Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Application of the Root-Locus Method to the Design and Sensitivity Analysis of Closed-Loop Thermoacoustic Engines C Mark Johnson.
Advertisements

Bode Diagram (1) Hany Ferdinando Dept. of Electrical Engineering Petra Christian University.
Heat Capacity II Sound Velocity Method CHEM 4396 (W237) Physical Chemistry Laboratory Fall 2009 Instructor: Dr. Aleksey I. Filin.
Chapter 4 Modelling and Analysis for Process Control
Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
Frequency response When a linear system is subjected to a sinusoidal input, its steady state response is also a sustained sinusoidal wave, with the same.
Introduction to Frequency Response Roundup before the confusion.
“On Designing Improved Controllers for AQM Routers Supporting TCP Flows” The PI Controller Presented by Bob Kinicki.
Transforming C(s) into c(t): Negative Feedback Control with Proportional Only Controller Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond.
Green Team Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson September 14, 2005 UTC ENGR 329 Speed System.
Jigsaw Puzzle 3 rd Team Angela Purkey Jason Powell Mena Aziz Engr
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Flow Control System Steady State Operation & Step Response February 1 st, 2006 U.T.C. ENGR 329.
FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM
Level Team Team Members Note by Dr. Henry: List your team members’ names on this slide.
LEVEL-1 Frequency Response –Experiments –Modeling Jim Henry.
Marshal Stout Michael Brooks Nathan Wilson ENGR 329 Team Green February 11, 2009.
Pressure System Amanda Newman Andy Patel Bryan Cuervo September 28 th 2005 ENGR. 329 UTC Engineering.
Flow Rate Control System
Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions.
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
Introduction: Eccentricity and Cogging. Motor Model.
Red Team -Pressure- Steady State Operating And Step Response Dennis To Cory Richardson Jamison Linden 6/26/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Frequency Response Analysis
Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.
Team Green John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles UTC ENGR Steady State and Step Response Performance Speed Control System.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.
B Note from Dr. Henry These slides are suggested to be ADDED to your previous presentation that included system description, diagrams, SSOC, operating.
Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
What does Kc do?. What is Kc? Kc is the Controller Gain of a control system. It can be adjusted to obtain a variety of system responses.
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
Micron Technology Clinic Effect of Transistor Number and Hierarchy on Simulation Speed Presented by: Jason Oneida Advisor: Dr. Ken Stevens.
Distributed Laboratories: Control System Experiments with LabVIEW and the LEGO NXT Platform Greg Droge, Dr. Bonnie Heck Ferri, Jill Auerbach.
HOMEWORK 08D Block diagrams Problem 1: Problem 2:
Outline Background Explosion Phenomena Experiments Correlation Conclusion/Summary Questions.
Start Presentation September 27, nd Homework Problem In this homework problem, we wish to model a mechanical system. The problem deals with a simple,
Modern Control System EKT 308
CS-EE 481 Spring Founder’s Day, 2004 University of Portland School of Engineering In-Line Headphone Amplifier Authors Jim Bosak Casey Hughes Jeff.
Lecture 2: Measurement and Instrumentation. Time vs. Frequency Domain Different ways of looking at a problem –Interchangeable: no information is lost.
Laboratory for Low-Power Management and Integrated SMPS 1 Power Stage Parameter Estimation and Digital Controller Design for SMPS with the Use of Limit.
Frequency Response Analysis and Stability
Feedback Filters n A feedback filter processes past output samples, as well as current input samples: n Feedback filters create peaks (poles or resonances)
ABL Tracking System PRESENTED BY: SIDNEY JONES AND AJ MARIN.
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي - دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
Measurement and Instrumentation
Plot Diagram.
Feedback loop gain, stability
Lesson 20: Process Characteristics- 2nd Order Lag Process
Introduction to Electronics
Estimation of the critical temperature ratio
2nd Homework: Cervical Syndrome
Updated Velocity Data for undamped panel 2
Figure Hz sine wave to be sampled.
Phase in Circuits Intro to ECSE Analysis K. A. Connor
Microelectronics.
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Frequency Response Method
دکتر حسين بلندي- دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
ECE 576 POWER SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND STABILITY
Frequency Response Analysis
Example Combination of Systems Transfer Function:
Time-domain vs Frequency -domain?
Modulation Lab 2 – 2019/1440 By: Elham Sunbu.
Jigsaw Team Estrogen Stephanie Wilson Amanda Newman Jessica Raymond
Presentation transcript:

Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329

Yellow Team Jimy George Jeff Lawrence Taylor Murphy Jennifer Potter

Outline System Background –Description, SSOC, Step Response Frequency Response Experiment Frequency Response Model Results Conclusions

Flow System Setup

Block Diagram

Steady State Operation

SSOC

SSOC with Step Ranges

Experimental and Model Results K (lb/min/%) =0.26 Tau (sec) =0.46 t0 (sec) =0.42

Step Results; K

Step Results; Tau

Step Results; t 0

Frequency Response Experiment Operate with alternating frequencies Amplitude equal to 5% or 7.5% Base Power equal to center of region. Starting Frequency of 1/(tau*2*pi) Vary frequency up and down to the limits - when output is in phase with input or there is no perceptible oscillation

Sample Sine Plot

Example Experimental Bode Plots

Modeling Approach Output Function Used Excel to Model

Model Bode Plots 45%-55%

Model Bode Plots 55%-70%

Model Bode Plots 70%-85%

Model Bode Plots 85%-100%

Comparison of Results: Gain

Comparison of Results: Time Constant

Comparison of Results: Dead Time

Comparison of Results: Ultimate Frequency

Comparison of Results: Ultimate Controller Gain

Comparison of Results: Order

Conclusion FOPDT parameters from the model: K = 0.22 lbs/min/% Tau = 0.3 sec to = 0.37 sec Other values from experiment: Kcu = 10 %/(lbs/min) fu = 0.87 Hz Order = 1