Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIE Annual Conference| September 24, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson,
Advertisements

August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Index 4 Description: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 is : the Post-secondary Readiness index, which is used to show the readiness of students on campus.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver Accountability Development What do we know? What do we want to know? March 4, 2014.
LINKING ACCOUNTABILITY AND INSTRUCTION Ty Duncan ESC 17 Coordinator of Accountability and #esc17
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
Accountability Update Professional Service Provider Update and Network Meeting April 1,
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Overview Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability
Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
1 August 8, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of 2014 Accountability.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Accountability Update District Testing Coordinator Advisory Committee Meeting March 20,
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
10/19/2015 Academic Excellence Indicator System Woden ISD.
Accountability 2014!! Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Shauna Lane, ESC 17 Ty.
Overview of 2015 Accountability SUMMER 2015 MICKI WESLEY, DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTABILITY & COMPLIANCE CINDY TEICHMAN, COORDINATOR OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
TETN Videoconference #30120| February 26, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
TETN Session #18319 | November 14, 2013 | 1:00-3:00 p.m. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Northwest ISD January 11, 2016 The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global.
Charter School Summit| June 16, 2014 Diane J. Hernandez | Texas Education Agency Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Charter School Summit| June 30, 2015 Christopher Lucas| Texas Education Agency Department of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
July 11, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Michael Murphy State and Federal Accountability.
TETN Videoconference #36664| April 21, 2016 Texas Education Agency | Assessment and Accountability Performance Reporting Overview of 2016 Accountability.
Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.
Accountability 2016 Shauna Lane, Educational Specialist
Accountability Overview 2016
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Accountability Update
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Texas State Accountability
A-F Accountability and Special Education
State and Federal Accountability Overview
2014 State Accountability Ratings
Presentation transcript:

Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center

Performance Index Framework 2 To receive a Met Standard rating, all campuses and districts must meet the performance targets for all four indexes for which they have performance data in Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Accountability System

Benefits of an Index System Eliminates the “death by single cell” of all previous systems in Texas. Allows areas of strength to offset areas of that perhaps need improvement. Gives districts and campuses a comprehensive data system to improve instruction.

Drivers All Accountability Systems have drivers that come from legislation. (HB3 from the 82 nd legislative session and HB5 from the 83 rd legislative session.) – College Readiness is primary driver of this system. – Student growth is being used for first time in this system – Level III (top end) performance of students who are economically disadvantaged or have historically underperformed. This is also know as “Closing the Achievement Gap” in this system.

Index Targets for 2014 Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 All 4 components STAAR only District Campus: Elementary N/A12 Middle School 2827N/A13 High School/K-12 N/A Districts and campuses must meet ALL index targets on which they are evaluated to receive a “Met Standard” rating.

Index 1: Student Achievement 2014 Target: 55 7 Index 1: Student Achievement provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across all subjects for all students on BOTH general and alternative assessments. This index is purely pass or fail based on the passing standard (Phase-In 1 for 2014). It takes all STAAR assessments and calculates by content area. Here is an example.

Index Targets for 2014 State Index I Target District and Campus Score District55 Campus: Elementary 55 Middle School High School/K-12 Districts and campuses must meet ALL index targets on which they are evaluated to receive a “Met Standard” rating.

9 Index 2: Student Progress 2014 Target: District Target is 16 Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students served by special education, and English language learners. This index measures student progress over time in Reading and Math. Points are given if students meets the STAAR Progress Measure based on how much better they got from previous school year STAAR assessment. One additional point is given if they exceed the growth expectation. High Schools do not have this Index this school year.

Index Targets for 2014 State Targets for Index 2District and Campus Index 2 Results District16 Campus: Elementary 33 Middle School 28 High School/K-12 N/A Districts and campuses must meet ALL index targets on which they are evaluated to receive a “Met Standard” rating.

11 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps 2014 Target: District Target is 28 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps emphasizes advanced academic achievement of the economically disadvantaged student group and the lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups at each campus and district. This index measures each subject area’ economically disadvantaged students and two lowest performing race/ethnicity groups from previous school year. One point is given for each student who passes and an extra point is given for each student who meets the Level III (the very top) passing standard. Repeat for Math, Writing, Science and Social Studies

Index Targets for 2014 State Index 3 Targets District and Campus Index 3 Results District28 Campus: Elementary 33 Middle School 28 High School/K Districts and campuses must meet ALL index targets on which they are evaluated to receive a “Met Standard” rating.

13 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness District Target: 57 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the importance of earning a high school diploma that provides students with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school. Index 4 uses four different indicators that are 25% of the total score each. 1)STAAR Final Level II, 2)Graduation Score/Rate, 3)Graduation Plan, and 4)College-Ready Graduates are not available for high schools or districts, evaluate only the STAAR Final Level II performance at the following Index 4 targets: High Schools/K-12: 21 Districts: 13 Index 4 for Elementary and Middle School Campuses only use the STAAR Percent Met Final Level ll on two or more tests for (eight student groups) only.

14 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Indicator All Students African Amer. Amer. Indian AsianHispanic Pacific Islander White Two or More Races ELL Special Ed. Total Points Max. Points STAAR Score STAAR % Met Final Level ll on Two or More Tests 29%16%40%23%38%36% STAAR Score (STAAR total points divided by maximum points)30 Graduation Score (Gr. 9-12) 4-yr. graduation rate84.3%78.8% 91.6%86.0%44.2%69.8% yr. graduation rate85.1%78.8%80.0%92.1%84.0%48.9%77.5% Highest Graduation Total Graduation Score (best of total graduation points divided by maximum points)78.0 RHSP/DAP Score 4-yr. graduation Percent RHSP/DAP 82.7%76.4%83.6%83.0% RHSP/DAP Score (best of total RHSP/DAP points divided by maximum points)81.4 Postsecondary/College-Ready Graduates Score College-Ready Graduates either subject (ELA or Math) 82.0%72.0%78.0%89.0% College-Ready Score (total points divided by maximum points)80.2 Overall Index Score STAAR Score30.0 Multiply by Weight Graduation Score78.0 RHSP/DAP Score81.4 College-Ready Score80.2 Index Score (sum of weighted index scores)

Index Targets for 2014 Index 4 State TargetsIndex 4 District and Campus Targets All 4 components STAAR only All 4 components STAAR only District57N/A Campus: Elementary N/A12N/A Middle School N/A13N/A High School/K Districts and campuses must meet ALL index targets on which they are evaluated to receive a “Met Standard” rating.

2014 Distinction Designations Per Texas Education Code (TEC) §39.201, alternative education campuses (AECs) evaluated under AEA provisions are not eligible for distinction designations. Comparison Groups are determined by common campus demographics.

2014 Distinction Designations Student Progress (based on Index 2) Closing Performance Gaps (based on Index 3) Academic Achievement in: – Reading/English Language Arts – Mathematics – Science – Social Studies Postsecondary Readiness for campuses and districts

2014 Distinction Designations Districts and Campuses Postsecondary Readiness: House Bill 5 (83rd Texas Legislature, 2013) expanded distinction designations to both districts and campuses for outstanding performance in attainment of postsecondary readiness. Index 4 STAAR Component: Percent of Students at Final Level II Performance Standard Four-Year Graduation Rate (Class of 2013 longitudinal cohort) Recommended High School Program or Distinguished Achievement Program (RHSP/DAP) Rates (Class of 2013 longitudinal cohort) College-Ready Graduates (school year graduates meeting the Texas Success Initiative (TSI) college readiness standards in both reading/ELA and mathematics based on TAKS, SAT, or ACT) Advanced/Dual Enrollment Course Completion Rate (school year ) SAT/ACT Performance (At/Above Criterion, ) SAT/ACT Participation ( ) AP/IB Examination Performance: Any Subject (school year percent of examinees meeting the criterion score)

20 Distinction Designations Index 2 & Index 3