Long-Term Ambient Noise Statistics in the Gulf of Mexico Mark A. Snyder & Peter A. Orlin Naval Oceanographic Office Stennis Space Center, MS Anthony I.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Properties of Random Variables
Advertisements

Fourier series With coefficients:. Complex Fourier series Fourier transform (transforms series from time to frequency domain) Discrete Fourier transform.
Appendix A. Descriptive Statistics Statistics used to organize and summarize data in a meaningful way.
Val Veirs Colorado College Colorado Springs, CO, Scott Veirs Beam Reach marine science and sustainability school Seattle, WA,
FREQUENCY ANALYSIS Basic Problem: To relate the magnitude of extreme events to their frequency of occurrence through the use of probability distributions.
Defence Research and Development Canada Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada Canada The impact of noise on passive monitoring of marine mammals.
Error Propagation. Uncertainty Uncertainty reflects the knowledge that a measured value is related to the mean. Probable error is the range from the mean.
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather. Climate and Weather “Climate is what you expect. Weather is what you get.” -Robert A. Heinlein.
Regionalized Variables take on values according to spatial location. Given: Where: A “structural” coarse scale forcing or trend A random” Local spatial.
Environmental Data Analysis with MatLab Lecture 24: Confidence Limits of Spectra; Bootstraps.
Listening to the Sound: Ambient Noise in Admiralty Inlet
SeaSonde Overview.
Standard Scores & Correlation. Review A frequency curve either normal or otherwise is simply a line graph of all frequency of scores earned in a data.
The Correlation between Atlantic Hurricane Frequency and ENSO Jessica Johnson EAS 4480 Spring 2012.
Hydrologic Statistics
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
MSE 600 Descriptive Statistics Chapter 10 in 6 th Edition (may be another chapter in 7 th edition)
STATISTICS: BASICS Aswath Damodaran 1. 2 The role of statistics Aswath Damodaran 2  When you are given lots of data, and especially when that data is.
Oceanography 569 Oceanographic Data Analysis Laboratory Kathie Kelly Applied Physics Laboratory 515 Ben Hall IR Bldg class web site: faculty.washington.edu/kellyapl/classes/ocean569_.
Managing Software Projects Analysis and Evaluation of Data - Reliable, Accurate, and Valid Data - Distribution of Data - Centrality and Dispersion - Data.
Graphical Summary of Data Distribution Statistical View Point Histograms Skewness Kurtosis Other Descriptive Summary Measures Source:
Overview Summarizing Data – Central Tendency - revisited Summarizing Data – Central Tendency - revisited –Mean, Median, Mode Deviation scores Deviation.
Statistics Recording the results from our studies.
Review of Probability Concepts ECON 4550 Econometrics Memorial University of Newfoundland Adapted from Vera Tabakova’s notes SECOND.
Describing Behavior Chapter 4. Data Analysis Two basic types  Descriptive Summarizes and describes the nature and properties of the data  Inferential.
Major Sources of Noise Sea State – Dominant factor above 500 Hz
Wolf-Gerrit Früh Christina Skittides With support from SgurrEnergy Preliminary assessment of wind climate fluctuations and use of Dynamical Systems Theory.
Autocorrelation correlations between samples within a single time series.
Skewness & Kurtosis: Reference
TYPES OF STATISTICAL METHODS USED IN PSYCHOLOGY Statistics.
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis. OUTLINE Organizing an ecological study Basic sampling terminology Statistical analysis of data –Why use statistics?
An Introduction to Statistics. Two Branches of Statistical Methods Descriptive statistics Techniques for describing data in abbreviated, symbolic fashion.
 Two basic types Descriptive  Describes the nature and properties of the data  Helps to organize and summarize information Inferential  Used in testing.
An investigation of factors affecting the accuracy of Thies disdrometers TECO-2008 St Petersburg, November 29th, 2008 Graham Upton Graham Upton and Dan.
Marina Maksimova Session 7 Comments for “Classical Tests”
2.There are two fundamentally different approaches to this problem. One can try to fit a theoretical distribution, such as a GEV or a GP distribution,
Edpsy 511 Exploratory Data Analysis Homework 1: Due 9/19.
Ocean Surface Current Observations in PWS Carter Ohlmann Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
BASIC STATISTICAL CONCEPTS Statistical Moments & Probability Density Functions Ocean is not “stationary” “Stationary” - statistical properties remain constant.
Quality Control: Analysis Of Data Pawan Angra MS Division of Laboratory Systems Public Health Practice Program Office Centers for Disease Control and.
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
Error Modeling Thomas Herring Room ;
Review of Probability Concepts Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University.
Kin 304 Descriptive Statistics & the Normal Distribution
Outline of Today’s Discussion 1.Displaying the Order in a Group of Numbers: 2.The Mean, Variance, Standard Deviation, & Z-Scores 3.SPSS: Data Entry, Definition,
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
©2011 Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning Elementary Statistics: Looking at the Big Picture 1 Lecture 12: more Chapter 5, Section 3 Relationships between Two.
NEMO-O DE NEMO First results from the NEMO Test Site G. Riccobene, for the NEMO Collaboration The NEMO Collaboration is performing the Phase 1 of the project,
Evaluation of SVP-BW drifters thanks to deployments near moored buoys DBCP-18 workshop - Martinique October 2002 By Pierre Blouch Presentation :
HMS 320 Understanding Statistics Part 2. Quantitative Data Numbers of something…. (nominal - categorical Importance of something (ordinal - rankings)
MR. MARK ANTHONY GARCIA, M.S. MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY.
Fourier series With coefficients:.
BPK 304W Descriptive Statistics & the Normal Distribution
Correlation between underwater noise level and AIS data in the Gulf of Catania (Sicily) Sara Pulvirenti Erice International School.
Kin 304 Descriptive Statistics & the Normal Distribution
The Probability Distribution of Extreme Geomagnetic Events in the Auroral Zone R.S. Weigel Space Weather Laboratory Department of Computational and Data.
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
MWA “burst mode”: Nov 2008 Solar 32 T Observations
Part Three. Data Analysis
STATS DAY First a few review questions.
BPK 304W Descriptive Statistics & the Normal Distribution
MEGN 537 – Probabilistic Biomechanics Ch.3 – Quantifying Uncertainty
Numerical Descriptive Measures
Descriptive and Inferential
Monterey Buoy LT Karen Wingeart.
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather
Waves and Tides Earth Science 6th Grade.
Comparison of Wind Speed and Wind Stress to Ocean Ambient Sound
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather
Numerical Descriptive Measures
Presentation transcript:

Long-Term Ambient Noise Statistics in the Gulf of Mexico Mark A. Snyder & Peter A. Orlin Naval Oceanographic Office Stennis Space Center, MS Anthony I. Eller Science Applications International Corporation

Outline Monthly Trends 14-Month Statistics Variability Time Scales Coherence (Frequency, Spatial) Comparison to NDBC* Weather Data Best-Fit Probability Density Functions Summary * National Data Buoy Center

EARS* Data Bottom-moored omni-directional hydrophone Bandwidth of 10 Hz Hz 14 months of data (Apr May 2005) Water depth ~ 3200 meters Hydrophone depth ~ 2935 meters Vicinity 27.5 N, 86.1 W (about 159 nm south of Panama City, FL and 196 nm west of Tampa, FL) * Environmental Acoustic Recording System

EARS* Data Acoustic Release Floats EARS Data Logger Bottom-moored omni-directional hydrophone Bandwidth of 10 Hz Hz 14 months of data (Apr May 2005) Water depth ~ 3200 meters Hydrophone depth ~ 2935 meters Vicinity 27.5 N, 86.1 W (about 159 nm south of Panama City, FL and 196 nm west of Tampa, FL) * Environmental Acoustic Recording System

Location of EARS and NDBC* Weather Buoys NDBC EARS 103 nm 89 nm 3200 m 55 m NDBC * National Data Buoy Center

Monthly Trends

Monthly Statistics* Mean Median Standard deviation Skewness Kurtosis Coherence time** * For 8 third-octave bands. ** Time for autocorrelation to decay to e -1 of its zero-lag value.

1 year cycle Hurricanes

14-Month Statistics

Low frequency band Positive skewness Chi – Square PDF Apr04 May05

Apr04 May05 High frequency band Negative skewness Hurricanes Winter Storms

1 st order Gauss-Markov process is characterized by an exponentially-decaying autocorrelation. Coherence time = 2.97 hours

400 Hz

Variability Time Scales

Distribution of Variance* Shows how the energy associated with variability is spread over long and short time scales Each vertical bar represents the variance contribution in a 1/10-decade freq band Sum of all vertical bars = total variance At 50 Hz, most of the variability is in time scales near 10 hours At 950 Hz, most of the variability is in time scales near 100 hours * Power spectrum of each 14-month time series, plotted versus period.

Power spectrum of 14-month time series shows how the energy associated with variability is spread over long and short time scales. Each vertical bar = variance in each 1/10-decade* freq band. Sum of all vertical bars = total variance. Low frequency band Most of the variability is in time scales near 10 hours Red curve is plot of 1 st order Gauss-Markov process 4 days6 weeks1 year * 1/10-decade ≈ 1/3-octave

4 days6 weeks1 year High frequency band Most of the variability is in time scales near 100 hours

Frequency Coherence

2 octaves to left and right of center frequency have correlation coefficient ≥ 0.5

Bandwidth of High Correlation Coefficient

Spatial Coherence

A1 A3 A km 2.56 km Water depth = 3200 m at all 3 sites Hydrophone depth = 2935 m at all 3 sites 10 month comparison

100 Hz - more affected by local noise sources 1000 Hz – wind is correlated over large distances 100 Hz - more affected by local noise sources 1000 Hz – wind is correlated over large distances

Comparison to NDBC Weather Data

Ambient Noise in the Ocean (Wenz Curves)

Measured and Predicted Noise Wind speed values are followed by estimated Beaufort Wind Force in ( ). Predicted and measured noise computed at 800 Hz 1/3-octave band.

Measured and Predicted Noise Wind speed values are followed by estimated Beaufort Wind Force in ( ). Predicted and measured noise computed at 800 Hz 1/3-octave band.

14-month avg wind speed = 11.3 knots Avg significant wave height = 1.06 m Avg Beaufort Wind Force = 3.5 Moderate to heavy shipping Shipping level 6-7 on scale of month avg wind speed = 11.3 knots Avg significant wave height = 1.06 m Avg Beaufort Wind Force = 3.5 Moderate to heavy shipping (Shipping level = 6-7 on scale of 1-9, with 1 = light, 9 = very heavy)

Best-Fit Density Functions (14 Months) σ R = Rayleigh parameter. n = degrees of freedom.

Summary Highest monthly noise levels at Hz |Mean - median| < 1.5 dB (monthly values) Noise levels at higher freqs ( Hz) peaked during extremely windy months (summer hurricanes and winter storms) Standard deviation was minimized in Hz region but increased at higher freqs, especially during periods of high wind variability (hurricanes)

14-Month Summary Ambient noise at low frequencies (25 – 400 Hz) Mean > median > mode (2 – 3 dB spread) All 3 values close and predicted by moderate to heavy shipping. Location of all 3 caused positive skewness (skewed towards peaks). Ambient noise at high frequencies (630 – 950 Hz) Mode > median > mean (2 – 3 dB spread) All 3 values close and predicted by avg BWF = 3.5 (11.3 knots avg wind). Location of all 3 caused negative skewness (skewed towards troughs).

14-Month Summary Coherence time was low (2 – 4 hours) in shipping bands (25 – 400 Hz) Coherence time was high (14 – 21 hours) in weather bands (630 – 950 Hz) Monthly coherence time was highest during extreme wind conditions

14-Month Summary The best fit for the 25 Hz and 200 Hz bands were Rayleigh PDFs (first 3 moments matched) The best fit for the 50 Hz and 100 Hz bands were Chi-Square PDFs (first 3 moments matched) The monthly and 14-month average noise levels agreed with predictions based on moderate to heavy shipping and the average weather as determined by the nearby NDBC buoys

14-Month Summary Temporal variability occurred over 3 time scales:  hours (shipping-related)  hours ( days, weather-related)  months (1 year cycle) The 25 Hz time series had a strong 8-hour component (sinusoidal autocorrelation; not shipping or weather) The 50, 100 and 200 Hz frequency bands were fit by a 1st order Gauss-Markov process (well characterized by 3 parameters: mean, variance and coherence time) More complicated structure in other bands

Avg BWF = 2.5 Mean = dB σ = 5.78 dB Range = dB Skewness = 0.45 C.T. = 1.74 hours Avg BWF = 4 Mean = dB σ = 4.67 dB Range = dB Skewness = C.T. = hours

Data Processing 2048 Point FFT 10 Minute Avg Power Spectra Separate Data Into 14 Months Bandpass Each Month’s Data Over Eight 1/3-Octave Bands Compute Monthly Statistics Over Each Frequency Band Raw Acoustic Time Series Data Average 732 (0.82 seconds each) periodograms. Sampled at 2.5 kHz. Remove disk spin and clips. Compute the average power in each band every 10 minutes. Δf = 1.22 Hz. F C = 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 630, 800, 950 Hz

FrancesIvan IJeanneIvan II