Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
1 Title I Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session May 23, 2011.
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Region 8 Education Service Center.  Develop an understanding of the characteristics and requirements of a CNA.  Develop an understanding of the CNA.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Program Design and Implementation for Targeted Assistance Programs Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
Program Evaluation.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
Chapter 10 Collecting Quantitative Data. SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES Establishing Procedures to Collect Survey Data Recording Survey Data Establishing the Reliability.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Implementing Mathematics K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Wisconsin Statewide Title I Network CESA #1 and the Wisconsin DPI
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Tom Barnes, Technology Coordinator Southwest Plains Regional Service Center
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
1 Fall 2010 Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education October 5, 2010.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
Module 4 Evaluating Services to Binational Migrant Students Designing an Implementation and Outcome Evaluation of State and Local Binational Services 1.
COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CNA) Schoolwide Programs.
Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
ANNUAL EVALUATION PLAN Schoolwide Programs. Annual Evaluation Plan.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 2
Title IA Planning, Fiscal, and Parental Involvement Workshops Maine Department of Education Kathryn Manning Jackie Godbout Rachelle Tome May 2006.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Building an Effective Evaluation of Your Flexible.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Hudson Area Schools - Lincoln Elementary School Improvement Professional Development Friday, February 26, 2010.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Gibraltar Philanthropy Forum Conference 19 November 2013 Dr Balwant Singh Kusuma Trust UK Philanthropy in Action.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Welcome to the (ENTER YOUR SYSTEM/SCHOOL NAME) Data Dig 1.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Title I Program Monitoring: Common Findings from FY18
SEC & State/District Initiatives
School Title I Stakeholder Meeting
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
February 21-22, 2018.
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Presentation transcript:

Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation Fall Title I Statewide Conference November 5, 2014

Agenda Needs assessment Title I program evaluation Where to find resources for each Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Needs assessment - requirements Districts are required to conduct annual needs assessments that include data on student achievement relative to State standards, and input from parents and educators Title I program planning must be based on district and school needs assessment Written needs assessment procedure is required Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Needs assessment - purpose Establishes priorities for action and informs decisions about allocation of resources (people, materials, time, and fiscal) Needs assessment will inform decisions on where/how resources (including Title I) should be distributed and utilized in the district Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Needs assessment - components In general, a needs assessment: Considers a range of needs and issues Student needs Curriculum and instruction Professional development Family and community involvement School and district context and organization Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Needs assessment - components Includes information gathered from a variety of sources Quantitative data, such as: student achievement results, enrollment counts, dropout rates, graduation rates from school and district records and reports, and demographic statistics from community-based or other organizations. Qualitative data that reveal attitudes and perceptions, such as: written surveys, face-to-face or telephone interviews, focus groups, or classroom observations. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Needs assessment - components Uses valid and reliable data Involves many individuals representing a range of knowledge, skills, and expertise Results in the development of goals and action plans Is used as the basis for resource allocation Includes regular follow-up and evaluation of plans and strategies Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Needs assessment - procedure Written procedure includes: Description of quantitative/qualitative data collected and analyzed Who is involved in analysis How priority needs are determined How school improvement plans and other documentation relate to this process Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Needs assessment - resources Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Conditions for School Effectiveness Self-Assessment http://www.doe.mass.edu/apa/general/ Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Conditions for School Effectiveness Self-Assessment Level 3 (districts with one or more schools among the lowest-performing 20% based on quantitative indicators, or schools with low graduation rates): Schools in Level 3 are required to complete a self-assessment process aligned with Essential Conditions for School Effectiveness. Level 3 districts will be given high priority for Department assistance, including resources to assist their efforts to implement the Essential Conditions at each identified school. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Conditions for School Effectiveness Self-Assessment Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Conditions for School Effectiveness Self-Assessment CSE Self-Assessment School Improvement Plan revision Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Program evaluation- requirements Federal legislation requires that a school operating a Title I program annually evaluate the implementation of, and results achieved by, the Title I program Written program evaluation procedure and program evaluation summary are required Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Program evaluation- purpose The Title I program evaluation is an annual review of Title I activities to determine if they are contributing to the desired outcomes: Improved student achievement Effective family engagement High quality professional development Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Program evaluation- components Measures efficacy and impact of Title I program Documents impact of Title I services on student learning Includes evaluation of private school services, parental involvement, consultancy services Informs school and district planning (cycle of continuous improvement) Is an advocacy tool Is conducted at end of program year Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Program evaluation- key questions Has the Title I program been effective? What has worked well in the Title I program? What has not worked well in the Title I program? How should the Title I program be refined? Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Program evaluation - procedure Description of: Data used Constituents consulted Process used to arrive at evaluation findings How findings are utilized for planning and improvement Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Program evaluation - summary Summary of: Program strengths Program weaknesses Subsequent program changes Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Program evaluation - resources Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Needs assessment & program evaluation What are the differences and how do they relate to each other? Program evaluation Evaluates Title I program only Done after the fact (end of year) Helps to plan Title I for next year Needs assessment Looks at all school data, including Title I Done before beginning of school year Assesses priority needs in district/schools and determines where Title I fits in, as well as other resources Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Continuous improvement Needs assessment Program evaluation Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Resources & contact info Title I sample documents: http://www.doe.mass.edu/apa/titlei/parta/review Conditions for School Effectiveness Self-Assessment: http://www.doe.mass.edu/apa/general Email: titlei@doe.mass.edu Phone: 781-338-6230 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education