Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835"— Presentation transcript:

1 Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to  pairs in pp collisions at 1.96 TeV (CDF) Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835

2 MSSM Higgs How do particles have mass?
SM Higgs mechanism Problems with SM Higgs may be solved in MSSM Five Higgs in MSSM: 2 charged, 3 neutral This paper deals with neutrals (): 1 CP-odd: A 2 CP-even: h (lighter), H (heavier) MSSM parameters: mA tan  = vu/vd, where vu, vd are vev’s of neutral Higgs that couple to up- and down-type fermions 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

3 MSSM Higgs For large tan b, one CP-even Higgs has similar mass, couplings to A Dominant  production mechanisms: Gluon fusion bb fusion Dominant decay modes for A, mass-degenerate CP-even state:  -> bb (~90%)  ->  (~10%) 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

4 The search at CDF Tevatron: CM energy 1.96 TeV
Data collected at CDF II between Integrated luminosity 310 pb-1  ->  for 90 < mA < 250 GeV/c2 One  -> lepton + neutrinos (e, ) Other  -> hadrons + neutrino (had) 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

5 CDF detector =-ln(tan(/2)) 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

6 Event selection For the  ->  search, each event must contain a lepton candidate (e or ) and hadrons consistent with a  decay. Pre-select with a “lepton plus track” condition Lepton and track must both point into central cal. Must have azimuthal separation of > 10o e/ determination: Electrons only deposit energy in EM calorimeter Muons seen in muon chambers outside cal. Momentum of neutrinos: missing transverse energy 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

7 Event selection Hadron reconstruction
Energy from  decays are deposited in a small, contiguous region Four-momentum of this jet determined from tracks of charged particles and energies of 0’s within “signal cone” Particles in a ring outside the signal cone must have very low transverse energy (< 1 GeV total). This isolation cuts out quark and gluon jets. 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

8 Event selection Hadron reconstruction
The jets must have 1 or 3 tracks (charged particles), and sum of charges 1 Invariant mass must be < 1.8 GeV/c2 ( = m) Require (Ecl/Psigtrk)(0.95-f)>0.1 to reject electrons Ecl: value of energy deposit in the calorimeter f: ratio of electromagnetic to hadronic energy Psigtrk: scalar sum of track momenta in signal cone Require ETcl > 15 GeV to reject muons 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

9 Event selection Hadron reconstruction efficiency:
38% at pThad = 15 GeV/c 46% at pThad > 25 GeV/c Probability of misidentifying quark or gluon jet 1.5% at ETjet = 20 GeV 0.1% at ETjet = 100 GeV 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

10 Monte Carlo Simulation
Event generation: PYTHIA, with CTEQ5L PDFs Tau decays: TAUOLA package Detector response: GEANT-based model 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

11 Backgrounds Dominant background: Z/* -> 
Second-highest: “fake” ’s (misidentified quark or gluon jets) from processes like di-jet, multi-jet, W+jets, +jets Third: Z/* -> ll, WW, WZ, ZZ, tt Background contributions determined by Monte Carlo 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

12 Eliminating backgrounds
Cut out low-energy multi-jet backgrounds Each e/ candidate must pass pT threshold of 10 GeV/c Each had candidate must pass pT threshold of 15 GeV/c, must also have opposite charge Require |pTl|+|pThad|+|ETmiss| > 50 GeV 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

13 Eliminating backgrounds
Cut out W+jets backgrounds Define: pvis = (pl + phad)   pETmiss = ETmiss   Require pETmiss > 0.6pvis - 10 GeV/c Removes ~85% W+jets events, keeps ~95% of signal Cut out Z -> ll decays with misidentified lepton: reject events with lepton + 1-prong had invariant mass within 10 GeV/c2 of Z mass 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

14 Signal Acceptance For mA = 90 GeV/c2, combined acceptance for ehad and had channels is 0.8% For mA = 250 GeV/c2, combined acceptance is 2.0% 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

15 Uncertainties Systematic uncertainties for particle ID efficiency: had 3.5%, e 1.3%,  4.6% Uncertainties in trigger efficiency: ehad 2.1%, had 1.4% Jet ->  misidentification 20% (3% bg. overall) Uncertainty in signal acceptance Due to event-level cuts < 2% Due to PDFs: 5.7% 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

16 Expected events from SM
Number of expected standard model events passing all cuts: 4965(stat)28(sys)25(lumi) for a range of 438 to 554 events Breakdown: 405 from Z/* ->  75 from jet ->  misidentification 16 from all remaining background sources 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

17 Data 487 observed events Reconstructed the mass (mvis) for each event: invariant mass of visible tau decay products and ETmiss NOTE: This is incorrect! Binned the data to compare with background and hypothetical Higgs data No signal evidence observed for mA = 90 through 250 GeV/c2 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

18 Example plot: mA = 140 GeV/c2
10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

19 Exclusion limits 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

20 Excluded regions Plotted excluded regions in parameter space for four situations mhmax vs. no-mixing  > 0 and  < 0 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

21 Excluded regions 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard

22 Conclusions LEP excluded mA < 93 GeV/c2, higher mA for small tan 
This search also excluded regions of higher tan  Results similar to those of D0 10/23/06 Jessica Leonard


Download ppt "Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google