Strategic Plan 2012/17 and Annual Performance Plan 2012/13 INDEPENDENT POLICE INVESTIGATIVE DIRECTORATE (IPID) 19 NOVEMBER 2014 BRIEFING TO THE PORTFOLIO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRESENTATION TO THE JOINT RULES COMMITTEE 15 MARCH 2012 ON THE PROGRESS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PANEL ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED.
Advertisements

Discipline Under the IDEA Tulsa Public Schools Special Education and Student Services Presenter: Cheryl Henry August, 2011.
Principals’ Meeting PS 273 October 9, 2013 Progressive Discipline Office of Legal Services.
Public Complaints Ottawa Police Services Board September 24, 2012.
Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement June 6 - 9, 2010 Fredericton, New Brunswick.
1 Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs Compliance monitoring in the Department of Home Affairs 30 April 2013.
Quality Representative Training Version
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES BILL, 2013 PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND INDUSTRY 11 JUNE
The Audit Process PRESENTED BY:.
Portfolio Committee Presentation Government printing Works Audit and Compliance 07 May 2013 Presented by: Chief Executive Officer.
STRATEGIC PLANS, BUDGETS AND ANNUAL REPORTS Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Arts and Culture 11 March 2008.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Outreach and Education Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement.
PRESENTATION BY THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CORRECTIONAL SERVICES PRESENTER: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SIRAJ DESAI DATE: 4 NOVEMBER 2009.
DRAFT REGULATIONS ON THE SOCIAL ASSISTANCE ACT,
NPHS Booster Board President First Vice President - Fundraising Second Vice President - Spirit Secretary Treasurer Parliamentarian Auditor Freshman Squad.
Click to edit Master subtitle style  IPID REGULATIONS Good Hope Chamber, Ground Floor Good Hope Building, Parliament 5 June 2012, 09:30 – 13:00 INDEPENDENT.
National Treasury 11 March Overview of Presentation  The Constitution and oversight  PFMA requirements for tabling of annual reports  Proposed.
Briefing on Progress made with regard to Prevention and Management of Child Abuse and Neglect Especially Child Sexual Abuse Presentation at the Portfolio.
Research Examiner/ Independent Chair Training Programme
1 Status of PSC recommendations (January December 2007) Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 March 2008.
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON THE FORENSIC AUDIT THAT WAS CONDUCTED DURING May 2006.
CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE SERVICE ACT 2 OF 2011 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON POLICE.
Complaints The Policy Company Limited ©. Policy Complaints are encouraged and welcomed as a way of ensuring that any dissatisfaction with the quality.
Portfolio Committee on Appropriations Audit of predetermined objectives 26 March 2013.
Strategic Plan 2012/17 and Annual Performance Plan 2012/13 INDEPENDENT POLICE INVESTIGATIVE DIRECTORATE (IPID) 12 NOVEMBER 2014 BRIEFING TO THE PORTFOLIO.
CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE1 THE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE SERVICE BILL [B 16 of 2010] PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on International Relations and Cooperation on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year 15 October 2014.
TOURISM BILL “ THE CONTENTS ” Friday; 17 May 2013.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Presentation of the Property Rates Debt to the Port Folio Committee on Cooperative Governance & Traditional Affairs 25 October 2011 Presented by: Cathy.
SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE1 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT COMPLIANCE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2012/13 FY SECRETARIAT OF POLICE.
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Economic Development Department on the audit outcomes for the 2013/2014 financial year Presenter: Ahmed Moolla October.
Free State Province DOMAIN 4 : PUBLIC HEALTH DOMAIN 6 : OPERATIONAL COMPONENT 8 : COMMUNICATION Sub COMPONENTS : 26 and 27.
Policy and Procedure for the Handling of Complaints against the AG Consultation with the Standing Committee on the Auditor-General 9 April 2008 Wandile.
Module 7 How to Write an MPAC Report and Resolutions APAC MPAC Training Roll-out
CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE1 DRAFT POLICY GUIDELINES CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE BY MINISTER OF POLICE TO BE APPROVED BY PARLIAMENT FOR THE DIRECTORATE.
Presentation to NCOP Committee on Local Government and Administration The HoD Evaluation Framework 27 August 2003.
Nols du Plessis National Treasury 26 October 2005.
Plans of Correction (PoC) Donna Tiberi, RN Standards Interpretation p: e: 1.
Regional Accreditation Workshop For Asia and Eastern Europe Manila, Philippines th March, 2012.
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON SRSA INFORMATION PERFORMANCE QUARTER 4 OF THE 2015/16 FINANCIAL YEAR Date: 24 MAY 2016.
DVA REPORTS ICD JANUARY 2010 – DECEMBER 2010 PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE PROGRAMME 3 Presented by Mr. M Dlamini & Ms. N Mbuli Wednesday,09.
Background Background 16 April Act came into operation.
Audit of predetermined objectives
CDA PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2005/03/09 PROF RATAEMANE.
Portfolio Committee on Police DNA National Forensics Oversight and Ethics Board 23 November 2016.
Parliament and the National Budget Process
THE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID)
Presentation to the Tourism Portfolio Committee Assurance assessment criteria for the financial year 3 May 2017.
Presentation on the Joint Standing Committee on Financial Management of Parliament 07 September 2016.
Training Appendix Revised January 2018.
July - September 2017 October - December 2017
Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID)
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
INDEPENDENT POLICE INVESTIGATIVE DIRECTORATE
OFFICE OF THE DPCI JUDGE
STANDING COMMITTE ON PUBLIC ACCOUNTS Director-General: Basic Education
STRATEGY TO REDUCE CASE BACKLOGS TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON POLICE
11 independent POLICE INVESTIGATIVE DIRECTORATE BILL, 2010 Aims and Objectives of the Bill Briefing to the portfolio committee on police Tuesday,
Portfolio Committee on Police DNA National Forensics Oversight and Ethics Board 23 November 2016.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON SPORT AND RECREATION ON THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE SASREA APPEAL BOARD.
Joint Workshop of the Finance and Appropriations Committees on the Review of the Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act (Act No 9 of.
Joint Meeting: Finance and Appropriations Comittees
Joint PRESENTATION: IPID AND CSPS
DRAFT BUDGET FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IPID ACT
Select Committee on Security and Justice
Presentation transcript:

Strategic Plan 2012/17 and Annual Performance Plan 2012/13 INDEPENDENT POLICE INVESTIGATIVE DIRECTORATE (IPID) 19 NOVEMBER 2014 BRIEFING TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON POLICE Parliament CHALLENGES IPID RECOMMENDATIONS

PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE BRIEFING 2 Presented By Ms Mariaan Geerdts Acting Chief Director – Compliance Monitoring and Stakeholder Management

IPID MANDATE IN TERMS OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE SAPS 3 Responsibilities of Executive Director (IPID Act) Section 7 7(6) The Executive Director must ensure that complaints regarding disciplinary matters are referred to the National Commissioner and where appropriate, the relevant Provincial Commissioner. 7(7) Once a month the Executive Director must submit to the Minister a summary of the disciplinary matters and provide a copy thereof to the Secretary.

SAPS MANDATE IN TERMS OF IPID ACT 4 Disciplinary recommendations Section The National Commissioner or the appropriate Provincial Commissioner to whom recommendations regarding disciplinary matters were referred, as contemplated in section 7(6) and (7), must- (a) within 30 days of receipt thereof, initiate disciplinary proceedings in terms of the recommendations made by the Directorate and inform the Minister in writing, and provide a copy thereof to the Executive Director and the Secretary; (b) quarterly submit a written report to the Minister on the progress regarding disciplinary matters made in terms of paragraph (a) and provide a copy thereof to the Executive Director and the Secretary; and (c) immediately on finalisation of any disciplinary matter referred to it by the Directorate, to inform the Minister in writing of the outcome thereof and provide a copy thereof to the Executive Director and the Secretary.

IPID REGULATIONS IN TERMS OF RECOMMENDATIONS 5 Disciplinary referrals 12. (1) A complaint of a disciplinary nature or recommendations by the Directorate involving the discipline of a member or members of the South African Police Service or the Municipal Police Services must be contained in a report substantially similar to Form 3. (2) The Executive Director or relevant provincial head must, in accordance with section 7(6) of the Act, read with section 9(m) and 21 (1)(f), ensure that the form contemplated in sub-regulation (1) is correctly completed and submitted to the National Commissioner or relevant Provincial Commissioner of Police, as the case may be. (3) The Executive Director or relevant provincial head must interact and liaise with the National Commissioner or Provincial Commissioner of Police regarding progress relating to disciplinary proceedings initiated by the National Commissioner of Police, as the case may be, in accordance with section 30 of the Act. (4) The duty imposed upon the Executive Director or the relevant provincial head in terms of sub-regulation (2) or (3) may be delegated, in writing, by the Executive Director or relevant provincial head, as the case may be, to a suitable member of the Directorate.

IPID’S RECOMMENDATION PROCESS 6  Completion of the Recommendation Report -The Recommendation Reports must meet a certain criteria in terms of IPID Regulations, Form 3. -The investigator sign the Recommendation Report, send it to the supervisor for quality control and for their signature and thereafter the supervisor is to send the report to the Provincial Head for approval and their signature; -The Provincial Head scrutinize the Recommendation Report in order to ascertain whether the recommendation is in order. If he/she is satisfied with the Recommendation Report, he/she sign it and endorsed the date/date stamp in order to measure the 30 days compliance from the date of completion to the date of referral to SAPS/MPS (APP target); -The Provincial Head complete/update the file on the Case Flow Management System and update the case file by ensuring that a signed copy of the Recommendation Report is filed in the case file before he/she referred the recommendation to SAPS.

IPID’S RECOMMENDATION PROCESS 7  Referral of the Recommendation Report to SAPS/MPS -Recommendation Reports are submitted to SAPS within 30 days after completion; -The Recommendation Report must be hand delivered together with the cover letter, which comprises the list of the Recommendation Report(s). No Recommendation Reports are allowed to be faxed, ed or send by post to the SAPS/MPS; -The designated IPID official wait to obtain acknowledgement of receipt from the SAPS Recommendation Coordinator; -The IPID Provincial Coordinator must ensure that no duplicate Recommendation Reports are forwarded to the SAPS/MPS; -The IPID Provincial Coordinator must ensure that Recommendation Reports are delivered to the correct stakeholder and no reports meant for the NPA be mistakenly delivered to the SAPS/MPS and vice versa;

IPID’S RECOMMENDATION PROCESS 8 -The IPID Provincial Coordinator then complete the Recommendation Register and send the scanned copies of the Recommendation Reports and the Register immediately to the Compliance Monitoring Section; -The IPID Provincial Coordinator forward an to the Compliance Monitoring Section on a weekly, verifying that all referred Recommendations Reports and feedbacks received from the SAPS/MPS were forwarded to National Office; -All scanned copies of Recommendation Reports, Registers and feedback reports must reach the Compliance Monitoring Section before the 7 th of the following month in order to be considered for the monthly report to the Minister.

IPID’S RECOMMENDATION PROCESS 9  Phase Two -The SAPS must provide the response in terms of Section 30(a) and (b) of the IPID Act during the monthly recommendation meetings as well as comparing the IPID and SAPS statistics on recommendations. -The response from SAPS must be in a form of actual proof such as a copy of the appointment of a disciplinary investigator/initiator or a letter with regard to instituting a disciplinary process.  Phase Three -The SAPS must provide the outcome of the IPID recommendation in terms of Section 30(c) of the IPID Act during the monthly recommendation meetings. -The response from SAPS must be in a form of actual proof such as a copy of a written warning and/or a record of the disciplinary hearing.  Phase Four -The Provincial Head must ensure that the case file and the Case Flow Management System is updated with the feedback information and that the Recommendation Register is updated; -The Compliance Monitoring Section must be informed accordingly in order for the status of the recommendation to be updated on the National Recommendation Register.

IPID REQUIREMENTS IN TERMS OF RECOMMENDATIONS 10 -All recommendations are recorded in a Register, which records the relevant details in terms of performance (when the case is completed – (30 days) – when the recommendation is forwarded to SAPS – (30 days) – when a reply is received from SAPS, if satisfactorily, then the matter is resolved). Performance in terms of whether timeframes are met is measured and reported on in the Section 9(n) Report and Annual Report. -Confirmation of the feedback is required, it is not sufficient to only receive an updated spreadsheet with the updated statuses of the recommendations, each recommendation must have its own response and be accompanied by supporting documentation, e.g. Report from SAPS with a copy of the written warning issued to the SAPS/MPS member; -The Provincial Head must keep record of all recommendations sent to SAPS, update the recommendation register and keep record of all responses from SAPS in terms of Section 30(a), (b) and (c); -In the event that the Provincial Head is not satisfied with the response(s) on the recommendations forwarded to the SAPS/MPS, the Compliance Monitoring Section must be informed and the matter will be engaged with on a National level (with SAPS and the Legal Section if needs be); -If new evidence comes to light IPID will review the Recommendation accordingly, which might result in the recommendation being amended to that of a recommendation Not to take any disciplinary steps.

RECOMMENDATION MEETINGS 11 -Recommendation Meetings on Provincial Level to occur on Monthly and Quarterly basis as per the meeting schedule; -Minutes of meetings are forwarded to National Office for record keeping and reporting progress to the ED (Consultative Forum); -Attendance of members are monitored; -Issues raised in the provincial meetings are noted and discussed on National level; -To date, 55 confirmed meetings took place on provincial and national level for the current financial year.

EXTERNAL CHALLENGES 12 Replies on IPID Recommendations -Receiving feedback on Section 30(a), (b) and (c) in terms of Supporting documents; -Delay in receiving a response, responses from 2012 still outstanding; -Confusion in terms of the reporting channels when recommendations are involving members of from different provinces or Divisions. Section 30 (a), (b) and (c)2012/ / /2015 (6 months) IPID (Documentary proof)15% (788)4.3% (38/884)12% (59/475) SAPS (Spread sheets)78% (615/788)100% - > 84% ?-

EXTERNAL CHALLENGES 13 Decisions on Recommendations -SAPS decline to initiate disciplinary action on recommendations, without proper reasons being provided, even after it was agreed that the SAPS must implement IPID recommendations; -Outcomes relating to the “Withdrawal by the complainant”, without proper documentation to the effect; -Outcomes does not match the seriousness of the case and often the outcome results in no effective corrective measures being implemented. E.g. suspended sentences or written warnings for rape cases; -Occasional insistence by SAPS to re-investigate IPID cases undermines the whole exercise.

CONCLUSION 14 Way Forward In order for the procedural challenges to be addressed IPID, CSP and SAPS will be engaging in a Recommendation Workshop on 26 November 2014 to discuss our respective needs and finding long terms solutions for our challenges. Amending the IPID Regulations to cater for Recommendations more effectively and to give more guidance and structure to the Recommendation process and response format required from SAPS. Amending the IPID Regulations to strengthen compliance with the IPID Act in terms of the sections dealing with Recommendations.