J. Estrada - Fermilab1 AFEII in the test cryostat at DAB J. Estrada, C. Garcia, B. Hoeneisen, P. Rubinov First VLPC spectrum with the TriP chip Z measurement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
Advertisements

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002 The Fiber Tracker Option for MICE Spectrometers The D0 Central Fiber Tracker – Experience and Implications for MICE.
MICE Fiber Tracker Electronics AFEII for MICE (Front end readout board) Recall: AFEs mount on ether side of the VLPC cass, with fibers going to the VLPCs.
Performance of MPPC using laser system Photon sensor KEK Niigata university, ILC calorimeter group Sayaka IBA, Hiroaki ONO, Paul.
Study of Photon Sensors using the Laser System 05/7/12 Niigata University, Japan Sayaka Iba, Editha P. Jacosalem, Hiroaki Ono, Noriko.
TileCal Electronics A Status Report J. Pilcher 17-Sept-1998.
First Results from Tracker 1  Cryostat Commissioning  AFE/VLSB Firmware and Readout  Cosmic Ray Setup  Tracker Readout  Software  Trigger Timing.
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
Tracker DAQ Makoto Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE Frascati 2005/6/27.
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
1 VLPC system and Cosmic Ray test results M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Oct, 3, 2007.
KEK Analysis Report Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2006/06/10 MICE CM15.
Tracker Controls MICE Controls and Monitoring Workshop September 25, 2005 A. Bross.
1 KEK Beam Test Analysis Hideyuki Sakamoto 15 th MICE Collaboration Meeting 10 st June,2006.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting July 18, 2007.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
Paul Rubinov TriP-t & AFEII status. AFE and CFT 9 o K VLPC (x512) AFE DISCRADC Discriminator output every 396 nsec for L1 Amplitude signal readout for.
MICE Workshop Sept 2004 AFEII for MICE Recall: AFEs mount on ether side of the VLPC cass, with fibers going to the VLPCs between them. AFE has 8 identical.
AFE II Status. Analog Front-End (AFE) Board  Approximately 200 AFE boards are needed to readout CFT (&CPS/FPS) u 512 channel (2/cassette) u Analog output.
MICE Tracker Readout Increased Data Readout Rate VLSB Development 16 AFE II t boards 8 Visible Light Photon Counter (VLPC) cassettes 4 cryostats.
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
Oct, 2000CMS Tracker Electronics1 APV25s1 STATUS Testing started beginning September 1 wafer cut, others left for probing 10 chips mounted on test boards.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Mark Raymond /10/051 Trip-t testing brief status report test setup description - hardware and software some very early results.
1 MICE Tracker Update M. Ellis UKNFIC Meeting 25 th August 2005.
MICE Tracker Readout Status VLPC – Cryo – Front End Electronics A.Bross Berkeley, February 2005.
MR (7/7/05) T2K electronics Beam structure ~ 8 (9?) bunches / spill bunch width ~ 60 nsec bunch separation ~ 600 nsec spill duration ~ 5  sec Time between.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.
FADC progress in Vienna Reported by H.Ishino for Vienna FADC group M.Pernicka and H.Steininger.
ECFA Sep 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P.
Fiber Tracker Update Edward McKigney Imperial College July 3 rd, 2002.
July 19, 2006VLCW-06 Vancouver1 Scint/MAPMT Muon Prototype Operation Robert Abrams Indiana University.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 23 March 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
All DØ Meeting, 12/01/00 Central Fiber Tracker Light Guide Performance Thomas Nunnemann Fermilab 90 days before RunII … (a.k.a. 12/01/00)
12/7/2015 Paul Rubinov PRR Mar Production Readiness Review  Welcome!  Our motto: When you earnestly believe you can compensate for lack of talent.
1M. Ellis - 17th May 2007 SciFi Decoding (Everything you never wanted to know but couldn’t avoid going over and over)  VLSB Data (unpacking to AFE, MCM,
1 KEK test-beam software progress Malcolm Ellis MICE Video Conference 4 th May 2005.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Trip-t testing progress report
WBS 1.2.8: AFE II Status and Plans Alan Bross for the DZero Central Fiber Tracker Group DZero Run IIb Detector Upgrade Director’s Review July 15, 2004.
FNAL Beam test results A. Zhang, V. Bhopatkar, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, M. Hohlmann HEP Group A, Florida Tech 2013/11/18.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Analysis for QA (temporary) Hideyuki Sakamoto 1 st October 2007 MICE Tracker Phone Meeting.
Summary of final results from MICE note: “ MICE Scintillating Fibre Tracker Prototype - First progress report - ” M.Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) for the SciFi.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
4 May 2006May 06 PMG - Paul R1 AFEII-t Status May 4, 2006 PMG Paul Rubinov.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
PHOTOTUBE SCANNING SETUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Doug Roberts U of Maryland, College Park.
20 April 2007MICE Tracker Phone Meeting1 Analysis of cosmic/self-triggerd data of station 5 Hideyuki Sakamoto MICE Tracker Phone Meeting 20 th April 2007.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Results with the RPC system of OPERA and perspectives
Commissioning of the Crystal evaluation setup
AFE II Status First board under test!!.
Analysis of FADC single-crystal data
Muon Recording Studies and Progress for the MICE Tracker
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
VELO readout On detector electronics Off detector electronics to DAQ
Physics Implications of the AFE II Upgrade
University of California Los Angeles
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
Presentation transcript:

J. Estrada - Fermilab1 AFEII in the test cryostat at DAB J. Estrada, C. Garcia, B. Hoeneisen, P. Rubinov First VLPC spectrum with the TriP chip Z measurement using the TriP chip Conclusion and plans (more detail about the electronics in Paul’s talk) MICE Fiber Tracker Workshop Fermilab July 15, 2003

2 Short history of AFEII Two summers ago the design of AFEII started. AFEI does not work at 132 nsec (at that point 132nsec was still alive). A new front end chip (TriP: Trigger and Pipeline) was designed to replace the SIFT+SVX combination. The new system uses a commercial ADC for the charge readout. MCMII was designed for the TriP chip, MCMII mounts on the existing AFE. We have been using MCMII for 1.5 years, three existing versions. Last summer we received the TriP chips, they were mounted on MCMII and readout using the existing AFE (SASeq). Extensive tests of 8 chips were done in the bench (see DØNote and DØNote 4076), high yield ~90%. We have enough TriP chips for the full AFE replacement. This summer we have the 4-cassette cryostat to look at real signals from the VLPC.

3 Why do we still bother with AFEII? (132nsec is not a possibility anymore) The situation is as follows: –we have the TriP chip, we have enough of them. –we have seen that it works, and maybe it solves many of the issues with AFEI (split pedestals, tick to tick variations). After some discussion with DØ management we agreed to: –build a real AFEII and populate it with 8 MCMII (J. Anderson) –at the end of the year, with the information from our tests and our knowledge of the performance of AFEI, we will make a decision on the possible replacement of the CFT electronics.

4 VLPC spectrum We have a high gain cassette (~55K in Don’s units), from our spares. Without seriously optimizing the parameters for the operation of the TriP in these conditions, we got a nice sprectrum. Notice the very little spread between channels and the uniformity in the gain. Same channels as seen by the stereo board, after very hard work to reduce the noise.

5 Fits to the spectra Mysterious deformation around 128 counts We measure a gain of around 21 counts/p.e., from our previous studies of the chip we believe this means that the VLPC are running at ~75K, a bit higher than what we were expecting… Other typical parameters: pedestal width=0.18 p.e., gain dispersion=0.17 p.e., pedestal spread (RMS-16 channels)= 0.05 p.e.

6 Z measurement The TriP seems to be working, we will keep testing it to have the information to make the correct decision in December. One idea: a minor modification to the TriP that would allow us to measure the time when the discriminators fired with respect to the crossing clock, (see DØNote ). This will give a measurement of the Z position of the hit along the fiber, could help for tracking (tracking algorithm experts need to evaluate how useful this will be). We are now measuring the resolution that we can achieve for this z measurement using the current version of the TriP (we can only look at ½ the channels of the TriP and we needed to implement an external readout for the timing).

7 Cosmic Muon Trigger scope  SASeq ethernet AFEII-prototype VLPC bit3 ADC information timing information Discriminator signal ADC information

8 Our events DISCR. from TriP CROSSING(132nsec) SCINT.1 SCINT.2 This is how me measure timing of the discriminator, with respect to the muon trigger and the crossing clock. The green line is the OR of 16 channels.

9 Charge injection, integration window The TriP has an internal mechanism to inject charge in any channel. We used this system to inject 60 and 30 fC (~ 7 and 3.5 p.e.) at a ramdom time with respect to the 132 nsec crossing to see the integration window and the internal timing resolution in the TriP discriminator. t1= time from crossing clock to charge injection 30 nsec

10 Charge Injection, timing resolution in the TriP. A) B) C) A)The time walk of the discriminator as a function of injected charge is very small. B)The timing spread in the discriminator is 420 ps for 60 fC. C)The timing spread in the discriminator is 662 ps for 30 fC.

11 Integration window We open a 30 nsec integration window and scan it with respect to the 132nsec clock. Looking at the average signal (ADC output) we determine position for the optimal integration window, and we use this window to measure the timing resolution.

12 Signal with muon trigger T4= time from crossing clock to muon trigger For events outside this window the charge does not get completely integrated in the TriP and we could be missing the first photons from our signal. This data corresponds to 2 different runs, our setup had a timing problem during the first run that made us miss part of the interesting events.

13 Our signal We are using the 11m waveguides, and are getting in average approx. 5 p.e.

14 Time walk The photons from the scintillating fibers have some timewalk (~0.83 nsec/pe), we correct for this timewalk. As the number of photons increases the timing spread reduces. The integration window cut is already applied to this data.

15 Results, with a cut at 5 p.e. The width of the peak is about 4 nsec wide, and there is a tail that makes the RMS 3.3 nsec. This could come from muons at large angle that have a different Z Corrected discr. timing (nsec)

16 Results as a function of the cut in the ADC we start to get a measurement only above 5 p.e., and for the large signal pulses we get about RMS=2.8 nsec (2.8 nsec x 16 cm/nsec = 48cm)

17 Result for different timing The integration window, according to the ADC, shows a plateau in the width of the timing distribution. When pulses are delayed the spread becomes larger because we start missing the first photons.

18 Conclusion and Plans The TriP still looks good. The noise and the channel to channel differences look ok (so far we looked at a small number of channels). It is amazing how easy it is to operate this chip compared to SVX+TriP. For the moment we get σ=48cm for the Z measurement of the hit in the fiber. We will continue trying to understand if this is the best we can do (part of this resolution could come from cosmic muons at large angle, that actually have a different Z). We are waiting for input from our tracking experts to tell us how useful will this information be for track reconstruction ( reduction of fakes, reduction of CPU time for tracking algorithm, resolution improvement). Now moving to 396 nsec operation of the TriP, the performance of the TriP has not been studied in detail with this timing…