National Innovation Systems and the Outsourcing of Research Conference on Global R&D in China Nanjing, May 27-29, 2005 Richard P. Suttmeier University of Oregon
The “NIS” Concept Innovation as systemic phenomenon The relevance of institutional and cultural legacies The “national” in “NIS” NIS and the globalization of innovation Contradictions?
“Outsourcing” Markets, hierarchies, transaction costs, and the search for “complementary assets” The changed calculus The IT revolutionThe IT revolution Challenges of innovationChallenges of innovation “Global” diffusion of S&T capabilities“Global” diffusion of S&T capabilities Rethinking the “boundary of the firm”
Outsourcing R&D and NIS Companies and countries The inevitable tensions between “source” and “target” Enhancing NIS through techno- globalism ? Managing tensions through domestic compensatory measuresManaging tensions through domestic compensatory measures Harmonization of international normsHarmonization of international norms “Win-win” outcomes?
The China Case NIS characteristics Capable research systemCapable research system Weak industrial innovation traditionWeak industrial innovation tradition Research – production gapResearch – production gap IPR, VC problemsIPR, VC problems Trajectory of Chinese NIS(?) “Enterprise - centered” (model 1)“Enterprise - centered” (model 1) “Networked” (no center) (model 2)“Networked” (no center) (model 2)
Foreign R&D in China Add value to NIS Exploit under-utilized talentExploit under-utilized talent Incubate talentIncubate talent Capitalize innovationCapitalize innovation Illustrate how to close the research – production gapIllustrate how to close the research – production gap Demonstrate network managementDemonstrate network management Reinforce “model 2”Reinforce “model 2” Promote harmonization of normsPromote harmonization of norms
Questions Relative and absolute gains Are national compensatory policies consistent with the network “imperatives” of outsourcing? Foreign R&D and International Cooperation in S&T (ICST) “Spillovers”“Spillovers” Effects on “self-organizing communities”Effects on “self-organizing communities” Business models and the “intellectual commons”Business models and the “intellectual commons”