College and Career Ready Standards and English Learners Kenji Hakuta Stanford University 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jonathan Gibson & Kulwadee Axtell Nevada Department of Education.
Advertisements

The Common Core for English Language Learners: Challenges and Opportunities
Civil Rights and English Learners Melanie Manares Kansas State Department of Education.
Welcome to College and Career Ready Standards Quarterly Meeting # 1.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Cristina Hudgins Middle Tennessee State University
Education 205 The Impact of Social and Behavioral Science Research on Educational Issues: Focus on English Language Learners and Issues of Policy and Practice.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Today Educational context for second language acquisition. Break (10 min) Course overview.
Transitioning to the Common Core Common Core Academy - Summer 2011.
Local Control Funding Formula and English Learners Flexibility Amid Federal and State Regulations and Laws California Latino School Boards Association.
Educating Students with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) and English Language Learners (ELL) Leonard Shurin, Curriculum and Staff Developer for IU8.
TITLE VI OF THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 42 U.S.C § 2000d No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
 Federal Laws Related to English Learners. Video – How Not to Register EL Students.
Supporting English Language Learners in the Era of New Standards: New Paradigms, New Technologies, New Data. Kenji Hakuta 1December 8, 2014Accountability.
Title III: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students Serving English Language Learners – It’s the Law VAFEPA: October.
English Language Assessment. English Language Assessment Policy background.
Kenji Hakuta Stanford University
Education 330 Teaching English Language Learners: Issues in Policy, Leadership, and Instruction Fall, 2014.
Education 330 Teaching English Language Learners: Issues in Policy, Leadership, and Instruction 3/27/2011ASCD: San Francisco Spring, 2012.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
A New Assessment for English Language Learners TESOL K-12 Dream Day March 26, 2014.
1 Office for Civil Rights U.S. Department of Education This presentation provides general information and does not represent a complete recitation of.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) Title VI, Section 504, Title II – Special Education and Limited English Proficient Students.
Section III: Legislation & Supreme Court Rulings in Support of ELLs
ESOL Hopkins Elementary Presenter: Yanira Alfonso, EDS ESOL Teacher Hopkins Elementary School.
PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN OUR SCHOOLS.
Serving English Language Learners with ESEA Title III, Part A Funds.
The Common Core for English Language Learners: Challenges and Opportunities Understanding Language Language, Literacy, and Learning.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
ESL Legislation Michelle Samoray ELS Language Center
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
ESOL Program (English for Speakers of Other Languages) in Greenwood District Questions and Answers Updated July 2015.
© 2012 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium Introduction to the WIDA English Language Development.
North Carolina Understanding Language Project North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Stanford University.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
From Lau to Unz: An Anatomy of the Debate over Bilingual Education. Kenji Hakuta Stanford University University of La Verne.
Oregon State Board of Education March 7,  Kathleen Vanderwall, Manager, Test Design Office of Assessment and Information Services, Oregon Department.
ESL LEGISTLATION ELS Language Centers Daiva Berzinskas Contact Information:
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
North Carolina Understanding Language Project North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Stanford University.
The Importance and Development of Language Objectives.
1 ESL Legislation and its effects on society. 2 Why is ESL education so important? Question -Why is there a need to implement laws and policies to mandate.
Preparing for Title III Program Application Process March 24, 2011 NC DPI Title III/ESL Consultants Glenda Harrell & Ivanna Mann Thrower.
English Language Learners and the Law Gema Sieh Highland Rim.
Laws Governing ESL Programs in the US Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Science Standards and English Language Learners.
ALBERTVILLE CITY SCHOOLS Enrollment, Identification and Education of EL Students
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Presentation to EL Advisory Committee November 2012.
Understanding Language: A Discussion Photo: Courtesy Jeff Johnson Kenji Hakuta Stanford University.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Agenda Review Public Comments Election of Chair NDE ELL Program Professionals: Jane Splean – Program Supervisor Kulwadee Axtell Jonathan Gibson Blakely.
ELL 101 Stephanie Johnson, LPSD38 ELL Coordinator.
Federal Title III Monitoring Visit Educational Equity Charlene Lui, Paul Ross, Cheryl Pietz, Nathan Moore, Sara Moore.
English as a Second Language (ESL) Program. 2 Preview Acronyms Introduction, Second Language Acquisition Demographic Information Federal and State Mandates.
David Q. Moreno, CTE Director
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
TERY J. MEDINA, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR THE SOUTHEASTERN EQUITY CENTER 800 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 400 Fort Lauderdale, FL Telephone:
Understanding Your Child’s Report Card
Education 330 Teaching English Language Learners: Issues in Policy, Leadership, and Instruction Spring, 2013.
January 14, 2016 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist
Introduction to English learners and Related Federal and State Rules
Education 330 Teaching English Language Learners: Issues in Policy, Leadership, and Instruction Spring, 2014.
Monday, April 9 What can we say about the number of ELLs in the United States? What can we say about the academic achievement of ELLs? What role has ESEA.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Hawaii TAC Meeting WIDA Assessments
ESSA Requirements Related to English Learners
Presentation transcript:

College and Career Ready Standards and English Learners Kenji Hakuta Stanford University 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Humans are information integration machines. 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

The two cyclops problem. 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Civil Rights Act of 1964 NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference Title VI. No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. 8/4/2014

Elementary and Secondary Education Act ESEA (1965) 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

There is no equality of treatment merely by providing students with the same facilities, textbooks, teachers and curriculum; for students who do not understand English are effectively foreclosed from any meaningful education. U. S. Supreme Court Lau v. Nichols 1974 Lau v. Nichols (1974) NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference8/4/2014

Basic English skills are at the very core of what these public schools teach. Imposition of a requirement that, before a child can effectively participate in the educational program, he must already have acquired those basic skills is to make a mockery of public education. U. S. Supreme Court Lau v. Nichols 1974 Lau v. Nichols (1974) NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference8/4/2014

NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference ?

Castañeda v. Pickard (1981) Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals § 1703(f) of the EEOA makes it unlawful for an educational agency to fail to take "appropriate action” to overcome language barriers that impede equal participation by its students in its instructional programs." (1) Whether the school system is pursuing a program informed by an educational theory recognized as sound by some experts in the field, or, at least, deemed a legitimate experimental strategy. (2) Whether the programs and practices actually used by the school system are reasonably calculated to implement effectively the educational theory adopted by the school. (3) Whether the school's program succeeds, after a legitimate trial, to produce results indicating that the language barriers confronting students are actually being overcome. 648 F.2d 989; 1981 U.S. Judge Carolyn Randall (King) 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Castañeda v. Pickard (1981) Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals § 1703(f) of the EEOA makes it unlawful for an educational agency to fail to take "appropriate action” to overcome language barriers that impede equal participation by its students in its instructional programs." (1) Whether the school system is pursuing a program informed by an educational theory recognized as sound by some experts in the field, or, at least, deemed a legitimate experimental strategy. (2) Whether the programs and practices actually used by the school system are reasonably calculated to implement effectively the educational theory adopted by the school. (3) Whether the school's program succeeds, after a legitimate trial, to produce results indicating that the language barriers confronting students are actually being overcome. 648 F.2d 989; 1981 U.S. 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Castañeda v. Pickard (1981) Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals § 1703(f) of the EEOA makes it unlawful for an educational agency to fail to take "appropriate action” to overcome language barriers that impede equal participation by its students in its instructional programs." (1) Whether the school system is pursuing a program informed by an educational theory recognized as sound by some experts in the field, or, at least, deemed a legitimate experimental strategy. (2) Whether the programs and practices actually used by the school system are reasonably calculated to implement effectively the educational theory adopted by the school. (3) Whether the school's program succeeds, after a legitimate trial, to produce results indicating that the language barriers confronting students are actually being overcome. 648 F.2d 989; 1981 U.S. 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Castañeda v. Pickard (1981) Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals § 1703(f) of the EEOA makes it unlawful for an educational agency to fail to take "appropriate action” to overcome language barriers that impede equal participation by its students in its instructional programs." (1) Whether the school system is pursuing a program informed by an educational theory recognized as sound by some experts in the field, or, at least, deemed a legitimate experimental strategy. (2) Whether the programs and practices actually used by the school system are reasonably calculated to implement effectively the educational theory adopted by the school. (3) Whether the school's program succeeds, after a legitimate trial, to produce results indicating that the language barriers confronting students are actually being overcome. 648 F.2d 989; 1981 U.S. 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Sound theory ImplementationResults examine evaluate reform revise Articulated in OCR policy memoranda issued on Sept. 11, 1984, reiterated successively in 1985, 1990, /4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference ?

A Nation at Risk (1983)… call for standards. 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Section 1014(d) of the Hawkins ‑ Stafford Amendments of 1988 requires Chapter 1 participants to ``have needs stemming from educational deprivation and not related solely to... limited English proficiency.'' 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

No Child Left Behind 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

No Child Left Behind: Three important pieces for ELLs Sec. 1111(a)(3)(ix)(III) the inclusion of limited English proficient students, who shall be assessed in a valid and reliable manner and provided reasonable accommodations on assessments administered … including, to the extent practicable, assessments in the language and form most likely to yield accurate data… Sec. 1111(a)(3)(xiii) enable results to be disaggregated within each State, local educational agency, and school by…English proficiency status. Sec 3113(b)(2) standards and objectives for raising the level of English proficiency that are derived from the four recognized domains of speaking, listening, reading, and writing, and that are aligned with achievement of the challenging State academic content and student academic achievement standards described in section 1111(b)(1). 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

The New Civil Right: Inseparable education for language and content 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Old Paradigm ContentLanguage Mostly vocabulary, Grammar NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference 8/4/20148/4/2014

New Paradigm Discourse Text (complex text) Explanation Argumentation Purpose Typical structure of text Sentence structures Δ Vocabulary practices LanguageContent NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference 8/4/20148/4/2014

8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

The New Content Standards (CCSS/NGSS/CCRS) Photo: Courtesy Jeff Johnson

MOOCs from Understanding Language Effective teachers facilitate rich student academic discourse that is supported by the tools of reading, writing, and visualization. The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), supported by the new English Language Proficiency Standards, have created a context for reform whose signature instructional moments include these uses of language. 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Three Legs of the Language Stool Learning through discourse. Transacting with text and images. Writing about evidence, reasoning and argument. 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Continuum of MOOCs 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

c-MOOCs “c” is for … connectivity, collaborative, constructivist, creative, collective… Applied as… …take a SCOOP of language and analyze, reflect, share, collaborate 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

c-MOOCs “c” is for … connectivity, collaborative, constructivist, creative, collective… Applied as… …take a SCOOP of language and analyze, reflect, share, collaborate 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

It is more like “Citizen Science” than it is a “MOOC”. 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Learning from a Pilot MOOC (through support from OELA/NPD) INSTRUCTORS Kenji Hakuta Jeff Zwiers Sara Rutherford-Quach Addressed how to facilitate classroom discoursese as required by the new CCSS and NGSS Targeted educators of English Language Learners Required participants to listen closely, analyze, reflect, and act on student-to-student interactions 8,000 enrolled, plus 1,000 auditors 2,000 active participants joined 519 teams of 1-8 per team 1,560 fully completed first assignment completion rate*: 26.2% *with respect to those who turned in the 1st assignment 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

MOOC as a Vehicle for Collaboration IHEsStates and Districts NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference Stanford (Kenji Hakuta, Jeff Zwiers, Sara Rutherford) Stanford (Jonathan Osborne, Bryan Brown, Helen Quinn, Guadalupe Valdes) Stanford (Sam Wineburg) Stanford (David Brazer) Stanford (Rachel Lotan) Oregon State (Karen Thompson) UCSC (George Bunch, Judit Moschkovich) UC Davis (Susan O’Hara, Harold Levine) UCLA (Margaret Heritage), Alison Bailey CSU Sacramento (Sue Baker, Adele Arellano, Stephanie Biagetti, Pia Wong) U Virginia (Amanda Kibler) U Wisconsin (Tim Boals, Margo Gottlieb, Gary Cook) U Maryland (Melinda Beltran) East Carolina University (Rob Lucas) UNC Chapel Hill (Marta Civil) New Mexico State University (Anita Hernandez) University of New Mexico (Rebecca Blum Martinez) UC Berkeley (David Pearson) Seattle University (Robert Hughes) North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (Nadja Trez) Topic: CCSS Implementation – ELA Middle School and Math Elementary Oregon Department of Education (Timothy Blackburn and Martha Martinez) Topic: ELPA21 Standards SFUSD (Angie Estonina), LAUSD (Hilda Maldonado) and OUSD (Nicole Knight) Topic: Student Discourse Seattle Public Schools (Veronica Gallardo) Topic: Student Discourse New York City Schools (in process) New York State Education Department (in process) 8/4/2014

Understanding Language | Online MOOCs The Database 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Understanding Language | Online MOOCs All MOOCs will be focused on SCOOPS of student work that display evidence from (1) discourse, (2) transaction with text, (3) writing about evidence, reasoning and argument that contributes to the Database. MOOCs will be specialized by different content areas, grade levels, student subgroups, geographical region. The MOOC COOP will be comprised of primarily faculty and LEAs, where the IHE will package and offer the MOOC, and the LEA will collaborate in capturing examples of student work and instruction that can become model content for the MOOC. Members of the MOOC COOP will be part of an IP agreement that will allow reciprocal borrowing/lending of MOOC content with agreed-upon allowances and restrictions. MOOC COOP membership will allow special access to the Database. 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

Understanding Language | Online The Database The Database will consist of MOOC SCOOPS, including all information about the SCOOPS gathered from the MOOC (description of setting, self-evaluations, peer evaluations, etc.) and will be searchable. The main uses of the Database are: Evaluation and improvement of MOOCs To support Formative Assessment Online, a service to allow users to enter new samples of student language (new SCOOPS) and to use the database as a reference point for formative assessment practice by finding “similar” and “informative” examples. Basic research, such as mapping learning progressions for the language used around specific content topics. Other activities to move the field, such as sponsoring Natural Language Processing contests to model expertise in evaluating student language. 8/4/2014NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference

The “Vision” NC DPI Summer ELL Support Conference Formative Assessment MOOC Mosaic Metadata Traffic patterns NLP Data University Collaborations District Collaborations 8/4/2014