1 Oregon Reading First: Cohort B Leadership Session Portland, Oregon May 27, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Instructional Decision Making
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
1 Oregon Reading First Fall Cohort B Leadership Webinar October 14, 2009.
B-ELL Leadership Professional Development Oregon Reading First October 2 nd, 2008 University of Oregon © 2008 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
1 Reading First at Oak Grove Elementary School Medford School District 549C Julie York – District Person Julie Evans – Principal Barbara Low – Reading.
1 Cohort B Q2: How are we doing?. 2 Reviewing Outcomes  What percent of students are reaching benchmark goals in each grade level?  What percent of.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Webinar Data-based Action Planning Winter 2009.
1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 13, 2010.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.
1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Winter 2010 Data Based Planning for Instructional Focus Groups.
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
1 Q2: How are we doing? Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Cohort B Leadership Session March 3, 2008 Agenda.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Oregon Reading First Cohort B B-ELL Leadership Session Jorge Preciado University of Oregon March 5th, 2009 © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
Schoolwide Reading Improvement Model - RTI Name:___________________________ Grade:___________________________ School:__________________________ CONSULTING.
Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS The District Data Team Meeting Blending Behavioral and Academic Multi-tiered Systems of Support Oregon.
RtI/ExCel Update Cambrian School District January 12, 2012.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Instructional Leadership and Reading First Component 3-Part B Sara Ticer, Principal, Prairie Mountain School District Support for Instructional Leadership.
D62 Response to Intervention
B-ELL Leadership Session May 26, 2009 Jorge Preciado University of Oregon © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
Company LOGO Professional Development in the Zone Organizational Meeting January 13, 2005.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Does Reading First Work? Feng-Yi Hung, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Program Evaluation Clover Park School District.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
DIBELS Data: From Dabbling to Digging Interpreting data for instructional decision-making.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
CSI Maps Randee Winterbottom & Tricia Curran Assessment Programs Florida Center for Reading Research.
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
Benchmark Data Meetings Presented to Coaches September 6, 2013 Adapted from MiBLSi materials.
EOY DIBELS Benchmark Data for Intervention Programs Oregon Reading First Schools June, 2009 © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
DATA REFLECTION: Providing Generally Effective Instruction Oregon Reading First Cohort B Project Level Data Erin Chaparro, Ph.D. Jean Louise Mercier Smith,
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
© 2010 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Data-Based Leadership
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Oregon Reading First Summary Outcomes at the End of Year 1: Students at Benchmark (On Track) (C) 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.
Oregon Reading First Summary Outcomes at the End of Year 1: Students at Benchmark (On Track) © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.
Presentation transcript:

1 Oregon Reading First: Cohort B Leadership Session Portland, Oregon May 27, 2009

2 Housekeeping

3

4 Sustainability

5 What does it take to sustain an effective reading program? That which is worth sustaining is best supported not by a person but by a system and its culture. Build and nurture the system and its culture. (Hargreaves and Goodson, 2006)

6 tt Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework Goals Assessment Instruction Leadership Professional Development Commitment

7 Sustainability is..... “...the ability of a staff to maintain the core beliefs and values (culture) of a program...and use them to guide program adaptations over time...”...while maintaining improved or enhanced outcomes. -adapted from Century and Levy, 2002

8 Sustaining Reading First: A Premise... Those who are able to sustain the improved outcomes they have attained under Reading First will be those who: see Reading First not as a funding stream, but as a different way of thinking about teaching and learning see the management of change as a systems level process

9 Planning for Sustainability To access a wide variety of resources on sustainability planning, including: –Planning tools at state, district, school and classroom levels –Examples of strong sustainability plans and related tools –Background information about sustainability Go to the web site of the Reading First Sustainability Project at

10 Project-level data

11 DATA REFLECTION: Providing Generally Effective Instruction Oregon Reading First Cohort B Project Level Data Spring 2009 Erin Chaparro, Ph.D. Jean Louise Mercier Smith, Ph.D. Deni Basaraba, M.A.

12 Objectives Review Spring 2009 Project-level Data Review Project Goals for K/1 Discuss next steps for the NWF analyses

13 Overview of Project-Level Data

14 Kindergarten PSF Spring 2009

15 Kindergarten NWF Spring 2009

16 First Grade NWF Spring 2009

17 First Grade ORF Spring 2009

18 Second Grade ORF Spring 2009

19 Third Grade ORF Spring 2009

20

21

22

23

24 Did we meet our goals?

25 Answering Important Questions Project Level Goals for K/1 –Increase the percent of Kindergarten students meeting the Spring benchmark goal (80%- 95%). –74.3% At low risk for NWF-CLS –89% Established on PSF –78.4% Made AP (+17.4% from Spring ‘06)

Project Level Goals for K/1 Increase the percent of strategic and intensive students making adequate progress and/ meeting the benchmark goal. Answering Important Questions

27 Taking A Closer Look at 1st Grade Intensive Notes: Yr. 1Yr. 2Yr. 3Yr.4 % Intensive making AP % of Students who are Intensive

28 Taking A Closer Look at 1st Grade Strategic Notes: Yr. 1Yr. 2Yr. 3Yr.4 % Strategic making AP % of Students who are Strategic

29 Project-level Action Plan Kindergarten 1.Increase percent of students established on NWF by end of KG (80%- 95%) 2.Target automaticity in word reading (“say it the fast way”). A.November 15: ERI Blending Enhancements Webinar B.December 11: Kindergarten Teacher’s Session on small group instruction and behavior routines C.Use Instructional Focus format to target specific skill deficits and maximize differentiation. D.RCs to provide data and Instruction support to coach and/or KG grade- level team. 3. Improve vocabulary and comprehension by improving decoding and word reading maximizing opportunities to build vocabulary A.October 16 (K/1) Read Aloud Session with Lana Santoro Actions ORFC Assistance

30 Project-level Action Plan First Grade Target Intensive and Strategic 1st Grade Students: Use Instructional Focus Groups for differentiating instruction Start replacement intervention early Ensure appropriate pacing (amount of content covered aligns with amount of growth required) Evaluate student progress (in-program and DIBELS) A.October 7: First Grade Teacher Session on small group instruction and behavior routines. B.Use Instructional Focus format to target specific skill deficits and maximize differentiation. C.RCs to provide data and Instruction support to coach and/or 1st grade- level team D.Establish pacing goals, track progress using new LPR system E.Horizons Intervention Training on September 23 F.RC expert on intervention programs to provide support across schools Actions ORFC Assistance

31 Project-level Action Plan First Grade 3. Improve vocabulary and comprehension by improving decoding and word reading maximizing opportunities to build vocabulary A.October 16 (K/1) Read Aloud Session with Lana Santoro ORFC Assistance Actions

32 What’s Next? NWF Analyses

33  Pacing  Plan groups now to start interventions and/or small groups early in September.  What lesson do students need to finish by the end of year to reach goal?  Instruction  Provide language instruction in grades K-1.  When in doubt, place students in intervention rather than core. Remember, a benchmark score is only the 40th percentile.  Ensure all students are having multiple opportunities to respond rather than individual turns.  Provide students more time reading connected text. Considerations

34 “The goal is to transform data into information, and information into insight.” Carly Fiorina

35 Data-based Action Planning

36 Are enough of our students in the established (low risk) range? Are too many students in the in the deficit (at-risk) range? Example Data: Table 1 58% 26%

37 Example Data: Table 2 Evaluate the health of your support systems at each grade level. Identify systems that need additional support. Grade 1 Intensive Grade 1 Strategic Grade 3 Strategic and Benchmark

38 Data-Based Leadership Planning Use: (a) your school’s DIBELS Data Summary, (b) a review of your school action plan progress, and (c) your principal walk-through feedback to identify relevant actions that you can do to support your school action plan.

39

40 District Support What support does the principal need to meet principal actions? What support do the schools need to meet school actions?

41

42 Instructional leadership is perhaps the single most important role for principals to play when increased achievement is the goal. (National Association of Elementary School Principals, 2001)

43 Looking Ahead

44

45 Looking Ahead and Next Steps June 6: District Team Leader to notify Russ Sweet if a Cohort B school (or schools) is (are) interested in applying for funds for the school year. Copy Trish Travers on the Week of June 8: ODE and the ORFC will meet to determine funding and identify schools that will receive technical support through a Regional Coordinator. Week of June 22: Districts will be notified of the amount of support and/or funds each school will receive. Prior to the start of 2009/2010 school year: Each school leader will work with the regional coordinator to develop a plan to use the funds to sustain Reading First.

46 Fall 2009 Calendar Tentative Dates 9/8/09 - 9/25/09: Fall DIBELS Testing Window 9/17/09: Fall Leadership Webinar (1:00 - 3:00) 9/18/09: LPR Webinar (1:00 - 3:00) 1/4/10 - 1/29/10: Winter DIBELS Testing Window

47 “We are not where we want to be. We are not where we are going to be. But we are not where we were.” Rosa Parks Moving forward