments –Modeling Jim Henry.
Marshal Stout Michael Brooks Nathan Wilson ENGR 329 Team Green February 11, 2009.
Pressure System Amanda Newman Andy Patel Bryan Cuervo September 28 th 2005 ENGR. 329 UTC Engineering.
Flow Rate Control System
Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions.
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
Red Team -Pressure- Steady State Operating And Step Response Dennis To Cory Richardson Jamison Linden 6/26/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.
Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Team Green John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles UTC ENGR Steady State and Step Response Performance Speed Control System.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.
Examples of Control Systems Application. Modeling the Ball and Beam Experiment.
B Note from Dr. Henry These slides are suggested to be ADDED to your previous presentation that included system description, diagrams, SSOC, operating.
What does Kc do?. What is Kc? Kc is the Controller Gain of a control system. It can be adjusted to obtain a variety of system responses.
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
Chapter 8 Performance of P-only, PI and PID Controllers.
SECOND-ORDER CIRCUITS THE BASIC CIRCUIT EQUATION Single Node-pair: Use KCL Differentiating Single Loop: Use KVL.
Automatic Control Theory-
DNT Control Principle Root Locus Techniques DNT Control Principle.
MESB374 System Modeling and Analysis Forced Response
Properties of Root Locus Lesson Objectives : After finish this lesson, students will be able to  be aware of the control system problem  be aware of.
Distributed Laboratories: Control System Experiments with LabVIEW and the LEGO NXT Platform Greg Droge, Dr. Bonnie Heck Ferri, Jill Auerbach.
Chapter 5 Transient and Steady State Response “I will study and get ready and someday my chance will come” Abraham Lincoln.
1 Lecture D32 : Damped Free Vibration Spring-Dashpot-Mass System Spring Force k > 0 Dashpot c > 0 Newton’s Second Law (Define) Natural Frequency and Period.
Chapter 4 Dynamic Systems: Higher Order Processes Prof. Shi-Shang Jang National Tsing-Hua University Chemical Engineering Dept. Hsin Chu, Taiwan April,
Modal Theory of Single Degree of Freedom System Dept. of Mechanical Engineering Yungpeng Wang 南臺科技大學 STUST.
o Problem Reconsider Problem
Modern Control System EKT 308
Chapter 7 Adjusting Controller Parameters Professor Shi-Shang Jang Chemical Engineering Department National Tsing-Hua University Hsin Chu, Taiwan.
CS-EE 481 Spring Founder’s Day, 2004 University of Portland School of Engineering In-Line Headphone Amplifier Authors Jim Bosak Casey Hughes Jeff.
Chapter 6 Analysis of Feedback Control Systems Prof. Shi-Shang Jang Chemical Engineering Department National Tsing-Hua University Hsin Chu, Taiwan June,
Modern Control System EKT 308 Root Locus and PID controllers.
ABL Tracking System PRESENTED BY: SIDNEY JONES AND AJ MARIN.
1 Time Response. CHAPTER Poles and Zeros and System Response. Figure 3.1: (a) System showing input and output; (b) Pole-zero plot of the system;
Modern Control System EKT 308
Overhead Controller Design Project Name Department and University Date Class Name.
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
EENG 2610: Circuit Analysis Class 13: Second-Order Circuits
Time Response Analysis
Instructor: Jongeun Choi
Dynamic Behavior of Ideal Systems
Unit-Ramp Response System & Control Engineering Lab.
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
UNIT-II TIME RESPONSE ANALYSIS
CBE / MET Feb 12.
CBE 491 / Sep 12.
Response of Higher Order Systems
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Unit-Impulse Response
CBE / MET Feb 12.
Second-Order Systems Chapter 5 Standard form:
Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond
x points: -7, -4+3i HW- 05 Problem:05-01
Presentation transcript:

Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Yellow Team Jimy George Jeff Lawrence Taylor Murphy Jennifer Potter

Outline Flow System Background Previous Work Proportional Control Modeling Results Conclusions

Flow System Setup

Block Diagram

Steady State Operation

SSOC

Step Response Results K (lb/min/%) =0.26 τ (sec) =0.46 t 0 (sec) =0.42

Frequency Response Experiment

Bode Plots Kcu (%/(lb/min) =10.00 K ((lb/min)/%) =0.24 τ (sec) =0.27 t 0 (sec) =0.35 m (order) =1.14 fu (Hz) =0.95

Model Bode Plot K (lb/min/%) =0.22 t0 (sec) =0.35 Tau (sec)=0.25 f u =0.95

Model Bode Plot K (lb/min/%) =0.22 t0 (sec) =0.35 Tau (sec)=0.25 K cu =10

FOPDT Parameters K = 0.24 (lb/min)/% τ = 0.28 sec t 0 = 0.4 sec

Closed Loop Transfer Function

Root Locus Parameters K CD =0.08 K QD =6.6 K CU =10 f u =1.24 *all units for K are % / (lb/min)

ζ Locations Response to Step Change in Set PointSymbolAverage Critical DampingK CD /500th DecayK C /10 DecayK C Quarter DecayK QD 6.6 UltimateK CU 10

Results From Root Locus Ultimate Quarter Decay Critically Damped Underdamped Overdamped Kc = 10 Kc = 6.6 Kc = < Kc < 10 0 < Kc < 0.08 *all units are % / (lb/min)

Predicted Ultimate Frequency and Ultimate Gain Bode PlotLuyben Method Routh Method Direct Substitution K CU = 10% / (lb/min) K CU = 9.6% / (lb/min) K CU = 10% / (lb/min) F u =0.87 HzF u =0.67 Hzn/aF u = 1.24 Hz

Model Results for K CD Offset Offset = 4.9 lb/min Decay Ratio = 0 Settling Time = 0.8 s K CD = 0.10% / (lb/min) Set Point Output Settling Time

Model Results for K QD Offset Offset = 1.9 lb/min Decay Ratio = 0.25 Settling Time = 3.9 s K QD = 6.6%/ (lb/min) Settling Time Set Point Output

Model Results for K CU Offset = 1 lb/min Decay Ratio = 1 Settling Time = never K CU = 10%/ (lb/min) Output Set Point Offset

Proportional Only Model Results K C (%*min/lb)Offset (lb/min) Critical Damping /500th Decay /10 Decay Quarter Decay Ultimate101.5

Experimental Results for K CD Offset = 4.9 lb/min Decay Ratio = 0 Settling Time = 0.8 s K CD = 0.10% / (lb/min) Settling Time Offset

Experimental Results for K QD Offset = 2.4 lb/min Decay Ratio = 0.25 Settling Time = 4.5 s K QD = 0.10% / (lb/min) Offset Settling Time

Experimental Results for K CU Offset = 1.2 lb/min Decay Ratio = 1 Settling Time = never K CD = 10% / (lb/min) Offset

Proportional Only Experimental Results K C (%*min/lb)Offset (lb/min) Critical Damping /500th Decay /10 Decay Quarter Decay Ultimate101.2

Comparison of Results Critical Damping 1/500th Decay 1/10th Decay 1/4th Decay Ultimate Root Locus P-Only Model P-Only Experimental

Conclusion For Kc needed Overdamped0 < Kc < 0.10 Critically DampedKc = 0.10 Underdamped0.10< Kc < 10 Quarter Decay Kc = 5.0