M. Amann, W. Schöpp, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen The RAINS-GHG Model Approach Work in progress.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IIASA Janusz Cofala, Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Emission Projections for 2020 Results from a study for the.
Advertisements

Air Pollution and Climate
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Links between climate, air pollution and energy policies Findings from the.
State of model development: RAINS/GAINS International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, A. Chambers, J. Cofala,
MultiMOD – An equilibrium model for energy market & infrastructure analysis Ruud Egging 24 th Oct 2013 CREE meets CenSES.
Leading Partners in Science Interactions of metrics and alternative policy settings at a country level: a case study from New Zealand Andy Reisinger 1.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) WG III AR4 Outline Ogunlade Davidson Co-chair Working Group III PRE-SBTA Session, Milan, Italy November.
Chalmers University of Technology Metrics and stabilization of the global average surface temperature Daniel J.A. Johansson Division of Physical Resource.
Integrated Assessment Modeling, cost-effectiveness, and agricultural projections in the RAINS model Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied.
The Tyndall Centre comprises nine UK research institutions. It is funded by three Research Councils - NERC, EPSRC and ESRC – and receives additional support.
1/18 Long-term Scenarios for Climate Change-Implications for Energy, GHG Emissions and Air Quality Shilpa Rao, International Institute of Applied Systems.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: The approach. Cost-effectiveness needs integration Economic/energy development (projections) State of emission controls,
Methodology and applications of the RAINS air pollution integrated assessment model Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
The inclusion of near-term radiative forcing into a multi-pollutant/multi-effect framework Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM)
Agenda Markus Amann Methodology Fabian Wagner Initial results for emissions from energy use and industrial activities Ian McCallum Estimates of mitigation.
Janusz Cofala The RAINS model: Modelling of emission controls and costs.
The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
SGM P.R. Shukla. Second Generation Model Top-Down Economic Models  Project baseline carbon emissions over time for a country or group of countries 
LINKAGES AND SYNERGIES OF REGIONAL AND GLOBAL EMISSION CONTROL Workshop of the UN/ECE Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling January 27-29, 2003.
6.1 Module 6 Reporting of Mitigation Assessments in National Communications Ms. Emily Ojoo-Massawa CGE Chair.
UNFCCC Workshop, 9/ /1 2004, Dublin. September 30 – October 1, 2004, Dublin, Ireland Jiří Spitz ENVIROS, s. r. o. Czech Republic UNFCCC Workshop,
Global and regional black carbon mitigation opportunities Zig Klimont Improving BC Emissions Estimates and Abatement.
Global Air Quality: Policies for Ozone Depletion and Global Warming Chapter 13 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.
Baseline emission projections for the EU-27 Results from the EC4MACS project and work plan for the TSAP revision Markus Amann International Institute for.
The GAINS model. Rationale Air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) often stem from the same sources Energy consumption and agricultural activities.
Center for International Climate and Environmental Research-Oslo: Research Priorities and Interest in China Lin Gan SINCIERE Member Workshop October 19,
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.
The use of the GAINS_Italy Model for Impact Assessment T. Pignatelli, G. Vialetto ENEA – Technical Unit for Environmental Technologies (UTTAMB) Atmospheric.
EC4MACS European Consortium for Modelling of Air Pollution and Climate Strategies GAINS Greenhouse Gas – Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies DG ECFIN.
1 Co-benefits of options for cleaner energy use in China Wellcome Trust Meeting, London, May 27, 2008 Kristin Aunan, CICERO China – an important country.
Application of IIASA GAINS Model for Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution in Europe Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
M. Amann G. Klaassen, R. Mechler, J. Cofala, C. Heyes International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Modelling synergies and trade-offs between.
The GAINS model State of play
Co-benefits of Integrated Approach to Air Quality Management and Climate Change Mitigation Role of Integrated Assessment Methods in SEA Dr. Vladislav.
1 JRC – Ispra DG JRC and EC4MACS IPTS Institute for Prospective Technology Studies - Peter Russ - Antonio Soria - Szabolc Szekeres IES Institute for Environment.
GAINS databases Links and interactions with the international reporting processes UNECE TFEIP/EIONET meeting Dublin, Ireland, October, 2007 Z.Klimont.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of GAINS Milena Stefanova, ENEA Bologna, 23 marzo 2010 UTVALAMB-AIR Unità Tecnica Modelli, Metodi.
RAINS becomes GAINS and other “future” stories TFIEP Workshop on Emission Projections Thessaloniki, Greece, October, 2006 Zbigniew Klimont EMEP Centre.
Low carbon scenarios for the UK Energy White Paper Peter G Taylor Presented at “Energy, greenhouse gas emissions and climate change scenarios” June.
European Commission: DG Environment Objectives and Policy Context of EC4MACS Ger Klaassen Kick-Off meeting EC4MACS 6 March 2007.
Current knowledge and possible systematic biases Linkages with greenhouse gas policy Fabian Wagner M. Amann, C. Berglund, J. Cofala, L. Höglund, Z. Klimont,
IIASA J. Cofala Methodology for estimating the control potential and costs for PM emissions in Europe Costing method, cost components, parameters Types.
AIR QUALITY GOVERNANCE AND CLIMA EAST: OPPORTUNITIES FOR COOPERATION Dr. Mikhail Kozeltsev, Key Expert 24 April 2014, Batumi, 4th Workshop IPPC and Permitting.
Non-CO 2 Greenhouse Gas Offset Projects: Basic Considerations Karl H. Schultz Climate Mitigation Works International LLC Panel Three: Design Issues RGGI.
Janusz Cofala and Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Application.
IIASA International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) RAINS-Asia: A Tool for Optimization Analysis of the Acidification Problem in Asia while.
Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg,
Future challenges for integrated assessment modelling Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Use of emissions & other data reported within the LRTAP Convention in the IIASA GAINS model Z.Klimont Center for.
IIASA analysis of near-term mitigation potentials and costs in Annex I countries.
The links to global problems Presentation at the 25 th anniversary special event of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution “Past successes.
Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development The 14th Annual Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) Conference Co-benefits of energy efficiency.
Baseline emission projections and scope for further reductions in Europe up to 2020 Results from the CAFE analysis M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala,
U.S. National Communication: Projections and Effects of Policies and Measures United States Delegation UNFCCC Workshop on National Communications from.
Comparison of GHG mitigation efforts between Annex 1 countries Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Integrated Assessment and IPCC: Links between climate change and sub-global environmental issues presentation at Task Force Integrated Assessment Modelling,
TF HTAP, TF IAM, Vienna, February HTAP-GAINS scenario analysis: preliminary exploration of emission scenarios with regard to the benefits of global.
Scope for further emission reductions: The range between Current Legislation and Maximum Technically Feasible Reductions M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala,
CES KULeuven The Pan EU NEEDS TIMES model: main results of scenario analysis The Pan EU NEEDS TIMES model: main results of scenario analysis SIXTH FRAMEWORK.
IIASA Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Emission Inventories, Emission Control Options and Control Strategies A.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Cost-effectiveness Analysis in CAFE and the Need for Information about Urban Air Quality.
Clean Air for Europe ROLE OF ENERGY BASELINE IN CAFE 28 February 2002 Matti Vainio DG Environment, Air Quality and Noise Unit.
31 January 2007 GAINS Review Peringe Grennfelt Christer Agren Matti Johansson Rob Maas Simone Schucht Les White With comments from: Helen ApSimon Julio.
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
Emission Projections for 2020
CAFE baseline dissemination workshop
J. Cofala Z. Klimont CIAM/IIASA
CAFE baseline dissemination workshop
Stakeholder consultation meeting on the CAFE baseline scenario Welcome 30 April, 2004 CAFE BASELINE SCENARIO STAKEHOLDER MEETING, 30 April, 2003.
Presentation transcript:

M. Amann, W. Schöpp, J. Cofala, G. Klaassen The RAINS-GHG Model Approach Work in progress

Introduction of GHGs into RAINS Task: Develop cost curves for GHGs (CO 2, CH 2, N 2 O, CFC, HFC, SF 6 ) in addition to SO 2, NO x, VOC, NH 3, PM, (BC, CO) Country-by-country, medium-term up to 2030 Challenges: How to capture linkages in emissions, controls, impacts, and instruments? How to model structural changes?

Traditional RAINS optimization Decision variables: segments of pollutant-specific cost curves No interaction between pollutants Cost curves fixed for given energy structure, no structural change possible

New decision variables Decision variables: Amounts of economic activities controlled by a given abatement measure k (act i,k ) –Each technical measure represented as a variable For each activity class i: Σ act i * eff j = total activity –Derived from an exogenous baseline scenario –E.g., demand for useful energy (transport volume) –Kept constant in RAINS calculations

Emission- and cost calculation Emission calculation: Σ act i,j * emission factor i,j,l = total emissions l –For each pollutant l –Emission factors include effects of controls –Captures multi-pollutant effects of individual measures Cost calculation: Σ act i,j * cost coeff i = total costs –Cost coefficients describe costs for each technology, not allocated to a specific pollutant –Serves as objective function in optimization

Efficiency improvements and fuel substitution Efficiency improvements: eff > 1 in Σ act i * eff = total activity. or: Σ act i + sav = total activity Fuel substitution (e.g., coal  gas): –Decision variable fs: Σ act i * eff + fs = total coal use Σ act i * eff - fs = total gas use Costs and applicability limits derived from sensitivity runs of full energy model!

Environmental constraints Air quality: Σ emissions i * transfer function ik  target level k –For each receptor k –For deposition, air quality, health effects, etc. –Simultaneous constraints for multiple effects Greenhouse gases (l): Σ emissions il * X l  emission ceiling –For each country or groups of countries –For each GHGs or a basket of GHGs –X l : weighting factor (GWP) or function (radiative forcing)

Carbon trading Between countries: Σ act buy * emission factor CO2 - trade  total CO 2, buy Σ act sell * emission factor CO2 + trade  total CO 2, sell –Also possible for other GHGs/basket of GHGs Buying C from the world market: Σ act buy * emission factor CO2 - trade  total CO 2, buy Σ other costs + trade * C price = total costs Pollution taxes: Σ other costs + Σ emissions l * tax l = total costs

Costs and benefits Simplifications: Temporal aspects (reflected by constraints) Substitution options (reflected by constraints) Gains: Capture full interaction between pollutants Allow systematic exploration of co-benefits Enables full integrated assessment of air pollution and climate change Requirements: Link to full energy model to derive limits Embed in long-term energy/climate scenarios

A multi-pollutant/multi-effect problem

Conclusions Work in progress Building, as far as possible, on reviewed RAINS databases and UNFCCC information Cooperation with climate modelling community welcome Methodology and implementation to be completed by late 2004 Further workshops at IIASA to discuss details and review progress