Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Advertisements

Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Flow Control System Steady State Operation & Step Response February 1 st, 2006 U.T.C. ENGR 329.
FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM
Level Team Team Members Note by Dr. Henry: List your team members’ names on this slide.
LEVEL-1 Frequency Response –Experiments –Modeling Jim Henry.
Marshal Stout Michael Brooks Nathan Wilson ENGR 329 Team Green February 11, 2009.
Pressure System Amanda Newman Andy Patel Bryan Cuervo September 28 th 2005 ENGR. 329 UTC Engineering.
Flow Rate Control System
Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions.
Lecture 17. System Response II
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
Red Team -Pressure- Steady State Operating And Step Response Dennis To Cory Richardson Jamison Linden 6/26/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Team Green John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles UTC ENGR Steady State and Step Response Performance Speed Control System.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.
B Note from Dr. Henry These slides are suggested to be ADDED to your previous presentation that included system description, diagrams, SSOC, operating.
Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
What does Kc do?. What is Kc? Kc is the Controller Gain of a control system. It can be adjusted to obtain a variety of system responses.
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
Chapter 8 Performance of P-only, PI and PID Controllers.
Viscously Damped Free Vibration. Viscous damping force is expressed by the equation where c is a constant of proportionality. Symbolically. it is designated.
Out response, Poles, and Zeros
Feedback Control Systems (FCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
Automatic control by meiling CHEN1 Lesson 9 Root locus Automatic control 2. Analysis.
Autumn 2008 EEE8013 Revision lecture 1 Ordinary Differential Equations.
Lecture 12 - Natural Response of Parallel RLC Circuits
Automatic Control Theory-
1 Chapter 2 We need to write differential equations representing the system or subsystem. Then write the Laplace transform of the system. Then we will.
DNT Control Principle Root Locus Techniques DNT Control Principle.
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي- دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
Chapter 5 Transient and Steady State Response “I will study and get ready and someday my chance will come” Abraham Lincoln.
1 Lecture D32 : Damped Free Vibration Spring-Dashpot-Mass System Spring Force k > 0 Dashpot c > 0 Newton’s Second Law (Define) Natural Frequency and Period.
LCR circuit R V0 L I(t)=0 for t<0 V(t) C + trial solution
Chapter 3 Dynamic Response The Block Diagram Block diagram is a graphical tool to visualize the model of a system and evaluate the mathematical relationships.
Subsea Control and Communications Systems
Lec 6. Second Order Systems
Modern Control System EKT 308 Steady-State and Stability.
ChE 182 Chemical Process Dynamics and Control
Modeling Transient Response So far our analysis has been purely kinematic: The transient response has been ignored The inertia, damping, and elasticity.
Dr. Tamer Samy Gaafar Automatic Control Theory CSE 322 Lec. 11 Root Locus.
1 Time Response. CHAPTER Poles and Zeros and System Response. Figure 3.1: (a) System showing input and output; (b) Pole-zero plot of the system;
Modern Control System EKT 308
Lecture 13: Second-Order Systems Time Response Lecture 12: First-order systems Lecture 13: Second-order systems Lecture 14: Non-canonical systems ME 431,
Negative Feedback Control Heat Exchanger Transfer Function.
Chapter 6 Second-Order Circuit.
SKEE 3143 Control Systems Design Chapter 2 – PID Controllers Design
3.0 Time Response OBJECTIVE
Lecture 7/8 Analysis in the time domain (II) North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
EENG 2610: Circuit Analysis Class 13: Second-Order Circuits
Time Response Analysis
Instructor: Jongeun Choi
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
UNIT-II TIME RESPONSE ANALYSIS
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Response of Higher Order Systems
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Unit-Impulse Response
CBE / MET Feb 12.
Second-Order Systems Chapter 5 Standard form:
By: Nafees Ahamad, AP, EECE, Dept. DIT University, Dehradun
Presentation transcript:

Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z

Outline Pressure System Background Previous Work: Transfer Function Root Locus Theory Modeling Results Conclusions

Background: Schematic Diagram

Background: Block Diagram Manipulated Variable M System C Controlled Variable % Motor Speed Pressure in cm-H 2 O

Background: SSOC Operating Range: 30 – 70% Output: 1.3 –3.8 cm H 2 O

Background: FOPDT Parameters K = cm of H 2 O / % t o = 0.25 sec  = 0.4 sec

Feedback Control

Root Locus Theory Where  is the damping ratio. Decay Ratio =

Effects of          Overdamped = monotonic and stable Underdamped = oscillatory and stable Undamped = sustained oscillations Unstable = growing oscillations Run-away = monotonic and unstable

Four Possible Responses

Root Locus Parameters K CD = highest value of K C that provides monotonic and stable output (critically damped) K QD = value of K C that produces one-quarter oscillating decay K CU = highest value of K C that causes oscillatory and stable output (marginally stable)

Root Locus Parameters K CD is found where the roots go from real to complex K QD is found where the ratio of the imaginary root to the real root is 4.5 K CU is found where the real portion of the root goes from negative to positive.

Parameter Locations K CD K CU K QD Dr Henry’s Suggestion: Put the VALUES of the Kc’s for the different choices you have on this graph

 Locations

Results from Root Locus Ultimate K cu = 37 Quarter Decay K c = 24. Critically Damping K c = 0.1 Underdamped 0.1< K c < 37 Overdamped 0 < K c < 0.1 *all units are % / cm H 2 O

Conclusions For K c needed Overdamped 0 < K c < 0.1 Critically Damped K c = 0.1 Underdamped 0.1< K c < 36.9 Quarter Decay K c = 24.2 *all units are % / cm H 2 O

Questions?