An Overview of Recent Changes To the EEP Restoration Plan and Mitigation Plan Templates Steven D. Roberts Vegetation Senior Specialist

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Maryland Department of the Environment Restoration and Regulation Discussion Presented by: Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Department of the Environment.
Advertisements

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FORESTRY DIVISION (323)
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Revegetation after management What areas have been overlooked or under studied? Environmental factors: Conditions influencing the outcome of planting native.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
THE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES ASSISTANCE PROGRAM NC Water Resources Congress October 30, 2014.
EEP Update Kevin H. Miller CVS-EEP Vegetation Monitoring Workshop Wake Technical Community College Northern Campus June 10, 2009.
Chapter Florida’s Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM)
Direct Purchase of Services October, Introduction to the DPS and the DPS Manual Define the process that SHOULD be adhered to by potential vendors/providers.
Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRIT) Eastgate Shopping Center Chapel Hill, NC September 9, 2008.
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Convention on Wetlands “The conservation and wise use of.
Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.
“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Legislation.
Compensatory Mitigation in Coastal Louisiana Keith Lovell, Administrator Office of Coastal Management Department of Natural Resources 10/03/121.
EEP Data Flow Kevin H. Miller CVS-EEP Vegetation Monitoring Workshop Wake Technical Community College Northern Campus June 9, 2009.
An Overview of the EEP-CVS Data Flow Charts Steven D. Roberts Vegetation Senior Specialist
EEP Watershed Planning Overview August 12, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Nationally recognized, innovative, non-regulatory program formed in July.
Advantages of Monitoring Vegetation Restoration With the Carolina Vegetation Survey Protocol M. Forbes Boyle, Robert K. Peet, Thomas R. Wentworth, and.
Jan 22-24, 2007 Transportation Research Board U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District North Carolina’s Interagency Agreements to Streamline Project.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Christine Krall, SW Region Environmental Winter 2015.
1.0 INTRODUCTION Seán Moran. SIMPLE? Commissioning is a complex issue requiring: Planning Leadership Teamwork Training Communications.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Rosewood Park Coastal Section 506 of WRDA 2000 Kirston Buczak, PMP USACE, Chicago District May 2012.
Golf Course Water Resources Best Management Practices TOOLBOX  Project Overview  Your Role in the Project April 2009.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Watershed-based Plan To Restore the Hackensack Meadowlands: The Meadowlands Comprehensive Restoration Implementation Plan Terry Doss and Karen Appell The.
Buckhorn Mountain EIS Project August Buckhorn Mountain Exploration Project Echo Bay Exploration is seeking federal and state authorization for.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
1 Field Maintenance of Structural and Vegetative Measures Level 1A: Fundamentals Seminar Education and Certification for Persons Involved in Land Disturbing.
Construction Site Best Management Practices and the Project Design Process.
Integrity ♦ Innovation ♦ Accountability ♦ Commitment to Excellence ♦ Teamwork City of Southlake Storm Water Management Plan Christi Upton
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.
Wildlife Program Amendments CBFWA Members Meeting – Sept
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Fish Habitat Restoration.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Environmental Dredging of Perfluorochemical-Impacted Sediment from a Sensitive Wetland Mark A. Gaetz (3M) Paul Lear (WRScompass)
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
WETLAND VEGETATION Ruth M. Ladd, P.W.S. Policy Analysis and Technical Support Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New England District.
1 1 Reasonably Foreseeable Compliance Measures Sandi Potter Engineering Geologist.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
UNIT 13 – Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring and Compliance UNIT 13.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 9A CVFPB MEETING – October 25, 2013.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) CVS/EEP Vegetation Monitoring Protocol.
Planning Habitat Restoration for Dredging Projects WEDA Midwest Chapter Conference Green Bay, Wisconsin April 27, 2012 Jack Brunner.
Orange Creek Basin Stakeholder Engagement. Meeting Purpose  Review FWC’s Stakeholder Engagement Process  Update the public on the previous 6 months.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Clearing and Site Preparation and Site.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
 Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 January 7, 2015.
Department of Environmental Quality Coastal Habitat Protection Plan (CHPP) 2 Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Management Commission.
Matt Meyer, D1 Environmental Coordinator. Agencies with Jurisdiction over Wetlands: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Board of Water & Soil Resources - WCA.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
Water.europa.eu Compliance Checking of River Basin Management Plans Strategic Coordination Group Meeting, 4-5 November 2009 DG Environment, European Commission.
Historical Drivers for Goals and Success Criteria for Stream and Wetland Mitigation Overview of Concepts, Mechanisms, and Opportunities for Improved Development.
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services
Continuing Authorities Program
September 8, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
Designers’ Manual Overview and Chapter Contents
Prairie Restorations, Inc.
Wildlife Program Amendments CBFWA Members Meeting – Sept
INDOT Storm Water Management
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of Recent Changes To the EEP Restoration Plan and Mitigation Plan Templates Steven D. Roberts Vegetation Senior Specialist

Overarching Goals of Changes Transform the mitigation plan document from an after the fact account to a guidance document and repository of closeout related information. Transform the mitigation plan document from an after the fact account to a guidance document and repository of closeout related information. Increase functionality and congruency among the series of documents being applied to mitigation projects from the design phase to close out. Increase functionality and congruency among the series of documents being applied to mitigation projects from the design phase to close out.

Diagram of Process Inefficiency Site Selection Close Out Restoration Plan Construction Mitigation Plan Monitoring Reports Maintenance/Repair Contingencies

Diagram of Process Linkage Site Selection Close Out Restoration Plan Mitigation Plan Construction Monitoring Reports Maintenance

Presentation Outline Mitigation Plan Format Changes Mitigation Plan Format Changes Primary Issues with Previous Mitigation Plan Formats Primary Issues with Previous Mitigation Plan Formats Means of Mitigation Plan Improvement Means of Mitigation Plan Improvement Beyond Minimum Success Criteria Beyond Minimum Success Criteria Refinement of Terminology Refinement of Terminology Diagram of Document Congruency Diagram of Document Congruency Restoration Plan Format Changes Restoration Plan Format Changes Primary Issues with Previous Restoration Plan Formats Primary Issues with Previous Restoration Plan Formats Means of Restoration Plan Improvement Means of Restoration Plan Improvement Comments and Discussion Comments and Discussion

Primary Issues with Previous Mitigation Plan Formats The conventional process has involved submitting Mitigation Plans after design and construction activities have occurred The conventional process has involved submitting Mitigation Plans after design and construction activities have occurred Application of multiple formats from different agencies and inconsistency Application of multiple formats from different agencies and inconsistency Unclear accounts of applicable “success criteria” Unclear accounts of applicable “success criteria” The lack of a standard method for addressing endeavors to achieve more than the minimum success criteria The lack of a standard method for addressing endeavors to achieve more than the minimum success criteria

Means of Mitigation Plan Improvement Processes Requiring the development and review of the mitigation plan document to occur in concert with restoration plan development Requiring the development and review of the mitigation plan document to occur in concert with restoration plan development Phasing in this new approach to document development on all new projects Phasing in this new approach to document development on all new projects Mitigation Template Format Requirement of complete outlines of all applicable minimum success criteria, including official rules, guidelines and adopted law- Requirement of complete outlines of all applicable minimum success criteria, including official rules, guidelines and adopted law- Restoration Template Format Standard format improvement intended to facilitate and documents endeavors that go beyond the minimum success criteria Standard format improvement intended to facilitate and documents endeavors that go beyond the minimum success criteria

Primary Agency Involvement

List of Applicable Guidelines, Official Rules and Laws Stream Mitigation Guidelines (2003) US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington NC District ( Stream Mitigation Guidelines (2003) US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington NC District ( NC Administrative Code NCAC 15A 02B.0100,.0200, and (May 1, 2007) NC Division of Water Quality: NC Administrative Code NCAC 15A 02B.0100,.0200, and (May 1, 2007) NC Division of Water Quality: The Coastal Area Management Act ARTICLE 7. NC Division of Coastal Management: The Coastal Area Management Act ARTICLE 7. NC Division of Coastal Management: Endangered Species Act of 1973 (As amended through 2008) US Fish and Wildlife Service: Endangered Species Act of 1973 (As amended through 2008) US Fish and Wildlife Service: Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (As amended through 2007) The NC Sedimentation Control Commission: Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (As amended through 2007) The NC Sedimentation Control Commission: Etc. Etc.

Means of Mitigation Plan Improvement Processes Requiring the delivery and review of the mitigation plan document before baseline monitoring is done Requiring the delivery and review of the mitigation plan document before baseline monitoring is done Phasing in the new standard format to all new projects Phasing in the new standard format to all new projects Mitigation Template Format Requirement of complete outlines of all applicable minimum success criteria, including official rules, guidelines and adopted law Requirement of complete outlines of all applicable minimum success criteria, including official rules, guidelines and adopted law Restoration Template Format Standard format improvement intended to facilitate and document endeavors that go beyond the minimum success criteria Standard format improvement intended to facilitate and document endeavors that go beyond the minimum success criteria

Beyond Minimum Success Criteria Simply stated, the “minimum success criteria” are inadequate for addressing the achievement of variable amounts of project success and corresponding credit. Simply stated, the “minimum success criteria” are inadequate for addressing the achievement of variable amounts of project success and corresponding credit. Great, lets go further! Wait, why go further?

Terminology Refinement Minimum Success Criteria: Defined by official rules, guidelines and adopted law administered by various regulatory agencies. Goals: Measures of success necessary to achieve and go beyond the minimum success criteria. Objectives: The means of achieving goals.

Linking Restoration With Function (Exert taken from 2008 Restoration Plan Template)

Diagram of Document Congruency Restoration Plan Define Goals/Objectives Close Out Document Outline of Goal/Objective Achievement Mitigation Plan Est. Monitoring Approach Goals/Objectives/Methods Monitoring Reports Tempered Analysis Goals/Objectives

Example Goals Reduce the dominance of exotic invasive vegetation to a non detrimental level Reduce the dominance of exotic invasive vegetation to a non detrimental level Reduce or eliminate soil erosion Reduce or eliminate soil erosion Restore historic wetland hydrology Restore historic wetland hydrology Enhance the vegetative community structure Enhance the vegetative community structure

Example Objectives Mechanically remove and dispose of all vegetative portions of existing exotic invasive species using heavy equipment Mechanically remove and dispose of all vegetative portions of existing exotic invasive species using heavy equipment Survey for exotic invasive species throughout the construction phase of the project and treat with herbicide as needed Survey for exotic invasive species throughout the construction phase of the project and treat with herbicide as needed Execute maintenance contract during monitoring years 1-3 for the purpose of controlling exotic invasive vegetation Execute maintenance contract during monitoring years 1-3 for the purpose of controlling exotic invasive vegetation Install temporary and permanent seed mixes along with live stakes immediately after construction Install temporary and permanent seed mixes along with live stakes immediately after construction Staged installation of plant species derived from natural community reference data in the form of bare root, containerized and burlap plant material Staged installation of plant species derived from natural community reference data in the form of bare root, containerized and burlap plant material Alter the hydrology of the given site based on hydrology gauge data from nearby reference wetlands Alter the hydrology of the given site based on hydrology gauge data from nearby reference wetlands Install seeds, plugs and containerized forms of plant species derived from natural community reference data Install seeds, plugs and containerized forms of plant species derived from natural community reference data

Primary Issues with Previous Restoration Plan Formats Lack of an adequate template for addressing the range of activities that potentially happen within each planting zone. Lack of an adequate template for addressing the range of activities that potentially happen within each planting zone.

Means of Restoration Plan Improvement Introduction of a standard format for tables pertaining to vegetation establishment and soil treatments for each zone Introduction of a standard format for tables pertaining to vegetation establishment and soil treatments for each zone

Restoration Plan Template 7.7 Soil Restoration Table 7-Soil Preparation and Amendment Summary

Restoration Plan Template 7. 8 Natural Plant Community Restoration Table 8-Seeding Plan Summary

Restoration Plan Template 7. 8 Natural Plant Community Restoration Table 9-Planting Plan Summary