1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In situ Hadronic E/p Calibration of the ATLAS barrel calorimeters using Minimum Bias Events N.Huseynov 1,2, Y.Kulchitsky 1,3, P.Tereshko 1,3,V.Vinogradov.
Advertisements

INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
PFA on SiDaug05_np Lei Xia ANL-HEP. PFA outline Calibration of calorimeter –Done –Not tuned for clustering algorithm Clustering algorithm –Done: hit density.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Analysis Meeting 12 th June 2007.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Jet Note 8 Meeting 7 th June 2007.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
My work PAST WORKS: 1) (Madrid) Data Analysis in L3, LEP: - Measurement of the Mass, Width and Cross Section of the W boson production at LEP, Study.
Track Extrapolation/Shower Reconstruction in a Digital HCAL – ANL Approach Steve Magill ANL 1 st step - Track extrapolation thru Cal – substitute for Cal.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory 1 LCWS 2013, Tokyo, Japan November , 2013.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia 1 CALICE Meeting LAPP, Annecy, France September 9 – 11, 2013.
DHCAL - Resolution (S)DHCAL Meeting January 15, 2014 Lyon, France Burak Bilki, José Repond and Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Status of KLOE real data analysis by the AMADEUS group Oton Vázquez Doce, 4 Maggio 2007.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
Jet Calibration in ATLAS Mark Hodgkinson ATLAS UK Meeting, IPPP January 2008.
W Mass and Width at LEP2 Jeremy Nowell ALEPH / Imperial College London On behalf of the LEP collaborations.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Comments on systematics of corrected MB distributions Karel Safarik (presented by A. Morsch) Meeting of the Minimum Bias and Underlying Event WG CERN,
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Individual Particle Reconstruction The PFA Approach to Detector Development for the ILC Steve Magill (ANL) Norman Graf, Ron Cassell (SLAC)
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
Jet Energy and Resolution at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta YETI meeting, 7/1/2008.
Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.
Jet Energy Scale and Calibration Framework
The truth information in the hadronic samples
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
W mass reconstruction and jet calibration in ttbar events
Interactions of hadrons in the Si-W ECAL
Missing Transverse Energy Calibration in W/Z(+jets) Events
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
May 2006 Hadronic Calibration Workshop Jet Session at Munich
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Charged PID in Arbor 23/02/2016 Dan YU.
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
STAR Geometry and Detectors
PDF Uncertainties on W+Jets
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Presentation transcript:

1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007

2 Introduction The hadronic energy scale can be checked in situ by looking at the ratio between pion momentum (p) from the inner detector (should be close to actual) and the calorimeter energy (E). Goal is to know energy scale to 1% Coverage of |eta|<2.5 Current work on single pions from tau decay does not cover the low E range (below 20GeV). Minimum bias events can cover this range. Used 50k minimum bias monte carlo events (equivalent amount collected with approx. luminosity of pb -1 ) csc pythia_minbias.recon.AOD.v Used 100k minimum bias monte carlo events at 900GeV. csc pythia_minbias_900.recon.AOD.v Comparison of minimum bias to single pion monte carlo. Used: 50k single 1GeV pions - csc singlepart_singlepi_et1.recon.AOD.v k single 3GeV pions - csc singlepart_singlepi2.recon.AOD.v

3 Approach E taken as the sum of caloTopoCluster energies (calibrated to EM scale only) in cone. Cone size of ΔR cone =0.4 found to be optimal Track extrapolated to 2 nd layer of EM Calorimeter must match at least one cluster within ΔR match <0.05 Require clusters and tracks in |eta|<2.4 Bias to E/p in minimum bias due to: Correlated background contaminating clusters from: Neutral particles Charged particles with no track in ID. Tracks not belonging to pions Cuts made to remove bias: Based on tracks: Number of tracks in event < 15 ΔR track isolation >0.8 >1 B Layer Hit Based on clusters Cluster Multiplicity < 4 Energy difference in cones ΔR=1.0 and Δ R=0.4 < 200MeV Energy fraction in cone ΔR=0.2 > 0.7xEnergy in cone ΔR=0.4 Approx. 1 track in 200 survive. (or 1 per 10 events) For 50k events

4 Results and Plan Results: 1 GeV bias approx 10% 3 GeV bias approx 3% (within error) 900GeV minimum bias results similar. Work to improve bias continuing Also need to study: Additional calibration schemes Trigger Tracks from high momentum tail requires higher statistics (Atlfast?) Pile-up some samples becoming available now Sample E/p mean RMS -minimum bias -single pion (after cuts) -single pion (before cuts) Error: ±0.011 Sample E/p mean RMS -minimum bias -single pion (after cuts) -single pion (before cuts) Error: ±0.011 For 50k minimum bias events. Single pions weighted to have the eta distribution of minimum bias tracks passing cuts.