WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews Jerry McCarthy, ATS Teri Cannon, WASC.
Advertisements

Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews Please join the audio portion of this training: Access code * *
Demonstration of sustained effective leadership in academic practice and academic development Evidence of impact on high quality student learning Draw.
BOGDAN HOANCA UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE Plenary II – Mission, Core Themes, & Achievement Indicators.
New England Association for Schools and Colleges Re-Accreditation for Brandeis University Marty Wyngaarden Krauss Provost and Senior Vice President for.
NWCCU Standards for Accredition The new process. Revised NWCCU Accreditation Standards New Standards: reduced from 9 to 5 Standard One--Mission, Core.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
AQIP: “Academic Quality Improvement Program” Same Great Quality, Less Filling.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
WASC Educational Effectiveness Review Report First Draft March
Strategic Planning Definitions Tennessee Board of Regents.
Program Assessment, WASC and Cal Poly Pomona Bob Hurt Faculty Associate for Program Assessment and Academic Program Review.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Minimum Core Skills and embedding. A study by the National Research and Development Centre (NRDC) 2006 discovered that…. Learners on embedded courses.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Formative Evaluation of UNGEI Findings and Selected Recommendations Presentation to UNGEI GAC 14 February 2012.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Reaccreditation by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges How can Counseling Psychology and Pastoral Ministries help? September 16, 2008.
Accreditation in the higher education
Program Review & Evaluation Processes CSUSB 508/09/10 Presented by Kit Alvarez.
Developing the Year One Report: WVC’s Experience as a Pilot College Dr. Susan Murray Executive Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Revisiting Foothill’s Vision, Values and Institutional Goals Wednesday, February 5, 2014 PaRC Meeting E. Kuo.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Higher Learning Commission North Central Association Accreditation Visit April 2016.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación Methods and approaches for a management and evaluation of research at the Higher Education.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.
Learning and Development Developing L&D business partnerships
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
MVC – Outcomes Assessment FLEX –Day February 8, 2013.
Curriculum Renewal in the Faculty of the Professions: Overview.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
Capabilities Analysis Briefing for Chancellor and Senior Leaders.
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report January 2009 WASC Accreditation.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
WASC Orientation and Discussion September 2, 2009 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
Facult Retreat January 2010 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
February 21-22, 2018.
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Presentation transcript:

WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006

Organizing Around Core Commitments Core Commitment to Institutional Capacity: –The institution functions with clear purposes, high levels of institutional integrity, fiscal stability, and organizational structures to fulfill its purposes. Core Commitment to Institutional Capacity: –The institution functions with clear purposes, high levels of institutional integrity, fiscal stability, and organizational structures to fulfill its purposes.

Organizing Around Core Commitments Core Commitment to Educational Effectiveness: –The institution evidences clear and appropriate educational objectives and design at the institutional and program level. The institution employs processes of review, including the collection and use of data, that assure delivery of programs and learner accomplishments at a level of performance appropriate for the degree or certificate awarded. Core Commitment to Educational Effectiveness: –The institution evidences clear and appropriate educational objectives and design at the institutional and program level. The institution employs processes of review, including the collection and use of data, that assure delivery of programs and learner accomplishments at a level of performance appropriate for the degree or certificate awarded.

WASC Standards STANDARD 1: Defining Institutional Purposes and Ensuring Educational Objectives STANDARD 2: Achieving Educational Objectives Through Core Functions STANDARD 1: Defining Institutional Purposes and Ensuring Educational Objectives STANDARD 2: Achieving Educational Objectives Through Core Functions

WASC Standards STANDARD 3: Developing and Applying Resources and Organizational Structures to Ensure Sustainability STANDARD 4: Creating an Organization Committed to Learning and Improvement STANDARD 3: Developing and Applying Resources and Organizational Structures to Ensure Sustainability STANDARD 4: Creating an Organization Committed to Learning and Improvement

Format of the Standards The Standard. Criteria for Review. Guidelines. Questions for Institutional Engagement. The Standard. Criteria for Review. Guidelines. Questions for Institutional Engagement.

Standard 1. Defining Institutional Purposes and Ensuring Educational Objectives Foci – ➤ Institutional Purposes – ➤ Integrity Foci – ➤ Institutional Purposes – ➤ Integrity

Standard 1. Defining Institutional Purposes and Ensuring Educational Objectives Definition –The institution defines its purposes and establishes educational objectives aligned with its purposes and character. It has a clear and conscious sense of its essential values and character, its distinctive elements, its place in the higher education community, and its relationship to society at large. Through its purposes and educational objectives, the institution dedicates itself to higher learning, the search for truth, and the dissemination of knowledge. The institution functions with integrity and autonomy. Definition –The institution defines its purposes and establishes educational objectives aligned with its purposes and character. It has a clear and conscious sense of its essential values and character, its distinctive elements, its place in the higher education community, and its relationship to society at large. Through its purposes and educational objectives, the institution dedicates itself to higher learning, the search for truth, and the dissemination of knowledge. The institution functions with integrity and autonomy.

Standard 2. Achieving Educational Objectives Through Core Functions Foci – ➤ Teaching and Learning – ➤ Scholarship and Creative Activity – ➤ Support for Student Learning Foci – ➤ Teaching and Learning – ➤ Scholarship and Creative Activity – ➤ Support for Student Learning

Standard 2. Achieving Educational Objectives Through Core Functions Definition. –The institution achieves its institutional purposes and attains its educational objectives through the core functions of teaching and learning, scholarship and creative activity, and support for student learning. It demonstrates that these core functions are performed effectively and that they support one another in the institution’s efforts to attain educational effectiveness. Definition. –The institution achieves its institutional purposes and attains its educational objectives through the core functions of teaching and learning, scholarship and creative activity, and support for student learning. It demonstrates that these core functions are performed effectively and that they support one another in the institution’s efforts to attain educational effectiveness.

Standard 3. Developing and Applying Resources and Organizational Structures to Ensure Sustainability Foci – ➤ Faculty and Staff – ➤ Fiscal, Physical and Information Resources – ➤ Organizational Structures and Decision-making Processes Foci – ➤ Faculty and Staff – ➤ Fiscal, Physical and Information Resources – ➤ Organizational Structures and Decision-making Processes

Standard 3. Developing and Applying Resources and Organizational Structures to Ensure Sustainability Definition. –The institution sustains its operations and supports the achievement of its educational objectives through its investment in human, physical, fiscal, and information resources and through an appropriate and effective set of organizational and decision-making structures. These key resources and organizational structures promote the achievement of institutional purposes and educational objectives and create a high quality environment for learning. Definition. –The institution sustains its operations and supports the achievement of its educational objectives through its investment in human, physical, fiscal, and information resources and through an appropriate and effective set of organizational and decision-making structures. These key resources and organizational structures promote the achievement of institutional purposes and educational objectives and create a high quality environment for learning.

Standard 4. Creating an Organization Committed to Learning and Improvement Foci – ➤ Strategic Thinking and Planning – ➤ Commitment to Learning and Improvement Foci – ➤ Strategic Thinking and Planning – ➤ Commitment to Learning and Improvement

Standard 4. Creating an Organization Committed to Learning and Improvement Definition –The institution conducts sustained, evidence-based, and participatory discussions about how effectively it is accomplishing its purposes and achieving its educational objectives. These activities inform both institutional planning and systematic evaluations of educational effectiveness. The results of institutional inquiry, research, and data collection are used to establish priorities at different levels of the institution, and to revise institutional purposes, structures, and approaches to teaching, learning, and scholarly work. Definition –The institution conducts sustained, evidence-based, and participatory discussions about how effectively it is accomplishing its purposes and achieving its educational objectives. These activities inform both institutional planning and systematic evaluations of educational effectiveness. The results of institutional inquiry, research, and data collection are used to establish priorities at different levels of the institution, and to revise institutional purposes, structures, and approaches to teaching, learning, and scholarly work.

WASC Institutional Review Process

WASC Institutional Proposal Timeline

WASC Institutional Proposal Content

WASC Preparatory Review Timeline

WASC Preparatory Review Content

WASC Educational Effectiveness Review Timeline

WASC Educational Effectiveness Review Content