Stopping TKI treatment in CML: Who and when

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr N M Butt Consultant Haematologist
Advertisements

A Proposal for BMS (Dasatinib) in GIST Jon Trent, MD, PhD Assistant Professor Dept. of Sarcoma Medical Oncology The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson.
The National CML Society 2012 CML UPDATE “What’s New? What’s Coming?” Luke Akard MD Co-Director Indiana Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program.
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Treatment Success and Milestones
CML Research for better treatment Steve O’Brien Northern Institute for Cancer Research Newcastle University Medical School CML patient meeting, 11 th October.
Long Term Follow-Up After Imatinib Cessation for Patients in Deep Molecular Response: The Update Results of the STIM1 Study1 Preliminary Report of the.
CML & MPDs Practitioner Conference CML: Cases and interactive voting Brian Huntly University of Cambridge and Addenbrookes Hospital.
DR Discontinuation of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors CML and MPDs UK national meeting Newcastle, March 1 st, 2013 Dr Delphine Rea Service.
Final Study Results of the Phase III Dasatinib versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Trial (DASISION, CA )1.
The role of transplant for CML in the imatinib era Dr Wendy Ingram Consultant Haematologist University Hospital of Wales.
1 Rea D et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 811.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Interest in Topics Related to the Treatment of Patients with CML (Percent Responding 9 or 10)
Comparison of Nilotinib and Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd Beyond One Year Larson.
CML SPIRIT 3 Steve O’Brien Northern Institute for Cancer Research Newcastle University Medical School Newcastle, March 2013.
Treatment of CML Transplant or Imatinib? Mark B Juckett MD Section of Hematology/BMT University of Wisconsin.
Ponatinib as Initial Therapy for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 1483.
Discontinuation of Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Maintained Complete Molecular Response: Updated Results of the STIM 1 Discontinuation.
CML in China Qian Jiang, MD Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
Dose Interruption/Reduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the First 3 Months of Treatment of CML Is Associated with Inferior Early Molecular Responses.
David Marin, Imperial College London Early molecular prediction of response to TKI.
CML TKIs – where are we up to? Steve O’Brien
Current use of imatinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia Michael O’Dwyer Haematologica March 2003.
ENESTnd 24-Month Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.
An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gambacorti-Passerini.
Safety and efficacy of imatinib cessation for CML patients with stable undetectable minimal residual disease: results from the TWISTER study by David M.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Prospects for stopping treatment : Should this be in a clinical trial? CML patient & carer meeting 2015 Hammersmith Hospital, 14 th November 2015 Richard.
Early Molecular and Cytogenic Response Is Predictive for Long-Term Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Hanfstein B.
Treatment of CML. Goal of Therapy Complete molecular remission and cure – Achieve prolonged, durable, nonneoplastic, nonclonal hematopoiesis, – Eradication.
Dr Nauman Butt – Royal Liverpool University Hospital CML Patient Seminar - 14 th November 2015 What is CML? How do we treat it? Get up to speed…
Molecular Monitoring in CML the process and questions we can answer Letizia Foroni.
Dasatinib Compared to Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Twelve- Month Efficacy and Safety.
Initial Findings from the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib,
Chronic myelogenous leukemia Uncommon disease Highly lethal when ineffectively Rxd Most pts are in their 50s+60s The molecular understanding of this disease.
Switching to Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase with Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response on Imatinib: Results from the LASOR.
A Pivotal Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I BCR ‐ ABL Mutation:
Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP):
Dasatinib or Imatinib (IM) in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Two-Year Follow-Up from DASISION Kantarjian H et al.
Acknowledgements Trial & data management, Newcastle Corinne Hedgley, Lynn Seeley, Caroline Hodgson, Ruth Bescoby, Carrie Page, Angela Fallows, Laura Brown,
Case report Sudden blastic transformation in patient with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib mesylate Mehrdad Payandeh,MD Hematology, Medical.
Future of CML treatments – Are they getting us closer to cure? Andreas Hochhaus Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany.
Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective,
Update on Approved TKIs Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML and AML Sections Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas.
Strategies of pregnancy management need further experience accumulation. Surely the most safe time for pregnancy in CML females is a period of stable CMR.
CML SPIRIT 1, 2 (and 3…) Prof Stephen O’Brien Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University Medical School.
The Challenge of Monitoring CML When Resources Are Limited Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML & AML Section Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Phase III EURO-SKI: Cessation of TKI Therapy Safe, Feasible for Pts Who Achieve Deep Molecular Response New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference.
HOW TO TREAT FIRST LINE FAILURE?
Shah N et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 206.
Early Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Predict for Better Outcomes in Untreated Patients with CML-CP — Comparison of 4 TKI Modalities (Standard- and.
Great Debates and Updates in Hematologic Malignancies 2014
Ellen K. Ritchie Clinical Director, Richard T. Silver MPN Center
The Nurse View Key Insights Along the CML Continuum
Resistance in the land of molecular cancer therapeutics
Resistant CML: Understanding the Science to Change Outcomes
Monitoring Milestones in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Imatinib – where are we now. What about generic imatinib
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Diagnosis and Treatment
Best Practices in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia by Multidisciplinary Teams
Long-term outcome with dasatinib after imatinib failure in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: follow-up of a phase 3 study by Neil P. Shah, François.
Crossover for pts meeting ELN 2013 failure criteria
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
Stopping treatment: who and when
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Leber B et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 94.
The Changing Goals of CML Therapy
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: MD-2025 Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
The Pathway to Progress Against Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia.
Bone marrow fibrosis associated with long-term imatinib therapy: resolution after switching to a second-generation TKI by Naranie Shanmuganathan, Susan.
Presentation transcript:

Stopping TKI treatment in CML: Who and when Stopping TKI treatment in CML: Who and when? 13th National CML Patient Forum, Newcastle 11th October 2014 Prof. Mhairi Copland University of Glasgow / Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre

Questions I’ve had CML for a long time and I’m doing fine…….. Could I stop treatment or take less? What is the evidence for this? What are MMR and MR4? How is DESTINY different? What will happen in the future?

STopping IMatinib (STIM) 100 French patients in CMR for at least 2 years All were on imatinib for several years Some had had previous interferon Imatinib stopped, then monthly molecular testing (PCR)

STIM: Stopping imatinib in CMR/MR4 39% Mahon et al Lancet Oncology 2010

STopping Imatinib (STIM) Imatinib resumed as soon as the PCR became positive All 61 relapses responded (56/61 back to CMR/MR4) No-one had a more serious deterioration in their CML

Rate of TFR in all 40 patients. TWISTER: Stopping imatinib in undetectable disease Rate of TFR in all 40 patients. Rate of TFR in all 40 patients. Actuarial estimate of the rate of TFR. The 95% CI is indicated by dashed lines. TFR = treatment-free remission Ross D M et al. Blood 2013;122:515-522 ©2013 by American Society of Hematology

STIM: Can we predict who relapses? Mahon et al Lancet Oncology 2010

Loss of MMR as trigger for restarting TKI therapy 65% 61% Loss of MMR is a practical and safe criterion for restarting TKI therapy 55% If use STIM criteria……… and restart therapy when BCR-ABL become detectable Kaplan-Meier estimates of RFS defined (A) as loss of major molecular response (MMR) and (B) according to STIM (Stop Imatinib) study criteria after imatinib discontinuation in 80 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). (A) Overall probability of maintaining MMR in patients with stable confirmed complete molecular response (cCMR; 38 patients) and unstable cCMR before study entry (42 patients) was estimated as 65% (95% CI, 47% to 78%) and 64% (95% CI, 48% to 77%) at 12 months, respectively (P = .75). (B) Overall probability of maintaining CMR in patients with stable cCMR (39 patients) and unstable cCMR before study entry (42 patients) was estimated as 55% (95% CI, 38% to 69%) and 43% (95% CI, 28% to 57%) at 12 months, respectively (P = .18). 43% 29% Rousselot P et al. JCO 2014;32:424-430 ©2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

All patients achieve deep molecular responses after re-starting TKI… All patients achieve deep molecular responses after re-starting TKI…. But can take time Cumulative incidence of complete molecular response (CMR) in patients re-treated after loss of major molecular response. Median time to regain CMR was estimated as 7.3 months. Rousselot P et al. JCO 2014;32:424-430 ©2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Does BCR-ABL need to be negative to stop therapy? 12 15 18 21 24 Time (months) CCR 100 1 MMR 0.1 CMR/MR4 (level of detection) 0.01 30 36 42 BCR-ABL PCR %

Does BCR-ABL need to be negative to stop therapy? 12 15 18 21 24 Time (months) CCR 100 1 MMR 0.1 CMR/MR4 (level of detection) 0.01 30 36 42 BCR-ABL PCR % ….we don’t know

De-Escalation and Stopping Treatment with Imatinib, Nilotinib or sprYcel = DESTINY CI – Richard Clark, Liverpool 2 separate groups; MR4 and MMR; each treated the same 84 pts in each group 50% treatment dose: IM 200mg; NIL 200mg 2xday; DAS 50mg Monitor monthly for 12 months If PCR remains below 0.1%, then stop Check PCR alternate months in months 26-37 Check PCR monthly until month 25 De-escalate TKI (13 months) Stop TKI MONTHS

DESTINY: key inclusion criteria CML in first chronic phase only, aged 18 or over Demonstration of BCR-ABL1 positivity at or shortly after original diagnosis Must have received TKI treatment for at least 3 years At least 3 molecular results over the preceding 12 months, that fit either of the following groups (results from any UK lab are acceptable): (MR4 group) all the available BCR-ABL1 molecular results over the preceding 12 months are in MR4 (MR4 is defined as a BCR-ABL1/ABL1 ratio of zero, with at least 10,000 ABL1 control transcripts). (MMR group) some or all BCR-ABL1 molecular results are in MMR (BCR-ABL1/ABL1 ratio of 0.1% or less, but not zero, with at least 10,000 ABL1 control transcripts). If the results over the preceding 12 months are a mix of MMR and undetectable BCR-ABL1, then the patient is eligible for the MMR but not the MR4 group.  

DESTINY: key exclusion criteria Any molecular result during the preceding 12 months that is not in either MMR or MR4. Treatment with higher than standard TKI doses ('standard' is defined as imatinib 400mg daily, nilotinib 400mg twice daily or dasatinib 100mg daily), unless as part of a clinical trial of first line therapy, e.g. SPIRIT1. Patients who switched previous licensed TKI treatment (imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib) twice or more because of intolerance. Patients who switched previous licensed TKI treatment (imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib) because of resistance. Patients treated with lower than standard TKI doses (imatinib 400mg daily, nilotinib 400mg twice daily or dasatinib 100mg daily) for tolerance reasons may be included. Previous treatment with ponatinib or bosutinib cannot enter. However, patients who received interferon prior to commencing TKI (even if resistant to their interferon) are eligible, provided their response to TKI fits the entry criteria.  

SPIRIT 3 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Compare first line intervention Randomised Stage 2 Identify partial responders early Switch Stage 3 Identify ‘best’ responders later Reduce/stop Primary endpoint: MR3 (MMR) at 3 years Secondary: sustained MR3 CMR on reduced dose/stop (no more bone marrows!) EFS, PFS, OS Health Economics, QoL SPIRIT 3

(if MR3 for at least 1 year) Stage 1 Randomise (500 to each group) Stage 2 Selective switch (3 months or later) Stage 3 Reduce dose, stop (after minimum 3 years) Imatinib Imatinib Group I Imatinib n=500 Ponatinib Ponatinib R Aim to reduce and stop (if MR3 for at least 1 year) Ponatinib Ponatinib Switch if: Partial response >10% @ 3 months >1% at 12 months Intolerance (dose reduction, no switch – stuff to be pulled in from S2 protocol) When ‘go to trial office’. Standard ‘script’ required. ‘Authorisation’. This is required. Single medic approval. Monthly review of switch events. Can’t force to switch. Loss of response CHR easy Loss of MR3 if on two occasions, 3 months (NOT 1 month) apart If a samples is 0.1 – 1.0 then 3 months, if over 1.0 then repeat within a month. Group N Nilotinib n=500 Nilotinib Nilotinib Primary endpoint MR3 at 3 years

What do you think?